![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 49 Joined: 24-February 03 Member No.: 4,152 ![]() |
Somewhere, sometime I got it in my head that layering does not pertain to form-fitting armor. What a wonderful and glorious invention. However, my hopes were shattered when I checked M&M and according to cannon FFA only negates combat pool penalties. Anyone know where I may have picked up that incorrect info? Maybe errata or something?
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,138 Joined: 10-June 03 From: Tennessee Member No.: 4,706 ![]() |
Check the errata (www.shadowrunrpg.com). I do believe it removes the quickness penalties, as well.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 49 Joined: 24-February 03 Member No.: 4,152 ![]() |
But it does layer like normal armor right?
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,616 Joined: 15-March 04 Member No.: 6,158 ![]() |
Yep, it's halved if you're wearing any armor with a Ballistic or Impact rating higher than its rating, otherwise it's at its full ratingl. Beyond that, it basically doesn't count as another layer of armor.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 309 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,548 ![]() |
I can't seem to find the rule, and I know one of ya'll must know this off the top of yer head, so, in layering, do you round down or up?
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#6
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 511 Joined: 30-May 03 From: Tulsa, OK Member No.: 4,652 ![]() |
The rule is to round down, but most of the time we house rule it to round up, as long as people aren't getting crazy with stacking. We see no reason a 3/1 form-fitting half suit shouldn't go ahead and give 2/1 on top of a jacket or long coat or something.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#7
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 309 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,548 ![]() |
I'd say, round down, to a minimum of 1. So, a 3/1 half suit would be 1/1. Or a 4/1 full suit would be 2/1.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#8
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 11,410 Joined: 1-October 03 From: Pittsburgh Member No.: 5,670 ![]() |
by the book, you round down with no minimum. minimum 1 is a fairly common houserule, though.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#9
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 693 Joined: 26-March 03 Member No.: 4,335 ![]() |
Yeah, I looked in the rules, and saw that it only affects combat pool penalties, as well. which is all fine and good, but it's the quickness penalties that are more restrictive when layering.
I'll have to look for the erratta. Even if the errata doesn't fix this, FFBA still has a role to play - FFBA 1 & 2 are still pretty concealable under normal clothing. Nobody ever wears FFBA 3 - cause how are you going to hide the hood, gloves and booties? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#10
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,616 Joined: 15-March 04 Member No.: 6,158 ![]() |
They come with those things, you don't have to wear them to gain the benefit of the armor. They're an extra incentive for someone who wants, say, Thermal Dampening or Ruthenium Polymers... or to hide their fingerprints and face on a run.
Note that the Half-Body Suit only covers the thighs, groin, and torso; the arms and lower legs are fully exposed. That's where the extra Ballistic +1 comes into play with the Full-Body Suit. Unless you use house rules or aren't wearing any other armor, the Half-Body Suit doesn't provide any functional armor improvement over the Shirt; +1/+0 for both. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#11
|
|||
Manus Celer Dei ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,012 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 ![]() |
Clearly you can somehow, as it has a Conceal of 10 IIRC. ~J |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#12
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,616 Joined: 15-March 04 Member No.: 6,158 ![]() |
It's actually Concealability 12, I believe.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#13
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 511 Joined: 30-May 03 From: Tulsa, OK Member No.: 4,652 ![]() |
Yeah, but still. Hiding the hood and gloves isn't going to be practical in a walking around everyday type situation. Now, once you get down to business on the run, that's one thing, but meeting up with the Johnson or doing bodyguard work, etc, you're going to probably stick to the half-suit so you don't look like a complete idiot.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#14
|
|
Manus Celer Dei ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,012 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 ![]() |
Conceal 12 sounds eminently practical. The only thing I can think of that would make it impractical is Summer.
~J |
|
|
![]()
Post
#15
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,616 Joined: 15-March 04 Member No.: 6,158 ![]() |
Again, the context is that the hood and gloves are extras. They're not required for the armor benefits. You would have to strip off the arm and lower leg portions to get to the equivalence of the half-body suit.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#16
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 511 Joined: 30-May 03 From: Tulsa, OK Member No.: 4,652 ![]() |
well, I'm not saying it would be easy to hide, but to hide a hood covering most of your head you'd have to wear a hood or something else covering most of your head. Which, in most situations isn't practical. Obviously the FFBA would be easily hidden, but the means to do so are obvious, at least with the hood. Gloves over the FFBA gloves are less conspicuous, but I still don't see gloves coming back into fashion or anything.
Just because it has a Conceal of 12 just means it's not hard to cover up, but at the same time covering up 95% of your body in most places, especially indoors just isn't practical or inconspicuous, imo. How often do you go out and about and see someone covered from head to toe except their face? Not very often. I suppose you could use some sort of wig with long hair or something on the hood, but I still think wearing it out and about around town just isn't practical. Suit up with the full suit for the actual run, but wear the half-suit around town and for everday protection. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#17
|
|
Manus Celer Dei ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,012 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 ![]() |
Tucking the hood into the back of your collar or whatever. Unless you're going to houserule the conceal to only apply under certain conditions, there is incontrovertibly some way to conceal it while wearing normal clothes (long pants, long-sleeved shirt).
~J |
|
|
![]()
Post
#18
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 309 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,548 ![]() |
Step 1.) Wear jeans, wear shoes, wear long-sleeved shirt.
Step 2.) Remove hood, remove gloves. Step 3.) Place hood and gloves in pocket. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#19
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 511 Joined: 30-May 03 From: Tulsa, OK Member No.: 4,652 ![]() |
But if you're not wearing the hood and gloves does it still give the full benefit of protection? Where do you draw the line between the half-suit and the full-suit?
If you take off the gloves and hood the only difference between the two at that point is that the full suit continues to cover the forearms and calves. Do you lower the protection rating of the full-suit without the hood and gloves? Do you just ignore it? I'll admit it's something we ignored for a long time, and everyone just wore full FFBA suits all the time... |
|
|
![]()
Post
#20
|
|||||
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,616 Joined: 15-March 04 Member No.: 6,158 ![]() |
Again, the context is that the hood and gloves are extras. They're not required for the armor benefits. You would have to strip off the arm and lower leg portions to get to the equivalence of the half-body suit.
And the only difference between the shirt and the half-suit is that it covers the crotch and the thighs. If you put on some gloves and a hood, you still don't have a full suit because they don't provide any notable armor protection. They're useful extras for everything mentioned earlier. |
||||
|
|||||
![]()
Post
#21
|
|||
King of the Hobos ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,117 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 127 ![]() |
We always just ruled that without the gloves/hood it counted as a half-body suit for armour rating. One just for common sense, and the other because it's only a point lower balistically- and helmets, or in this case the hood, give you a +1 armour rating- so it kinda follows internal logic. |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#22
|
|||||
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 400 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 825 ![]() |
So, the full sleeves and lower leg coverings don't do anything?
It follows logically if you think that a thin fabric hood can provide the same type of protection as a hard military-style helmet. |
||||
|
|||||
![]()
Post
#23
|
|
King of the Hobos ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,117 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 127 ![]() |
Hence the kinda. All of this is IMHO and YMMV of course. :)
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#24
|
|
Decker on the Threshold ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,922 Joined: 14-March 04 Member No.: 6,156 ![]() |
Well, also keep in mind that helmets typically provide Impact armor, so by that logic FFBA without the cowl would be 4/0 :P
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#25
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,616 Joined: 15-March 04 Member No.: 6,158 ![]() |
And yet, oddly enough, the half-body suit, which doesn't have the optional accessories, provides 3/1. Go figure. :P
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 8th August 2025 - 10:57 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.