IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> New XM8 Assault Rifle
Cray74
post Aug 25 2004, 10:52 PM
Post #26


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,428
Joined: 9-June 02
Member No.: 2,860



QUOTE (hobgoblin)
or just go underbarrel & singel shot just like what you have on the current m4/m16. from what i understand the forgrip is removeable to reveal attatchment points for stuff like that...

Note that the grenade launcher of the OICW was so large that the assault rifle was the underslung item.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Aug 25 2004, 10:56 PM
Post #27


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



i know, and its had the magazine for the grenades in the stock fo the rifle itself.

i read your line about issueing the launcher to a single grunt or squad as issueing as a seperate weapon, i guess i read it wrongly...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FlakJacket
post Aug 25 2004, 11:49 PM
Post #28


King of the Hobos
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,117
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 127



On the design front, isn't this basically what people said when the first M-16's came out- that it looked too much like it should have Mattel stamped on it?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cray74
post Aug 25 2004, 11:52 PM
Post #29


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,428
Joined: 9-June 02
Member No.: 2,860



QUOTE (FlakJacket)
On the design front, isn't this basically what people said when the first M-16's came out- that it looked too much like it should have Mattel stamped on it?

Heh...I just read the M16 called the "Mighty Mattel" in a novel, "Isle in the Sea of Time," by SM Stirling.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BGMFH
post Aug 26 2004, 12:17 AM
Post #30


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 403
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Kill Em All
Member No.: 2,018



SOme of the early M-16s did have Mattel stamped on them...

not kidding, look it up.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Arethusa
post Aug 26 2004, 12:45 AM
Post #31


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,901
Joined: 19-June 03
Member No.: 4,775



Just to clarify, the OICW, eventually designated XM29, never made it out of the experimental stage. It was a bulky, useless cumbersome grenade launcher strapped on top of a short carbine. But here's the problem: the advantage of a short carbine is maneuverability— for which it must sacrifice range, stopping power, penetration, fragmentation, accuracy, etc. When you tie 10 fucking pounds of grenade launcher on top, you've pretty much wasted your time. This, of course, occurred to no one on the project, which happily spent loads of money trying to make the thing work.

Needless to say, it didn't, but the 20mm platform and airburst capable grenade launcher was, at least in the eyes of the military, viable. The weapon was split in two, and the short carbine, which was based on the G36, was used as the basis of the XM8 series. The grenade launcher is the XM25, and is essentially the grenade launcher of the OICW/XM29 ripped off and turned into a standalone weapon, carried in somewhat similar fashion to the M79 of old(e).

Do not, however, think that this means 40mm is out. There are still 40mm attachments for the XM8 series (not using the current RIS standard; there is a specific quick attach system for the XM8 which is supposedly superior and can be adapted to current rails if need be), and they will likely be carried in squads in addition to the presence of a dedicated grenadier.

And that's about enough of that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Aug 26 2004, 12:57 AM
Post #32


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



not to mention the Mk-19 automatic grenade launcher--more fun than a burning nunnery!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Arethusa
post Aug 26 2004, 01:13 AM
Post #33


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,901
Joined: 19-June 03
Member No.: 4,775



Well, the Mk19 is a different brand of 40mm altogether from what people generally know from the M79 and M203 type stuff.

But hey, fun is fun— and everbody knows fun rules.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Aug 26 2004, 01:24 AM
Post #34


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



bah, don't you read your SR? they're both grenade launchers, ergo they both use the same ammo !!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Aug 26 2004, 01:56 AM
Post #35


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



now who the hell needs a grenade launcher that can do fully automatic fire? if you need to reduce a area to is component molecules then you call those nice people in the rocket silos, thats what they are there for :silly:

but i guess the military never knew what the word overkill meant ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Arethusa
post Aug 26 2004, 02:23 AM
Post #36


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,901
Joined: 19-June 03
Member No.: 4,775



QUOTE (mfb)
bah, don't you read your SR? they're both grenade launchers, ergo they both use the same ammo !!

My brain is upside down!

QUOTE (hobgoblin)
now who the hell needs a grenade launcher that can do fully automatic fire? if you need to reduce a area to is component molecules then you call those nice people in the rocket silos, thats what they are there for :silly:

but i guess the military never knew what the word overkill meant ;)

That's not an uncommon reaction to the Mk19, but in reality, when your back's against the wall, the Mk19 really does prove itself in terms of heavy suppression and support. The full auto isn't there to hose so much as provide quick follow up and allow multiple targets to be engaged effectively— and when things go wrong, I don't think I'd complain.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Crusher Bob
post Aug 26 2004, 02:32 AM
Post #37


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,598
Joined: 15-March 03
From: Hong Kong
Member No.: 4,253



The Mk19 has a bit more oomph that a M2 but you can still mount it on light vehicles. The next step up is really light cannon, but you need a much heavier platform for that. You can stick a Mk19 on top of a Humvee and get fire support out to about 1 mile
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Aug 26 2004, 02:42 AM
Post #38


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



overkill is the word of the day when the bad guys come at you in waves. it's also handy to be able to arc your fire over an obstruction.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mmu1
post Aug 26 2004, 03:04 AM
Post #39


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,070
Joined: 7-February 04
From: NYC
Member No.: 6,058



I think it'd look allright in black if they just did something about that stupid stock that really does look like something belonging on a plastic Star Trek prop...

Of course, why they couldn't just use the damn G36 and rename it is beyond me. Abyone with a clue knows it's a slightly re-designed G36 anyway, and everyone else will never know or care.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Arethusa
post Aug 26 2004, 03:31 AM
Post #40


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,901
Joined: 19-June 03
Member No.: 4,775



The XM8 is not a G36. It is a development of the adapted short carbine portion of the OICW/XM29, which was itself an adaptation of the G36. They are related, but they are not the same gun.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bossemanden
post Aug 26 2004, 04:15 AM
Post #41


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 52
Joined: 3-August 04
Member No.: 6,535



"• It's more versatile than the old M-16 rifle it will replace and should fire thousands of rounds before jamming, rather than the few hundred shots before the M-16 typically jams."

This could mean two different things:

1) The XM8 should be able to fire several thousand rounds continuously before jamming.

2) Each shot fired has a 1/"several thousands" chance of causing a jam.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siege
post Aug 26 2004, 04:39 AM
Post #42


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,065
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Fayetteville, NC
Member No.: 3,916



A fairly thorough page on the XM-8

The Russian Gun Page with some interesting photos

-Siege
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Aug 26 2004, 04:46 AM
Post #43


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



or, it could mean the XM-8 can fire can fire several thousand rounds sporadically--eg, normal use--before jamming.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bossemanden
post Aug 26 2004, 04:49 AM
Post #44


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 52
Joined: 3-August 04
Member No.: 6,535



QUOTE (mfb)
or, it could mean the XM-8 can fire can fire several thousand rounds sporadically--eg, normal use--before jamming.

Essentially what I was trying to say with 2) :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Clyde
post Aug 26 2004, 04:59 AM
Post #45


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 458
Joined: 12-April 04
From: Lacey, Washington
Member No.: 6,237



The main change with the XM-8's operating system is a gas piston to operate the bolt, rather than blowing propellant gas straight through the tube and running the bolt with that like on the M-16. That keeps it from spewing carbon deposits all over the workings of the gun the way the M-16 does, which accounts for your improvement in reliability. Of course, that means that Heckler & Koch have just invented the AR-18 . . .
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MYST1C
post Aug 26 2004, 09:02 AM
Post #46


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 858
Joined: 25-August 03
From: Braunschweig, North German League, Allied German States
Member No.: 5,537



QUOTE (hobgoblin)
and why the fuck must the us military have its own design on that rifle? cant they just use the base G36?

You actually expect the mighty US Army (self-proclaimed "world's premier fighting force") to adopt a weapon other countries already use?
The US Army doesn't follow, instead it takes the lead (even if that means giving an existing weapon a new look and name and manufacturing it in the US so it can be called an American gun).

He who finds sarcasm in my post may keep it, print it and put it on his wall.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Aug 26 2004, 09:30 AM
Post #47


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



...right. it couldn't be an attempt to create a more advanced fighting force. the XM-8 might not be a stupendously badass leap in technology, but how about the XM-312--a fifty-cal machine gun that weighs, as i recall, only a hundred pounds with tripod. the US Army is attempting to undergo a massive shift in the next 10-20 years, changing out pretty much everything they use. so, no. they're not interested in what everyone else is using now--they want what everyone else will want to be using in twenty years.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Austere Emancipa...
post Aug 26 2004, 11:36 AM
Post #48


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,889
Joined: 3-August 03
From: A CPI rank 1 country
Member No.: 5,222



QUOTE (Clyde)
The main change with the XM-8's operating system is a gas piston to operate the bolt, rather than blowing propellant gas straight through the tube and running the bolt with that like on the M-16. That keeps it from spewing carbon deposits all over the workings of the gun the way the M-16 does, which accounts for your improvement in reliability. Of course, that means that Heckler & Koch have just invented the AR-18 . . .

As far as gas pistons go, the AK-47 is operated by one. However, several people do seem to believe that the designers of the G36 might have taken a good look at AR-18s when designing the internals. Regardless, saying that the G36 (or the XM8) is simply a re-invented AR-18 would be like saying that all ultra-modern sniper rifles that have a Mauser turn-bolt are re-invented Mauser G98s.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ed_209a
post Aug 26 2004, 04:12 PM
Post #49


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 944
Joined: 19-February 03
Member No.: 4,128



One downside to the Mk-19 is the long standoff range. The fuze won't function til it goes 20-30m, and it's a not a great idea to shoot anything inside 75m or so.

I have also heard reports that they can be unreliable once mother nature gets inside it.

Mechanically though, it's pretty cool. Ya gotta respect a weapon with a bolt that weighs more than most assault rifles. :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Aug 26 2004, 05:21 PM
Post #50


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



was not HK mixed into with the OICW project? whats stopping them from useing what they have learned in the G36 and then when the us military comes talking they take some of the internal design of the G36 and stuff it into the XM8?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

5 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 3rd May 2026 - 09:26 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.