IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V  « < 2 3 4  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Game Police, Is this their headquarters?
James McMurray
post Feb 14 2005, 08:45 PM
Post #76


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,430
Joined: 10-January 05
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Member No.: 6,957



QUOTE (Fortune)
If you don't want people's opinions, don't post! If you don't like someone's response, then report them to an Admin. There's no need to make a completely off-topic thread (something that is somewhat frowned upon here) and continually bemoan the fact that a few people disliked an idea enough to call it stupid.

If off topic threads are frowned upon, why are you helping to keep this one alive? ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Feb 14 2005, 08:58 PM
Post #77


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



I didn't start it, nor does it need my assistance to stay alive, as judged by the amount of posts prior to mine. :P

My contribution was to inform you (and others) that the Admins do not really like off-topic threads, as well as to point out the appropriate procedure should you (or anyone else) truly take offence to any specific post or poster.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Arethusa
post Feb 14 2005, 09:00 PM
Post #78


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,901
Joined: 19-June 03
Member No.: 4,775



QUOTE (James McMurray)
QUOTE (Fortune @ Feb 14 2005, 02:16 PM)
If you don't want people's opinions, don't post! If you don't like someone's response, then report them to an Admin. There's no need to make a completely off-topic thread (something that is somewhat frowned upon here) and continually bemoan the fact that a few people disliked an idea enough to call it stupid.

If off topic threads are frowned upon, why are you helping to keep this one alive? ;)

Please. There's been enough stupid prickwaving in this thread as it is.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James McMurray
post Feb 14 2005, 09:07 PM
Post #79


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,430
Joined: 10-January 05
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Member No.: 6,957



Prickwaving? I can assure you that my genitals were completely inside my clothes at the time I posted that. And given his response I assume Fortune took it as it was intended.

Perhaps you just have an overactive imagination and/or a penchant for waving pricks? :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post Feb 14 2005, 09:29 PM
Post #80


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



Prickwaving...

<Woosh><Woosh><Woosh>

er... nevermind ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
LinaInverse
post Feb 14 2005, 09:33 PM
Post #81


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 292
Joined: 24-September 04
Member No.: 6,701



If you look at the length and breath of my responses (ie, click search posts for my username), you'll find that I rarely get nasty with public posts. My deep personal hot-button though (calloused from years of shoddy Real-Life sessions) is GMs who arbitrarily make ridiculously unfair rulings for the sole purpose of getting glee watching their players suffer.

QUOTE (Sandoval Smith)
Second, when a GM includes hackle raising descriptions for (as they're initially presented) arbitrary and unfair situations, which include lines like-
QUOTE

I have turned many a player into Paste with this one and do love the look on thier faces when I explain how to disarm the trap and open the exit door.

- positive reactions are rare, because it seems a lot of us have played in games where GMs pulled stunts like this, and while the GM seemed to have a great time seeing how he could screw with the PCs, it was a pretty miserable experince for all the players.

That's also why the uber-rats got such a poor reception. A statless, damage immune, magic reflecting critter. It's hard to imagine them having a reason for existing, except for the GM to amuse himself at the PCs' expense? There are statless NPCs out there, but the PCs should rarely, if ever, encounter them. If a GM has Lofwyr just hanging out, and if the PCs annoy them he backhands them through the bar, and this happens on a semi-regular basis, I'd criticize them just the same as if they did something similar with the uber-rats.


Thank you. My thoughts exactly and probably more tactfully put than I would have.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tisoz
post Feb 15 2005, 09:39 AM
Post #82


Free Spirit
*******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,948
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Bloomington, IN UCAS
Member No.: 1,920



Realistically, this may be the home of the game police.

I recall some long debates about rules over the last few years, and also some house rules about excluding certain equipment. Somehow, perhaps purely coincidently ;), the game rules got changed in line with the house rules or the conclusion of the debate. The rules received an erratta. Things like the Chipjack Expert Driver, the mnemonic enhancer, called shots, and invisibility.

Since it may appear that this board has some influence, there are people who don't want their precious character or tactics to become obsolete or less than legal because it takes advantage of a rule quirk or some piece of equipment that bestows advantages beyond its cost. Even if you think there is no way this forum influences the game rules, there are groups that play by the concensus reached on this forum. So this forum influences games on the net and around the world.

It depends on what you see as the function of police. To kick in your door and punish evil doers or a group that seeks to maintain a tidy environment and kick the drek out of any idea that clutters it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Feb 15 2005, 11:24 AM
Post #83


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



"I Am The Law!"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Feb 15 2005, 03:19 PM
Post #84


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,007
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



To some degree the board automatically has influence, in that some of the people who will determine the rules read it. As a result, the ideas discussed here are likely already in their minds when it comes time to work out the next variation on them. They may not be chosen, but just being already on the list is a big advantage.

The same is true, incidentally, of any other source read by the arbiter of something.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KarmaInferno
post Feb 15 2005, 03:26 PM
Post #85


Old Man Jones
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,415
Joined: 26-February 02
From: New York
Member No.: 1,699



QUOTE (Fortune)
"I Am The Law!"

Should be "Uh Ahm da LUH!"

:D


-karma
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V  « < 2 3 4
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 30th December 2024 - 03:58 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.