 Invisible to Cameras, But Not to the Naked Eye |
 Dec 19 2004, 03:18 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
King of the Hobos  Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,117 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 127  |
This has probably come up before and is fairly obvious to most people, but I don't usually deal with magicians so I just wanted to check. If you cast Invisibility on yourself at Force 1 you'd be invisible to all visual based mechanical or electronic devices, but people would only have to roll one success at a Willpower 2 test to see you and not notice the spell?
|
 |
 
|
Posts in this topic
FlakJacket Invisible to Cameras Dec 19 2004, 03:18 AM
Catsnightmare No, they would have to cast Improved Invisibility ... Dec 19 2004, 03:21 AM Fortune Invisibility, being Mana-based, has absolutely no ... Dec 19 2004, 03:22 AM FrostyNSO I think he/she may be asking if a force 1 invisabi... Dec 19 2004, 04:39 AM Fortune No, objects never get a resistance roll against sp... Dec 19 2004, 05:06 AM Modesitt The passage you're looking for is on page 192,... Dec 19 2004, 05:11 AM Fortune I know that passage is there, and have argued abou... Dec 19 2004, 05:47 AM Fortune As a note, I was under the impression that ORs onl... Dec 19 2004, 05:48 AM Modesitt Upon re-reading - Yeah. Chart only specifies up t... Dec 19 2004, 08:03 AM Fortune That's the one, thanks. (I hate that I can... Dec 19 2004, 08:10 AM GrinderTheTroll QUOTE (Fortune) That's the one, thanks. (I hat... Dec 20 2004, 06:33 PM TeOdio Invisibility is one that crops up a bit in my game... Jan 6 2005, 04:22 AM Kanada Ten QUOTE Improved Invisibility has no target. It is a... Jan 6 2005, 04:28 AM Panzergeist I don't think that passage applies to indirect... Jan 6 2005, 04:48 AM Kanada Ten If that were the case then the mana Invisibility c... Jan 6 2005, 04:55 AM GrinderTheTroll This line of thinking has helped me understand the... Jan 6 2005, 06:08 PM Tarantula QUOTE (GrinderTheTroll) In the case of a camera, s... Jan 6 2005, 06:13 PM Moon-Hawk I agree. The person looking at the output of the ... Jan 6 2005, 06:16 PM GrinderTheTroll Ah, so if I understand what you are both saying is... Jan 6 2005, 06:32 PM Moon-Hawk I totally agree with your revised statement. Jan 6 2005, 08:16 PM mfb this seems sensible to me. Jan 6 2005, 09:17 PM TeOdio Don't forget, however, you can record magical ... Jan 7 2005, 03:49 AM mfb that's not how Imp Invis works, though. if the... Jan 7 2005, 06:25 AM The White Dwarf This thread has shined some useful light on some o... Jan 7 2005, 09:20 AM OurTeam QUOTE (FlakJacket) ... but people would only have ... Jan 7 2005, 10:18 AM Kanada Ten Just as a note, all Indirect Illusions are resiste... Jan 7 2005, 02:47 PM Lindt Needless to say, this needs to be fixed for SR4...... Jan 7 2005, 03:32 PM Jrayjoker I concur, the difference is profound, and should b... Jan 7 2005, 03:46 PM Kanada Ten This topic has some of the more common - and uncom... Jan 7 2005, 04:03 PM Sandoval Smith QUOTE (Jrayjoker) I concur, the difference is prof... Jan 7 2005, 05:00 PM Kanada Ten QUOTE You see, I just don't get it when people... Jan 7 2005, 05:10 PM Jrayjoker That is more of what I was talking about...3M, not... Jan 7 2005, 05:14 PM Fortune That's still 4 successes over 2. With the Aver... Jan 7 2005, 05:34 PM Jrayjoker But who makes a mage with WP less than 5? And whic... Jan 7 2005, 05:42 PM Fortune Whether the character is optimized is not the poin... Jan 7 2005, 06:30 PM GrinderTheTroll Interesting enough, you could have a guard station... Jan 7 2005, 06:34 PM Lantzer Grinder, a cheaper tactic would be a closed door. ... Jan 7 2005, 07:01 PM GrinderTheTroll Ha! That settles it, doors in front of each c... Jan 7 2005, 07:36 PM Jrayjoker And not glass doors either, to easy to cast throug... Jan 7 2005, 08:06 PM mfb pshaw. that's not sinister, that's SOP in ... Jan 7 2005, 08:39 PM
BitBasher Additionally in secure areasyou could also go the ... Jan 7 2005, 10:39 PM  |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 13th June 2025 - 02:01 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.