Adept-Fu Decision..., Do Killing Hands Function in Stun? |
Adept-Fu Decision..., Do Killing Hands Function in Stun? |
Apr 29 2004, 10:26 PM
Post
#1
|
|||
The Sewer Jockey Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 857 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Kent, United Kingdom Member No.: 1,197 |
Here's the impetus... The BBB says:
Gramatically, in terms of how it is written, that implies the following: Choice = (STR)M Stun OR (STR)<Killing Hands Level> Physical. I would prefer to go this route however: Choice = (STR)<Killing Hands Level> Stun OR (STR)<Killing Hands Level> Stun I realise that may not suit some, however. So how about a third option? Given that the users of Bone Lacing can choose to have their attacks do physical instead (sacrificing some of the power) then why cannot the inverse be true for PhysAds? For example: Choice = (STR/2)<Killing Hands Level> Stun OR (STR)<Killing Hands Level> Physical What is the general concensus, here? Does anyone have any further suggestions? |
||
|
|||
Apr 29 2004, 10:28 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,616 Joined: 15-March 04 Member No.: 6,158 |
The quote is pretty specific. You can do your normal Stun unarmed damage [(STR)M Stun augmented by things like Bone Lacing or whatever], or the purchased level of Physical damage.
|
|
|
Apr 29 2004, 10:28 PM
Post
#3
|
|||
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,138 Joined: 10-June 03 From: Tennessee Member No.: 4,706 |
|
||
|
|||
Apr 29 2004, 10:29 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Why oh why didn't I take the blue pill. Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 6,545 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Gloomy Boise Idaho Member No.: 2,006 |
Can someone translate this for me? It seems like a interesting question.
|
|
|
Apr 29 2004, 10:34 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,616 Joined: 15-March 04 Member No.: 6,158 |
Translation: He's asking how you handle Killing Hands when a character only wants to do Stun damage. If you have Killing Hands D, can you do a Deadly Stun attack with it instead of Deadly Physical?
|
|
|
Apr 29 2004, 10:52 PM
Post
#6
|
|
The Sewer Jockey Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 857 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Kent, United Kingdom Member No.: 1,197 |
Quite right, Lime, that's exactly what I'm asking. It just seemed a little... I dunno, unfair (?) that purchasing such an uber unarmed bonus would do great things for those that wanted to kill with a single blow, but suck rear if one wanted to be able to "almost always render the opponent unconscious with a single blow" - think of a STR: 8 or so character with KH:D - almost an instant knockout if the dice go their way.
I'm looking at in terms of the non-killing theorem (like why runners use gel rounds) and also for sparring - you want to practice your magical art in the form of killing hands, but you don't want to accidentally kill the guy you're sparring with. |
|
|
Apr 29 2004, 11:06 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 18 Joined: 22-July 03 From: Victoria, BC Member No.: 5,012 |
I'm thinking something like this: (inspired by the FAQ quote)
Increase the target number when doing stun damage, given that you have to focus on not killing your opponent like you were trained to with Killing Hands. This only applies to anything greater than normal hand to hand damage. (i.e. Moderate) Target numbers increase as wound level increases. For example: Killing Hands at Deadly level -> Stun Damage at Deadly = TN+2 Killing Hands at Serious level -> Stun Damage at Serious = TN+1 Or something like that.. Thoughts? |
|
|
Apr 29 2004, 11:23 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,965 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Edinburgh, Scotland Member No.: 2,032 |
It's OT, but what would people think of a reduced cost version of killing hands that only does stun damage? IE: Something to up the damage level of your HTH attacks, or enchantify your basic melee attacks cheaply.
As for the question posed: I'm fine with the system the way it is (you don't get the killing hands damage level on melee attacks). If You don't KO them with one punch then you probably will do with your next (Str)M Stun attack as they have +2 to TNs. |
|
|
Apr 29 2004, 11:24 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Chicago Survivor Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 5,079 Joined: 28-January 04 From: Canton, GA Member No.: 6,033 |
For that, just wear Shock gloves
|
|
|
Apr 29 2004, 11:28 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,616 Joined: 15-March 04 Member No.: 6,158 |
I already have that power.
Haymaker Cost: 1 (Serious) or 3 (Deadly) This power works exactly like Killing Hands save that it augments the adept's natural Stun damage from Moderate to the purchased level. Like Killing Hands, it's equally effective on the astral plane or for purposes of defeating Immunity to Natural Weapons. Note that since the adept starts with Moderate Stun naturally, the costs are effectively identical to Killing Hands at the same level. |
|
|
Apr 29 2004, 11:52 PM
Post
#11
|
|||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 114 Joined: 24-November 02 Member No.: 3,638 |
Yeah, we did that in our game as well, though we just called it "Stun Hands". It's a little cheaper than Killing Hands of the same level. |
||
|
|||
Apr 30 2004, 12:00 AM
Post
#12
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,965 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Edinburgh, Scotland Member No.: 2,032 |
@ACL, Not quite, There's still the possibility of magicifying the adept's natural (Str)M Stun... That should definately not be free. 0.25 PPs sound OK?
|
|
|
Apr 30 2004, 12:07 AM
Post
#13
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,616 Joined: 15-March 04 Member No.: 6,158 |
All the other perks are pretty much free as part of other powers (you need Astral Perception at the very least to attack astral entities, and any magical augmentation such as Distance Strike and potentially even Improved Ability: Unarmed Combat will allow you to defeat Immunity to Natural Weapons). But sure, if you wanna go that route 0.25 sounds fine to me.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th April 2024 - 12:16 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.