IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Ruger thunderbolt vs ruger super warhawk.
Modular Man
post May 29 2013, 11:13 PM
Post #26


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 366
Joined: 17-March 10
Member No.: 18,317



QUOTE (Thanee @ May 29 2013, 09:59 PM) *
My prefered Thunderbolt is modded for FA with extended magazine (and whatever recoil compensation fits in; yeah, a cyberarm gyromount comes in handy with this one).

Even though you are only carrying a sidearm, you are packing the punch of an assault rifle (almost; and only on close ranges, of course). (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

Bye
Thanee

I can agree here.
I'm currently putting together a concept for the pistols-only-approach of my character (strength of 2 and the desire to pack multiple weapons lead to using handguns very quickly (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) ). So far I've come up with dual Thunderbolts (smart), modded with firing selection change (FA), personalized grip, powered folding stock, underbarrel weight, and an external sound suppressor (not enough slots integrate it). Allows my character to fire two long bursts with minimum recoil, as far as I recall. To be used in situations when two bullets a combat round ain't gonna cut it. This isn't meant for dinner parties, this gear is packed for going to war.

Assuming my GM lets me use two folding stocks at once, one set to each shoulder, character's chest facing the enemy both guns are aimed at (I don't have experience with guns, so just my personal logic):
Each gun has its own recoil compensation of 5 (2 due to design, 1 from the grip, 1 from the underbarrel weight, 1 from the stock as it is a pistol), so this would leave me at no penalty firing the first gun with the character's first simple action, then firing the other in the second one on a penalty of -1 (not counting off-hand).
Anyone see any holes in this logic? If so, please tell me.

Though I have to admit, the Super Warhawk is just classic.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Raiden
post May 29 2013, 11:30 PM
Post #27


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 755
Joined: 8-August 12
From: Geogia
Member No.: 53,120



aye I had a char ex-swat one of my first. dual war-hawks, had as spares dual colts. the war-hawks turned out to be nice little thing even when you wanted a lot of dakka. load up ex-ex rounds you have 7P and -3AP 2-4 shots a round the GM house ruled that if you are aiming both weapons at the same target you can apply laser sight or smartguns to the total dice pool before splitting. was nice of him. best part is while you pick people off the other guys are shooting at the troll carrying the machine gun lol. or the mage.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Grak
post May 30 2013, 03:26 AM
Post #28


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 65
Joined: 1-March 13
From: Awakened Lands
Member No.: 77,269



QUOTE (Modular Man @ May 30 2013, 12:13 AM) *
I can agree here.
I'm currently putting together a concept for the pistols-only-approach of my character (strength of 2 and the desire to pack multiple weapons lead to using handguns very quickly (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) ). So far I've come up with dual Thunderbolts (smart), modded with firing selection change (FA), personalized grip, powered folding stock, underbarrel weight, and an external sound suppressor (not enough slots integrate it). Allows my character to fire two long bursts with minimum recoil, as far as I recall. To be used in situations when two bullets a combat round ain't gonna cut it. This isn't meant for dinner parties, this gear is packed for going to war.

Assuming my GM lets me use two folding stocks at once, one set to each shoulder, character's chest facing the enemy both guns are aimed at (I don't have experience with guns, so just my personal logic):
Each gun has its own recoil compensation of 5 (2 due to design, 1 from the grip, 1 from the underbarrel weight, 1 from the stock as it is a pistol), so this would leave me at no penalty firing the first gun with the character's first simple action, then firing the other in the second one on a penalty of -1 (not counting off-hand).
Anyone see any holes in this logic? If so, please tell me.

Though I have to admit, the Super Warhawk is just classic.


If you dual wield you will split your dice pool between the two weapons but it only uses one simple action. I'm not sure but I think you will suffer massive recoil negatives. You have modded these things into SMGs, aside from it being cool, the crunch might work out better with actual SMG's that have built in RC values instead of pistols at that point.

Oh and you might want to drop those smartlinks. They are unusable when dual wielding just like laser sights. (Which is really silly if you ask me.)

Beyond all that the biggest problem with this approach is the extremely short range of pistols. Your are going to be eating negatives doing anything further out then 5 metres. If there is a range extending mods that would be well worth getting over those smartlinks.

The Warhawk is sexy but they are for historical reenactments these days. I'd bet Bull even has one (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RHat
post May 30 2013, 03:53 AM
Post #29


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,962
Joined: 27-February 13
Member No.: 76,875



Using one simple action each for each weapon is an alternative method for dual wielding as a means to diminish recoil problems - and in that case, smartlinks can be used. And Thunderbolts have built in omni-stacking RC, like an Ares Alpha.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Grak
post May 30 2013, 05:27 AM
Post #30


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 65
Joined: 1-March 13
From: Awakened Lands
Member No.: 77,269



QUOTE (RHat @ May 30 2013, 04:53 AM) *
Using one simple action each for each weapon is an alternative method for dual wielding as a means to diminish recoil problems - and in that case, smartlinks can be used. And Thunderbolts have built in omni-stacking RC, like an Ares Alpha.


So what you'd equip a guy with two pistols & ambidextrous to effectively double your ammo capacity? I guess that would appeal to people fluff wise.

The Thunderbolt having a free -2rc is pretty cool, no wonder my players like them. Once the Star get the boot I'll wager they all try to buy one.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
X-Kalibur
post May 30 2013, 05:47 AM
Post #31


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,579
Joined: 30-May 06
From: SoCal
Member No.: 8,626



Technically speaking, red dot sights from Gun Heaven provide the +1 bonus while dual wielding, since the rules specifically only include laser sights and smart links.

Your numbers are bothering me a little bit though. Firstly - can pistols mount underbarrel weights? Second - what stock? Third - Why personalized grips over electronic firing, especially if you are silencing it. You've also modded them for FA, but isn't FA always a complex action? You could fire both of them as a complex action with FA, but then you'd subtract all uncompensated recoil from both dice pools. Times like these when cyber forearms with gyromounts come in really handy.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RHat
post May 30 2013, 06:40 AM
Post #32


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,962
Joined: 27-February 13
Member No.: 76,875



QUOTE (Grak @ May 29 2013, 11:27 PM) *
So what you'd equip a guy with two pistols & ambidextrous to effectively double your ammo capacity? I guess that would appeal to people fluff wise.

The Thunderbolt having a free -2rc is pretty cool, no wonder my players like them. Once the Star get the boot I'll wager they all try to buy one.


That's actually a pretty strong flavour point for them in Seattle - I'd imagine that when the Star got booted out, a lot of their equipment went to the grey market.

And that's pretty much the idea - rather than burning the mod slots for net zero recoil, you can make recoil irrelevant.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Grak
post May 30 2013, 07:33 AM
Post #33


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 65
Joined: 1-March 13
From: Awakened Lands
Member No.: 77,269



QUOTE (RHat @ May 30 2013, 07:40 AM) *
That's actually a pretty strong flavour point for them in Seattle - I'd imagine that when the Star got booted out, a lot of their equipment went to the grey market.

And that's pretty much the idea - rather than burning the mod slots for net zero recoil, you can make recoil irrelevant.


Hell it could even make a great Shadowrun, when the Star falls runners are called in to liberate the gear from a warehouse. Load up the good ol' bulldog to the roof and take it down to your local Ancients chapter. Of course you have to dodge the trogs go-gangers who caught wind of the delivery.

The open mod slots would definitely be a bonus for some runners and would work well with something like a warhawk/deputy which isn't gonna fire BF/FA anytime soon. My favourite thing to do is dropping that explosive mod into the skinlink. When one of my players picked up the favourite gun of a pyscopathic weapon smith boy did he have a blast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RHat
post May 30 2013, 07:58 AM
Post #34


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,962
Joined: 27-February 13
Member No.: 76,875



... That was a terrible pun.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Modular Man
post May 30 2013, 10:20 AM
Post #35


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 366
Joined: 17-March 10
Member No.: 18,317



QUOTE (RHat @ May 30 2013, 05:53 AM) *
Using one simple action each for each weapon is an alternative method for dual wielding as a means to diminish recoil problems - and in that case, smartlinks can be used. And Thunderbolts have built in omni-stacking RC, like an Ares Alpha.

Sums up the way I intend to use those guns.

QUOTE (X-Kalibur @ May 30 2013, 07:47 AM) *
Your numbers are bothering me a little bit though. Firstly - can pistols mount underbarrel weights?

I'll try to clarify some of that (additional errors may come from me trying to handle the english language...). The modification "Underbarrel Weight" ("Arsenal", p. 153) can be integrated into pistols, unlike the auto-adjusting modification on the same page or the external accessory (as pistols do not have an underbarrel slot for accessories).
QUOTE (X-Kalibur @ May 30 2013, 07:47 AM) *
Second - what stock?

The modification "Folding Stock" ("Arsenal2; p. 151f). One version of this mod can be powered, so unfolding the stock becomes a free rather than a simple action. Also adds +1 recoil compensation, if I'm not mistaken.
QUOTE (X-Kalibur @ May 30 2013, 07:47 AM) *
Third - Why personalized grips over electronic firing, especially if you are silencing it.

You've got a point here. I picked personalized grips mainly for budget reasons, but you just made me reconsider things (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) . Thanks. Good idea.
The silencers were also meant as a precaution for the really recognizable sound pattern of the guns, as mentioned in the book.
QUOTE (X-Kalibur @ May 30 2013, 07:47 AM) *
You've also modded them for FA, but isn't FA always a complex action? You could fire both of them as a complex action with FA, but then you'd subtract all uncompensated recoil from both dice pools. Times like these when cyber forearms with gyromounts come in really handy.

Firing a long burst requires a weapon that can fire (and is set to) FA (SR4A, p. 154). Long bursts are still simple actions, though. So, one long burst from one gun is fired with the first simple action, the second after that.

I hope I could clarify what I'm trying to achieve here. I don't intend to fire both weapons with one simple action, the dice pool splitting is just too hard for this character.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Thanee
post May 30 2013, 11:19 AM
Post #36


jacked in
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,733
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 463



QUOTE (Stahlseele @ May 29 2013, 10:04 PM) *
wanna go one further?
ask why you should not be able to get something like that as a cyber-arm-gun . .


Naaah, too many slots lost.

Bye
Thanee
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Thanee
post May 30 2013, 11:25 AM
Post #37


jacked in
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,733
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 463



QUOTE (SpellBinder @ May 30 2013, 01:09 AM) *
Warhawk, and style, all the way.


I don't like revolver style, except for wild west. Really, I don't see the appeal at all. Automatics are much more stylish in my eyes. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

Bye
Thanee
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post May 30 2013, 11:38 AM
Post #38


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



QUOTE (Thanee @ May 30 2013, 01:19 PM) *
Naaah, too many slots lost.

Bye
Thanee

que?
you only lost the slots in the arm for the weapon, the weapon itself has it's own mod slots again, if i remember this right
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Warlordtheft
post May 30 2013, 05:46 PM
Post #39


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,328
Joined: 2-April 07
From: The Center of the Universe
Member No.: 11,360



I's go with the Warhawk, more style and a few other advantages. I forget the details, but I did give one NPC a pair of these guys (along with ambedexterity). He had two smartlink systems installed in his cybereyes (House rules/gm fiat) so he could get the smarlink bonus for both pistols.

Each Pistol had the following mods:
Smartlink (1 slot)
SS to SA (1 slot)
Level 3 ceramic parts (1 slot)
Expanded Cylinder (1 slot)
Ammo skip system (1 slot)
Electronic Firing (1 slot)

Typically he carried 4 rds of ex ex, 2 rds of regular and 2 rds of gel.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SpellBinder
post May 30 2013, 08:46 PM
Post #40


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,351
Joined: 19-September 09
From: Behind the shadows of the Resonance
Member No.: 17,653



QUOTE (Thanee @ May 30 2013, 04:25 AM) *
I don't like revolver style, except for wild west. Really, I don't see the appeal at all. Automatics are much more stylish in my eyes. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

Bye
Thanee
Each to their own. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
phlapjack77
post May 31 2013, 04:00 AM
Post #41


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,473
Joined: 24-May 10
From: Beijing
Member No.: 18,611



QUOTE (Critias @ May 30 2013, 04:08 AM) *
Which do you think is more awesome: a hand-cannon firing bursts like Robocop's gun, or a honkin' big revolver that sounds like God clapping his hands?

Every time a character of mine fires in BF mode, I hear that distinctive sound from Robocop and I picture those jars of baby-food exploding. So badass. It's indelibly etched in my gray matter...


QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ May 30 2013, 12:55 AM) *
For me it is a Preference issue. I FAR prefer the Ruger Super-Warhawk. Style all the way. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

QUOTE (Thanee @ May 30 2013, 07:25 PM) *
I don't like revolver style, except for wild west. Really, I don't see the appeal at all. Automatics are much more stylish in my eyes. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

If my character is more high-tech, I would choose the thunderbolt. If my character is more old-school or whatever, I choose the superwarhawk (Riggs vs. Murtaugh)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post May 31 2013, 04:36 AM
Post #42


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



Right tool for the right job.

If you're hunting street scum like Robocop: Thunderbolt.

If you're hunting Drones or Cars: Super Warhawk.

Choose ammo to taste.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Grak
post May 31 2013, 05:42 AM
Post #43


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 65
Joined: 1-March 13
From: Awakened Lands
Member No.: 77,269



QUOTE (CanRay @ May 31 2013, 05:36 AM) *
Right tool for the right job.

If you're hunting street scum like Robocop: Thunderbolt.

If you're hunting Drones or Cars: Super Warhawk.

Choose ammo to taste.



CanRay the right tool is always a Panther Assault Cannon!
Pistols are for when you're playing nice.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stingray
post May 31 2013, 08:14 AM
Post #44


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 695
Joined: 21-March 09
Member No.: 17,002



QUOTE (Warlordtheft @ May 30 2013, 08:46 PM) *
I's go with the Warhawk, more style and a few other advantages. I forget the details, but I did give one NPC a pair of these guys (along with ambedexterity). He had two smartlink systems installed in his cybereyes (House rules/gm fiat) so he could get the smarlink bonus for both pistols.

Each Pistol had the following mods:
Smartlink (1 slot)
SS to SA (1 slot)
Level 3 ceramic parts (1 slot)
Expanded Cylinder (1 slot)
Ammo skip system (1 slot)
Electronic Firing (1 slot)

Typically he carried 4 rds of ex ex, 2 rds of regular and 2 rds of gel.

..Smartlink is firearms accessorie too, just paying cost of weapon(internal s-link) and saving 1 modification slot..
..Electronic Firing takes 2 slots, not 1..so that takes saved slot from smartlink..
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RHat
post May 31 2013, 08:45 AM
Post #45


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,962
Joined: 27-February 13
Member No.: 76,875



QUOTE (Stingray @ May 31 2013, 02:14 AM) *
..Smartlink is firearms accessorie too, just paying cost of weapon(internal s-link) and saving 1 modification slot..
..Electronic Firing takes 2 slots, not 1..so that takes saved slot from smartlink..


The internal version IS the mod - just rewritten in SR4A to go without the modification rules.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stingray
post May 31 2013, 08:52 AM
Post #46


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 695
Joined: 21-March 09
Member No.: 17,002



QUOTE (RHat @ May 31 2013, 11:45 AM) *
The internal version IS the mod - just rewritten in SR4A to go without the modification rules.

..SR4a pg.322. firearms accessories (those do not use slots), in the box
Smartgun system,Internal, mount - ,availiibility 6r, cost Weapon cost..
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post May 31 2013, 08:55 AM
Post #47


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



QUOTE (Grak @ May 31 2013, 12:42 AM) *
CanRay the right tool is always a Panther Assault Cannon!
Pistols are for when you're playing nice.
Bull, is that you? When did you get a second account?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RHat
post May 31 2013, 09:06 AM
Post #48


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,962
Joined: 27-February 13
Member No.: 76,875



QUOTE (Stingray @ May 31 2013, 02:52 AM) *
..SR4a pg.322. firearms accessories (those do not use slots), in the box
Smartgun system,Internal, mount - ,availiibility 6r, cost Weapon cost..


Yes, that is to which I refer. That is the mod, simply placed in a book where the mod rules do not exist so that the internal version is available without extended core.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stingray
post May 31 2013, 09:21 AM
Post #49


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 695
Joined: 21-March 09
Member No.: 17,002



QUOTE (RHat @ May 31 2013, 12:06 PM) *
Yes, that is to which I refer. That is the mod, simply placed in a book where the mod rules do not exist so that the internal version is available without extended core.

???
some Accessessories have also Modification version(those take slots)
Accessory version takes no slots, no skill or gear needed to install
Modification version takes slot(s), may need skill, and/gear to install..

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RHat
post May 31 2013, 09:29 AM
Post #50


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,962
Joined: 27-February 13
Member No.: 76,875



Both varieties of Smartgun require Armourer to install. And are you seriously attempting to argue that the internal smartgun doesn't take up any space?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd April 2026 - 06:54 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.