IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Combat basics
Lass
post Dec 19 2012, 04:37 PM
Post #1


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 60
Joined: 27-June 09
Member No.: 17,329



I feel like such a noob asking this but I remember I got it wrong the first time I played and dont want to get it wrong again after not playing SR for 3 years. In combat it goes

1. Attacker rolls to score hits.
2. Defender rolls to avoid hits.
3. compare
4. If net hits plus weapon damage exceed the defenders rolls you potentially do damage.
5. Defender makes a resist check.

At the end of that, if the defender has resisted the damage, does he still take stun damage?

Any help is wonderful,

Cheers
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Iduno
post Dec 19 2012, 05:24 PM
Post #2


Moving Target
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 587
Joined: 27-January 07
From: United States
Member No.: 10,812



That order looks right. After the damage type (stun or physical) is determined in steps 3 and 4, you either resist all of the damage or take what you didn't resist. The damage type doesn't change again, and if you reist it all you don't take damage.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lass
post Dec 19 2012, 05:48 PM
Post #3


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 60
Joined: 27-June 09
Member No.: 17,329



awesome thanks! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neraph
post Dec 19 2012, 06:21 PM
Post #4


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,542
Joined: 30-September 08
From: D/FW Megaplex
Member No.: 16,387



QUOTE (Lass @ Dec 19 2012, 10:37 AM) *
I feel like such a noob asking this but I remember I got it wrong the first time I played and dont want to get it wrong again after not playing SR for 3 years. In combat it goes

1. Attacker rolls to score hits.
2. Defender rolls to avoid hits.
3. compare
4. If net hits plus weapon damage exceed the defenders rolls you potentially do damage.
5. Defender makes a resist check.

At the end of that, if the defender has resisted the damage, does he still take stun damage?

No. Number 4 should be "If attacker has net hits you add net hits to base weapon damage to determine how much damage the defender needs to soak."

Then, if modified damage after the soak is greater than the defender's modified armor value the damage is physical. If the modified damage is lower than the modified armor value, the damage is converted to stun.

EDIT: SR4A, page 149, Resolving Combat; SR4A, page 150, Ranged Combat Summary sidebar; SR4A, page 157, Melee Combat Summary sidebar.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bearclaw
post Dec 20 2012, 12:44 AM
Post #5


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,632
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Portland Oregon, USA
Member No.: 1,304



I thought you determined whether or not it was stun damage based on net hits, not net damage.
Am I reading that right?
attack
defend
add net hits to damage
if modified damage is over AV damage is physical. Go to soak.
damage is stun

soak = roll body + armor , subtract from damage. Defender takes that many boxes.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Dec 20 2012, 12:52 AM
Post #6


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



Neraph OVERLOOKED that this was SR THREE! NOT FOUR!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neraph
post Dec 20 2012, 12:56 AM
Post #7


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,542
Joined: 30-September 08
From: D/FW Megaplex
Member No.: 16,387



QUOTE (Bearclaw @ Dec 19 2012, 06:44 PM) *
I thought you determined whether or not it was stun damage based on net hits, not net damage.
Am I reading that right?
attack
defend
add net hits to damage
if modified damage is over AV damage is physical. Go to soak.
damage is stun

soak = roll body + armor , subtract from damage. Defender takes that many boxes.

Yah, I derped for a second. At least I posted the references that are correct.

QUOTE (Stahlseele @ Dec 19 2012, 06:52 PM) *
Neraph OVERLOOKED that this was SR THREE! NOT FOUR!

How could I overlook something that wasn't stated?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Dec 20 2012, 12:59 AM
Post #8


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



My bad, i read the first sentence as meaning SR3 was played, i am way too tired it seems x.x
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 7th January 2025 - 08:01 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.