 Matrix crash of '65? Wha?, I missed something... |
  |
 Mar 22 2005, 10:35 AM
Post
#26
|
|||||
|
panda!  Group: Members Posts: 10,331 Joined: 8-March 02 From: north of central europe Member No.: 2,242  |
true, but that does not stop people from making statements like it :P and bookwyrm, i dont think thats so bad an idea. the more info that gets put on shadowrunrpg the more it seems to become a whole new beast. but im glad they dont toss the whole storyline like WW did with the new WoD... |
||||
 |
 
|
||||
|
Mar 22 2005, 10:04 PM
Post
#27
|
|||||
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,086 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 364 |
Well forgive me for assuming a dumpshocker was trying to make sense. I of all people should know better. |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
Mar 23 2005, 04:55 AM
Post
#28
|
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,379 Joined: 16-April 02 From: the LI shadows Member No.: 2,607 |
What I find as the major strike against SR4 is that they're scrapping all the good Magic rules that have come before; Magic In The Shadows is a damn fine book, and something I re-read on occaision.
I like the idea of a wireless Matrix, but calling them 'hackers' is going to have serious repercussions. Again, I'll wait until the book hits & I can have a look at it. |
|
|
|
|
Mar 23 2005, 05:23 AM
Post
#29
|
|||
|
Grand Master of Run-Fu Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 6,840 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Tir Tairngire Member No.: 178 |
Who says they're scrapping all the good magic rules? The basic stuff was mostly unchanged from 2nd to 3rd, and the changes weren't that dramatic from 1st to 2nd. The big changeover from 2nd to 3rd was the graded initiation, and I think they'll probably keep it. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
Mar 23 2005, 05:58 AM
Post
#30
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 187 Joined: 30-April 04 Member No.: 6,294 |
Exactly. All we've been told is that the rules have been streamlined, not broken into a million pieces.
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 23 2005, 04:29 PM
Post
#31
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 881 Joined: 1-May 04 Member No.: 6,295 |
Although (and I'm just being cynical here) there is nothing to say the the developers decided that in order to streamline the rules they had to be broken into pieces and glued back together again.
Personally, I think we should all wait until we have some more info on the changes, or *gasp* just wait until the new book comes out. But then again, this is dumpshock and if there's one thing we do well it's speculate and make up new rules. |
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 4th September 2025 - 07:52 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.