IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

92 Pages V  « < 73 74 75 76 77 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Shadowrun 5 & a lot more in 2013!
Cochise
post Apr 22 2013, 03:59 PM
Post #1851


Mr. Quote-function
***

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 1,317
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Somewhere in Germany
Member No.: 1,376



QUOTE (binarywraith @ Apr 22 2013, 05:50 PM) *
Not at all. It's the power foci / magic rating split difference. Both do the same thing mechanically, but with different prices.

In this case, buying back essence would be a serious karma sink in exchange for more cyber, as opposed to cybermancy which is the fast and dirty way of taking someone off the street and not killing them while jamming more cyber into them than they can actually cope with.


The problem is: Cybermancy mechanically "sucked" pretty much ever since rules for it were provided. Now your suggestion moves cybermancy from being the only way of exceeding the absolute barrier created by Essence and turns it into an even less desirable "quick and dirty" form. And you suggestion even brings about the question of Cyberzombies returning to "life" by regaining Essence with your mechanic.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ixal
post Apr 22 2013, 05:39 PM
Post #1852


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 280
Joined: 25-February 13
Member No.: 76,416



QUOTE (Cochise @ Apr 22 2013, 03:59 PM) *
The problem is: Cybermancy mechanically "sucked" pretty much ever since rules for it were provided.


Thats apparently a common problem with most of the "special" races (Cyberzombie, Shifter, Drake, HMVV ...). Only SURGE seems have been accepted well (because of the MinMax potential).
Personally I do not care, but groups who tend to play "on the limit" likely won't see any of those characters.
But then, I would like to see rules which would discourage minmaxing as (only?) valid way of gaming anyway.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cochise
post Apr 22 2013, 06:06 PM
Post #1853


Mr. Quote-function
***

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 1,317
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Somewhere in Germany
Member No.: 1,376



QUOTE (Ixal @ Apr 22 2013, 07:39 PM) *
Thats apparently a common problem with most of the "special" races (Cyberzombie, Shifter, Drake, HMVV ...). Only SURGE seems have been accepted well (because of the MinMax potential).


I wouldn't blame "MinMax potential" but rather the fact that originally all these concepts were designed to be NPC-only and - at least in case of cyberzombies - were mechanically vastly inferior in comparison to what they were supposed to be on "fluff"-levels (both in p&p material and in novelizations). Oh and SURGE originally wasn't accepted well at all ...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tzeentch
post Apr 22 2013, 06:29 PM
Post #1854


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 746
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 459



QUOTE (Cochise @ Apr 22 2013, 04:31 PM) *
At first glance the idea sounds interesting, but then it even more invalidates the idea of cybermancy than the various cybermancy rules did so far ...

-- So no loss. The cybermancy rules were a very ugly kludge to get around the Essence mechanic - which itself was just a game balance stat to add a "fun" element of resource management and prevent cybered reign of terrors.
-- The less "fun" resource management elements the better.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ixal
post Apr 22 2013, 07:09 PM
Post #1855


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 280
Joined: 25-February 13
Member No.: 76,416



QUOTE (Cochise @ Apr 22 2013, 06:06 PM) *
Oh and SURGE originally wasn't accepted well at all ...


I wonder if there ever was anything new which was received well...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fatum
post Apr 22 2013, 08:49 PM
Post #1856


Runner
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,801
Joined: 2-September 09
From: Moscow, Russia
Member No.: 17,589



QUOTE (Tzeentch @ Apr 22 2013, 10:29 PM) *
-- So no loss. The cybermancy rules were a very ugly kludge to get around the Essence mechanic - which itself was just a game balance stat to add a "fun" element of resource management and prevent cybered reign of terrors.
-- The less "fun" resource management elements the better.
Essence is a reflection of a very important fluff point, I'd even say, one foundational to the setting. It's truly puzzling how you can't see it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bannockburn
post Apr 22 2013, 11:28 PM
Post #1857


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,651
Joined: 22-April 12
From: somewhere far beyond sanity
Member No.: 51,886



So, new blog post up, talking about artwork.
Disregard the link title, it may be misleading. Unfortunately, the linked picture isn't ... well, linked.

http://www.shadowrun.com/shadowrun-tableto...er-as-the-hero/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
_Pax._
post Apr 22 2013, 11:52 PM
Post #1858


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Validating
Posts: 2,492
Joined: 19-April 12
Member No.: 51,818



The image is properly included at the original blogpost: http://www.shadowruntabletop.com/2013/04/s...er-as-the-hero/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bannockburn
post Apr 22 2013, 11:52 PM
Post #1859


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,651
Joined: 22-April 12
From: somewhere far beyond sanity
Member No.: 51,886



Yep, found that, too, about a minute ago (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tasti man LH
post Apr 23 2013, 12:04 AM
Post #1860


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 525
Joined: 20-December 12
Member No.: 66,005



Well, judging by the name of the image, I guess this is our first look at the character portraits for the Pre-gen character sheets. So far lookin' good. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

And if that's supposed to be an MCT Fly-Spy drone, kinda not what I expected them to be...slimmer? Although I guess that's one other layer of camoflage if the drone actually looks like a fly from a distance...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DMiller
post Apr 23 2013, 02:18 AM
Post #1861


Moving Target
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 681
Joined: 23-March 10
From: Japan
Member No.: 18,343



QUOTE (Falconer @ Apr 22 2013, 07:38 PM) *
DMiller:
See 'Infusion" foci... in SR4... they contain an adept power... usable by the adept. No need to break power foci in that way.

Which book is the Infusion Focus in? I don't recall having seen it, of course I haven't purchased all of the books either.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tasti man LH
post Apr 23 2013, 02:20 AM
Post #1862


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 525
Joined: 20-December 12
Member No.: 66,005



Infusion Foci are in the Digital Grimoire.

The Infusion metamagic is in Street Magic.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DMiller
post Apr 23 2013, 02:32 AM
Post #1863


Moving Target
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 681
Joined: 23-March 10
From: Japan
Member No.: 18,343



Nice, thanks guys. I do have both of those books, I just never noticed the Focus before. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Falconer
post Apr 23 2013, 03:54 AM
Post #1864


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Validating
Posts: 2,283
Joined: 12-October 07
Member No.: 13,662



Dmiller:
They're also far less expensive to bond than power foci.

I really like the flavor of the infusion metamagic as well... it's like turning on the nitrous funny car boost to the adept... for that short term boost in power with the attendant downtime.

Effectively the infusion focus is 3 karma per 0.25PP it gives you access too... far cheaper than raising magic or initiating provided of course our initiate grade is high enough to make use of it....

But especially if you allow PP for initiating on pure adepts... initiations are cheap (and even preferable) to raising magic for adepts. Adept centering goes off initiate grade... as do many other things...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pepsi Jedi
post Apr 23 2013, 04:36 AM
Post #1865


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,139
Joined: 31-March 10
From: UCAS
Member No.: 18,391



QUOTE (tasti man LH @ Apr 22 2013, 07:04 PM) *
Well, judging by the name of the image, I guess this is our first look at the character portraits for the Pre-gen character sheets. So far lookin' good. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

And if that's supposed to be an MCT Fly-Spy drone, kinda not what I expected them to be...slimmer? Although I guess that's one other layer of camoflage if the drone actually looks like a fly from a distance...


I rather liked the art. My wife loved it. That's her kinda ork.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tasti man LH
post Apr 23 2013, 04:41 AM
Post #1866


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 525
Joined: 20-December 12
Member No.: 66,005



Hey, like I said, I like it too. Hell, apparently my current players STILL have it in their heads that all orks and trolls are ugly as sin, and hence why no one wanted to play as one.

Also, who's the artist of this piece, if I may ask? The art style looks the same as the guy who did the pre-gen sheets for runners in the 2050 sourcebook...is is the same guy?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DMiller
post Apr 23 2013, 05:43 AM
Post #1867


Moving Target
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 681
Joined: 23-March 10
From: Japan
Member No.: 18,343



QUOTE (Falconer @ Apr 23 2013, 12:54 PM) *
Dmiller:
They're also far less expensive to bond than power foci.

I really like the flavor of the infusion metamagic as well... it's like turning on the nitrous funny car boost to the adept... for that short term boost in power with the attendant downtime.

Effectively the infusion focus is 3 karma per 0.25PP it gives you access too... far cheaper than raising magic or initiating provided of course our initiate grade is high enough to make use of it....

But especially if you allow PP for initiating on pure adepts... initiations are cheap (and even preferable) to raising magic for adepts. Adept centering goes off initiate grade... as do many other things...

Thanks for the info. Infusion is really cool, except that it becomes almost unusable later in the game. Oh well, guess it's back to increasing my Magic for PPs.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sk8bcn
post Apr 23 2013, 08:17 AM
Post #1868


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 702
Joined: 21-August 08
From: France
Member No.: 16,265



QUOTE (tasti man LH @ Apr 23 2013, 02:04 AM) *
Well, judging by the name of the image, I guess this is our first look at the character portraits for the Pre-gen character sheets. So far lookin' good. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

And if that's supposed to be an MCT Fly-Spy drone, kinda not what I expected them to be...slimmer? Although I guess that's one other layer of camoflage if the drone actually looks like a fly from a distance...


Not at my taste. It make me think of Hawkmoon's idiotic jumping frog technologie from Shattered Island (old scenario from the 90s).

I mean: either they are supposed to look like flies for camoufage and then the pic has a problem with proportions, either they are really 10cm long drones and then, beeing modeled to look like a fly is idiotic.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Falconer
post Apr 23 2013, 12:06 PM
Post #1869


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Validating
Posts: 2,283
Joined: 12-October 07
Member No.: 13,662



DMiller... that can be fixed fairly easy if you allow the adept to 'dial down' the infusion power in a manner similar to how a mage can cast at force 8... but can easily dial it down to force 4.

Also the point of the infusion foci is they don't count against that power for drain purposes, the focus is merely unusable while it recharges quickly. So infusion foci even with the rules as strictly written continue to work well by taking the edge off.


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Larsine
post Apr 23 2013, 03:08 PM
Post #1870


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 647
Joined: 9-September 03
From: Sorø, Denmark
Member No.: 5,604



QUOTE (Ixal @ Apr 22 2013, 09:09 PM) *
I wonder if there ever was anything new which was received well...

SR1?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
binarywraith
post Apr 23 2013, 07:42 PM
Post #1871


Shooting Target
****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 1,973
Joined: 4-June 10
Member No.: 18,659



QUOTE (Larsine @ Apr 23 2013, 09:08 AM) *
SR1?


Street Sam's Catalog and Neo Anarchist's Guide to Real Life. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/love.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tasti man LH
post Apr 23 2013, 08:09 PM
Post #1872


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 525
Joined: 20-December 12
Member No.: 66,005



QUOTE (Larsine @ Apr 23 2013, 08:08 AM) *
SR1?


Last I checked it was for the setting, not necessarily the rules for gameplay.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Apr 23 2013, 08:20 PM
Post #1873


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



QUOTE (binarywraith @ Apr 23 2013, 02:42 PM) *
Street Sam's Catalog
I freely admit that I loves me my gear porn! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jareth Valar
post Apr 23 2013, 08:34 PM
Post #1874


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 162
Joined: 18-August 06
From: C.A.S.
Member No.: 9,160



Seattle source book. Best fluff book ever...well in the top 3. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/grinbig.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cryptoknight
post Apr 23 2013, 08:37 PM
Post #1875


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 697
Joined: 18-August 07
Member No.: 12,735



QUOTE (_Pax._ @ Apr 20 2013, 10:48 AM) *
Not unarmed Adepts. There's no applicable or comparable place for them to spend that money.

Also, even a weapon focus pales by comparison, pricewise, with cyberware.



Weapon Foci Hardliner gloves?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

92 Pages V  « < 73 74 75 76 77 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th December 2025 - 08:56 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.