IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
k1tsune
post Sep 24 2004, 09:30 PM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 302
Joined: 20-October 03
Member No.: 5,740



Okay. I have a player who's played Cyberpunk pretty extensively, and she wants to know if there's a SR equivalent to (or a possibility to implement) Cyberpunk's airboarding... basically skateboarding on boards with hovercraft-ish abilities. I don't have Rigger 3, so... I don't know what can and can't be done. Any ideas?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ecclesiastes
post Sep 24 2004, 09:33 PM
Post #2


Jesus Freak
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,141
Joined: 23-April 04
From: Anaheim, CA
Member No.: 6,274



I once had a character that made a Vectored Thrust drone that was shaped like a surfboard. He'd strap in and ride it through the skies. I'll see if I can dig up the stats for it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Sep 24 2004, 09:40 PM
Post #3


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,012
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



You might be able to modify a microskimmer. I'll check in a few minutes.

If she calls herself Anarki, though, I'm going to rail her.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lilt
post Sep 24 2004, 09:46 PM
Post #4


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,965
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Edinburgh, Scotland
Member No.: 2,032



I suspect the most accurate thing (I say suspect because I'm not a CP expert) would be to make a simple small skimmer drone. All of the power plants can carry enough weight for a person (100KGs by shadowrun rules) and stay under their maximum load rating.

They're technically hovercraft so would us ethe hovercraft skill to pilot, but due to the unconventional piloting system (the top-heavy nature of a person riding on them) you may want to impose penalties, make a different skill to ride such-as the 'hoverboard' skill, or simply use the all-mighty athletics skill.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post Sep 24 2004, 10:26 PM
Post #5


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



Really, outside of cyberpunk a hoverboard is basically impossible to ride. It's essentially frictionless, it's impossible to turn because there's nothing to effect external force on it in that matter. It totally lacke sthe centripedal force necessary to turn.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kanada Ten
post Sep 24 2004, 10:38 PM
Post #6


Beetle Eater
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,797
Joined: 3-June 02
From: Oblivion City
Member No.: 2,826



The best method would be to use a dumb Ally Spirit with Three Dimentional Movement trapped in a board shape or wood homoculous (sp?). It would have been taught to respond to the rider in a manner similar to skateboarding. The other way with magic would be to use a specilized Levitaiton spell designed to accomidate such rider reactions quicikened or anchored to board.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
k1tsune
post Sep 24 2004, 11:09 PM
Post #7


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 302
Joined: 20-October 03
Member No.: 5,740



QUOTE (Kanada Ten)
The best method would be to use a dumb Ally Spirit with Three Dimentional Movement trapped in a board shape or wood homoculous (sp?). It would have been taught to respond to the rider in a manner similar to skateboarding. The other way with magic would be to use a specilized Levitaiton spell designed to accomidate such rider reactions quicikened or anchored to board.

Yeah, but this is an Otaku who's electroics-obsessed. She wouldn't even think of the magical methods.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
the_dunner
post Sep 25 2004, 01:11 AM
Post #8


Shooting Target
****

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 1,784
Joined: 28-July 04
From: Cleveland, OH
Member No.: 6,522



This one came out and was hyped for the 2000 Olympics:

http://www.airboard.com.au/

Apparently it remains commercially available, at least in Australia.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post Sep 25 2004, 02:28 AM
Post #9


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



That's absolutely nothing like a skateboard.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lilt
post Sep 25 2004, 03:15 AM
Post #10


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,965
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Edinburgh, Scotland
Member No.: 2,032



The skimmer could easily be designed to work like a skateboard. It could maybe even be all-mechanical. You have the basic leaning to turn, you can have the back of the board extend past the back of the back of the area that keeps the thing afloat, so you could initiate turns like that (don't know the technical term for the basic turn by lifting the front wheels off the ground and moving them to either side). You could turn with just a fan pointing backwards, it'd take some extra skill on the part of the user though. That could be compensated for if you added some intelligent engineering to the thing to help cancel side-travel.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RangerJoe
post Sep 25 2004, 03:43 PM
Post #11


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 749
Joined: 22-June 02
From: Parts Without
Member No.: 2,897



QUOTE
This one came out and was hyped for the 2000 Olympics:

http://www.airboard.com.au/

Apparently it remains commercially available, at least in Australia.


Krike, those things are loud. I'll just keep to my rigged Segway for now, I think.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blakkie
post Sep 25 2004, 04:18 PM
Post #12


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,718
Joined: 14-September 02
Member No.: 3,263



QUOTE (BitBasher)
Really, outside of cyberpunk a hoverboard is basically impossible to ride. It's essentially frictionless, it's impossible to turn because there's nothing to effect external force on it in that matter. It totally lacke sthe centripedal force necessary to turn.

That's where the internal force comes in. Changing the thrust vector from straight down to include a slight horizontal portion would move it. Extremely complicated to control movement? Yes. But so are modern fighter jets.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Czar Eggbert
post Sep 25 2004, 06:40 PM
Post #13


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 93
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 975



cranial RCD! Just control it with a thought. The hard part would be coming up with a way to do that and stay standing. It's kind of the same idea as rigging a bike. Then again I always thought of rigging as a techno-telepathic link with the veichial.

-The Eggman
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Synner
post Sep 25 2004, 07:04 PM
Post #14


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,314
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Lisbon, Cidade do Pecado
Member No.: 185



I once had a writeup for one of these, building on the a small surfboard-sized board, with a couple of stabilizing fins and mounting the equivalent of three microskimmer drones on the underside. Two for lift and one for forward thrust.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
k1tsune
post Sep 27 2004, 11:38 PM
Post #15


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 302
Joined: 20-October 03
Member No.: 5,740



QUOTE (Synner)
I once had a writeup for one of these, building on the a small surfboard-sized board, with a couple of stabilizing fins and mounting the equivalent of three microskimmer drones on the underside. Two for lift and one for forward thrust.

Could you help me at least figure out where to start in building one? I've never really messed with vehicles a lot. (relatively new GM)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kanada Ten
post Sep 27 2004, 11:43 PM
Post #16


Beetle Eater
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,797
Joined: 3-June 02
From: Oblivion City
Member No.: 2,826



Yeah, I'd say start with a Small Hovercraft chassis, hopefully R3 has a drone one to start with. Then, I'd use the Fuel Cell engine as they have the best of all the features. I'd also keep it Remote Controlled, but one could add Manual Controls. For sure add a Bucket Seat, but just call it a "Ergonomic Standing Pod" and then Improved Handling, Watertight Mod for Hovercrafts, and Speed maybe some Engine Customization.

Have the builder scour the Matrix and find some design plans and then do a bunch of runs with him or her getting the parts for it. Some B&R tests later...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tanka
post Sep 27 2004, 11:47 PM
Post #17


Chrome to the Core
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,152
Joined: 14-October 03
From: ::1
Member No.: 5,715



QUOTE (Czar Eggbert)
cranial RCD! Just control it with a thought. The hard part would be coming up with a way to do that and stay standing. It's kind of the same idea as rigging a bike. Then again I always thought of rigging as a techno-telepathic link with the veichial.

-The Eggman

Cyberfoot with DNI controller and a router to link the Cranial RCD to the foot.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
k1tsune
post Sep 27 2004, 11:48 PM
Post #18


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 302
Joined: 20-October 03
Member No.: 5,740



QUOTE (Kanada Ten)
Yeah, I'd say start with a Small Hovercraft chassis, hopefully R3 has a drone one to start with. Then, I'd use the Fuel Cell engine as they have the best of all the features. I'd also keep it Remote Controlled, but one could add Manual Controls. For sure add a Bucket Seat, but just call it a "Ergonomic Standing Pod" and then Improved Handling, Watertight Mod for Hovercrafts, and Speed maybe some Engine Customization.

Have the builder scour the Matrix and find some design plans and then do a bunch of runs with him or her getting the parts for it. Some B&R tests later...

In character, she's already sketching out plans. Thing is, the player's new to SR, and I'm not good enough with vehicles to be much help.

So.. er.. are any of these things not listed or different in Rigger 2? That's all I've got, at the moment. (Poor poor broke GM).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kanada Ten
post Sep 27 2004, 11:51 PM
Post #19


Beetle Eater
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,797
Joined: 3-June 02
From: Oblivion City
Member No.: 2,826



Well, hang on. I've got the Shop and that program uses R2.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zenmaxer
post Sep 27 2004, 11:58 PM
Post #20


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 241
Joined: 20-September 04
Member No.: 6,682



When you have it designed and finished, I'd like to see it. I think it could easily find a place in a lot of campaigns, particularly if we can think of some easier way to control it...
One thing that might work is allowing manual control using "power" lean steering... with the lean being interpreted by the drone and translated into the appropriate thrust shifts to actually execute the turn. Or maybe a wireless remote of some sort might work better, like a small ball held and rotated in the desired direction of movement.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
k1tsune
post Sep 28 2004, 12:03 AM
Post #21


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 302
Joined: 20-October 03
Member No.: 5,740



If only there were a way for it to be controlled like a Segway or sommat...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kanada Ten
post Sep 28 2004, 12:09 AM
Post #22


Beetle Eater
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,797
Joined: 3-June 02
From: Oblivion City
Member No.: 2,826



Airboard, Small (Gas)

Handling 2/2 (4/4 with rider)
Speed 180
Accel 19
Body/Armor 1/0
Sig 6
Autonav/Pilot -/1
Sensor 1
Cargo -
Load 300

Seating - Ergonomic Standing Pad
Setup/Breakdown 0
Entry Open
Landing/Takeoff N/A
Fuel Gasoline ( 25 liters )
Economy 0.5 km/liter

DP Cost 562
Cost 16578.9992630482 ¥

Skimmer, Small Reference (Rigger 2)

Features
Bucket Seats (Level 0)*
Hovercraft Water Seals (Level 0)
Handling Improvement (- 1)
Handling Improvement (OffRoad) (- 1)
Load Increase (+ 29)
Acceleration Increase (+ 14)
Speed Increase (+ 90)

--

The problem with the small Skimmer is that it has no CF and no capacity for CF. I could do the Large (closer to motorcycle size) and add Gyroscopic Stabilizers which would eliminate the with rider penalty. In theory you could remove the Remote Control interface, Sensor, and Rigger Adaptation from the Skimmer and add Manual Controls instead, which would also eliminated the +2 Handling.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Sep 28 2004, 12:17 AM
Post #23


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,012
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Otakuboard Basic

Chassis: Medium Skimmer (Markup 1.00)

Power Plant: Electric Fuel Cell

Final Cost: ¥37,700

Hand. 2, Speed 75, Accel 6, Body 2, Armor , Sig 6, Auto , Pilot 1, Sensor 1, Cargo 3, Load 300, Seating 1, Entry , Fuel EC (120 PF), Econ .4 Km/PF

Remote-Control Interface, Rigger Adaptation

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kanada Ten
post Sep 28 2004, 12:18 AM
Post #24


Beetle Eater
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,797
Joined: 3-June 02
From: Oblivion City
Member No.: 2,826



Airboard, Civilian (Electric)

Handling 3/3
Speed 90
Accel 10
Body/Armor 1/0
Sig 7
Autonav/Pilot -/1
Sensor 1
Cargo -
Load 295
Seating Ergonomic Standing Pad
Setup/Breakdown 0
Entry Open
Fuel Electric ( 50 PF )
Economy 0.4 km/PF

DP Cost 296
Cost 7400 ¥

Skimmer, Small Reference (Rigger 2)

Features
Acceleration Increase (Level 6)
Bucket Seats (Level 0)
Load Increase (Level 29)

--

This is the off the shelf model from retail outlets around the Matrix.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zenmaxer
post Sep 28 2004, 12:18 AM
Post #25


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 241
Joined: 20-September 04
Member No.: 6,682



blow it, nevermind. I'll work up a military\shadowtech version later.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th July 2025 - 01:21 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.