IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> I think I've found a gross violation of copyright., Who should I contact?
ShadowDragon8685
post Jun 20 2005, 08:11 AM
Post #1


Horror
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,322
Joined: 15-June 05
From: BumFuck, New Jersey
Member No.: 7,445



A brief search of www.shadowrunrpg.com proved fruitless - possibly because my interenet connection is sporadically dieing due to the modem ingesting an unhealthy amount of water.

I think I've found a gross Comercial violation of Shadowrun's copyrights. I bought a game at WalMart, called Restricted Area. In addition to being a so-cheesy-it's-funny knock off, I've noticed that the game uses many terms which I believe to be copyrighted by FanPro. Examples I've found so far include Cyberware, Bone Lacing, Datajacks, Dermal Plating, and a few others.


Could someone point me towards the correct party to contact about this possible breach of copyright?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toturi
post Jun 20 2005, 08:40 AM
Post #2


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



I believe those terms are not SR copyright.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Grinder
post Jun 20 2005, 09:01 AM
Post #3


Great, I'm a Dragon...
*********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 6,699
Joined: 8-October 03
From: North Germany
Member No.: 5,698



rob@srrpg.com maybe?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon8685
post Jun 20 2005, 09:30 AM
Post #4


Horror
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,322
Joined: 15-June 05
From: BumFuck, New Jersey
Member No.: 7,445



Then they oughta be...

When I first played this game, my thoughts were "Oh my god... Some nameless German company created a thoroughly unholy union of Diablo II and Shadowrun... And then made it suck more than it did by default."

And yeah. Once my Internet's back in proper working order, I'll try that email.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fresno Bob
post Jun 20 2005, 09:53 AM
Post #5


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,156
Joined: 15-March 03
From: Fresno, CalFree
Member No.: 4,252



I don't think those terms are copyrightable, due to their generic-ness. Then again, I'm no lawyer.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nerbert
post Jun 20 2005, 10:10 AM
Post #6


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 442
Joined: 23-April 04
From: Pennsylvania
Member No.: 6,280



Heh, if they were copyrighted I'm sure some certain irate authors would have beat down FASA's door two decades ago.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Grinder
post Jun 20 2005, 10:36 AM
Post #7


Great, I'm a Dragon...
*********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 6,699
Joined: 8-October 03
From: North Germany
Member No.: 5,698



Mhhhh... Battletech.... :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eyeless Blond
post Jun 20 2005, 10:39 AM
Post #8


Decker on the Threshold
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,922
Joined: 14-March 04
Member No.: 6,156



I'm much more concerned with the Matrix, which I know *is* copyrighted by FASA. :) Did they get a huge chunck of money for that one?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FlakJacket
post Jun 20 2005, 10:44 AM
Post #9


King of the Hobos
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,117
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 127



If you mean the films, then no. They only hold the copyright, or whichever one it is that I can never remember, to the term matrix in relation to RPG's. At least that's how I remember Adam explaining it to me ages back.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
the_dunner
post Jun 20 2005, 12:16 PM
Post #10


Shooting Target
****

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 1,784
Joined: 28-July 04
From: Cleveland, OH
Member No.: 6,522



Actually, the company you'd want to contract on this would be Wizkids, not FanPro.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Demonseed Elite
post Jun 20 2005, 12:26 PM
Post #11


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,078
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 67



Not sure this would be the right address, but try customerservice@wizkidsgames.com .

WizKids doesn't have many of those terms copyrighted, but if the terms are used in a very similar context, it's possible they may have some kind of case. But they'd need to see a real lawyer about that. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tanka
post Jun 20 2005, 12:50 PM
Post #12


Chrome to the Core
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,152
Joined: 14-October 03
From: ::1
Member No.: 5,715



I don't believe any of those are copyrighted. A lot of cyberpunk uses stuff like that.

In fact, Cyberpunk 2020 uses most of those a lot.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mmu1
post Jun 20 2005, 01:26 PM
Post #13


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,070
Joined: 7-February 04
From: NYC
Member No.: 6,058



Cyberware, a copyright violation? That's like someone trying to copyright "software" or "hardware".

Same thing with the others, they're pretty damn generic.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aku
post Jun 20 2005, 01:38 PM
Post #14


Running, running, running
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,220
Joined: 18-October 04
From: North Carolina
Member No.: 6,769



You have to remembber though, it's not all about generic-ness, for instance, consider what most of us are working with right now, probably either

Windows™ or maybe a
Macintosh:™

So it can be very industry spacific. Now with that said, it is possible for some terms to be universal, within a spacific genre, such as, i'd imagine cyberware would be, since it is more of a descriptor, than an actual item. I would think it is possible, if they had done it, if they were the "first" within the genre to use them, for things such as dermal plating, move by wires to be copyrighted.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyuhan
post Jun 20 2005, 02:04 PM
Post #15


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 276
Joined: 4-September 04
Member No.: 6,628



I wonder if any of the parties involved will look into legal action...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Jun 20 2005, 02:07 PM
Post #16


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,546
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



QUOTE (ShadowDragon8685)
I think I've found a gross Comercial violation of Shadowrun's copyrights. I bought a game at WalMart, called Restricted Area. In addition to being a so-cheesy-it's-funny knock off, I've noticed that the game uses many terms which I believe to be copyrighted by FanPro. Examples I've found so far include Cyberware, Bone Lacing, Datajacks, Dermal Plating, and a few others.

Firstly, yes, Restricted Area is a new game that came out. They were actually kind enough to log on here about six months ago and point us to their demo. If you search for "Restricted Area", you'll find the thread.

Secondly, cyberware was made up well before shadowrun, and I'm not sure how you can contest that "bone lacing", "datajacks" or "dermal plating" could even be copyrighted, much less by Shadowrun first, since things like datajacks and bone lacing are very old.

So no, no copyright infringement involved. I wouldn't bother e-mailing anyone.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aku
post Jun 20 2005, 02:07 PM
Post #17


Running, running, running
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,220
Joined: 18-October 04
From: North Carolina
Member No.: 6,769



It's possible, but i just checked my SR3, and the only words it specifically copyrights are "Matrix" and "Shadowrun". The best thing is to check whichever book it is that has the majority of cyber in it, and see if theres anynotes in it (in the front, with the dedications and credits and that stuff) While it would still technically be possible to persue if they think they can convince the judges that a term has become synonomous with Shadowrun, it would be highly unlikely for them to try, i would think.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dizzo Dizzman
post Jun 20 2005, 02:18 PM
Post #18


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 91
Joined: 23-January 05
From: Washington, DC
Member No.: 7,007



I'm absolutely shocked! That you can buy gaming books at Wal-Mart! :twirl:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aku
post Jun 20 2005, 02:32 PM
Post #19


Running, running, running
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,220
Joined: 18-October 04
From: North Carolina
Member No.: 6,769



it's not a book though, it's a CRPG, that has been talked about for a while now over on the general gaming boards.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
shadow_scholar
post Jun 20 2005, 02:37 PM
Post #20


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 139
Joined: 6-February 05
Member No.: 7,059



I think it is actually a video game of some sort, not a traditional table top rpg.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Backgammon
post Jun 20 2005, 02:41 PM
Post #21


Ain Soph Aur
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,477
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Montreal, Canada
Member No.: 600



Thread discussing Restricted Area

I seriously doubt they have any copyright infringement with Shadowrun.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aku
post Jun 20 2005, 02:47 PM
Post #22


Running, running, running
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,220
Joined: 18-October 04
From: North Carolina
Member No.: 6,769



Especially since it's German made, and as i understand it, the SR following over in Deutschlund is fairly strong. the people couldnt even feign a lack of knowledge.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Jun 20 2005, 03:11 PM
Post #23


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



QUOTE (Aku)
You have to remembber though, it's not all about generic-ness, for instance, consider what most of us are working with right now, probably either

Windows™ or maybe a
Macintosh:™

So it can be very industry spacific. Now with that said, it is possible for some terms to be universal, within a spacific genre, such as, i'd imagine cyberware would be, since it is more of a descriptor, than an actual item. I would think it is possible, if they had done it, if they were the "first" within the genre to use them, for things such as dermal plating, move by wires to be copyrighted.

Notice that the letters TM are used there, not C.

You can't copyright individual words, terms, or names - period - end of sentence.


Those can, however, be trademarked. Trademarks give very limited protection within an industry. If I were to build a house that has windows I wouldn't have to get Microsoft's permission first. If I were to program an OS and call it Windows BP microsoft would have my hoop on a platter - although they would probably just buy the thing from me in the end.


Restricted Access can't violate the Wizkids trademark because it is in a different industry. Trademarks are meant to ensure brand identification and prevent customer confusion. If there is no chance of confusion then the trademark doesn't mater much.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aku
post Jun 20 2005, 03:23 PM
Post #24


Running, running, running
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,220
Joined: 18-October 04
From: North Carolina
Member No.: 6,769



QUOTE (Hysmarca)

Restricted Access can't violate the Wizkids trademark because it is in a different industry. Trademarks are meant to ensure brand identification and prevent customer confusion. If there is no chance of confusion then the trademark doesn't mater much.


True, but it will often be up to the judges to determine where one industry begins, and another ends. For instance, is shadowrun in the "tabletop Rpg--Diced gaming" industry, or just the "Gaming industry". I would say it should be defined as the gaming industry as a whole. For instance, the term "Microsoft" is both, obviously, the company, but is also used, i beleive, in industries that want to define how soft something is (I'm thinking pillows/bedding, but bear with me) but obviously, there isn't any confusion there.

However, if someone were to publish a cyberpunk (or even any genre) of game, called "shadowrun", whether or not it really bore ANY resemblence to the game we play, Wizkids could easily win that trademark/copyright case, because I would think that it would seem to be approved by Wizkids.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Jun 20 2005, 05:27 PM
Post #25


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,546
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



If you're going to argue trademarks, Wizkids certainly doesn't have a case. After all, they don't own the rights to Shadowrun video games, Microsoft does. And do you REALLY want to be taking money from a small time computer game producer that's trying to make a good Shadowrun themed product so you can give it to a giant corporation that hasn't shown the slightest interest in anything having anything to do with Shadowrun?

Let Swishtail or whatever the company is called be. Whether you like the game or not, they're doing a lot better than anyone else on the computer game shelf when it comes to Cyberpunk genre games, and we both need those sorts of games out there.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th April 2024 - 05:11 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.