Elementalist Question |
Elementalist Question |
May 27 2004, 06:50 AM
Post
#1
|
|||||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 125 Joined: 1-March 04 From: Gulf Coast Member No.: 6,111 |
SR3 page 160 says:
MitS page 17says:
OK, I'm confused. :dead: I checked the errata and the FAQ at FanPro and am still confused. Am I misreading this or do they contradict each other? A) You are misreading it and here is how to read it. B) Hey, it's an optional supplement and the rule was changed. C) Elementalist and Elemental Mage are NOT the same thing; therefore, there is no contradiction. D) Other??? Thanks in advance for the help! - theartthief |
||||
|
|||||
May 27 2004, 06:53 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 260 Joined: 20-March 04 From: That really good state. Yeah, you know the one... Member No.: 6,177 |
I believe that MITS takes precedent as it is the official magic book.
|
|
|
May 27 2004, 06:53 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Grand Master of Run-Fu Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 6,840 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Tir Tairngire Member No.: 178 |
C. Elementalists and elemental mages are *not* the same thing at all.
Specifically-- Elementalists are Priority-B aspected magicians, like sorcerers and conjurers, but closer to shamanists. Elemental mages are full hermetic mages who have a "specialization" that acts similarily to a shaman's totem bonus/disadvantage. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 01:27 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.