![]() ![]() |
Aug 25 2004, 10:52 PM
Post
#26
|
|||
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,428 Joined: 9-June 02 Member No.: 2,860 |
Note that the grenade launcher of the OICW was so large that the assault rifle was the underslung item. |
||
|
|
|||
Aug 25 2004, 10:56 PM
Post
#27
|
|
|
panda! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,331 Joined: 8-March 02 From: north of central europe Member No.: 2,242 |
i know, and its had the magazine for the grenades in the stock fo the rifle itself.
i read your line about issueing the launcher to a single grunt or squad as issueing as a seperate weapon, i guess i read it wrongly... |
|
|
|
Aug 25 2004, 11:49 PM
Post
#28
|
|
|
King of the Hobos ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,117 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 127 |
On the design front, isn't this basically what people said when the first M-16's came out- that it looked too much like it should have Mattel stamped on it?
|
|
|
|
Aug 25 2004, 11:52 PM
Post
#29
|
|||
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,428 Joined: 9-June 02 Member No.: 2,860 |
Heh...I just read the M16 called the "Mighty Mattel" in a novel, "Isle in the Sea of Time," by SM Stirling. |
||
|
|
|||
Aug 26 2004, 12:17 AM
Post
#30
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 403 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Kill Em All Member No.: 2,018 |
SOme of the early M-16s did have Mattel stamped on them...
not kidding, look it up. |
|
|
|
Aug 26 2004, 12:45 AM
Post
#31
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,901 Joined: 19-June 03 Member No.: 4,775 |
Just to clarify, the OICW, eventually designated XM29, never made it out of the experimental stage. It was a bulky, useless cumbersome grenade launcher strapped on top of a short carbine. But here's the problem: the advantage of a short carbine is maneuverability— for which it must sacrifice range, stopping power, penetration, fragmentation, accuracy, etc. When you tie 10 fucking pounds of grenade launcher on top, you've pretty much wasted your time. This, of course, occurred to no one on the project, which happily spent loads of money trying to make the thing work.
Needless to say, it didn't, but the 20mm platform and airburst capable grenade launcher was, at least in the eyes of the military, viable. The weapon was split in two, and the short carbine, which was based on the G36, was used as the basis of the XM8 series. The grenade launcher is the XM25, and is essentially the grenade launcher of the OICW/XM29 ripped off and turned into a standalone weapon, carried in somewhat similar fashion to the M79 of old(e). Do not, however, think that this means 40mm is out. There are still 40mm attachments for the XM8 series (not using the current RIS standard; there is a specific quick attach system for the XM8 which is supposedly superior and can be adapted to current rails if need be), and they will likely be carried in squads in addition to the presence of a dedicated grenadier. And that's about enough of that. |
|
|
|
Aug 26 2004, 12:57 AM
Post
#32
|
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 11,410 Joined: 1-October 03 From: Pittsburgh Member No.: 5,670 |
not to mention the Mk-19 automatic grenade launcher--more fun than a burning nunnery!
|
|
|
|
Aug 26 2004, 01:13 AM
Post
#33
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,901 Joined: 19-June 03 Member No.: 4,775 |
Well, the Mk19 is a different brand of 40mm altogether from what people generally know from the M79 and M203 type stuff.
But hey, fun is fun— and everbody knows fun rules. |
|
|
|
Aug 26 2004, 01:24 AM
Post
#34
|
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 11,410 Joined: 1-October 03 From: Pittsburgh Member No.: 5,670 |
bah, don't you read your SR? they're both grenade launchers, ergo they both use the same ammo !!
|
|
|
|
Aug 26 2004, 01:56 AM
Post
#35
|
|
|
panda! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,331 Joined: 8-March 02 From: north of central europe Member No.: 2,242 |
now who the hell needs a grenade launcher that can do fully automatic fire? if you need to reduce a area to is component molecules then you call those nice people in the rocket silos, thats what they are there for :silly:
but i guess the military never knew what the word overkill meant ;) |
|
|
|
Aug 26 2004, 02:23 AM
Post
#36
|
|||||
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,901 Joined: 19-June 03 Member No.: 4,775 |
My brain is upside down!
That's not an uncommon reaction to the Mk19, but in reality, when your back's against the wall, the Mk19 really does prove itself in terms of heavy suppression and support. The full auto isn't there to hose so much as provide quick follow up and allow multiple targets to be engaged effectively— and when things go wrong, I don't think I'd complain. |
||||
|
|
|||||
Aug 26 2004, 02:32 AM
Post
#37
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,598 Joined: 15-March 03 From: Hong Kong Member No.: 4,253 |
The Mk19 has a bit more oomph that a M2 but you can still mount it on light vehicles. The next step up is really light cannon, but you need a much heavier platform for that. You can stick a Mk19 on top of a Humvee and get fire support out to about 1 mile
|
|
|
|
Aug 26 2004, 02:42 AM
Post
#38
|
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 11,410 Joined: 1-October 03 From: Pittsburgh Member No.: 5,670 |
overkill is the word of the day when the bad guys come at you in waves. it's also handy to be able to arc your fire over an obstruction.
|
|
|
|
Aug 26 2004, 03:04 AM
Post
#39
|
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,070 Joined: 7-February 04 From: NYC Member No.: 6,058 |
I think it'd look allright in black if they just did something about that stupid stock that really does look like something belonging on a plastic Star Trek prop...
Of course, why they couldn't just use the damn G36 and rename it is beyond me. Abyone with a clue knows it's a slightly re-designed G36 anyway, and everyone else will never know or care. |
|
|
|
Aug 26 2004, 03:31 AM
Post
#40
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,901 Joined: 19-June 03 Member No.: 4,775 |
The XM8 is not a G36. It is a development of the adapted short carbine portion of the OICW/XM29, which was itself an adaptation of the G36. They are related, but they are not the same gun.
|
|
|
|
Aug 26 2004, 04:15 AM
Post
#41
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 52 Joined: 3-August 04 Member No.: 6,535 |
"• It's more versatile than the old M-16 rifle it will replace and should fire thousands of rounds before jamming, rather than the few hundred shots before the M-16 typically jams."
This could mean two different things: 1) The XM8 should be able to fire several thousand rounds continuously before jamming. 2) Each shot fired has a 1/"several thousands" chance of causing a jam. |
|
|
|
Aug 26 2004, 04:39 AM
Post
#42
|
|
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,065 Joined: 16-January 03 From: Fayetteville, NC Member No.: 3,916 |
|
|
|
|
Aug 26 2004, 04:46 AM
Post
#43
|
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 11,410 Joined: 1-October 03 From: Pittsburgh Member No.: 5,670 |
or, it could mean the XM-8 can fire can fire several thousand rounds sporadically--eg, normal use--before jamming.
|
|
|
|
Aug 26 2004, 04:49 AM
Post
#44
|
|||
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 52 Joined: 3-August 04 Member No.: 6,535 |
Essentially what I was trying to say with 2) :) |
||
|
|
|||
Aug 26 2004, 04:59 AM
Post
#45
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 458 Joined: 12-April 04 From: Lacey, Washington Member No.: 6,237 |
The main change with the XM-8's operating system is a gas piston to operate the bolt, rather than blowing propellant gas straight through the tube and running the bolt with that like on the M-16. That keeps it from spewing carbon deposits all over the workings of the gun the way the M-16 does, which accounts for your improvement in reliability. Of course, that means that Heckler & Koch have just invented the AR-18 . . .
|
|
|
|
Aug 26 2004, 09:02 AM
Post
#46
|
|||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 858 Joined: 25-August 03 From: Braunschweig, North German League, Allied German States Member No.: 5,537 |
You actually expect the mighty US Army (self-proclaimed "world's premier fighting force") to adopt a weapon other countries already use? The US Army doesn't follow, instead it takes the lead (even if that means giving an existing weapon a new look and name and manufacturing it in the US so it can be called an American gun). He who finds sarcasm in my post may keep it, print it and put it on his wall. |
||
|
|
|||
Aug 26 2004, 09:30 AM
Post
#47
|
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 11,410 Joined: 1-October 03 From: Pittsburgh Member No.: 5,670 |
...right. it couldn't be an attempt to create a more advanced fighting force. the XM-8 might not be a stupendously badass leap in technology, but how about the XM-312--a fifty-cal machine gun that weighs, as i recall, only a hundred pounds with tripod. the US Army is attempting to undergo a massive shift in the next 10-20 years, changing out pretty much everything they use. so, no. they're not interested in what everyone else is using now--they want what everyone else will want to be using in twenty years.
|
|
|
|
Aug 26 2004, 11:36 AM
Post
#48
|
|||
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,889 Joined: 3-August 03 From: A CPI rank 1 country Member No.: 5,222 |
As far as gas pistons go, the AK-47 is operated by one. However, several people do seem to believe that the designers of the G36 might have taken a good look at AR-18s when designing the internals. Regardless, saying that the G36 (or the XM8) is simply a re-invented AR-18 would be like saying that all ultra-modern sniper rifles that have a Mauser turn-bolt are re-invented Mauser G98s. |
||
|
|
|||
Aug 26 2004, 04:12 PM
Post
#49
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 944 Joined: 19-February 03 Member No.: 4,128 |
One downside to the Mk-19 is the long standoff range. The fuze won't function til it goes 20-30m, and it's a not a great idea to shoot anything inside 75m or so.
I have also heard reports that they can be unreliable once mother nature gets inside it. Mechanically though, it's pretty cool. Ya gotta respect a weapon with a bolt that weighs more than most assault rifles. :D |
|
|
|
Aug 26 2004, 05:21 PM
Post
#50
|
|
|
panda! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,331 Joined: 8-March 02 From: north of central europe Member No.: 2,242 |
was not HK mixed into with the OICW project? whats stopping them from useing what they have learned in the G36 and then when the us military comes talking they take some of the internal design of the G36 and stuff it into the XM8?
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 3rd May 2026 - 09:26 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.