IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Invisiblility question, Yeah I know, but it's not that bad
paul_HArkonen
post Feb 14 2005, 11:43 PM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 881
Joined: 1-May 04
Member No.: 6,295



Anyway, This is probiblaly me being blind and stupid, but does improved invisibility effect Thermographic eyeware, and lenses?

I know it doesn't effect ultrasound, but I just needed to know about thermo, because to me it doesn't make sense for it to have an effect, but I know better than to mix logic and SR rules.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James McMurray
post Feb 14 2005, 11:50 PM
Post #2


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,430
Joined: 10-January 05
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Member No.: 6,957



It depends on how you read it. The spell's description says it makes the target undetectable by "normal vision." Some would probably read this to mean it doesn't protect against temographic vsion at all.

If you're not one of those, then you don't even need improved invis to fool cybereyes, as the mana version of the spell affects the viewer's mind, not his eyes.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Arethusa
post Feb 14 2005, 11:52 PM
Post #3


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,901
Joined: 19-June 03
Member No.: 4,775



Except that thermographic is normal for a number of species...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James McMurray
post Feb 14 2005, 11:54 PM
Post #4


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,430
Joined: 10-January 05
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Member No.: 6,957



Right, which is why I said that some people would read it that way. It all depends on your definition of "normal."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GrinderTheTroll
post Feb 15 2005, 12:08 AM
Post #5


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,754
Joined: 9-July 04
From: Modesto, CA
Member No.: 6,465



QUOTE (paul_HArkonen)
Anyway, This is probiblaly me being blind and stupid, but does improved invisibility effect Thermographic eyeware, and lenses?

I know it doesn't effect ultrasound, but I just needed to know about thermo, because to me it doesn't make sense for it to have an effect, but I know better than to mix logic and SR rules.

If someone paid essence then I'd let Invisibility effect the player.

If it's not been paid with essence (goggles, lenses, systems, sensors, bleh) then I'd make them use Improved Invisibility to try and fool them.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sren
post Feb 15 2005, 12:14 AM
Post #6


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 211
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,444



While there's no perfect way to scientifically explain the physical version of magical invisibility in shadowrun, here's my take on it: The physical invisibility spell, improved invisibility, allows 99% of electromagnetic waves to pass throught the recipient of the spell, but the recipient's mass still intereacts with medium-dependant waves (like sound) normally. (if 100% of electromagnetic waves passwed through the character, he'd be effectively blind, so I reason that this 1% is also why witnesses of the invisible being et a saving throw...)

In plain enlgish: the target of the spell is like a squeaky clean, flat, piece of glass at room temperature. Sound still bounces of it just fine, and it doesn't necessarily give off a noticeable thermal signature.

Just my 2 cents
Thanks for pretendig to pay attention ;-)
S'Ren
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Feb 15 2005, 12:51 AM
Post #7


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,008
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



If you resist the spell, you see the target normally and may not even realize that they're invisible to some people. That doesn't sound like a physical change to me.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gilthanis
post Feb 15 2005, 09:01 AM
Post #8


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 139
Joined: 19-September 04
From: Charleston, IL
Member No.: 6,676



Though I don't like the decision (because thermo is only heat radiating off not the person themselves), FanPro has it listed in their FAQ that it does fool Thermo.

Not to mention if Trolls were near by, they would (pretty much) always see the invisible people if it did work.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GrinderTheTroll
post Feb 15 2005, 07:38 PM
Post #9


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,754
Joined: 9-July 04
From: Modesto, CA
Member No.: 6,465



There is little-to-no logic with magic, trying to tie real physics in attempts to explain it are often pointless.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Feb 15 2005, 07:41 PM
Post #10


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



kage, you can't get that from the text in SR3. all it says is that a target who resists the spell notices the illusion--that's a whole different animal from not realizing the illusion exists.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Weredigo
post Feb 15 2005, 07:44 PM
Post #11


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 349
Joined: 28-January 05
From: Phoenix, Arizona
Member No.: 7,030



If it were me I would rule on the basis of wether the thermo being used to view the invisible target was a part of the viewers normal vision (were they born with it) or is it artificial, if artificial yes they would see, if part of thier natural vision package, then no.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GrinderTheTroll
post Feb 15 2005, 07:46 PM
Post #12


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,754
Joined: 9-July 04
From: Modesto, CA
Member No.: 6,465



QUOTE (mfb)
kage, you can't get that from the text in SR3. all it says is that a target who resists the spell notices the illusion--that's a whole different animal from not realizing the illusion exists.

huh? I gatherd from kage's comments that just because you see it doesn't mean you know who else knows it's an illusion or who has/hasn't make the resistance check.

:?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Feb 15 2005, 07:50 PM
Post #13


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,008
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



I'm having trouble finding the exact section, but I'm pretty sure it says that someone who resists is unaffected by the spell. If you'd care to tell me how someone unaffected by an invisibility spell would notice that someone was invisible without observing the reactions of others (or, alternatively, point out that I'm completely wrong in my memory of the wording), I'd appreciate it.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Reaver
post Feb 15 2005, 08:05 PM
Post #14


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 518
Joined: 24-February 03
From: Tucson
Member No.: 4,153



Every gaming group I've been with has rulled that it does not affect thermal. Hence the reason our mages wrote a spell that does affect thermal as well... just with a slightly higher drain of course.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GrinderTheTroll
post Feb 15 2005, 08:07 PM
Post #15


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,754
Joined: 9-July 04
From: Modesto, CA
Member No.: 6,465



QUOTE (Reaver)
Every gaming group I've been with has rulled that it does not affect thermal. Hence the reason our mages wrote a spell that does affect thermal as well... just with a slightly higher drain of course.

Which is interesting since heat is radiation like light. Like I said, physics and magic don't mix.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Endgame50
post Feb 15 2005, 08:10 PM
Post #16


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 192
Joined: 19-July 04
From: N 42° 43.799'. W 84° 27.901'
Member No.: 6,496



It affects a person's visual senses. It's an illusion--the physical version makes a little less sense since it automatically fools sensors (which have no mind to fool) but people resist normally. Which means, as some fellow kindly stated before, that if they resist, it's like the spell doesn't exist--they're completely unaffected.

Anyway, the basic point is, against living organisms, it fools their mind--or at least the part governing sight. The reason ultrasonic vision will bypass it is it's technically a sound-based sense. The processor built into it will make a visual map based on the data it gathers from the sonic pulses it emits, but remember--a stealth spell will fool it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
paul_HArkonen
post Feb 15 2005, 08:31 PM
Post #17


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 881
Joined: 1-May 04
Member No.: 6,295



a Stealth spell, perhaps I'm just being stupid again, but I haven't heard of a stealth spell, silence, yeah, but not stealth, care to fill me in?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Endgame50
post Feb 15 2005, 08:41 PM
Post #18


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 192
Joined: 19-July 04
From: N 42° 43.799'. W 84° 27.901'
Member No.: 6,496



QUOTE (paul_HArkonen)
a Stealth spell, perhaps I'm just being stupid again, but I haven't heard of a stealth spell, silence, yeah, but not stealth, care to fill me in?

page 196, SR3:

Indirect Illusion Spell: Stealth.
Type: P. Target 4. Duration S. Drain +1(M)

Stealth is cast on a target who becomes inaudible to normal hearing. The subject can move in complete silence and nothing they do makes noise. Things not being touched by the subject can still make noise, so a character under a stealth spell would make no noice knocking on a door, but the door would make noise hitting the floor or wall if it was kicked in.

It's basically a single target silence spell.

M&M page 18 notes indirect illusion spells that affect sound affect ultrasound vision in the same way invisibility affects normal vision. They do use silence as their example, however.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Feb 15 2005, 08:41 PM
Post #19


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,008
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Essentially single-target Silence with a more powerful effect.

Edit: old and sloooow.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th March 2025 - 11:10 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.