IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

9 Pages V  « < 7 8 9 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Horrors
Kremlin KOA
post Nov 5 2004, 06:01 PM
Post #194


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,590
Joined: 11-September 04
Member No.: 6,650



given that city roads can take steel tracked cran es in the backk woods podunk part of the world where i live... I doubt that this thing will kill the bitumin.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stormdrake
post Nov 5 2004, 06:11 PM
Post #195


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 689
Joined: 16-September 03
From: Colorado
Member No.: 5,623



Ok back on topic. So acourding to shadows of europe all traces of Horrors have not been scrubbed from the game. After the death of the Big D I was under the impression that no more had been done with the Horrors and any connection between ED and SR had been cut. Did Fanpro change that after they bought the franchise or where the people I was talking to smoking something? Keep in mind I played SR I and am now coming back to SR III with very little exposure to SR II
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Req
post Nov 5 2004, 06:37 PM
Post #196


Avatar of Mediocrity
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 725
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle, WA (err, UCAS)
Member No.: 277



My impression is that the Dragonheart stuff has prevented the Scourge from happening for a long-ass time. That said, the ED connection is still apparent. Every SR book I've read recently has either an IE or a great dragon or someone making some comment about the Ancient Times, somewhere.

I think between Harlequin's Back and Dragonheart the ED connection is no longer the primary focus of the metaplot, but there's still plenty of it to be used if that's what you're into. Which I am. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Nov 5 2004, 08:19 PM
Post #197


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



QUOTE (Kremlin KOA @ Nov 5 2004, 01:01 PM)
given that city roads can take steel tracked cran es in the backk woods podunk part of the world where i live... I doubt that this thing will kill the bitumin.

Kenetic Energy is Mass*(1/2)Velocity^2. The genetic energy that a tracked vehicle dumps into a road is exactly 0, since the tracks have no vertical velocity relative to the road. Feet, on the other hand, would dump quite a bit of energy into the road with every step. But, shock absorbers and light-weight materials would reduce this.

Police mecha would probably be less intimidating that some other alternatives for dealing with mechanized armor, such as rocket launchers. If some wacko decides to take his heavy duty construction mech on a rampage, regular police won't have much chance against it. In such cases, an anthroform mech with a shock baton would be preferable to a tank, an armed helicopter, or cops with bazookas from both a PR and property damage standpoint. The trick is to not build the mech as a war machine, instead making it as light, agile, and friendly as possible. Against tanks and helicopters using AV rounds it would be all but useless, but it would be less likely to cause absurd amounts of damage when confornting rampaging civilian mecha.

WIth the proliferation of drones, I suspect that many police forces would have special vehicle units specifically to deal with criminal riggers and rampaging robots. For the most part, they would have riggers with the best equipment available to take control of criminal rigger networks. However, they'd probably have a variety of specialized drones to employ when option A doesn't work.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kremlin KOA
post Nov 6 2004, 01:35 AM
Post #198


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,590
Joined: 11-September 04
Member No.: 6,650



yeah but force exerted is mass on surface area... hence why vehicles that ARE too heavy for a road damage it (I've seen what a tank does to a cheap hot mix road)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Nov 6 2004, 07:38 AM
Post #199


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



QUOTE (Kremlin KOA @ Nov 5 2004, 08:35 PM)
yeah but force exerted is mass on surface area... hence why vehicles that ARE too heavy for a road damage it (I've seen what a tank does to a cheap hot mix road)

Your right. This also points out a flaw in my logic. I was assuming that the cow was a ball when I should have been assuming that it was a sled.

Because the walking motion is pendulum-like, the KE exerted against the ground lateraly, the same as with wheeled vehicles. It is only running, with uses a spring-like motion, which exerts considerable KE agaisnt the ground.

But, still differance is huge.

Take a two-legged, 5 metric ton walker with a footprint of 1 square meter per foot and a two-tracked 5-metic-ton tank with a footprint of 5 square meters per track.

The formula for force is mass*acceleration. In this case accelleration=Earth's gravity=9.8m/s^2

5,000kg*9.8m/s^2= 49,000 Newtons

This is the same for both machines. However, the formula for pressure is force/area.

The tank, with 10m^2 worth of track exerts a pressure of 4,900N/m^2 or 4,900 Pascals against the road surface.

The walker exerts a force of 24,500 Pascals when standing on both feet. However, when walking all force is focused on one foot, resulting in a total pressure of 49,000 Pascals, 10 times the pressure of the tank with the exact same weight. This become worse if the walker ties to run or jump.
I'm not going to try to claculate the force of a running walker, there are too many variables to assume. But, jumping walker would produce a pressure equal to mass*(gravity+acceleration) Assuming that it takes exactly 1 second for the jumper to leave the ground (A big assumption, it should be considerably less) and the height of the jump is 1 meter, the walker would exert 35,567 Pascals on the road surface.
Edit: The walker would land with 11,000 Jules of energy and again exert 35,567 Pascals on the road, assuming that decelleration takes 1 second. However, decelleration would probably be much shorter

Of course, weights and footprints in this example were purely arbitrary, but you get the idea. The footprint/mass ratio of a walker will always be smaller than the footprint/mass ratio of a tank and the walker will frequently half the seize of its footprint due to its very nature.
This doesn't invalidate the idea of a road worthy walker, it just means you have to keep the weight low compared to a tank. This can be done if you remember that civilian law enforcement rarely needs military-grade armored vehicles. A lightly armored and armored mech would work just as well.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kremlin KOA
post Nov 6 2004, 05:14 PM
Post #200


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,590
Joined: 11-September 04
Member No.: 6,650



true but two quick points
1 the walker can be four legged
2 the mass of a body 4 walker is 1.5 tons where a body 7 APC is 25tons or a body 6 heavy truck is 12 tons... there is a significant weight difference there and the APC at least is not supposed to damage bitumen.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moonstone Spider
post Nov 6 2004, 07:18 PM
Post #201


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 665
Joined: 20-November 03
Member No.: 5,834



Why not just give the Walker relatively large feet for it's size? I've seen the Mobile Propulsion Labs (A group dedicated to constructing a real life mecha) perform calculations showing a 4 Ton Mecha 20 feet tall (Granted this thing had no armor) with feet large enough to practically walk on quicksand, far lower ground pressure than human feet have. You don't have to use normal human proportions, just give the thing snoshoes and you're good to go through a guy's lawn without damage.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Toptomcat
post Nov 6 2004, 07:51 PM
Post #202


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 626
Joined: 1-March 04
Member No.: 6,112



QUOTE
" I was assuming that the cow was a ball when I should have been assuming that it was a sled."

Oh, you crazy Dumpshockers.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Nov 6 2004, 11:15 PM
Post #203


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,006
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



QUOTE (Moonstone Spider)
just give the thing snoshoes and you're good to go through a guy's lawn without damage.

But then you've got a giant snowshoe-sized area under which anything will get flattened, so you need a lot of clear space.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moonstone Spider
post Nov 7 2004, 08:15 PM
Post #204


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 665
Joined: 20-November 03
Member No.: 5,834



Yep, not like those 50 foot wide strips of pavement we need for cars.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Nov 7 2004, 10:13 PM
Post #205


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



QUOTE (Moonstone Spider @ Nov 7 2004, 03:15 PM)
Yep, not like those 50 foot wide strips of pavement we need for cars.

That's really the point. The only advantage that humanoid mecha have over cars is agility. A mech can go places where a can't. It can maneuver in tight spaces in a way that a car can't. Ideally, it can step over obstacles. Having giant feet kind of defeats this advantage, without which a mech is just an absurdly expensive, vulnerable, and slow car.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jeff Hauze
post Nov 9 2004, 05:17 PM
Post #206


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 8-March 02
Member No.: 2,267



QUOTE (Azrael)
Back in the day when these were the Deep Resonance forums, we had a thread going where a couple of the Earthdawn guys did some conversions for us.

Azrael, you're the best. This is BroJ the guy who started that project way back when. Somebody was just asking me if I still had the Word doc file from that project or the old saved threads. Unfortunately I had neither, but this will give them something. Thanks man.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

9 Pages V  « < 7 8 9 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th November 2024 - 12:41 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.