IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Hoverboards?
The Grifter
post Apr 27 2005, 05:02 PM
Post #26


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 478
Joined: 18-December 03
From: Louisville, KY
Member No.: 5,918



Waahhhhh! They're making fun of gays on the intenet again, mommy! OMG!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post Apr 27 2005, 05:10 PM
Post #27


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



QUOTE (The Grifter)
Waahhhhh! They're making fun of gays on the intenet again, mommy! OMG!

Wow, way to back up the "mature" end of the discussion.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Arethusa
post Apr 27 2005, 05:10 PM
Post #28


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,901
Joined: 19-June 03
Member No.: 4,775



QUOTE (The Grifter)
Waahhhhh! They're making fun of gays on the intenet again, mommy! OMG!

Was that supposed to be intelligent? Did you actually believe this would at all add anything worthwhile to this thread? Grow up.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post Apr 27 2005, 05:13 PM
Post #29


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



Incedentally. Hoverboards are pretty much totally unfeasable outside of cheezy movies. They are almost entirely frictionless because they are on a layer of air. They would be nearly impossible to turn at all. Ever see how a hovercraft handles? Piss poor is the correct answer. The wheels on a skateboard and the fins on a surfboard are pretty damn important because they allow it to maintain a vector and give resistance that allows it to turn. A Hoverboard does not have this.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nikoli
post Apr 27 2005, 05:17 PM
Post #30


Chicago Survivor
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,079
Joined: 28-January 04
From: Canton, GA
Member No.: 6,033



which is why vectored thrust is feasable, but prohibitively expensive and inefficient
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post Apr 27 2005, 05:20 PM
Post #31


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



QUOTE (Nikoli)
which is why vectored thrust is feasable, but prohibitively expensive and inefficient

Well, really vectored thrust isn't feasable as you'd still get nowhere near as maneuverable as a skateboard and it's be freaking huge to support a human and have enough fuel to run for any length of time. We're talking surfboard or likely much bigger. Fuel is the issue really.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Grifter
post Apr 27 2005, 05:34 PM
Post #32


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 478
Joined: 18-December 03
From: Louisville, KY
Member No.: 5,918



QUOTE
Yeah, you never will. And it's them fucking faggots. Always getting in the way of my antigravity. Goddamn gays. It's always them damn homosexual liberals a'messin' things up'n stuff.

--------------------


Ah, I see now, from the above comment. I bow to your superior intellect. U R g0dDz0rz!

QUOTE
Wow, way to back up the "mature" end of the discussion.


Yeah, I see you sicced your little stooge Urethra or whatever his name is on me too. Way to go.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FlipShow
post Apr 27 2005, 05:43 PM
Post #33


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 63
Joined: 11-March 05
Member No.: 7,152



http://www.kidradd.com/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RunnerPaul
post Apr 28 2005, 12:18 AM
Post #34


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,086
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 364



QUOTE (BitBasher)
Incedentally. Hoverboards are pretty much totally unfeasable outside of cheezy movies. They are almost entirely frictionless because they are on a layer of air. They would be nearly impossible to turn at all.

The link to a real-world personal air-cushion vehicle that was posted earlier in this thread (http://www.reallycooltoys.com/toys/i5info.html) shows one possible way of overcoming the problems of frictionlessness: adding wheels that only come in contact with the surface when the rider leans and shifts their center of gravity, and when they do lean, those wheels touch down just enough to provide the minimum friction needed to acomplish the desired effect.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Swing Kid
post Apr 28 2005, 12:20 AM
Post #35


Moving Target
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 189
Joined: 21-April 04
From: Usually in the Nexus
Member No.: 6,266



QUOTE (JaronK)
QUOTE (Swing Kid @ Apr 26 2005, 05:18 PM)
So...so should I take it from all of this that hoverboards are OK, unless you are a Buttrunner?

I just have no idea how to respond to this.

JaronK

Gotcha
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Swing Kid
post Apr 28 2005, 12:23 AM
Post #36


Moving Target
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 189
Joined: 21-April 04
From: Usually in the Nexus
Member No.: 6,266



QUOTE (Arethusa)
QUOTE (The Grifter @ Apr 27 2005, 12:02 PM)
Waahhhhh! They're making fun of gays on the intenet again, mommy! OMG!

Was that supposed to be intelligent? Did you actually believe this would at all add anything worthwhile to this thread? Grow up.

[bang bang bang]

Everyone check their sarcasm detectors. I think the network is down again.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post Apr 28 2005, 12:25 AM
Post #37


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



QUOTE (RunnerPaul)
QUOTE (BitBasher @ Apr 27 2005, 12:13 PM)
Incedentally. Hoverboards are pretty much totally unfeasable outside of cheezy movies. They are almost entirely frictionless because they are on a layer of air. They would be nearly impossible to turn at all.

The link to a real-world personal air-cushion vehicle that was posted earlier in this thread (http://www.reallycooltoys.com/toys/i5info.html) shows one possible way of overcoming the problems of frictionlessness: adding wheels that only come in contact with the surface when the rider leans and shifts their center of gravity, and when they do lean, those wheels touch down just enough to provide the minimum friction needed to acomplish the desired effect.

If you've ever seen a video of those, you'd know they can't turn for squat. The wheels cannot get enough traction to even approach the maneuverability of even a normal skateboard.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Swing Kid
post Apr 28 2005, 12:33 AM
Post #38


Moving Target
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 189
Joined: 21-April 04
From: Usually in the Nexus
Member No.: 6,266



True, but technology changes. If the technology was developed, it could be very useful, not to mention really cool. Hell, we are playing a game where BTLs and Wired Reflexes are common place, why couldn't this technology advance? It doesn't have to be vector thrust; it doesn't even have to be explained using what we know now as science. Bottom line is that it is definately possible. If we have slow, awkward versions in service now, then it is likely that the technology would be at that state in the Shadowrun world of the future. Think of the possiblities. Being able to carry a hoverboard on a run. You could hover over open ground instead of walking over it. Increased speed and manuverability. In the hands (feet?) of a apt user, it could prove to be a runner's best friend.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TEKE
post Apr 28 2005, 12:48 AM
Post #39


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 19
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Louisville, KY
Member No.: 527



I knew a few kids who hit the scene touting hoverboards as thier calling card. They were fast, fairly silent, and crazy as hell. Haven't seen em in a while, but I made a nice chunk of change off of them as thier fixer. Damn kids, they were nuts.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SpasticTeapot
post Apr 28 2005, 01:09 AM
Post #40


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 560
Joined: 21-December 04
Member No.: 6,893



QUOTE (The Grifter)
QUOTE
Yeah, you never will. And it's them fucking faggots. Always getting in the way of my antigravity. Goddamn gays. It's always them damn homosexual liberals a'messin' things up'n stuff.

--------------------


Ah, I see now, from the above comment. I bow to your superior intellect. U R g0dDz0rz!

QUOTE
Wow, way to back up the "mature" end of the discussion.


Yeah, I see you sicced your little stooge Urethra or whatever his name is on me too. Way to go.

Just do us all a favor and shut up. I have played shadowrun with homosexuals, and they're pretty darn good at it. If you're so incredibly closed-minded, perhaps you might actually go out and meet a few of them. Then again, you may already have; how do you know that Fred, the guy who you play RPG's with every other thursday, does'nt spend wednesday drinking cosmopolitans and hitting on guys on the local crew team?

Also, on the issue of vectored thrust, I might point out the Harrier jump-jet. It takes off and lands (while carrying a few AAMRAAMS, no less) on vectored thrust produced by an ordinary turbofan.
Once again, most people view a hoverboard as a skateboard sans wheels. This is not a hoverboard. A functional hoverboard would require a large skirt, powerful fan, gargantuan fins, and a set of very powerful gyroscopes to keep it upright. It would not be propelled much like a normal skateboard, either; it would be steered by a pair of rudders and not leaning to the left or right, much like a small boat. In fact, it would not be so much a skateboard as miniature, gyroscope-stabilized, foot-powerd hovercraft with little wings attached at 45 degree angles.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Swing Kid
post Apr 28 2005, 02:19 AM
Post #41


Moving Target
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 189
Joined: 21-April 04
From: Usually in the Nexus
Member No.: 6,266



QUOTE (TEKE)
I knew a few kids who hit the scene touting hoverboards as thier calling card. They were fast, fairly silent, and crazy as hell. Haven't seen em in a while, but I made a nice chunk of change off of them as thier fixer. Damn kids, they were nuts.

The German Kids? I heard they were adepts. Kicked out of the circuit, right?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Swing Kid
post Apr 28 2005, 02:33 AM
Post #42


Moving Target
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 189
Joined: 21-April 04
From: Usually in the Nexus
Member No.: 6,266



QUOTE (SpasticTeapot)
QUOTE (The Grifter @ Apr 27 2005, 12:34 PM)
QUOTE
Yeah, you never will. And it's them fucking faggots. Always getting in the way of my antigravity. Goddamn gays. It's always them damn homosexual liberals a'messin' things up'n stuff.

--------------------


Ah, I see now, from the above comment. I bow to your superior intellect. U R g0dDz0rz!

QUOTE
Wow, way to back up the "mature" end of the discussion.


Yeah, I see you sicced your little stooge Urethra or whatever his name is on me too. Way to go.

Just do us all a favor and shut up. I have played shadowrun with homosexuals, and they're pretty darn good at it. If you're so incredibly closed-minded, perhaps you might actually go out and meet a few of them. Then again, you may already have; how do you know that Fred, the guy who you play RPG's with every other thursday, does'nt spend wednesday drinking cosmopolitans and hitting on guys on the local crew team?

Also, on the issue of vectored thrust, I might point out the Harrier jump-jet. It takes off and lands (while carrying a few AAMRAAMS, no less) on vectored thrust produced by an ordinary turbofan.
Once again, most people view a hoverboard as a skateboard sans wheels. This is not a hoverboard. A functional hoverboard would require a large skirt, powerful fan, gargantuan fins, and a set of very powerful gyroscopes to keep it upright. It would not be propelled much like a normal skateboard, either; it would be steered by a pair of rudders and not leaning to the left or right, much like a small boat. In fact, it would not be so much a skateboard as miniature, gyroscope-stabilized, foot-powerd hovercraft with little wings attached at 45 degree angles.

I think Grifter was arguing AGAINST the gay-bashing...just so you know.

I also think that the harsh words spoken early on in this subject were just sarcasm. I get the impression that the gay-bashing was just a point being made about using the term "gay," with negative connotation.

Besides, I don't think any of it has anything to do with hoverboarding. One of the best runners I ever knew was known as (his words) the Shadowflamer. He was an adept that specialized in cat-fighting, and was a wiz in the club scene. Never could get past his fascination with Bet Midler BTL's though.

Anyway, everyone, lets all lighten up, eh?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shadow
post Apr 28 2005, 02:58 AM
Post #43


Why oh why didn't I take the blue pill.
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,545
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Gloomy Boise Idaho
Member No.: 2,006



Get over it, a guy used the word 'Gay' to mean something bad. Well deal with it. Gay used to just mean happy, words evolve. Gay is acceptable pop culture word for screwed up, or bad.

If you don't like it to bad. But thats no reason to go on a freaking tirade about it. So just let it all go, take a deep breath and get back to the subject at hand.

I ran a Stargate'esq game in Welcome to the shadows. The coolest character was an 80lb dwarf who had a hoverboard built with R3 rules. If drones can be used as Jet packs, they can be used as hoverboards.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Swing Kid
post Apr 28 2005, 03:03 AM
Post #44


Moving Target
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 189
Joined: 21-April 04
From: Usually in the Nexus
Member No.: 6,266



Amen
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Apr 28 2005, 04:53 AM
Post #45


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



QUOTE (JaronK)
You know, it may be common in Texas, but it's not actually a good thing to do. I, for one, avoid calling something Gay at all times unless it actually is homosexual. And let's face it, it's not because taking it up the butt would be bad. It's "that's like a gay person, i.e. lame." It promotes some pretty idiotic stereotypes.

I know some friends of mine started saying "that's so hetero" but it didn't catch on. It was pretty interesting to see the reactions, though.

JaronK

But, what if you're writing a poem and need a synonym for happy that rymes with day?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Swing Kid
post Apr 28 2005, 12:37 PM
Post #46


Moving Target
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 189
Joined: 21-April 04
From: Usually in the Nexus
Member No.: 6,266



...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Demosthenes
post Apr 28 2005, 01:04 PM
Post #47


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 401
Joined: 7-June 02
From: Living with the straw sheep.
Member No.: 2,850



Dumpshock persons unbellyfeel goodthink - doubleplusungood crimethinkers.
:P
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JaronK
post Apr 28 2005, 01:21 PM
Post #48


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 942
Joined: 13-May 04
Member No.: 6,323



Hyz... you're smarter than that, right?

And you know, this isn't about words evolving. This is the same as saying you were "Jewed down" when talking about negociating, or "Gyped" to mean stolen from. Anyone tells me they were "Jewed Down" around me, and I'll knock them to the ground pretty hard and then tell them they just really got Jewed Down. It's re-enforcing sterotypes on a social group, and it's wrong. Sorry, but that's how it is. Someone needs to say when it's simply wrong, and using "Gay" to mean "lame" isn't cool. If you can't understand this, grow up and think about it some more.

JaronK
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Apr 28 2005, 02:59 PM
Post #49


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,548
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



QUOTE (Shadow)
If drones can be used as Jet packs, they can be used as hoverboards.

Which is why I don't use jetpacks either. That, or I get a lot of PCs with burnt tushies.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Grifter
post Apr 28 2005, 03:04 PM
Post #50


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 478
Joined: 18-December 03
From: Louisville, KY
Member No.: 5,918



QUOTE
I think Grifter was arguing AGAINST the gay-bashing...just so you know.


SwingKid- Thank god, someone has a freakin' working brain here. You are correct.

QUOTE
Just do us all a favor and shut up. I have played shadowrun with homosexuals, and they're pretty darn good at it. If you're so incredibly closed-minded, perhaps you might actually go out and meet a few of them. Then again, you may already have; how do you know that Fred, the guy who you play RPG's with every other thursday, does'nt spend wednesday drinking cosmopolitans and hitting on guys on the local crew team?


SpasticTeapot: Okay, first of all, you have no idea what the hell you're talking about. You just want to jump on the Grifter-bashing bandwagon. Secondly, you're jumping on me for making fun of homosexuals, which if you'll notice, I didn't do, and you go ahead and stereotype them all as hanging out and drinking cosmopolitans.

For those too stupid to understand what my post was about, I was making fun of everyone here with their holier-than-thou attitudes, who believe that "Thou shalt not use the word gay in any manner that I myself deem inappropriate." What are you people, the fucking lexicon police? You know, this is a PUBLIC forum, and while I do not advocate descrimination of any kind, neither do I get all upset and throw a tantrum just because someone uses a figure of speech I don't agree with. You have an option to NOT read it if you don't agree with it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th September 2025 - 04:11 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.