NOT BECKS, The new chargen is not becks |
NOT BECKS, The new chargen is not becks |
Aug 6 2005, 11:50 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Harlequin Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 331 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 861 |
After reading this thread i just wanted to inform people that both Bull and Synner have said that the new chargen system is NOT Becks.
|
|
|
Aug 6 2005, 12:07 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Freelance Elf Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 7,324 Joined: 30-September 04 From: Texas Member No.: 6,714 |
Thanks for clearing that up.
|
|
|
Aug 6 2005, 02:19 PM
Post
#3
|
|||
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,718 Joined: 14-September 02 Member No.: 3,263 |
We can only hope the all uppercase, seperate thead title will be read understood and remembered by those that missed it the first 4 times. ;) |
||
|
|||
Aug 6 2005, 03:29 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Harlequin Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 331 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 861 |
I was hoping that a new thread might do it... a lot of people seem to "skim" threads they've read the start of.
|
|
|
Aug 6 2005, 04:39 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Manus Celer Dei Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,008 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
My god, BeCKS? How could they?
~J |
|
|
Aug 6 2005, 04:43 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Validating Posts: 1,618 Joined: 29-January 03 From: Montevideo, Uruguay. Member No.: 3,992 |
:notworthy:
|
|
|
Aug 6 2005, 04:46 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Running, running, running Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,220 Joined: 18-October 04 From: North Carolina Member No.: 6,769 |
I've known this practically from the beginning, one of the dev logs said they were ditching priority in favor of point buy...
|
|
|
Aug 6 2005, 07:03 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Why oh why didn't I take the blue pill. Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 6,545 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Gloomy Boise Idaho Member No.: 2,006 |
Its point buy, but its not like anything we have seen yet. From what I gatehr a starting character gets between 300 and 400 points (this is from a friend at Origins).
They may have of course changed this by the time the book gets released. I am still hoping they didn't just double ROF on guns just because the round is now 6 seconds. |
|
|
Aug 6 2005, 07:12 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Harlequin Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 331 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 861 |
This is part of what I mean. The round IS NOT 6 seconds. It is still 3 seconds.
|
|
|
Aug 6 2005, 07:54 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,001 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Michigan Member No.: 1,514 |
We'll have to Prod Bethyaga to update BeCk's to reflect SR4.
|
|
|
Aug 6 2005, 10:16 PM
Post
#11
|
|||
Why oh why didn't I take the blue pill. Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 6,545 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Gloomy Boise Idaho Member No.: 2,006 |
Well unless they changed it in the last two weeks, the round is 6 seconds. |
||
|
|||
Aug 6 2005, 10:23 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 3,314 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Lisbon, Cidade do Pecado Member No.: 185 |
You have been privy to outdated information. It was one option being playtested, but using 3 second turns was the option taken (the decision is certainly more than 2 weeks old) - and that is why people who've signed NDAs shouldn't leak stuff they're privy to under any circumstances even less so before its finalized.
|
|
|
Aug 6 2005, 10:29 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 778 Joined: 6-April 05 Member No.: 7,298 |
Sounds like we need another new thread titled, "It's 3 seconds" with a subtitle "SR4 rounds are not six seconds!".
|
|
|
Aug 6 2005, 11:15 PM
Post
#14
|
|||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 527 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,118 |
I would say they changed it more like five or six weeks ago. Either way, I can also affirm that the combat round's duration will be three seconds. |
||
|
|||
Aug 6 2005, 11:26 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Why oh why didn't I take the blue pill. Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 6,545 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Gloomy Boise Idaho Member No.: 2,006 |
I read the 6 seconds from the origins thread. I did say that it may have been changed. I don't read all the threads here nor do I follow you guys (freelancers) around on the boards so I miss things when they have been updated.
And I am glad they changed it :) give me hope. |
|
|
Aug 6 2005, 11:36 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,718 Joined: 14-September 02 Member No.: 3,263 |
Got it covered. Also i took the time to put up a helpful, health wise public service announcement.
|
|
|
Aug 7 2005, 12:52 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 91 Joined: 13-March 03 From: Bunker Gate 7 [CaTCo Compound] Member No.: 4,248 |
How can you confirm it's 3 seconds? I thinked that those who the read the rules was under the lock of a NDA...
|
|
|
Aug 8 2005, 10:59 PM
Post
#18
|
|||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 112 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Württemberg, AGS Member No.: 2,068 |
You know who gave that "6 second" information? I'm gonna tell you: Rob Boyle. In the Game Trade Magazine article. So better check your facts before accusing the wrong people. |
||
|
|||
Aug 15 2005, 03:03 PM
Post
#19
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 714 Joined: 26-February 02 From: .nl Member No.: 116 |
Bethyaga is a god.
|
|
|
Aug 16 2005, 07:22 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,001 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Michigan Member No.: 1,514 |
At least a minor diety if not a major pantheon of his own. Let's kick him and poke him with sticks to get v0.4 BeCK's.
|
|
|
Aug 16 2005, 07:25 PM
Post
#21
|
|
Manus Celer Dei Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,008 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
A trickster god, spreading suffering.
While this is usually a viewpoint I've derided as based on false assumptions, with regard to chargen as far as I've seen we really don't know anything significant about it—might want to wait on that before planning an alternate system. Or have I missed something? ~J |
|
|
Aug 16 2005, 07:26 PM
Post
#22
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,001 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Michigan Member No.: 1,514 |
Nope, I just like BeCK's. Haven't seen what the new system is, obviously, but what could be better than BeCKs????? 8)
|
|
|
Aug 16 2005, 07:37 PM
Post
#23
|
|||||
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,718 Joined: 14-September 02 Member No.: 3,263 |
An excellent example of why the game designers should, and do tend to, keep as tight a lip as possible on details during development. |
||||
|
|||||
Aug 17 2005, 04:36 AM
Post
#24
|
|||||||
Grumpy Old Ork Decker Group: Admin Posts: 3,794 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Orwell, Ohio Member No.: 50 |
Also a good couterpoint to those who kept saying the devs didn;t listen to playtest or fan feedback on stuff... Bull |
||||||
|
|||||||
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 14th January 2025 - 05:02 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.