Hurting my Players - Dumpshock Forums

Hurting my Players

Smiley View Member Profile	Jan 16 2005, 03:24 AM Post #26
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,102 Joined: 23-March 04 From: The Grizzly Grunion, in a VIP room. Member No.: 6,191	Meh, it could slow the bullet down a bit...

Sabosect View Member Profile	Jan 16 2005, 03:25 AM Post #27
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 807 Joined: 9-October 04 Member No.: 6,741	Not with the bullets I prefer to use on security armor... Edit: Of course, there is a reason my team prefers me to play a mage instead of a street sam. Apparently, I do less damage to large areas as a mage with rocket launchers and every spell in the book than as a street sam with standard equipment, a panther, and a few kilos of C12.

toturi View Member Profile	Jan 16 2005, 03:29 AM Post #28
Canon Companion Group: Members Posts: 8,021 Joined: 2-March 03 From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG Member No.: 4,187	Kinda like the MDC/SDC thing that RIFTS has got. Besides like many have pointed out, Called Shots to bypass armour really gets rid of all that armour fuss and by it works against all those pesky Military Armour.

Zeel De Mort View Member Profile	Jan 16 2005, 03:35 AM Post #29
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 403 Joined: 27-August 02 From: Scotland Member No.: 3,175	A called shot to bypass hardened armour doesn't make much sense to me. But then I wouldn't run it that they bypass armour in the first place.

Smiley View Member Profile	Jan 16 2005, 03:39 AM Post #30
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,102 Joined: 23-March 04 From: The Grizzly Grunion, in a VIP room. Member No.: 6,191	That rule is kinda wankatronic. If a guy is clad in head-to-toe armor, you can't really bypass it. If his head is sticking out, fine, groovy. Blow his teeth out the back of his neck. But the armor that's on the body part you're capping should still apply.

toturi View Member Profile	Jan 16 2005, 03:49 AM Post #31
Canon Companion Group: Members Posts: 8,021 Joined: 2-March 03 From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG Member No.: 4,187	By the wording in the Canon FAQ, you can bypass even the Armour spell and the built-in armour that critters have and it doesn't get anymore covered than that.

Smiley View Member Profile	Jan 16 2005, 03:54 AM Post #32
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,102 Joined: 23-March 04 From: The Grizzly Grunion, in a VIP room. Member No.: 6,191	Exactly. Wankatronic.

Zeel De Mort View Member Profile	Jan 16 2005, 04:02 AM Post #33
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 403 Joined: 27-August 02 From: Scotland Member No.: 3,175	Yeah I 100% disagree with the FAQ on this one.

Gyro the Greek S... Gyro the Greek Sandwich Pirate View Member Profile	Jan 16 2005, 04:02 AM Post #34
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 384 Joined: 18-August 03 From: North VA Member No.: 5,519	Hmm, I breezed through the Errata and FAQ on shadowrunrpg.com, and didn't see the modified layering rules. Can I get a confirmation on the change?

Smiley View Member Profile	Jan 16 2005, 04:05 AM Post #35
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,102 Joined: 23-March 04 From: The Grizzly Grunion, in a VIP room. Member No.: 6,191	It's in the errata on the SR website.

Zeel De Mort

Jan 16 2005, 04:12 AM

Post #36

Moving Target

Group: Members
Posts: 403
Joined: 27-August 02
From: Scotland
Member No.: 3,175

The bit about FFBA is in the CC errata:

http://www.shadowrunrpg.com/resources/errata_cc.shtml

QUOTE

Page 51: Form-Fitted Body Armor
Add to the end of the last sentence of the second paragraph the phrase: "...nor does it count against any Quickness tests (p. 285, SR3).

and the stuff about called shots bypassing armour (as one of the options you can pick for a called shot) is in the Combat section of the FAQ:

http://www.shadowrunrpg.com/resources/faq.shtml

QUOTE

Do called shots in ranged combat bypass armor, like they can in melee combat?
When handling called shots, for either melee or ranged combat, gamemasters should use the rules on p. 114, SR3 (ie., calling a shot is a Free Action, called shots receive a +4 target number modifier, etc) along with the following rules. The player calling the shot can choose one result from the following three options:

The Damage Code is increased by one Level (as stated on p. 114, SR3). The target's regular armor applies.
The attack bypasses the target's armor. In this case, the attack's Damage Code is not modified, but the Power is not reduced by armor bonuses. (Note that the attacker can simply choose a location on the target that is less armored, rather than bypassing the armor completely, so that only the armor in that location applies).
Target a smaller part of a larger target (such as the tires on a vehicle).

Smiley

Jan 16 2005, 04:21 AM

Post #37

Running Target

Group: Members
Posts: 1,102
Joined: 23-March 04
From: The Grizzly Grunion, in a VIP room.
Member No.: 6,191

QUOTE

The attack bypasses the target's armor. In this case, the attack's Damage Code is not modified, but the Power is not reduced by armor bonuses. (Note that the attacker can simply choose a location on the target that is less armored, rather than bypassing the armor completely, so that only the armor in that location applies).

When given a choice between bypassing armor completely and picking a spot that's less armored, who WOULDN'T bypass all armor? Am I reading this wrong? Why give options like that?

Zeel De Mort View Member Profile	Jan 16 2005, 04:29 AM Post #38
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 403 Joined: 27-August 02 From: Scotland Member No.: 3,175	I don't know. I assume/hope they're trying to imply that armour in the location you're calling the shot on should still apply no matter what. If you could only pick general areas like arms/head/torso/legs, then that'd be fairly workable at least.

Arethusa View Member Profile	Jan 16 2005, 04:52 AM Post #39
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,901 Joined: 19-June 03 Member No.: 4,775	There is no armor location! No armor in canon SR functions on a location basis. A vest does not give you 4 points of armor on your chest; it gives you four points of armor, period. You cannot hit him in the arm and bypass armor.

hyzmarca View Member Profile	Jan 16 2005, 05:00 AM Post #40
Midnight Toker Group: Members Posts: 7,686 Joined: 4-July 04 From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop Member No.: 6,456	I think that means to say that bypassing armor is not an all or nothing deal. The attacker can choose how much armor to bypass with a called shot, incase you don't want to kill the guy outright.

Zeel De Mort View Member Profile	Jan 16 2005, 05:09 AM Post #41
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 403 Joined: 27-August 02 From: Scotland Member No.: 3,175	:D I know there are no hit locations for armour, but if people were messing around with called shots, rather than just allowing every called shot to bypass ALL armour, I'd probably run it something like that. Decide which locations (locations being the same as for cyber armour) have how much armour each and then go from there. A house rule of course. No, in fact I would probably just throw out called shots altogether, much easier that way! Or at least remove option 2 from the list, the other two are fine.

Smiley

Jan 16 2005, 05:21 AM

Post #42

Running Target

Group: Members
Posts: 1,102
Joined: 23-March 04
From: The Grizzly Grunion, in a VIP room.
Member No.: 6,191

QUOTE (Arethusa)

There is no armor location! No armor in canon SR functions on a location basis. A vest does not give you 4 points of armor on your chest; it gives you four points of armor, period. You cannot hit him in the arm and bypass armor.

So a guy in a 5/3 armored jacket who recieves a called shot in the head still gets the 5/3 armor rating? (note that the called shot was used to hit the head and not the rest of his body.) I don't think so. It's and armored jakcet, not an armored bodystocking. Not an armored hoodie.

toturi View Member Profile	Jan 16 2005, 05:34 AM Post #43
Canon Companion Group: Members Posts: 8,021 Joined: 2-March 03 From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG Member No.: 4,187	You can't call shot to hit the head in the first place precisely because there is no hit location. You can call shot to bypass armour, increase damage. You can Call Shot, but you can call the shot to a specific location. The location is moot and is not up to you.

Smiley

Jan 16 2005, 05:36 AM

Post #44

Running Target

Group: Members
Posts: 1,102
Joined: 23-March 04
From: The Grizzly Grunion, in a VIP room.
Member No.: 6,191

QUOTE

Target a smaller part of a larger target (such as the tires on a vehicle).

Or... say... Someone's unarmored head. Since a jacket doesn't cover your head. Which is why they sell helmets separately.

Arethusa View Member Profile	Jan 16 2005, 05:44 AM Post #45
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,901 Joined: 19-June 03 Member No.: 4,775	No, no, no! You can't call shots to the head. End of story. Shadowrun does not allow this at all. Also, hyzmarca is wrong. You cannot choose how much to bypass. There are houserules for this, but that is something else entirely. Purely within canon, you can't do anything but take a shot through all the armor or take a shot at +4 TN through no armor.

Smiley

Jan 16 2005, 05:57 AM

Post #46

Running Target

Group: Members
Posts: 1,102
Joined: 23-March 04
From: The Grizzly Grunion, in a VIP room.
Member No.: 6,191

Then what is it, do you think, that stages the damage up a level when you call a shot? What imposes the +4 TN? You're aiming for a smaller, more vulnerable part of the body, like someone's melon. Which has less armor.

EDIT:

QUOTE

(Note that the attacker can simply choose a location on the target that is less armored, rather than bypassing the armor completely, so that only the armor in that location applies).

Since that's from the errata and it says that you CAN choose a location that is less armored, I think that would make it canon, don't you?

kevyn668

Jan 16 2005, 06:01 AM

Post #47

Runner

Group: Members
Posts: 2,751
Joined: 8-August 03
From: Neighbor of the Beast
Member No.: 5,375

QUOTE (Smiley)

QUOTE (Arethusa @ Jan 16 2005, 12:52 AM)

There is no armor location! No armor in canon SR functions on a location basis. A vest does not give you 4 points of armor on your chest; it gives you four points of armor, period. You cannot hit him in the arm and bypass armor.

So a guy in a 5/3 armored jacket who recieves a called shot in the head still gets the 5/3 armor rating? (note that the called shot was used to hit the head and not the rest of his body.) I don't think so. It's and armored jakcet, not an armored bodystocking. Not an armored hoodie.

Great.

<Will Robinson voice> "Here we go again...." </Will Robinson voice>

[ Spoiler ]

I haven't bothered with most of the other threads on this topic, but why can you call a shot to hit a vehicle's tires but not a person's head?

[ Spoiler ]

Oh, and :)

It just seems like we don't use enough smilies anymore...

Smiley View Member Profile	Jan 16 2005, 06:05 AM Post #48
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,102 Joined: 23-March 04 From: The Grizzly Grunion, in a VIP room. Member No.: 6,191	I think kevyn's right about the smilies. Seems like I'm somehow more guilty than anyone, given the handle... Also, AMEN to the tires/head comment.

Canid13

Jan 16 2005, 06:24 AM

Post #49

Moving Target

Group: Members
Posts: 278
Joined: 28-September 04
From: The Smoke
Member No.: 6,709

The third option is there to allow you to selectively target small objects. For example, can you shoot an apple off of someone's head? William Tell could, but he suffered a +4 TN penalty for the attack test.

When you used Called Shots to increase the damage level you're basically aiming for a known weak spot, say dead centre on the heart or perhaps the nads.... I've never been shot there but I suppose a shot to the nads would could as increasing the damage code.

When you call a shot to bypass armour, you're doing the same thing but trying to put the bullet(s) into a location without armour, or in the case of soemone with head-to-toe coverage you're attempting to hit a slightly less armoured location - for example the arm on someone with an armoured shirt underneath an armoured vest.

QUOTE

Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 20:39:00 -0700
Cc: info@shadowrunrpg.com
Subject: Re: Re: Shadowrun Called Shot to Helmets

Hi Brian and Aaron,

Oh, I'm so glad you guys are smart! There are a lot of folks that just don't
see what you see, and I didn't want to confuse anyone by pointing it out.
OK, here we go. There are two methods for this.

First method:
See Man and Machine, page 35, where it describes 5 locations for cyberlimb
body plating (also called "Armor" for cyberlimbs) as Arms, Legs, Front
Torso, Rear Torso, and Skull. It takes 5 points of body plating (armor) for
the Skull to count as one overall point of armor for the whole body. Since
the Armor Helmet and Secure Helmet both provide 1 overall point of ballistic
armor for the whole body, they should count for at least an individual
rating of 5 points, and no more than 9, as protection for the skull. So, the
simple calculation of helmet rating for protection to the skull is at least
5 ballistic. If you wanted to average 5 and 9, you might decide 7 points of
protection, but I don't think that either 5 or 7 is very precise.

Second method:
Assume we cover a character completely in a special material that I call "7
ballistic". Part of this material is formed as a helmet, part as worn armor.
Assume that when the "7 ballistic" material is worn all over the body
that
it provides 7 points of ballistic armor. Anywhere your shot hits, the body
is protected by 7 points of ballistic armor. Assume I take off the helmet.
Now, how much overall armor protection does the character get? Let's say
it's 6 points of overall protection. But if we somehow know that a shot is
hitting the rear torso, we know that it's hitting "7 ballistic" armor,
because "7 ballistic material" is on the rear torso. Overall the helmet
provides 1 point of ballistic, but if we know that a shot is hitting the
head, it's hitting the "7 ballistic material" and that's 7 points of
protection. This "special material" I'm describing is actually the material
of a suit of Medium Security Armor & Helmet.

With this method, we make an evaluation of what the material rating would be
if it covered the whole body. That's the rating we use if we know a shot is
striking a body part protected by that material. We actually end of with two
ways of calculating the protection of a Security Helmet this way. The first
is calculating it with the lightest armor it's made to go with. In which
case a 1/2 Security Helmet provides 7/6 protection to the head. The second
is keeping track of what kind of suit the Security Helmet actually came
with, so if it came with Heavy Security armor then the helmet provides 8/7
to the skull. You choose which feels better for your group.

One might argue that a Security Helmet is more rigid than the rest of the
suit, and thus provides more than 6 or 7 points of Impact protection, but I
usually don't go that far.

I hope this helps!

Signed,
ShadowFaq

----- Original Message -----
To: "ShadowFaq" <ShadowFaq@comcast.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 7:32 PM
Subject: Fwd: Re: Shadowrun Called Shot in Ranged Combat (fwd)

> How do you determine the localized armor rating of, say a helmet? If the
> helmet gives +1/+2 rating to a player's overall armor rating, how much
> does it help his/her head in a called shot? The numbers logically can't be
> the same...
>
>
> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 05:44:09 -0700
> From: ShadowFaq <ShadowFaq@comcast.net>
> Cc: info@shadowrunrpg.com
> Subject: Re: Shadowrun Called Shot in Ranged Combat
>
> Hi Aaron,
> Yes, the Cannon Companion has Called Shot rules for melee combat that
> allows
> you to use only the armor in the targeted location. There are also Called
> Shot rules in Man and Machine (page 106) for ranged weapons that deliver
> drugs (like Narcoject or Capsule rounds) which use only the armor in the
> targeted location.
>
> The Shadowrun Faq (www.ShadowrunRPG.com/resources/faq.shtml) describes
> Called Shot rules for general ranged weapons (like your pistol) that, as
> an
> option, lets you use only the armor in the targeted location.
>
> With these FAQ called shot rules, the player can choose one of the
> following:
> a) Use the called shot to raise the damage by one level, and apply all
> armor
> (7 in your example)
> or
> b) Use the called shot to *not* raise the damage level, but apply *only*
> the
> armor in the targeted location (1 in your example)
> or
> c) Use the called shot to achieve a particular objective. E.g. shooting a
> tire on a vehicle, shooting out a headlight, or shooting the leg of a
> fleeing suspect to keep him from running. In these cases extra successes
> should not stage up damage to the overall vehicle or person, but should
> instead be an indication of achieving better success with your particular
> objective.
>
> Signed,
> ShadowFaq
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> To: "ShadowFaq" <ShadowFaq@comcast.net>
> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 4:23 AM
> Subject: Re: shadowrun cannon companion
>
>
> lol ok heres another dilema.in a test game i wanted to
> use a called shot to an armored head of a baddie.he
> had and armor value of 7/7 (6/5+ helmet of +1/2).in
> the cannon companion it losts for advanced melee
> combat that armor for the targeted location
> protects.in this case head IE the +1/2.
> now heres my question.if with a pistol or other ranged
> weapon when i target the head.what armor value would
> it have?the +1 only or the full 7.
> thanks
> Aaron

I copied this from a previous thread - someone had asked ShadowFAQ about this and this was the responce. It states that, like cyberlimb armour, the 5/3 provided by an armoured jacket is a composite value, so the 7/7 privided by Sec armour is likewise a composite value and applies to the whole body - anywhere there's coverage gets the full value.

This is why I don't allow armour stacking in my games. I allow people to wear multiple pieces of armour, simply to provide coverage against called shots to bypass armour (twin Smartguns across the legs at knee height won't kill, but they'll get you a 'technical kill' which is enough).

It's up to me as the GM, when one of my players calls a shot, where the exact shot hit. Sure, 99% of the time when someone bypasses armour they're going into the head, since all NPC's are smart enough to wear armoured trousers as well as a jacket or long coat. But that's how I describe it. My players don't get to chose where it's going, they simply state which option for Called Shot they're intending to use.

I'm not saying it's a great system, as having no hit locations means it's very abstract, but it works. And it does give you some options.

As a House Rule, I've gone so far as to give helmets a second set of armour ratings - those which apply when the head itself it shot at a not the whole body. This is my take on what ShadowFAQ says in the above mails. So, a Security Helmet (from a Sec suit) looks like this:

Security Helmet: Ballistic +1(4), Impact +2(5)

So, if one of my players wears the helmet, their overall protection gets the normal plus values, but should a called shot dictate it should hit the head (Called Shot to lesser armoured location), then the shot (ranged or melee) is resisted using 4/5 armour. It seems to work well, and it makes helmets worth wearing again.

Smiley View Member Profile	Jan 16 2005, 06:28 AM Post #50
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,102 Joined: 23-March 04 From: The Grizzly Grunion, in a VIP room. Member No.: 6,191	Q.E.D. Cheers, Canid. Thanks.

« Next Oldest · Shadowrun · Next Newest »