Street Magic, So much for one book's enough :( Options

[The_Eyes]

[lacemaker]

Yeah, I was a big fan of the Awakenings style expansion of magic - how to run it, what it looks like, what it feels like, a few new curiosities to add flavour and broaden options, but not the grimoire style sudden massive expansion in the capabilities of the awakened.

[audun]

I'll second the request for a Target:Magic book. A book to cover what all the traditions are about, important magical groups, the powerplayers on the scene, magical research, magic and the law, magic and crime and magic around the world.
What would be neat is if they planned how to distribute content troughout the various books. Rather than first writing the basic magic rules, then the advanced rules and then added alot of new stuff in a T:M book, they should write it all at once. They have all the elements from SR3, organizing them shouldn't be much of a problem. A bit more consistency and flexibility would also be welcome (plug).

[Demosthenes]

Something catch in your throat, old chap?
:D

[Synner]

[Demonseed Elite]

Oops, my bad. Sorry about that, audun! Anyway, I'm a big fan of that stuff, covering significant movements in magic, and I think it should equally shape the way shamanism is presented. Because there are similar movements in shamanism, not only in European shamanism, but also in Native American religion. Just tossing out a bunch of stat box totems all with equal face-time is not the right way to do it.

[Ellery]

Since it may have sounded like I was being pretty negative in the thread that audun linked to, I'd like to mention that I liked the Old World Magic chapter also. It was pretty good flavor. The only issue I had with it was "scientific" designation for Renewed Hermetics.

I'm not sure what to do about rules vs. setting, though. There're a lot of rules to add, so you need most of a book devoted to that for each major topic ('ware, magic, hacking, and gear). But if you have a separate fluff book for each topic also, you end up with an awful lot of books. So I'd suggest a rules book on the topics for rules, and then perhaps a single setting-heavy book like NAGRL that covers all the topics; setting can then be updated heavily while new rules are sparse in later releases.

An online summary of new rules by type would be really handy too, so one didn't have to look through a half dozen books when you can't remember where a spell was introduced.

(Incidentally, I think the term "fluff" overly trivializes the importance of developing a believable alternate reality. Good "fluff" makes the world come alive. Dead, boring worlds are no fun to play in regardless of the rules.)

[blakkie]

[Geko]

As far as I can tell, the only reason FanPro has given current fans to want this change is that the rules will be streamlined. So the announcement of advanced rules released in follow-up books doesn't sit very well with me.

Sure, I would obviously expect business decisions, and even multiple books. But tell me you're streamlining a game I like (by completely overhauling it) and then go and tell me it'll likely take as many sourcebooks as the original (I tend to agree with the opinion that they seem to be following SR3 format: MitS, CC, Rigger, etc) and I have to wonder, what did you accomplish...besides turning a buck? I don't buy things simply so that someone can make money.

I realize it is quite likely to simplify the game in practice, "at the table," as it were. But I think this kind of announcement does justify scepticism. That, and it makes it pretty imperative that FanPro actually DOES streamline the game. Then again, it's questionable whether that would be beneficial, IMO.

So we'll see what they can pull off. But that did reinforce my scepticism.