IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> SR5 Technomancer feedback thread, For an upcoming book! Wow!
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Jun 1 2015, 03:42 PM
Post #51


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (Abschalten @ Jun 1 2015, 08:53 AM) *
I think you misunderstand me. My position is even with a bunch of karma technomancers are underpowered and gimped. They never catch up to deckers except on timelines that involve more earned karma than most campaigns earn from start to finish.


No, You are right... I totally agree...

Equivalent Karma means that the Decker will likely be better until there are stupid levels of Karma involved. BUT, a deck only ever gets so good, and if the TM is willing to get 'ware he can eventually surpass the Decker. Takes stupid levels of Karma and Nuyen though. Some would say that makes them balanced. I would not be one of them, because many of the TM's abilities are just too onerous to use (Looking at Complex Forms and Echoes here).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sengir
post Jun 1 2015, 05:55 PM
Post #52


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,091
Joined: 3-October 09
From: Kohle, Stahl und Bier
Member No.: 17,709



QUOTE (Ren @ Jun 1 2015, 02:58 AM) *
Anything is on the table, but huge changes like how Echoes work would be presented as alternate rules; You can use them, and the book will support the SR5/Data Trails rules, but we also have this here if you want to try that.

You can always follow the great tradition of reflex triggers: Don't rewrite the rules on how often pistols can fire, add a dirt cheap upgrade that allows them to fire twice per pass. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)

QUOTE (Cochise @ May 30 2015, 12:59 PM) *
Good try, but "a hacker" isn't a technomancer

New SR5 terminology: Hacker is the overarching term for both deckers and TMs
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Abschalten
post Jun 1 2015, 09:09 PM
Post #53


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,076
Joined: 31-August 05
From: Rock Hill, SC
Member No.: 7,655



QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ Jun 1 2015, 10:42 AM) *
... if the TM is willing to get 'ware he can eventually surpass the Decker. Takes stupid levels of Karma and Nuyen though...


If said amount of karma and/or nuyen is more than the vast majority of Shadowrun campaigns will ever see, then I think it's effectively a non-issue. The SR4 campaign I GM'd years ago hit 150 total karma earned after two years of playing (these were on the old karma payouts, pre-SR4A.) 150 karma is nothing to a technomancer. Karma evaporates like drops of water on a hot griddle iron. If after playing a character for two REAL LIFE years they cannot find parity in a role that another class can do better out of chargen, then they are not suited for that task. And operating inside the Matrix is supposed to be a technomancer's THING.

Personally, I'm down with allowing a technomancer to diversify out of just being a Matrix monkey. Unwired was letting them grow in other ways, giving them stuff to do besides being a God-level hacker. I think that was a fine approach, and should be taken further.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hermit
post Jun 1 2015, 11:10 PM
Post #54


The King In Yellow
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,922
Joined: 26-February 05
From: JWD
Member No.: 7,121



QUOTE
In SR4, as you know, TM's when they had enough Karma, could become badass. I mean why would you need Wired Reflexes when you can get it for "free" with Echos? Just think about that Hermit, with nothing but the power of their minds, SR4 Technomancers could move as fast as a Street same who dumped at LEAST 100,000 nuyen.gif for Wired Reflexes 3 (that's the standard version, MUCH, MUCH, more for Alpha or better). That to me SCREAMS that Technomancers are Psionic.

I know. My rants about this should still be archived here. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) They were ... rather angry. To me it seemed like somebody had watched too much Matrix.



Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sengir
post Jun 2 2015, 08:49 AM
Post #55


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,091
Joined: 3-October 09
From: Kohle, Stahl und Bier
Member No.: 17,709



QUOTE (KCKitsune @ Jun 1 2015, 04:37 PM) *
Oh, no, no, no, I was NOT going down , SR4 Technomancers could move as fast as a Street same who dumped at LEAST 100,000 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nuyen.gif) for Wired Reflexes 3 .

Costing them 4 Echoes instead. Not exactly bargain bin
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KCKitsune
post Jun 2 2015, 03:33 PM
Post #56


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,188
Joined: 9-February 08
From: Boiling Springs
Member No.: 15,665



QUOTE (Sengir @ Jun 2 2015, 03:49 AM) *
Costing them 4 Echoes instead. Not exactly bargain bin


I know. That's why I put it as "free". But still, they can do it and it costs them no money and no Essence. As with anything in Shadowrun, you can do things in two or three different ways and none of them is so superior as to render the others worthless.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BlackJaw
post Jun 2 2015, 09:45 PM
Post #57


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 482
Joined: 27-May 09
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Member No.: 17,213



1) Resonance Patches (or some other name): bits of resonance code that Technomancers can integrate into their Living Personas. They are similar to, but different than, cyberprograms. It costs a little bit of Karma to know a Patch, and you can only use a few at once (maybe echoes make it possible to use more). They do not require submersion to pickup. New Technomancer characters can have them. Look at the really important things that Cyberprograms do and make sure those are addressed.

2) One (probably popular) Resonance Patch should provide a way to reduce Fading. It might do this through reducing Fade values, by providing a bonus to resist fading, or through some other mechanics (like a pool of point that can be spent to reduce fade damage taken, but requires a rest to replenish). Depending on mechanics chosen, you could easily have two Patches here, one for Complex Forms, and one for Sprites. This would further develop the divide in specializations between Technomancers and "Technoshamans."

3) Maybe a complex form called "Overwrite Ownership." With it a Technomancer can temporarily make themselves the owner of a Device. While the Form is active, they become the device's owner, and can use it like any other device. When the form ends, it reverts back to its original owner. This setup prevents the Technomancer from transferring ownership while in charge, but it's also an ultimate hacker move, as ownership is more powerful than having three (illegal) marks on a device. Note, this form does not remove or change marks (including not putting marks on masters when used on slaves. Hell, it probably knocks things out of a WAN/PAN when active.) Note it doesn't work on Hosts. Note that it doesn't work on Personas (which means it doesn't work on Decks while a Hacker is using them or vehicles while a rigger is jumped into them.) For balance purposes, it might also automatically trigger an alert to the "real" owner when successfully cast on a target, so using this to get a locked door to open on a run will draw the Spider's attention. This is exactly the kind of crazy power that plays into the Corp narrative of technomancers being dangerous/criminals. It's a very potent ability, but it might put Technomancers back on the map for hacking... it makes them good at dealing with devices while Deckers are still better at deal with hosts. If the device is knocked off-line (reboots or is toggled to off-line mode) the complex form ends. I expect that it would carry a high Fade value compared to Puppeteer?
NOTE: As of Data Trails, ownership manipulation is now something AI characters can do (on limited targets) so an ability like this isn't completely nuts.

A more limited concept might be a complex form that scrambles ownership while active. Such a power would make the target device useless to it's owner while active.

4) Complex Forms that allow a Technomancer to enhance their own matrix traits (instead of the exiting ones that target other device they can't use for their Living Persona.) Possibly allow it to work on any living persona, and maybe even Sprites? This would be a big help to making Technomancers on par with Deck users.

4) I was disappointed to see Machine Sprites aren't any good at using devices. Their Diagnostic power is helpful for gaining limit and dice pool bonuses, but they have no skills or powers associated with controlling vehicles or using gunnery. How about a new Sprite that's more useful at operating vehicles and drones? Drone Sprite, or Pilot Sprite, or Rigger Sprite, or Jacker Sprite?

5) Clarification on how a Technomancer can gain a Direct Connection to a device, one of the key ways a Shadowrun hacker gains access to host systems. Yes, Data Trails gives technomancers the Touch-Link echo now, but that still requires subversion first. Can a Technomancer use trodes/data jack with their living persona to get a direct link?

6) Linked to #5, consider a Complex Form that allows a Technomancer to enter a Host system. It doesn't provide a Mark, making the technomancer stand out as not where they belong to anyone that inspects them (IC or Spiders) but it also doesn't risk alarm. You're either in or your not, and you take fading either way.

7) Maybe I missed this in Data Trails, but an Echo, "Patch" (see #1), or Complex Form (or multiple) that provides RCC abilities for a technomancer. Specifically the ability to control and rapidly jump through drones, and the ability to share Autosofts. Rapid jumping/control might be a patch, but the autosoft thing might need to be an Echo similar to the Echo ability to use Skillsofts.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ultra Violet
post Jun 3 2015, 10:36 AM
Post #58


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: 19-December 06
Member No.: 10,405



Many thing were said, most of the old stuff are missing right now! And THAT is unacceptable, and the rules are buggy as well!

The main problem I see is the Databomb! Databombs are an instant killer of all Technomancers, they do way to much damage, and the only trick in SR4A to survive a databomb explosion was the Cascarde power... that option do not exist anymore, and it was a f**k-up move!
A better solution is needed, really bad! Some sort of anti-databomb-form or -echo. Maybe an option to get a Matrix Condition Monitor for them or reducing the Damage of the databomb. Mainly a sentence like: "Matrix Damage do not overflow, if the Stun Damage Track is filled, the TM will be unconscious and kicked out off the Matrix (Dumpshock included)." If you think that is not a problem, make a test run and try to defend against a databomb (a Rating 2 databomb can make 12 DV, a Rating 6 form 6 to 36 DV, it is seriously to f**king much!)

The second thing I recognized was, there is no mentioning of the effect of spellcasting attribute spells on TMs, in previous Editions there was a sentence along with it. Why is that, why is it gone?

The next thing, since TM have to cast ever complex form every time, we need something like foci to ease their pain...
I don't know if the designer/authors of that idea really thought through, but TMs aren't Magicians and they need their complex forms far more often than Magicians need their spells casted. It is like a magican is always casting a couple of spells and every damage they get is stun... but for magic characters there are many ways to deal with drain... for TM there isn't...

Greetings
UV
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nylanfs
post Jun 3 2015, 01:16 PM
Post #59


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 366
Joined: 10-November 08
Member No.: 16,576



So don't open anything suspicious without thoroughly checking it out maybe?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rumanchu
post Jun 3 2015, 06:30 PM
Post #60


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 123
Joined: 19-February 10
From: Bakersfield, CA
Member No.: 18,179



I've been thinking this whole topic over while trying to read through Data Trails (there never seems to be enough time), and the biggest things that annoy me with my TM character aren't necessarily things that can easily be fixed based on how intractable the devs have been so far on reducing Fading costs. If we're to be expected to accept that the original Fading values for Forms are never going to change, then maybe give me a in-world *reason* why it's so damn hard for TMs to actually influence the Matrix now. This may be a tall order (considering that the whole Foundation bit seems to imply that the Resonance is involved somewhere in the underlying programming of the new Matrix), but even something like a page or two going on about how the Corps responded to the "public concerns" about the "technomancer threat" and researched (unspoken: through capture/torture of TMs) ways to ensure that the "new" Matrix would be 99.99% Technomancer-Free™. Heck, that even leaves an opening for making "new" Forms with lower Fading values by way of saying that TMs have spent their time since Matrix 3: Electric Bumblebee came out trying to find ways to work around what GOD and the Corps did to lock them out. It could be like that cool "new" Echo MMRI ("all the functionality of Mind over Machine, with none of the ambiguity!").

Maybe a Form that allows you to make a test against the Device Rating of something, with the net hits being the number of Marks that you can be assumed to have for non-Attack tests against that target as long as you sustain it (or even a one-shot deal). There could even be something where if you get a ridiculous number of hits or the target glitches that you are considered the owner for a short while (not long enough to transfer ownership).

There needs to be some sort of Centering equivalent for TMs, though preferably not an Echo (since Echoes are a pretty limited resource considering how many quality-of-life functions end up as Echoes). Maybe an advanced Sprite power or something.

One big gripe that I have with Data Trails is the inclusion of the Multidimensional Coprocessor. Say what you will about the inability of TMs to get any sort of Initiative boosts without risking their Resonance (yeah, yeah, Lightning Reflexes), at least I knew that only my Submerged TM was getting to add FIVE dice to his initiative roll (when in VR) while even the chromest of the chrome was limited to four. PSYCH! It cost *me* 13+ Karma to get that fifth die, but Johnny Decker just needed 1400 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nuyen.gif) and a call to a semi-competent fixer. (Not sure what you can do to offset that; maybe just bake it into Submersion as a benefit or something).

In the end, I just want Technomancers to feel like a character that I don't need to wait until I've spent 150+ Karma to be semi-decent when I'm pushing the limit using Edge compared to a brand-new Decker. (This may be oversimplifying it a bit, but you get the point).



Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SpellBinder
post Jun 4 2015, 01:24 AM
Post #61


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,351
Joined: 19-September 09
From: Behind the shadows of the Resonance
Member No.: 17,653



QUOTE (rumanchu @ Jun 3 2015, 12:30 PM) *
...

In the end, I just want Technomancers to feel like a character that I don't need to wait until I've spent 150+ Karma to be semi-decent when I'm pushing the limit using Edge compared to a brand-new Decker. (This may be oversimplifying it a bit, but you get the point).
Sounds like an example of success for the higher ups against the "overpowered" technomancer threat. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sarcastic.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rumanchu
post Jun 4 2015, 06:52 AM
Post #62


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 123
Joined: 19-February 10
From: Bakersfield, CA
Member No.: 18,179



QUOTE (SpellBinder @ Jun 3 2015, 06:24 PM) *
Sounds like an example of success for the higher ups against the "overpowered" technomancer threat. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sarcastic.gif)


Don't get me wrong, I believe that TMs deserved to be knocked down a peg or two in this edition, but nowhere near the level of degradation that they ended up being subjected to
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SpellBinder
post Jun 4 2015, 08:15 PM
Post #63


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,351
Joined: 19-September 09
From: Behind the shadows of the Resonance
Member No.: 17,653



QUOTE (rumanchu @ Jun 3 2015, 11:52 PM) *
Don't get me wrong, I believe that TMs deserved to be knocked down a peg or two in this edition, but nowhere near the level of degradation that they ended up being subjected to
Not at all, though I do agree with you to some extent as well.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shadowrenamon
post Jun 4 2015, 09:07 PM
Post #64


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 47
Joined: 31-May 15
Member No.: 194,459



I agree with most of the posts on how Technomancers need to have some way for them to be strong enough to be viable at character creation outside of just being a Digimon tamer. The easiest way would most likely be a good selection of TM specific qualities, both positive and negative, that help them out, especially stuff that makes drain resist a bit easier so that maxed out Will and even RES aren't such a must if you want to do more than one complex form a fight. Right now I think sprites are probably fine, though one or two that work well with drones would be cool to make the droneomancer more viable from the start, then able to get stronger with echos that already exist. Another thing I have kind of a problem with, and something I have a problem with in any rules system, is how ambiguous some of their abilities are, and not just in the fluff which is fine, but like Resonance Veil; that power gives literally no concrete rule on what it does, just that it does "something" which leaves it to GMs for it to either be busted as hell or totally worthless. Since it says illusion in the description then it's possible to take it that whatever is thought to be happening doesn't actually happen, but that still leaves out what it does; what has happened in the matrix? Can it replicate matrix actions, or does it just look like something is happening. Right now I'm running it in my game under the assumption if it goes through, then the device believes say you have your mark on it or it on you, that kind of stuff, but it's still somewhat oddly worded.

Something I actually just thought of while looking up Resonance Veil and seeing Tattletale, which isn't all that useful, would maybe be an upgraded version that maybe requires submergence to do, is one that lets the TM give someone an OS when they otherwise wouldn't; obviously not a host, but like giving the security spider or a g-man an OS then forcing convergence on them would be a neat, subversive kind of ability for them, and would make OS more relevant to the players as something other than a thing they don't want, and know most opponents won't ever have to worry about depending on the game.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Not of this Worl...
post Jun 6 2015, 08:59 PM
Post #65


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 284
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle Metroplex
Member No.: 217



QUOTE (Ren @ May 27 2015, 06:11 PM) *
What I'm looking for is all the feedback and suggestions you have on Technomancers. Positive, negative, neutral, personal attacks on devs and their writing, whatever you want. Maybe not that last one, but you get the idea. Tell me what works, what doesn't, what you miss, what you want gone, and I'll go through all of this and keep it in mind as I'm developing this book.


As a GM who liked Otaku in 3rd but my players ahardly touch TMs in 5th i have a couple easy ones.

1st more Techno and less Mancy. They are too magical and do not exhibit enough technological ffluff. There should be mystery for sure, butinstead its more every day technosorcery.

2nd TMs need to clearly excel at something and also clearly be wimps at something. 3rd editionn Otaku had a nice boost to metal attributes and penalty to physical ones. they shied away from all thing physcal but excelled at the Matrix. TMs are too similar in power and ability to Deckers. Please increase the contrasts.

That is it. stick with those two general principles and they could be a lot more fun to have in a group at the play table.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bertramn
post Jun 8 2015, 02:26 PM
Post #66


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 264
Joined: 28-October 14
From: HH
Member No.: 190,938



QUOTE (Not of this World @ Jun 6 2015, 10:59 PM) *
As a GM who liked Otaku in 3rd but my players ahardly touch TMs in 5th i have a couple easy ones.

1st more Techno and less Mancy. They are too magical and do not exhibit enough technological ffluff. There should be mystery for sure, butinstead its more every day technosorcery.

2nd TMs need to clearly excel at something and also clearly be wimps at something. 3rd editionn Otaku had a nice boost to metal attributes and penalty to physical ones. they shied away from all thing physcal but excelled at the Matrix. TMs are too similar in power and ability to Deckers. Please increase the contrasts.

That is it. stick with those two general principles and they could be a lot more fun to have in a group at the play table.



I agree wholeheartedly.

About the origin of Technomancers I am not too sure. There is not really one way of explaining them that I prefer,
I guess it would be best to keep their origin, and how their abilities work, mysterious still.
It just leaves more to the imagination of the players and GMs. Mystery has been lacking a little in Shadowrun for a while.

If we go along the similar relation between a Sammy and an Adept, a Technomancer should have a lot of abilities which a Decker CANNOT have.
This could be reasoned in the Matrix systems not knowing how to react to TMs, giving them unique approaches to many situations.
Having their abilities just be copies/equivalents of the abilities and possibilities of Deckers is boring imho.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Draco18s
post Jun 8 2015, 08:06 PM
Post #67


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,289
Joined: 2-October 08
Member No.: 16,392



So. I realized something over the weekend, thinking about game mechanics, particularly those related to stealth games.
Part of this relates back to Cogmind and some of the blog entries talking about information warfare and stealth.

And I finally made the connection:

A hacker being able to load up every program and hit the matrix with whatever he will and might need means that he makes no decisions about how to approach attacking a target: Stealthed until seen, then attacking whatever spots you, remaining behind stealth. Repeat.

So we have the following meta:
1) Stealth to the max, all the time, every time
2) Exploit to the max, all the time, every time
3) Spoof, edit, data search, analyze, etc. decent
4) Attack, armor, data bomb, etc. ignored (but still present; e.g. rating 3ish)

You end up with this. That is: You have all of the stealth capabilities of a ninja, all of the defensive abilities of a brick wall, and all of the offensive capabilities of a nuke (where money can be afforded) without any downsides (mechanics not withstanding: just because the roll came out bad doesn't mean you were weak: you were still tromping around with Rating 8 programs).

And I know I'm probably going to get flamed for this, but...

Bring back program limits. If a hacker can only have so many loaded programs at once, and can switch between program loadouts with a complex? action ("Shit I was spotted, drop stealth and bring weapons and shields online!") then there's an opportunity for a Technomancer's threading ability to shine: He always has every possible action at his finger tips ready to go...but he can only do one at a time (with complex forms being the "active set" of tools he always has available). It lets the TM get spotted through his Stealth, take a shot at the IC, and "dive for cover" while he reconfigures his active set. The Hacker can't take that pot-shot, but will have more options available to switch to.

Fading also needs to change. I'd personally put it as some future penalty, e.g. "You get the complex form now, but in 5 minutes you take 2 stun" kind of thing instead of an immediate penalty. More like adrenaline pumps, mechanically, than spells. Spell drain is clearly intended for "small benefits all day, orbial nukes once...at a cost" while Threading feels like something that needs to happen frequently, but not all the time. More like a "get out of jail free" card: spend it now, take a penalty later. And the more you spend, the bigger and sooner those penalties come, so you'd best get going while the going's easy.

(Also the biofeedback nature of matrix damage on the TM is bollocks. Hackers get programs and a buffer and a program to heal that damage, Technos take it immediately, don't get the "biofeedback resitance" roll on it,* and it hurts their meat parts).

*Nope sorry, that's only on actual biofeedback. From Black IC. The special attack. Matrix damage that hurts your meatbrain doesn't count!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sendaz
post Jun 8 2015, 10:20 PM
Post #68


Runner
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,039
Joined: 23-March 05
From: The heart of Rywfol Emwolb Industries
Member No.: 7,216



QUOTE (Draco18s @ Jun 8 2015, 03:06 PM) *
And I know I'm probably going to get flamed for this, but...

Bring back program limits. If a hacker can only have so many loaded programs at once, and can switch between program loadouts with a complex? action ("Shit I was spotted, drop stealth and bring weapons and shields online!") then there's an opportunity for a Technomancer's threading ability to shine: He always has every possible action at his finger tips ready to go...but he can only do one at a time (with complex forms being the "active set" of tools he always has available). It lets the TM get spotted through his Stealth, take a shot at the IC, and "dive for cover" while he reconfigures his active set. The Hacker can't take that pot-shot, but will have more options available to switch to.
It is a valid idea, making them change load outs is half the fun.

QUOTE
Fading also needs to change. I'd personally put it as some future penalty, e.g. "You get the complex form now, but in 5 minutes you take 2 stun" kind of thing instead of an immediate penalty. More like adrenaline pumps, mechanically, than spells. Spell drain is clearly intended for "small benefits all day, orbial nukes once...at a cost" while Threading feels like something that needs to happen frequently, but not all the time. More like a "get out of jail free" card: spend it now, take a penalty later. And the more you spend, the bigger and sooner those penalties come, so you'd best get going while the going's easy.

(Also the biofeedback nature of matrix damage on the TM is bollocks. Hackers get programs and a buffer and a program to heal that damage, Technos take it immediately, don't get the "biofeedback resitance" roll on it,* and it hurts their meat parts).

*Nope sorry, that's only on actual biofeedback. From Black IC. The special attack. Matrix damage that hurts your meatbrain doesn't count!

Fading does need tweaking, but was more thinking about adjusting the amount of damage versus delaying it, maybe knocking a few points off drain values.

However, we could lift a page from how when you perform an Attack or Sleaze action your OS increases by the number of hits, so that a TM facing Fading still resists with WIL + RES but would not take actual damage, rather increases OS by the final amount taken?
Again this would only apply to Fading. Dumpshock/biofeedback and such still do their usual bit to the body.
Am sure someone could spin a tale of how when they draw on connection to the Matrix ripples it also leaves ripples that GOD and Co. eventually pick up on....

Get in a big fight with both attacks and fading bouncing up the OS, one could get kicked out at an inopportune time.

This would give your TM a bit bigger 'drain pool' to work from though one would have to consider a few other points one of them being whether to allow Cleaner to work on OS generated by Fading or not, as their magical counterparts can not normally heal Drain via magic.
likewise the issue of sprites since there is stun vs physical fading depending on level....maybe Fading as OS normal for Res and under, if Sprite is over your RES its double the Fading based OS generated.

So it is not perfect by any stretch, but might serve as a base idea to toy with.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shadowrenamon
post Jun 8 2015, 10:41 PM
Post #69


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 47
Joined: 31-May 15
Member No.: 194,459



QUOTE (Sendaz @ Jun 8 2015, 02:20 PM) *
Fading does need tweaking, but was more thinking about adjusting the amount of damage versus delaying it, maybe knocking a few points off drain values.

However, we could lift a page from how when you perform an Attack or Sleaze action your OS increases by the number of hits, so that a TM facing Fading still resists with WIL + RES but would not take actual damage, rather increases OS by the final amount taken?
Again this would only apply to Fading. Dumpshock/biofeedback and such still do their usual bit to the body.
Am sure someone could spin a tale of how when they draw on connection to the Matrix ripples it also leaves ripples that GOD and Co. eventually pick up on....

Get in a big fight with both attacks and fading bouncing up the OS, one could get kicked out at an inopportune time.

This would give your TM a bit bigger 'drain pool' to work from though one would have to consider a few other points one of them being whether to allow Cleaner to work on OS generated by Fading or not, as their magical counterparts can not normally heal Drain via magic.
So it is not perfect but might serve as a base idea to toy with.


I'd say making Fade into your OS would take away another niche that TMs fill, and remove some of their flavor in the process. Right now the big mechanical benefit to a lot of what TMs do outside of traditional hacking is that it doesn't raise their OS, and as long as they don't perform illegal Matrix actions, can more or less use CFs and sprites as they wish, and then Static Veil themselves when they have to start hacking. The other problem there is that say Fade is now an OS thing, and especially if Cleaner wouldn't affect these points, the only way to remove them is to reboot your living persona. And while a decker might have the ware and extra skills to handle a fight in meat space, a TM relies on that matrix connection to be effective, and can't really take ware to compensate for their low physical stats, leaving you with a wimpy bit of dead weight until they can boot back up again. I feel the best way to fix Fade is to give options at both character creation in the form of qualities, and later on as echos, that can either increase your dice, or lessen what damage you do take, along with any new complex forms having much more reasonable Fade values.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Draco18s
post Jun 9 2015, 04:35 AM
Post #70


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,289
Joined: 2-October 08
Member No.: 16,392



QUOTE (Sendaz @ Jun 8 2015, 06:20 PM) *
Fading does need tweaking, but was more thinking about adjusting the amount of damage versus delaying it, maybe knocking a few points off drain values.


Oh, the amount of damage needs to come down too, don't get me wrong.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sendaz
post Jun 9 2015, 06:13 AM
Post #71


Runner
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,039
Joined: 23-March 05
From: The heart of Rywfol Emwolb Industries
Member No.: 7,216



QUOTE (Shadowrenamon @ Jun 8 2015, 05:41 PM) *
I'd say making Fade into your OS would take away another niche that TMs fill, and remove some of their flavor in the process. Right now the big mechanical benefit to a lot of what TMs do outside of traditional hacking is that it doesn't raise their OS, and as long as they don't perform illegal Matrix actions, can more or less use CFs and sprites as they wish, and then Static Veil themselves when they have to start hacking. The other problem there is that say Fade is now an OS thing, and especially if Cleaner wouldn't affect these points, the only way to remove them is to reboot your living persona. And while a decker might have the ware and extra skills to handle a fight in meat space, a TM relies on that matrix connection to be effective, and can't really take ware to compensate for their low physical stats, leaving you with a wimpy bit of dead weight until they can boot back up again. I feel the best way to fix Fade is to give options at both character creation in the form of qualities, and later on as echos, that can either increase your dice, or lessen what damage you do take, along with any new complex forms having much more reasonable Fade values.

I agree as I first said they need ways to bring the damage down in the first place.

The Fading to OS option was just an alternate idea if they were not going that route and like you pointed out has a number of problems of it's own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shadowrenamon
post Jun 9 2015, 06:28 AM
Post #72


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 47
Joined: 31-May 15
Member No.: 194,459



QUOTE (Sendaz @ Jun 8 2015, 11:13 PM) *
I agree as I first said they need ways to bring the damage down in the first place.

The Fading to OS option was just an alternate idea if they were not going that route and like you pointed out has a number of problems of it's own.


Indeed, just a critique of my own there. We at least agree Fade values suck right now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Smash
post Jun 9 2015, 10:18 PM
Post #73


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 413
Joined: 20-September 10
Member No.: 19,058



QUOTE (Shadowrenamon @ Jun 9 2015, 04:28 PM) *
Indeed, just a critique of my own there. We at least agree Fade values suck right now.


Do they suck though because they actually have consequence? When compared to magicians that's definately the case. Right now most starting magicians can cast force 6-8 fireballs all day just about. To me this is the problem, not technomancers.

If I was going to play with the system I'd probably up all spells drains by about 2 and perhaps make technomancer abilities slightly less punishing and maybe slightly more effective.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shadowrenamon
post Jun 9 2015, 10:27 PM
Post #74


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 47
Joined: 31-May 15
Member No.: 194,459



QUOTE (Smash @ Jun 9 2015, 02:18 PM) *
Do they suck though because they actually have consequence? When compared to magicians that's definately the case. Right now most starting magicians can cast force 6-8 fireballs all day just about. To me this is the problem, not technomancers.

If I was going to play with the system I'd probably up all spells drains by about 2 and perhaps make technomancer abilities slightly less punishing and maybe slightly more effective.

Is there a reason why a mage shouldn't be able to throw fireballs like that? Because if so, then why not just play a gun bunny or a street sam, cause until you run into a spirit then you'll be took week as a mage to really do much then with those spells because you'll be destroying yourself almost every round for maybe the same amount of damage. Fade values don't suck because they have consequences, they suck because it heavily penalizes you for try to do the unique thing that archetype is supposed to be able to do, and instead would have to fall back on doing the same things a decker does, but that they will be actively worse at because they don't have the same versatility and buffs to those things that a decker does. So yes, Fade values need to come down or have a good way to increase your defenses against other than buying more Willpower or Resonance. It doesn't mean that using them shouldn't have a risk or consequence, but that right now the risk is almost not worth doing more than once, maybe twice if you're lucky.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jaid
post Jun 10 2015, 03:31 AM
Post #75


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,089
Joined: 4-October 05
Member No.: 7,813



note that the only part of the technomancer's toolbox that is considered even remotely viable (ie spamming sprites all over the place) is the one part that doesn't have fading values ~4 points higher than spellcasting values. and even when you focus hard on that thing, the technomancer is still not remotely as powerful as a mage.

never mind that the mage also has tools to be useful in meatspace, and contrary to what the devs believe, forcing gear to be on the matrix for no clear reason does not give the technomancer (or the hacker) a useful way to constribute in meatspace (on the other hand, all the other things that already were on the matrix could be worthwhile... i could care less if the hacker takes out some chump security guard's goggles. i want the bloody door that's keeping me from getting away from those security guards, and more importantly the HTR team that is on its way, to be open).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

6 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th August 2025 - 09:16 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.