So Much For Stealth, Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger |
So Much For Stealth, Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger |
Jan 7 2013, 12:56 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 183 Joined: 10-January 10 Member No.: 18,025 |
http://gizmodo.com/5968827/quantum-physics...njammable-radar
and the tech curve just got blown if they make this thing work |
|
|
Jan 7 2013, 01:26 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Runner Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,801 Joined: 2-September 09 From: Moscow, Russia Member No.: 17,589 |
So, the way I understand, there are three ways to go about stealth technology.
First, build your plane in such a shape that it reflects the coming waves off to the sides, and nothing or nearly nothing back at the scanner (see F-117). That tech is unaffected by the development, because the waves are still not returning to your scanner, whether they are polarized or not. Second, there's using wave-absorbing materials to reduce the power of the waves reflected. Again, unaffected: polarized or not, the power of the waves you're getting at the receiver is diminished. Third, there's building aircraft with minimal possible RCS. That could potentially be affected, I guess, because RCS is a rather arcane thing to work with, depending on wavelength and complex shapes involved and whatnot; but I doubt that the change will be revolutionary (because why would it; principally the same RCS-reducing measures should work for the new radars, as well). So all in all, I can't see how the development (at least as described in the article) makes stealth obsolete. It might make active radar ECM less effective, but that's far from the revolutionary change described. |
|
|
Jan 7 2013, 08:27 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,351 Joined: 19-September 09 From: Behind the shadows of the Resonance Member No.: 17,653 |
Predator vs. Prey. When the scanner technology evolves, so too will the stealth technology.
|
|
|
Jan 7 2013, 11:59 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Horror Group: Members Posts: 5,322 Joined: 15-June 05 From: BumFuck, New Jersey Member No.: 7,445 |
I imagine that the simplest anti-infallible-radar technology will remain the most reliable.
Detect incoming infallible radar signal > auto-launch anti-radiation missile at it > one missile journey later, the other guy no longer has an expensive infallible quantum radar. So send in a few waves of drones whose only job is to present a target for the infallible radar to lock onto, blow the infallible radar away, and suddenly you could cruise overhead in a zeppelin and they wouldn't know it. (Hyperbolicly speaking, anyway.) |
|
|
Jan 8 2013, 12:07 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,575 Joined: 5-February 10 Member No.: 18,115 |
Now I want a Quantum Zeppelin.
~Umi |
|
|
Jan 8 2013, 01:02 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Runner Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,801 Joined: 2-September 09 From: Moscow, Russia Member No.: 17,589 |
Still waiting for other engineers around to point out how that thing is in any way negating the current stealth technologies.
|
|
|
Jan 8 2013, 01:34 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 428 Joined: 23-September 11 From: Vegas Member No.: 38,733 |
It has quantum in the name, therefore it must be infallible. Duh. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/proof.gif)
|
|
|
Jan 8 2013, 07:47 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 821 Joined: 4-December 09 Member No.: 17,940 |
From my read, what it does is merely making the radar jamming proof, as you can automatically sort out what's a genuine signal bouncing back from something that's sent at the radar by jammers and active decoys (say a tin can emiiting o nthe radar's wavelenght to masquerade as a B-52) . But it still vulnerable to chaff - both the plane and the chaff appears to the radar as a genuine return of it's pulse - and 'passive' stealth which doesn't give a return signal to lock on.
It might be harder to fool with 'active' stealth based on canceling the incoming signal with an opposite one. |
|
|
Jan 9 2013, 04:58 AM
Post
#9
|
|
Old Man of the North Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 9,652 Joined: 14-August 03 From: Just north of the Centre of the Universe Member No.: 5,463 |
|
|
|
Jan 9 2013, 09:53 AM
Post
#10
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,018 Joined: 3-July 10 Member No.: 18,786 |
|
|
|
Jan 10 2013, 06:26 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Immortal Elf Group: Members Posts: 10,289 Joined: 2-October 08 Member No.: 16,392 |
So, the way I understand, there are three ways to go about stealth technology. First, build your plane in such a shape that it reflects the coming waves off to the sides, and nothing or nearly nothing back at the scanner (see F-117). That tech is unaffected by the development, because the waves are still not returning to your scanner, whether they are polarized or not. Second, there's using wave-absorbing materials to reduce the power of the waves reflected. Again, unaffected: polarized or not, the power of the waves you're getting at the receiver is diminished. Third, there's building aircraft with minimal possible RCS. That could potentially be affected, I guess, because RCS is a rather arcane thing to work with, depending on wavelength and complex shapes involved and whatnot; but I doubt that the change will be revolutionary (because why would it; principally the same RCS-reducing measures should work for the new radars, as well). So all in all, I can't see how the development (at least as described in the article) makes stealth obsolete. It might make active radar ECM less effective, but that's far from the revolutionary change described. All of those are passive evasion of radar, not an active jam of radar. This new type addresses the second, not the first. |
|
|
Jan 10 2013, 06:55 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,632 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Portland Oregon, USA Member No.: 1,304 |
Stealth is what is used to drop a couple of laser guided bunker busters. Radar jamming is what is used to protect multiple waves of B52's.
Stealth is most likely unaffected, but the jamming used for large attacks will need to be updated. |
|
|
Jan 10 2013, 08:41 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,328 Joined: 2-April 07 From: The Center of the Universe Member No.: 11,360 |
Assuming of course you can field this radar and it has no adverse affects and doesn't interfere with your own equipment. What about a quantum jamming pod on a drone that detected and then flooded the receiver with the exact same signal.
Sensors, ECM, ECCM, is just a game of one upmanship. Few countries do it well and have the expertise. |
|
|
Jan 10 2013, 08:50 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Immortal Elf Group: Members Posts: 10,289 Joined: 2-October 08 Member No.: 16,392 |
|
|
|
Jan 10 2013, 11:16 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Runner Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,801 Joined: 2-September 09 From: Moscow, Russia Member No.: 17,589 |
All of those are passive evasion of radar, not an active jam of radar. This new type addresses the second, not the first. Well, sure, just like I said in the last paragraph in that message you quote. The thing is, stealth aircraft is considered stealth primarily for the passive measures: every modern combat plane has active ECM. So the whole pompousness of the article is not exactly spot on.
|
|
|
Jan 11 2013, 01:56 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Immortal Elf Group: Members Posts: 10,289 Joined: 2-October 08 Member No.: 16,392 |
|
|
|
Jan 11 2013, 02:07 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Runner Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,801 Joined: 2-September 09 From: Moscow, Russia Member No.: 17,589 |
Because it does not invalidate the stealth technology. Because stealth aircraft differ from not-stealth precisely by employing passive measures, ones the tech does nothing about.
|
|
|
Jan 11 2013, 03:19 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Immortal Elf Group: Members Posts: 10,289 Joined: 2-October 08 Member No.: 16,392 |
|
|
|
Jan 11 2013, 03:52 PM
Post
#19
|
|
Runner Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,801 Joined: 2-September 09 From: Moscow, Russia Member No.: 17,589 |
QUOTE (The article @ Dec 16 2012, 10:10 AM) A new kind developed by researchers at the University of Rochester however, dips into quantum physics and is unjammable and infallible. Get ready for a quantum future, where everyone can see you see them. |
|
|
Jan 11 2013, 04:02 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Immortal Elf Group: Members Posts: 10,289 Joined: 2-October 08 Member No.: 16,392 |
QUOTE A new kind developed by researchers at the University of Rochester however, dips into quantum physics and is unjammable and infallible. Get ready for a quantum future, where everyone can see you see them. It says "unjammable" and "infallible." It does not say "unavoidable." (Infallible in this usage is referring to spoofed signals, as the system can recognize the difference between a real signal and a faked signal infallibly) |
|
|
Jan 11 2013, 04:13 PM
Post
#21
|
|
Runner Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,801 Joined: 2-September 09 From: Moscow, Russia Member No.: 17,589 |
|
|
|
Jan 11 2013, 10:06 PM
Post
#22
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,351 Joined: 19-September 09 From: Behind the shadows of the Resonance Member No.: 17,653 |
Do remember what happened to the ship that was claimed to be "unsinkable".
|
|
|
Jan 11 2013, 10:24 PM
Post
#23
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,930 Joined: 9-April 05 From: Scandinavian Union Member No.: 7,310 |
"So guys we developed this new wiz tech, it makes it so we can't be jammed, like ever! We still can't see them, but if we could! we wouldn't be jammed (hmm, raspberry)"
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th April 2024 - 02:42 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.