![]() ![]() |
Oct 9 2004, 07:50 PM
Post
#1
|
|||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 807 Joined: 9-October 04 Member No.: 6,741 |
Please humor me in this. I know I am new on here and to the game. One thing I've been wondering about is why the Slivergun is considered so bad. It uses Flechette rounds, which come with so many disadvantages the gun is nowhere near as good as it seems. I found out how badly it can fare during a run where things went very badly. From page 116 of the 3rd Edition rulebook (latest printing):
Considering later on it also states the ammo is pretty much useless against just about anything with armor and Dermal Plating negates the damage increase, I would say this ammo is pretty much a disadvantage against anyone smart enough to wear armor. Oh, how I pity the poor wageslaves and innocent bystanders. Considering the problems of the ammo, I have no problem with the capacity. After all, a person is going to need more bullets to have the same chance of being effective with this weapon. Even a leather jacket can pose a challenge against this. But what about the built-in silencer? Or the burst-fire option? Well, considering how pistols can only have one barrel-mounted option, I would count the silencer for that option. That means anyone wanting to keep the ability to hide the weapon can't do much about the recoil of the burst-fire option. If they want to add a Gas Vent, I would say to them they lose the silencer and one or two points of concealability. Suddenly not quite that attractive anymore. Shock pads are useless for this, as the weapon is not designed to accept them. Also true of gyro stabilization. My own experience with it tells me a person needs to put more bullets into the air with the Slivergun to have a chance of success overall when compared to a normal weapon. The burst-fire option is almost a requirement to make it worthwhile. Can the concealability be gotten high, even with the Gas Vent? Yes. With the right holster and armor, I can get this sucker up to a rating of 9 in the "hide me" department. But why waste money doing that to this gun when I can pull the same thing with an unmodified Predator and get it up to a concealability of 10? After all, the Predator doesn't suffer half of the drawbacks using its normal ammunition, meaning less bullets overall when compared to the Slivergun, and spare clips for it are lighter to carry, meaning I can have more bullets on me when I need them. Still, perhaps the total package is too much for the weapon. But I cannot see how and would appreciate some enlightenment. |
||
|
|
|||
Oct 9 2004, 08:09 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 126 Joined: 11-September 04 From: French Runner Member No.: 6,652 |
You are wondering if there is any advantage in packing a Slivergun, aren't you? (Being a French-speaking French :D , I wanted to be sure)
As far as I'm concerned, I think a Slivergunn is not such a crappy choice: against armored targets, it is exactly the same as a good old heavy pistol ( Predator for example) since you either take Ballistic Armor or double Impact (which is slightly better on a few occasions:armor jacket, vest w/plates and of course security armor). Otherwise you get the flechette boost to 9S, which makes it the perfect critter killer (try that on a barghest or a pack of ghouls). I don't think the high ammo capacity to be so uninteresting...30 shots is something that can save your life, especially in a weapon with such a Dissimulation factor (including the silencer). of course it lacks the versatility of a regular gun, since you can't use specific ammo (APDS, Ex-explo, gel...) according to the situation... |
|
|
|
Oct 9 2004, 08:20 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 403 Joined: 27-August 02 From: Scotland Member No.: 3,175 |
This topic just may have been discussed briefly once or twice before. ;) Try doing a search for it.
My personal opinion is that the AVS is pretty poor. Against armoured targets you're generally worse off - it's not very common for an armoured character to have less than half as much impact as balistic, although it is usually a bit less. Best case scenario against armoured targets is that it's just as effective as a regular heavy pistol, and that won't happen often. Against truely unarmoured targets (and that also means they can't have any dermal armour or you lose the flechette bonus) you are a bit better off with the AVS, since you get +1 damage level. But a) It's pretty rare that you'd be trying to kill someone who has no armour at all, and b) It's still quite easy to kill such a character with a regular heavy pistol anyway! AVS does burst fire as a simple action, which is it's best feature if you ask me. That gets the damage code up to 12S (or 12D against unarmoured people). The equivalent would be something like a Savalette Guardian, which also does 12S but requires a complex action. The problem is, as Ombre said, there's no versatility. I would only ever use regular ammo if I was desperate and couldn't get hold of any EX (avail 6 - not that hard) or APDS etc. Depends what you use it for. An AVS does have some applications, but generally a regular heavy pistol is better, and certainly more versatile. |
|
|
|
Oct 9 2004, 08:25 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Decker on the Threshold ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,922 Joined: 14-March 04 Member No.: 6,156 |
One occasion where the Slivergun packs a really good punch is with a Smartlink 2. Make a Called Shot (+2 Call -2 SL = +0 net mod) and bypass all armor, doing 12D with one Simple Action!
Note, btw, the silencer is unique in that it is integrated, and not sticking off the barrel, so by the letter of the rules you can add a gas vent or something else to it as well. Having shock pads or personalized grip is just icing. |
|
|
|
Oct 9 2004, 08:46 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 403 Joined: 27-August 02 From: Scotland Member No.: 3,175 |
This is true. However it only works if your target doesn't have any dermal armour, since I don't see how you can bypass that! Or at least I wouldn't rule you can.
Also, you could just use a regular heavy pistol with a SL-2 and EX rounds. You'd have much more chance of hitting, and would still do 14S if it was burst fire. It would take a complex action I suppose, which you could convert to Aim/Shoot with the AVS. But then aaah, APDS! |
|
|
|
Oct 9 2004, 09:57 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Avatar of Mediocrity ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 725 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Seattle, WA (err, UCAS) Member No.: 277 |
But wait, can you have sex with it?
|
|
|
|
Oct 9 2004, 10:00 PM
Post
#7
|
|||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 807 Joined: 9-October 04 Member No.: 6,741 |
Dwarves or really cybered Sammies might be able to. |
||
|
|
|||
Oct 9 2004, 10:29 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 27 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,703 |
the correct awnser is only if you dikote it.
|
|
|
|
Oct 10 2004, 12:02 AM
Post
#9
|
|||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 897 Joined: 26-February 02 From: TIME OUT Member No.: 1,989 |
and after you have a nice dinner on topic: the AVS sucks, and is unrealistic even by SR standards |
||
|
|
|||
Oct 10 2004, 12:11 AM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Canon Companion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,021 Joined: 2-March 03 From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG Member No.: 4,187 |
Come on, guys. Keep it on topic, this is a newbie asking for help. Not to listen to your/our in-jokes.
|
|
|
|
Oct 10 2004, 02:22 AM
Post
#11
|
|||
|
Immoral Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 |
Which wouldn't factor into the equation with a Called Shot to avoid armor. As case could be made for avoiding Dermal as well, as it doesn't cover 100% of the body and head...but I won't be doing that, as I hate Called Shots avoiding armor in an abstract combat system. Sabosect: Other than excelling in Critter-bashing, another place here the Viper really shines is in situations where concealability and subtlety are needed. It's a great weapon to sneak into a high-society party or Corporate enclave, where your target(s) would not be expected to wear large amounts of armor. I really don't see the downside of the Viper. A number of points have been raised already in this thread in its favor. Of course it's not always going to be the right tool for the job every time (to paraphrase DeNiro in Ronin), but then nothing ever is. |
||
|
|
|||
Oct 10 2004, 02:27 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 807 Joined: 9-October 04 Member No.: 6,741 |
What's comical is I was questioning how it may be overpowered. I got that idea from one topic I was reading. Instead, I get the answer I was suspecting: It is likely not powerful enough, but at times has more than enough power.
|
|
|
|
Oct 10 2004, 02:40 AM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 942 Joined: 13-May 04 Member No.: 6,323 |
You can't add a gas vent to it... the rules talk about mounts that are used up by included weapon options being used up, and thus unable to take other mounts. The best recoil comp you can get on it would be a personalized grip for -1, which is pretty poor for a burst fire weapon. It's great for highly skilled assassin types though... get close to your target, take a few turns aiming, then burst fire to bypass armour with your silenced conceal 6 weapon. Ouch.
JaronK |
|
|
|
Oct 10 2004, 02:43 AM
Post
#14
|
|||||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 807 Joined: 9-October 04 Member No.: 6,741 |
|
||||
|
|
|||||
Oct 10 2004, 02:46 AM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 942 Joined: 13-May 04 Member No.: 6,323 |
The rules don't seem to indicate you can remove built in modifications like silencers... they don't take up concealability (advantage) but they permanently take up the mount (disadvantage). I don't think you can pop off the silencer for a gas vent.
JaronK |
|
|
|
Oct 10 2004, 02:49 AM
Post
#16
|
|
|
Canon Companion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,021 Joined: 2-March 03 From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG Member No.: 4,187 |
You can do it, if and only if the FCU or the gas vent is equal or less than that of the silencer.
|
|
|
|
Oct 10 2004, 02:54 AM
Post
#17
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 807 Joined: 9-October 04 Member No.: 6,741 |
Just pointing out I had that in mind. And, from what the GM who approved it told me, you can pop out a silencer if you know what you are doing. One of my contacts did (but I had to pay extra for the weapon...)
|
|
|
|
Oct 10 2004, 03:00 AM
Post
#18
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 942 Joined: 13-May 04 Member No.: 6,323 |
Well, with access to a gunsmithing shop or facility, you might be able to do it. The FCU of a gas vent IV system is far greater than that of a silencer, but even with a smartlink 2 you can design the AVS with the gun design rules with .5 FCU to spare, without having to resort to the improved FCU option. But that would require some noticeable skill and tools, and would lower the concealability to 4, at which point a good burst fire shotgun would be a better option.
JaronK |
|
|
|
Oct 10 2004, 03:19 AM
Post
#19
|
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,116 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,449 |
The Ares Viper is not too overpowered, but it is still an extremely useful gun.
Disadvanages: > Uses flechette ammo only. Flechette ammo is superior against unarmored targets, who will rarely be encountered by shadowrunners. Against armored targets, it is usually slightly less effective (you use either the ballistic or double the impact rating against it, and impact armor tends to be low enough that double impact is not higher than ballistic as much as you might think). Flechette ammo is also expensive. Advantages: > Stealth. It has a built-in silencer/sound suppressor. It has a Concealability of 6 - which can be raised to 12 by using a concealable holster and a secure long coat. It lighter than most heavy pistols or machine pistols. > Powerful. Most of its stats resemble those of a light pistol, but it has the 9M damage code of a heavy pistol, and on top of that it has full burst-fire capability. Yes, the recoil compensation sucks, but that can be said of most silenced weapons. > High ammo capacity. 30 rounds is incredible for a pistol. The Viper is primarily a stealth weapon, meant for covert ops and dealings where weapons should be discreet and non-obvious. In that role, it is far better than a light pistol. It also makes a good gun for a back-up, or for just walking Seattle's mean streets. Honestly, it only lags behind the other heavy pistols against heavily armored foes. One area of controversy with the Ares Viper Slivergun is with the revised rules for called shots (which are already controvsial in and of themselves ;) ), which let you use a called shot to negate armor. With most called shots, you have to choose to either negate the armor or stage up the Damage code. But flechette ammo stages up its Damage code against unarmored opponents - so someone using a slivergun can always choose to negate armor, and winds up getting the Damage code increase, too, for hitting an unarmored part of the body. Add in the Smartlink II, which reduces the penalty for called shots, and suddenly that Ares Viper starts looking mighty appealing. Like Eyeless Blond said, 12D bursts. :love: The other area of controversy is not so much how powerful the Viper is, but how some people feel that it violates realism, and some of the generally accepted conventions of the game, in order to duplicate Molly's pistol from Neuromancer. Also, people new to the game trying to powergame often tend to pick the Viper, giving it a bit of a stigma among some of the more experienced gamers, who have had bad experiences with people using the Viper. |
|
|
|
Oct 10 2004, 04:19 AM
Post
#20
|
|||
|
Immoral Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 |
...and an Underbarrel Weight [-1], and of course Strength 5 [-1]. I believe Strength 9 gives [-2] and 13 gives [-3], but I might be misremembering. It happens at my age. ;) |
||
|
|
|||
Oct 10 2004, 04:42 AM
Post
#21
|
|
|
Decker on the Threshold ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,922 Joined: 14-March 04 Member No.: 6,156 |
...except an Underbarrel weight isn't allowed for a pistol, as it has no underbarrel (or, for that matter, overbarrel) mount. Of course this is completely absurd, but hey, what can you do?
|
|
|
|
Oct 10 2004, 04:58 AM
Post
#22
|
|
|
Immoral Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 |
Since an external Laser Sight can be mounted on a pistol in either under or over-barrel variety, as can an external Smartlink and Rangefinder, I find it strange that a weight could not be added in lieu of any or all of the above. :please:
|
|
|
|
Oct 10 2004, 06:04 AM
Post
#23
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 942 Joined: 13-May 04 Member No.: 6,323 |
Actually, you can't add any underbarrel accessories, so you can't have an underbarrel laser sight. Realistic? No. Balance issue I suppose. But you can have a top mount... rangefinders go well there.
And the strength thing is 6+ to get one point, and I think 12+ to get 2 points. So realistically, for most folks, two points (personalized grip and strength 6) is the best you can do... most trolls aren't the subtle types, and would prefer an Ares Alpha or something, so 12 strength isn't going to apply in most cases. JaronK |
|
|
|
Oct 10 2004, 06:12 AM
Post
#24
|
|
|
Decker on the Threshold ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,922 Joined: 14-March 04 Member No.: 6,156 |
Look again. :) Pg. 75 of CC, where they outline the types of mounts available for pistols. Notive the lack of any underbarrel mounts whatsoever, no matter what frame you use (although I was mistaken as to the lack of top mounts; most pistal types do have one.) I guess you could try mounting an underbarrel weight on a top mount, but I'm pretty sure that's illegal for certain common-sense reasons. :)
|
|
|
|
Oct 10 2004, 06:21 AM
Post
#25
|
|
|
Immoral Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 |
I never meant to imply that you could mount them according to the CC rules. Go back and read some of the text of existing guns in the game, where it describes stuff being mounted underbarrel on a pistol. I meant that there were already guns using this feature, so it makes no sense to disallow it as a general rule. I can see Hold Outs and Light Pistols possibly not being able to mount under-barrel accessories, but it just doesn't make sense for Heavy Pistols, when we can do the same right now. It isn't like it's some high-tech recoil reduction system like Raygun's ERASe, it's a weight on the end of your barrel.
Over-barrel weights do exist IRL, if I'm not mistaken. I'm sure one of our resident gun enthusiasts will correct me if I'm wrong. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10th June 2026 - 03:09 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.