![]() ![]() |
Dec 18 2014, 08:25 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 1,973 Joined: 4-June 10 Member No.: 18,659 |
Just stumbled across this tonight, and immediately was amused. RFID-blocking clothing coming out of a collaboration between Betabrand and computer-security gurus at Norton.
http://thestack.com/rfid-blocking-blazer-j...ty-theft-171214 QUOTE Hacker and founder of Pen Test Partners Ken Munro has explained that "if we are not explicitly blocking these signals there are a lot of things that can go wrong, from stealing contactless payment card details to more life-threatening issues." Munro suggested that this preventative technology must be developed quickly as the popularity of wearable devices increases and RFID is used more frequently in wearable insulin pumps and defibrillators. "These are the devices where tampering or hacking over radio frequency could be life-threatening […] I'm not sure that medical device manufacturers have given enough thought to security," said Munro. So, even real-world security experts are noting that it is a serious problem to have your medical technology and identity vulnerable to wireless hacking... in 2014. Seems crazy that they'd forget that in the next 50 years and have to re-learn it the hard way, doesn't it? Feels strange, I'm used to Shadowrun presaging reality, not our objections to Shadowrun's design decisions being echoed by reality! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rotfl.gif) |
|
|
|
Dec 18 2014, 08:42 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 264 Joined: 28-October 14 From: HH Member No.: 190,938 |
I am so including this in my game.
It's necessary, it just is. |
|
|
|
Dec 18 2014, 09:49 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
The King In Yellow ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 6,922 Joined: 26-February 05 From: JWD Member No.: 7,121 |
While Darth Cheney enjoys still being in a world where lack of Wireless activity doesn't make his pacemaker nonfunctional.
QUOTE So, even real-world security experts are noting that it is a serious problem to have your medical technology and identity vulnerable to wireless hacking... in 2014. Seems crazy that they'd forget that in the next 50 years and have to re-learn it the hard way, doesn't it? Always did. |
|
|
|
Dec 18 2014, 09:55 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,009 Joined: 25-September 06 From: Paris, France Member No.: 9,466 |
But then you can't get the wireless bonuses of your pacemaker (IMG:style_emoticons/default/frown.gif)
|
|
|
|
Dec 18 2014, 12:50 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,039 Joined: 23-March 05 From: The heart of Rywfol Emwolb Industries Member No.: 7,216 |
But if he goes wireless he loses out on the bonus: Heart Implant Wireless Bonus: You don't go shooting your buddies while quail hunting. You have been warned. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif) On a side note, good to see Disklab has basically turned out the Faraday Bag for blocking mobile signals of contained items. Wonder if someone is going to make a Faraday style netgun that fires a signal dampening mesh around the target to restrain them as well as prevent them from setting off some remote device via wifi/mobile signals... |
|
|
|
Dec 18 2014, 01:25 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 264 Joined: 28-October 14 From: HH Member No.: 190,938 |
|
|
|
|
Dec 18 2014, 02:51 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
The ShadowComedian ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,538 Joined: 3-October 07 From: Hamburg, AGS Member No.: 13,525 |
Still not as awesome as the Monowire Netgun.
|
|
|
|
Dec 18 2014, 02:59 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 264 Joined: 28-October 14 From: HH Member No.: 190,938 |
Still not as awesome as the Monowire Netgun. Why not both? 'You are dead now, and you can't even tweet about it either!' |
|
|
|
Dec 18 2014, 03:52 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,039 Joined: 23-March 05 From: The heart of Rywfol Emwolb Industries Member No.: 7,216 |
Because I figure the Faraday net is probably a finer mesh to ensure signal dampening while a monowire net may have a wider mesh as you don't mind chunks falling through so devices may get lucky and fall through a gap and still get a signal out. Course you can just go with a fine mesh Faraday/Monowire combo to make a bloody mist and no signal output so I guess you are right, why not both? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif) |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st January 2026 - 12:22 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.