IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Voluntary Target, any volunteers?
Moon-Hawk
post Feb 18 2005, 02:00 PM
Post #1


Genuine Artificial Intelligence
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,019
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,715



2 questions:
1) What exactly constitutes a voluntary target? MitS pg 56 tells us that anyone who is aware of the spell and does not resist is voluntary, also anyone unconscious is considered voluntary. What about someone under a Control Thoughts spell (SR3 pg. 196) to make someone volunteer? Does that work?

also

2) What happens when a voluntary target changes their mind or wakes up or for any reason decides they are no longer voluntary? Does the spell automatically fail, or is it too late?

Thanks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tarantula
post Feb 18 2005, 03:17 PM
Post #2


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,664
Joined: 21-September 04
From: Arvada, CO
Member No.: 6,686



#1 brings up some interesting points, of which I don't know.

#2 is too late. I'm sorry, the time for resisting is when the spell is cast, you can't resist after the fact simply because you were knocked out.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bigity
post Feb 18 2005, 03:20 PM
Post #3


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,840
Joined: 24-July 02
From: Lubbock, TX
Member No.: 3,024



I would say you can't use magic to make someone a voluntary target. You can lie to them, and convince them they are about to get a Glamor spell or something, but I wouldn't allow magical alterations of it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jrayjoker
post Feb 18 2005, 03:34 PM
Post #4


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,453
Joined: 17-September 04
From: St. Paul
Member No.: 6,675



Treachery and tricketry are OK, but magic is not able to compel someone to accept a spell IMO.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
U_Fester
post Feb 18 2005, 04:32 PM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 230
Joined: 3-December 04
Member No.: 6,863



So you could get someone to voluntere to have a fireball cast on him if by using a mind spell on them first?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Edward
post Feb 18 2005, 04:36 PM
Post #6


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,073
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 6,587



Control thoughts might be enough to do it. After all if you cast it on a mage (getting past his will) you can implant a thought to make him cast a spell.

Also I don’t see a balance problem as once you have somebody under a control thoughts spell you have already defeated them and can make them give you any information you want. It is only even useful in the strangest of circumstances (saving somebody that would rather die)

I would probably allow it.

Edward
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tarantula
post Feb 18 2005, 04:55 PM
Post #7


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,664
Joined: 21-September 04
From: Arvada, CO
Member No.: 6,686



Well, in theory, if you cast armor on someone who didn't want it, they'd get to try to resist. Or heal, or any other beneficial spell. So, as Edward said, if you already control their thoughts at best you can make them live longer. I suppose the worst use of it I can think of is to control a meaty troll ganger, toss armor and such on him, and use him as your bullet shield/decoy man while the rest of the team does the real work.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Charon
post Feb 18 2005, 05:41 PM
Post #8


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,011
Joined: 15-February 05
From: Montréal, QC, Canada
Member No.: 7,087



Well, I'd argue that you can no more be the willing target of a fireball than the willling target of a bullet. You still make a body resistance test in both case even if some wizworm puppetmaster is making you hold still at the moment.

BTW I'd argue that someone who is under a control thought has not become willing for anything you force him to do. He just can't resist doing it. He's probably screaming inside his head for the duration. And he'll get a chance to break enchantment when you try to get him to hold still for a fireball if he sees it coming. That would fall under 'Commands that the target is deeply opposed to' IMO.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
U_Fester
post Feb 18 2005, 06:21 PM
Post #9


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 230
Joined: 3-December 04
Member No.: 6,863



QUOTE (Charon)
He's probably screaming inside his head for the duration.

When you say it that way, it makes it sound so poetic :love:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post Feb 18 2005, 08:36 PM
Post #10


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



QUOTE
also anyone unconscious is considered voluntary.
That's not right, in the canon rules an unconscious target automatically is NOT a voluntary target for any spell except beneficial health spells. They automatically resist all magic.

I would rule that no, control thoughts cannot make someone voluntary. That's a sunconcious action, not conscious thought, which explains why while sleeping target automatically resists all spells.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moon-Hawk
post Feb 18 2005, 08:42 PM
Post #11


Genuine Artificial Intelligence
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,019
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,715



That's not quite right either, BitBasher. (although neither was I)

MitS pg. 56
QUOTE
Unconscious targets are considered voluntary targets for health spells.  For all other spells, voluntary targets must be aware the spell is being case.


It never says beneficial health spells.
Thanks for catching that, I had misread that section.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post Feb 18 2005, 08:43 PM
Post #12


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



Aaaah, okay, I was close enough ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th May 2026 - 11:11 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.