rattan stick and claymore, a question about the cannon companion |
rattan stick and claymore, a question about the cannon companion |
Jun 6 2004, 07:17 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 15 Joined: 15-March 04 Member No.: 6,162 |
Can anyone explain why a claymore is listed as a polearm ? Isn't it a really big, 2-handed sword or did I miss something ? Wouldn't it be an edged weapon instead ?
I am wondering what exactly *is* a rattan stick to do *serious* stun damage on unarmored targets. The description says its a light stick that weights very little. Isn't serious stun damage overrated then ? It seems quite a lot to me... thanks |
|
|
Jun 6 2004, 07:20 AM
Post
#2
|
|||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 171 Joined: 27-April 04 From: Everywhere, but nowhere. Member No.: 6,286 |
It's used in south east asian style captial punishment. Made of strong bamboo fibers or equivalent; useless against armor but will easily cut into bare skin. Micheal Fay had a run in with one. :| |
||
|
|||
Jun 6 2004, 07:29 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Manus Celer Dei Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,006 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
Rattan sticks are typically made out of rattan, not bamboo ;)
That being said, they're seriously nasty to get hit with. ~J |
|
|
Jun 6 2004, 07:53 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 132 Joined: 4-May 03 Member No.: 4,535 |
ive got a pair of the sticks from a filipino friend, incredibly light, even more incredibly hard, seems like they would hurt to get hit with 30-36" long id say, 2-3" in diam i think (bad with measurements)
|
|
|
Jun 6 2004, 08:04 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,028 Joined: 9-November 02 From: The Republic of Vermont Member No.: 3,581 |
Claymores are Scottish two-handed swords, typically around 5'-5.5' long, 4-5 pounds, with 20" or so of hilt, about the same of ricasso, and long, slightly angled quillions with distinctive quatrafoil ends. They're not actually pole arms, but they handle similarly enough that lumping them into the same skill isn't terribly unreasonable. It makes a lot more sense than the division between Edged and Clubs, anyway.
Rattan is a grass, much like bamboo, but with a solid, fibrous core. They make patio furniture out of it. The SCA uses it to simulate swords and suchlike, because the weight and balance can be made pretty close to that of steel weapons, it's softer and more flexible than hardwoods, and it "broomsticks" on failure rather than breaking and producing sharp jagged ends. Rattan sticks doing S or even M damage is completely, totally, utterly ridiculous. At fighter practice every week, I get hit repeatedly with rattan sticks wielded by large men who are very good at using them. Some of them are up to 7.5' long and wielded two-handed. I occasionally walk away with a bruise sufficiently painful that I'd be willing to call it L Stun, but more typically it's nothing more than a minor bruise or two that I don't even notice unless I'm looking for them. While I do have the benefit of armor, I simply don't, by any reasonable standard, have the Body dice to soak M blows that consistently... and even that's assuming that my opponent didn't manage to stage it up at all. And I have been hit in spots where I have no armor at all on a number of occasions... it's painful, but not seriously damaging. |
|
|
Jun 6 2004, 08:08 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Grand Master of Run-Fu Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 6,840 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Tir Tairngire Member No.: 178 |
Claymore gets listed as a polearm because it's a big bladed two-handed weapon. Edged weapons would get a bit too powerful if they could include such weapons.
Rattan sticks and balisong knives (AKA butterfly knives) are the tradtional weapons of Escrima, the Philipino martial art. It's highly effective-- Philipinos armed with rattan sticks and knives fought off Cortez, whose Conquistadors had plate mail and muskets. Later, they fought off the US Marines with those same sticks and knives. (True story-- why are US Marines called leathernecks? Because they all had to wear leather neck guards at all times in the Philipines; their throats were getting cut at a fearsome rate.) The sticks I'm familiar with are about 18 inches long and maybe an inch across. What Slamm-O's describing sounds more like training sticks-- those are wider and heavier, sometimes filled with lead. People train with the heavier sticks, so when they use their real ones, they can really make them fly. The Escrima sticks are different than the rattan weapons John is describing, since they rely on speed and explosiveness instead of blunt force trauma. Yes, rattan sticks might not sound like much. But remember, those sticks have beaten off some of the strongest fighting forces the world had to offer. |
|
|
Jun 6 2004, 08:09 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 511 Joined: 30-May 03 From: Tulsa, OK Member No.: 4,652 |
Perhaps the SR designers were thinking of the solid wood swords used in practice of certain Japanese sword diciplines and such, instead of rattan.
[edit] Ahh, bokken, that's the name of them. A quick google search so you guys can see what I'm referring to if you're not entirely sure http://www.karatedepot.com/wp-ke-06.html |
|
|
Jun 6 2004, 08:24 AM
Post
#8
|
|||||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 214 Joined: 8-June 03 Member No.: 4,696 |
|
||||
|
|||||
Jun 6 2004, 08:59 AM
Post
#9
|
|||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 236 Joined: 14-March 04 From: Cal Poly: SLO Member No.: 6,155 |
Actually, the length depends on who it was made for. A correct claymore is measured the same way a rafting paddle is, you put the base on the ground and the tip comes to your chin. Not that it really matters, but just wanted to clarify a bit. |
||
|
|||
Jun 6 2004, 01:22 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Canon Companion Group: Members Posts: 8,021 Joined: 2-March 03 From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG Member No.: 4,187 |
Rattan sticks are very dangerous. They are used in the modern version of flogging here in Singapore. The prison docter is on standby every time a prisoner is scheduled to be caned, and the prisoner is, at most, only caned once every week until the sentence is carried out fully. I have heard stories of people simply being unable to control their bowels after being caned with a ratten stick, though i've never seen it myself.
|
|
|
Jun 6 2004, 02:48 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 614 Joined: 17-June 03 From: A safehouse about to be compromised by ninjas Member No.: 4,754 |
One thing Ive learned about hand to hand combat is that you might get hit, with fists or nunchaku or whatever, and it hurts but you can walk away. But if the guy you were fighting really *wanted* to permanently hurt you, the damage would accure fast. Ive been hit by wooden poles, fists, kicks, elbows etc and worst I ever got was the wind knocked outta me or a bruise. But at full go these are the same moves that break concrete, break bones, and can kill due to collapsed windpipes etc. Rattan sticks doing serious, on par with being hit by a shotgun, might be a bit much, but Id certainly class them above Light. And perhaps against someone without armor (naked, since most SRs wear armored clothing) maybe they are that dangerous. Its one of the things Ive not been hit with =)
|
|
|
Jun 6 2004, 03:11 PM
Post
#12
|
|||
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,685 Joined: 17-August 02 Member No.: 3,123 |
You don't just have the benefit of armor, you've got double the benefit of armor. You don't just have Body dice, you've got Body dice and Combat Pool. And if you find that your bruises frequently go unnoticed, I think you've got more Body than you give yourself credit for. |
||
|
|||
Jun 6 2004, 03:17 PM
Post
#13
|
|||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 282 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 197 |
I was reading Cryptonomicon, by Neal Stephenson, and he mentioned something about the .45 round coming into common use by soldiers in WWII solely because nothing smaller would stop the damn Philipinos. Struck me as funny at the time. I can't remember if that passage was written from the author's POV or a character. |
||
|
|||
Jun 6 2004, 03:39 PM
Post
#14
|
|||||
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,065 Joined: 16-January 03 From: Fayetteville, NC Member No.: 3,916 |
I'm sure someone will post a more historical reference, but the Filipinos used to wrap their bellies in gauze, keeping the body intact long enough for the nut with the knife to reach an officer and stab him to death. The .45 was introduced as being powerful enough to cause enough damage that the gauze trick was no longer (as) effective. -Siege |
||||
|
|||||
Jun 6 2004, 04:14 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,598 Joined: 15-March 03 From: Hong Kong Member No.: 4,253 |
There is (was?) a psycological disorder 'amok' that was native to the Philippines, and sort of murderous fury some what similar to the European 'breserk' but with different social triggers (iirc shame and or anger, high temperature (more prevalent during hot months), and usually triggered by a 'minor insult'...). Usually an period of brooding, then (with the 'trigger condition') an extremly violent outburst, sometimes followed by difficulty in remembering the details of the outburst. During the occupation of the Philippines, I'd imagine that 'minor insults' were pretty easy to come by...
Legend has it that amok Filipinos could have an entire revolver (the 36 caliber revolver in use as sidearm before the adocption of the 1911) emptied into them and still have enough oomph left to kill a few people... |
|
|
Jun 6 2004, 04:36 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 153 Joined: 1-April 04 Member No.: 6,211 |
I also think the making rattan sticks do 10S damage is a way to reflect the "skill" associated with the use of the sticks in the rules. That's also my explination for why a katana does more damage than other swords according to the rules. I'm a katana-phile, I love them, own them, practice with them, go to class about them, and I simply can't understand why they would increase the damage compared to other, similar weapons.
But that's ok. Last night, in preperation for my Shadowrun: St. Louis game, my rigger made a Eurocar Westwind that for short sprints can do over 500 mph. I've heard about the weird speed rules, only now do I get it. Back on Topic! |
|
|
Jun 6 2004, 07:03 PM
Post
#17
|
|||
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,065 Joined: 16-January 03 From: Fayetteville, NC Member No.: 3,916 |
Similar, in some respects, to the Japanese banzai or Rebel yell. It was a self-inspired emotional state that enabled the person to achieve said feats. In the case of the Moros, it was a religious frenzy. Insofar as I am aware, there has been no definitive study linking it to physiological disorder (per se). -Siege |
||
|
|||
Jun 6 2004, 07:32 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 409 Joined: 9-March 04 Member No.: 6,140 |
The Katana does more damage because it is sharper than European-style swords. A stroke from a katana could cut an armored samurai in half, cutting right through armor and bone. A western sword could cut through armor, and into flesh, but would generally halt once it reached bone. If you look in CC, the Ares monosword has the same power as a katana, for the same reason.
|
|
|
Jun 6 2004, 07:44 PM
Post
#19
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 749 Joined: 22-June 02 From: Parts Without Member No.: 2,897 |
I had a chance to get my hands on the German equivalent of a claymore (think 8.5 feet of steel with 6 feet of it sharp, and four or five widgets sticking out along the sides to prevent over-penetration). What's neat about them is that you often hold such swords both above and below the hand-guard. In effect, then, one totes such a blade around more like a spear than like a sword.
Remember, only trolls can swing such swords around in heroic, over-the-head manner. Mostly, claymores and other (exceptionally) long swords were used as anti-cavalry weapons, giving foot soldiers parity with mounted threats. In that role, such swords really do funciton as polearms (or can-openers, as I prefer to think of them), making the weapons grouping make sense. |
|
|
Jun 6 2004, 07:51 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 511 Joined: 30-May 03 From: Tulsa, OK Member No.: 4,652 |
Those german two-handed swords you're familiar with? Yes, they're more anti-cavalry. A Scottish Claymore however can be used quite effectively in hand-to-hand combat by a person of normal size who is trained in it's use.
It's one of those things I'm forever looking for, but years ago I was watching a history of the sword thing on the History Channel and they were talking with some guys who were taking surviving medieval swordsmanship manuals and recreating the fighting styles of the time. One of them dealt with the use of the claymore. They had some clips of the guys going through some fighting routines. It certainly wasn't traditional swordplay that was being used with the weapon, and it explains why someone would class it under Polarms/Staffs since it was more akin to that, but the fact remains it was a very effective style. I suppose those two-handed german swords could be used in a similar fashion, but as far as I'm aware they were developed for anti-cavalry support purposes. And those weren't even 8.5 feet long. I have a feeling you were looking at more of a ceremonial blade than anything else. Although I suppose they could have made something like that to be used on the battlefield, it seems a bit too large. |
|
|
Jun 6 2004, 07:58 PM
Post
#21
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 6,748 Joined: 5-July 02 Member No.: 2,935 |
The trick with using a giant can-opener (like a claymore, or any really big ass sword) is balance, reach and leverage. The blade gives you reach, so you can use it to hit people farther away. The blade gives you leverage, when you catch on something and need to rip. The blade can be heavy as fuck, which is why you need to be careful to balance it with your own weight, so you don't go ass-over-head every time you take a swing.
|
|
|
Jun 6 2004, 08:09 PM
Post
#22
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 53 Joined: 18-January 04 From: bethlehem, pennsylvania. not israel. we're not busy bulldozing any palestinian homesteads here. yet. Member No.: 5,989 |
Conner: I just recently saw this very show, within the few months or so. Its funny, becuase I have yet to be able to find anything else even remotely related to it since then, but I've been trying to explain it to a coworker. It was actually pretty interesting, as I saw it they did quite a few very clever things with their swords, but the biggest sticking point is I swear I remember watching them even use it revesed to treat the grip (nerds need to spring to point out the correct terminology here, cause I don't care) like a smashing hammer. Am I completely out of it, or was this part of the methods they used? |
|
|
Jun 6 2004, 09:16 PM
Post
#23
|
|||
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 6,640 Joined: 6-June 04 Member No.: 6,383 |
I'd much rather get clocked with a bokken than with rattan sticks. Have you ever been hit on the head by rattan sticks? They REALLY, REALLY **HURT**! S stun is entirely appropriate for representing a flurry of strikes from rattan sticks. |
||
|
|||
Jun 6 2004, 09:19 PM
Post
#24
|
|||
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 6,640 Joined: 6-June 04 Member No.: 6,383 |
Actually Japanese swords had a problem with breakage especially when the blade was pulled out of an armored torso. If you read "Heike Monogatari" sword breakage is a very common occurance. It requires a lot of skill to cut with a katana and not damage the katana itself if you're talking about slicing muscle and bone. I've literally never heard of an armored samurai being cut entirely in half by a katana, not even in the heroic legends of Heike Monogatari. Decapitated, yes. Cut in half? No. |
||
|
|||
Jun 6 2004, 09:57 PM
Post
#25
|
|||||
Mr. Quote-function Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 1,312 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Somewhere in Germany Member No.: 1,376 |
Of course it hurts ... But I would most definitely not chose a hit with a rattan stick over a hit with a bokken ... Or why do you think that Kendo practitioners wear that rather strong body armor and that helmet? A bokken can easily be used to kill people. Even good old Musashi did some of his recorded duels with bokken and killed his oppenents
I'd rather go with M ... but then again ... SR has several weapons and gimmicks that portray supernatural statistics and for a RPG that still has the "Fantasy"-touch that's perfectly fine with me ... |
||||
|
|||||
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 29th March 2024 - 06:08 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.