![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Immoral Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 ![]() |
What canon spell would you think would be most appropriate to simulate clothing on a naked metahuman form?
This could be useful, for instance when a Mage ceases to sustain a Shapechange spell, or a unclothed Ally Spirit wants to materialize in it's human form wearing setting-approriate clothing. Would Entertainment or Trid Entertainment be enough? Or would you need to go all out and use Phantasm or Trid Phantasm? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Mr. Johnson ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,587 Joined: 25-January 05 From: Berkeley, CA Member No.: 7,014 ![]() |
Umm, Create Clothing (drain code +1 S, by my reckoning)? With successes (up to force) giving you the number of people you could clothe, or the quality of the clothing (1 success = Rags or Scrubs, 2 successes = M.C.Hammer Pants and vest, 3 successes or higher = normal clothing)? :D
I would argue that depending on the character, the viewers might WANT to be voluntary for the illusion spell. ("Dear Ghost! Get some pants on, boy!") |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 292 Joined: 24-September 04 Member No.: 6,701 ![]() |
Unstable molecues...! Oh wait...
OK, "Fashion" says you have to end up with a similar amount of coverage as you started with, so that alone won't do it. Perhaps make a custom Manip spell; there already exist spells to Create Food/Water aren't there? How about a spell to Create Cloth, wrap it around your body, then use "Fashion" to shape it appropriately? Or even better, combine these into 1 spell (and up the Drain accordingly). |
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
Immoral Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 ![]() |
Yeah, I considered Fashion and Makeover as being not quite right.
Making a new spell wouldn't be difficult. I just really wanted to use one already in canon (if possible), because sometimes GMs can be picky that way. :) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
It's for winners ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 523 Joined: 8-February 05 From: Wiltshire with da shooty stuff Member No.: 7,067 ![]() |
I would use trid Phantasm, as it is flexible and can't be picked up by technological systems, assuming you know what clothing you want and that you have seen them (only a blind person with no hands would not ) you can recreate it.
torz x ;) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#6
|
|
Immoral Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 ![]() |
Yeah, that was my original thought, but the Drain Code's a bitch for that simple a spell.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#7
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 392 Joined: 13-January 05 From: Forgot where his meat body was Member No.: 6,971 ![]() |
And once you walk through an AA area with your trid phantasmic pants and a LS cop gets a lucky roll to resist the illusion, what then?
Worse, what if Bubba the Love Troll resists it in the barrens? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#8
|
|
Manus Celer Dei ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,013 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 ![]() |
It's not illusory, but if you have something that covers your arms, legs, and head you ought to be able to Fashion it into a T-shirt and shorts.
Is this a geas? ~J |
|
|
![]()
Post
#9
|
|
Beetle Eater ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 4,797 Joined: 3-June 02 From: Oblivion City Member No.: 2,826 ![]() |
I'd just use Mask, either as the base drain for a resisted "Entertainment" or as is. Entertainment is voluntary, so the second they think "he should put some cloths on" you'd be covered in the "obviously magical" clothing you cast.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#10
|
|
Immoral Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 ![]() |
My real reason for wanting it is for an Ally Spirit. I dislike making the metahuman form that always wears the same clothing, and if I did, it wouldn't be considered 'real' clothing, so would be unaffected by the Fashion Spell. It is also not always conveniant to carry spare apparel for the Ally on the off-chance that it will be needed.
The obvious benefit to frequent users of the Shapechange spell is just a bonus. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#11
|
|
Free Spirit ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,950 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Bloomington, IN UCAS Member No.: 1,920 ![]() |
I'd go with Mask or Physical Mask. Make it touch range for minimal drain.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#12
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 942 Joined: 13-May 04 Member No.: 6,323 ![]() |
You could create a limited self only version of Physical Mask that can only change the look of your clothing. The drain code wouldn't be too bad.
JaronK |
|
|
![]()
Post
#13
|
|
Immoral Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 ![]() |
Physical Mask makes sense. I just wasn't sure if it affected (or in this case added) clothing. I have no problems with using the Personal option.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#14
|
|
Beetle Eater ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 4,797 Joined: 3-June 02 From: Oblivion City Member No.: 2,826 ![]() |
Can Indirect Illusions even have a Touch range?
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#15
|
|
Immoral Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 ![]() |
According to the chart in MitS pg. 55, they can.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#16
|
|
Decker on the Threshold ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,922 Joined: 14-March 04 Member No.: 6,156 ![]() |
So, in conclusion:
Create Clothes (Illusion) Type P Target 4 Dur S Drain +1(L) Creates an illusary set of clothes. Successes can be used to improve quality of clothing produced (1 success = up to Ordinary; 2 successes = up to Fine; 3 successes = up to Tres Chic.) To make Fine or Tres Chic clothing the caster must also make a Modern Fashion (6) or (9) Knowledge test, respectfully. Create Clothes (Physical: Transformation Manip) Type P Target 4 Dur P Drain +1(S) Creates an actual set of clothes. Successes can be used to improve quality of clothing produced (1 success = up to Ordinary; 2 successes = up to Fine; 3 successes = up to Tres Chic.) To make Fine or Tres Chic clothing the caster must also make a Modern Fashion (6) or (9) Knowledge test, respectfully. Clothing created in this way is fragile: it has no protective value, and will only last for one day per Force of the spell. Sound about right? (Edit): Changed as per below conversation. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#17
|
|
Manus Celer Dei ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,013 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 ![]() |
I think you make it too easy to make Trés Chic clothing, personally.
~J |
|
|
![]()
Post
#18
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,129 Joined: 11-June 03 From: Tir Tairngire Member No.: 4,712 ![]() |
Maybe stage it 1 success (ordinary), 3 successes (Fine), and 5 successes (Tres Chic).
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#19
|
|||
Mr. Johnson ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,587 Joined: 25-January 05 From: Berkeley, CA Member No.: 7,014 ![]() |
Bibbity Bobbity Boo! I think that there's no way to create a "personal" version of the Create Clothes spell, just like there's no way to create a personal version of Create Food or Create Water... "Personal" simply means tacking on a "very restricted target" modifier, and since the spell does not affect a living thing, a very restricted target version of Create Clothes would be something like "Create Pants" or "Create Jockstrap" |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#20
|
|
Decker on the Threshold ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,922 Joined: 14-March 04 Member No.: 6,156 ![]() |
Good point, though personally I think the "tough" part of making Tres Chic clothing should be the associated Knowledge skill test. The clothes themselves are easy to make; it's the design that's hard. So maybe the associated fashion skill test should be (6) for Fine and (9) for Tres Chic? That way Fine clothing is really really hard to default on, and Tres Chic can't be defaulted on at all.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#21
|
|
Immoral Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 ![]() |
Yeah, I checked and Illusion cannot be Caster Only.
I do think the Drain Codes on those two spells listed is a bit high, since Mask and Physical Mask are only M and +1M respectively. Also, I'm not sure about the Knowledge Skill roll, as even the Fashion spell has no such need of any associated skill in clothes sense. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#22
|
|||||
Decker on the Threshold ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,922 Joined: 14-March 04 Member No.: 6,156 ![]() |
Hm. ActuallyI had used Mask as a template. For some reason I was thinking that clothing should be a multi-sense illusion, which is pretty dumb I guess. So getting rid of multi-sense gives you a And you're right; no caster-only illsion or manipulation. I was thinking Restricted Target (self), which is also dumb as it would only *affect* you. Sorta an Emperor's New Clothes spell. :P So yeah that's gone too. The Manipulation spell is right though. You start with Major Environmental change (create matter), which means (M), +1 Power for physical spell, +1 level for Permenant spell, -1 level for Touch range for a final code of +1(M). Create Food however is +1(S) so that's what I decided to use. :P This one you can theoretically use restricted target with to make it self-only, but I'm not sure how that would work; would the clothes disintigrate if you took them off?
Well I happen to think that it *should*, so there ya go. :P It really makes no sense that someone can make fashionable-looking clothes with no idea what the current fashions are. Hell, some people can't even dress themselves well, and that's easier to do than actually design your clothes from scratch! |
||||
|
|||||
![]()
Post
#23
|
|
Mr. Johnson ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,587 Joined: 25-January 05 From: Berkeley, CA Member No.: 7,014 ![]() |
When they said that Thread Magic was being written back into the game, I didn't know that this was what they were talking about. :D
|
|
|
![]() ![]()
Post
#24
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 942 Joined: 13-May 04 Member No.: 6,323 ![]() |
Completely overpowered. Think about it... you could use this spell to create a nasty, scary holloween costume... and then with a drain code of just +1(S), you'd have made horror threads!
:D JaronK |
|
|
![]()
Post
#25
|
|||
It's for winners ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 523 Joined: 8-February 05 From: Wiltshire with da shooty stuff Member No.: 7,067 ![]() |
Yeah deadly! don't know then? let me know if you find out as that is such a cool idea and my shaman would find that one interesting! torz x ;) |
||
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th August 2025 - 09:25 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.