Turn to Goo question |
Turn to Goo question |
Aug 25 2005, 12:05 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 5 Joined: 24-August 05 From: North Texas Member No.: 7,612 |
The line "Non-living material - including clothing, gear, and cyberware - is not affected" really bothers me. This would imply that if you turned someone with cyberware to goo that all their cyberware would be laying on the ground to be taken and that when the mage stopped sustaining the spell the victim would return to normal sans cyberware.
Is that a correct literal interpretation? Spell text: Turn to Goo transforms living tissue into a sticky, glue-like substance. The caster must win an Opposed Test pitting her Magic + Spellcasting against the target's Body ( + Counterspelling ). Additionally, the spell's force must equal or exceed the target's Body. Non-living material - including clothing, gear, and cyberware - is not affected. The target is not conscious while under the effects of this spell, and any damage suffered by the gooey form affects the target normally. The goo has a barrier Armor rating equal to Body + net hits ( see Barriers, p. 157 ). |
|
|
Aug 25 2005, 12:09 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Mr. Johnson Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,587 Joined: 25-January 05 From: Berkeley, CA Member No.: 7,014 |
Yup. It's a nasty, nasty spell. Although, I imagine it doesn't turn you into a small puddle, but rather a gelatinous blob approximately the size and mass of the previous form. If you wanted to get to the Cyberware, you'd have to "penetrate" the blob, which would involve doing damage to the Barrier/Structure Rating.
|
|
|
Aug 25 2005, 12:10 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Free Spirit Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,944 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Bloomington, IN UCAS Member No.: 1,920 |
Stealing the cyberware was the big use for the spell. Now you at least need to overcome the barrier rating to get it loose.
|
|
|
Aug 25 2005, 04:21 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,598 Joined: 15-March 03 From: Hong Kong Member No.: 4,253 |
Is the spell sustained? Does the effect start instantly? Does the effect end instantly once the sustaining is over?
Do you only need one net success to turn someone into goo? |
|
|
Aug 25 2005, 04:30 AM
Post
#5
|
|||
Free Spirit Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,944 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Bloomington, IN UCAS Member No.: 1,920 |
Yes. I suppose so. I suppose so. Force of spell not less than Body. Threshold is 1 net success on opposed roll. |
||
|
|||
Aug 25 2005, 04:34 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,598 Joined: 15-March 03 From: Hong Kong Member No.: 4,253 |
Sigh, this is sounding bad, you don't even need to drop that wandering guard with a stun bolt anymore, just cast a force 4ish turn to goo, then stab him a few times with a knife. As the spell requires a relatively low force and only 1 net success to produce instant incapacitation (compared to the force 7+ stun bolt you'd need to throw instead)
The requirement for instant incapacitation is usually linked to not being able to get the alarm out and not being able to retaliate, trun to goo covers both of these. |
|
|
Aug 25 2005, 04:41 AM
Post
#7
|
|||||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 442 Joined: 23-April 04 From: Pennsylvania Member No.: 6,280 |
Oh, an opposed roll. That makes a big difference. You might average 4 successes and they might average only 2, but there's still no way to predict. |
||||
|
|||||
Aug 25 2005, 04:50 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Manus Celer Dei Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,006 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
Congratulations, you just predicted.
(Well, strictly speaking you didn't, but you've got all the information you need to do so. For example, with your six-die caster versus a three-die resister, one in ten times you can expect more successes than they can get resisting. The rest is a bit more than I want to do right now (very tired), but simple and reliable) ~J |
|
|
Aug 25 2005, 08:34 AM
Post
#9
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 239 Joined: 21-August 05 Member No.: 7,586 |
I actually have to admit that i still prefer petrify..
it is almost the same, only that you add body to spellforce for barrier rating. however, instead of cutting yourself through jelly to get the precious cyberware, you simply cast create water right above your victims head. Collect the stuff rinse it in a shower, drop the spell and you got extremly clean, almost ready to implant used cyberware..... :vegm: |
|
|
Aug 25 2005, 10:05 AM
Post
#10
|
|
Knight Templar Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 212 Joined: 20-June 04 From: Ipswich, UK Just South of the Stinkfens Member No.: 6,424 |
maeel, you are a sick, twisted, warped individual. Why didn't I think of that? :S
|
|
|
Aug 25 2005, 01:11 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,453 Joined: 17-September 04 From: St. Paul Member No.: 6,675 |
So petrify turns you inot Lot's Wife? That would be a better name for the spell. Pillar of Salt.
|
|
|
Aug 25 2005, 01:21 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,718 Joined: 14-September 02 Member No.: 3,263 |
Is someone that is turned to Goo still concious? Could they still cast spells or use headware such as to make a call on a headphone?
Or better yet, could a transhuman with a full skull/torso/4-limb conversion just ignore the spell and beat you to a bloody smear? |
|
|
Aug 25 2005, 01:28 PM
Post
#13
|
|||
panda! Group: Members Posts: 10,331 Joined: 8-March 02 From: north of central europe Member No.: 2,242 |
hmm, canned goo :cyber: or maybe walking spam? :silly: |
||
|
|||
Aug 25 2005, 01:32 PM
Post
#14
|
|||
Mr. Johnson Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,587 Joined: 25-January 05 From: Berkeley, CA Member No.: 7,014 |
Erm, how does water dissolve the Petrify? I don't see anywhere in the spell description that states that it is no less than a solid material. |
||
|
|||
Aug 25 2005, 02:02 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 239 Joined: 21-August 05 Member No.: 7,586 |
the desrciption in SR3 states that the target is turned into calcium carbonate, which is water soluble, sure not very well, but good enough that your body washes away like chalk from the board.
ok, ok, not that good, but it works, if the GM is willing. once the spell design rules are out, i am gonna create my own spell... Liquify...... :evil: |
|
|
Aug 25 2005, 02:03 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 239 Joined: 21-August 05 Member No.: 7,586 |
not to mention the area spell..... messify :D
|
|
|
Aug 25 2005, 02:11 PM
Post
#17
|
|||
Mr. Johnson Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,587 Joined: 25-January 05 From: Berkeley, CA Member No.: 7,014 |
This GM isn't. Calcium carbonate comes in many forms, and from the description of the spell (given that the target gets a Barrier/Armor rating), I'd say that it's too tough for normal water to dissolve. If you get a high-powered sanding jetstream of water, then maybe. |
||
|
|||
Aug 25 2005, 02:16 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Technomancer Group: Retired Admins Posts: 4,638 Joined: 2-October 02 From: Champaign, IL Member No.: 3,374 |
Concentrated Acid on the other hand .... I had a team with a mage/shaman combo that would petrify followed by a toxic wave. Couldn't really stop them much with that one. Luckily the drain for toxic wave usually kicked in eventually and put the shaman out of comission for a little while.
|
|
|
Aug 25 2005, 02:53 PM
Post
#19
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 239 Joined: 21-August 05 Member No.: 7,586 |
actually one could create a sustained acidstream.... the drain would be + 1 power stronger than the original, and at damage level L....
how is petrify described in SR4 btw? |
|
|
Aug 25 2005, 03:03 PM
Post
#20
|
|||
panda! Group: Members Posts: 10,331 Joined: 8-March 02 From: north of central europe Member No.: 2,242 |
acid rain? |
||
|
|||
Aug 25 2005, 03:05 PM
Post
#21
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 239 Joined: 21-August 05 Member No.: 7,586 |
does that spell already exist in SR3? i've never seen it.....
|
|
|
Aug 25 2005, 03:08 PM
Post
#22
|
|
panda! Group: Members Posts: 10,331 Joined: 8-March 02 From: north of central europe Member No.: 2,242 |
nah, and for good reason. i dont think you can make a damagedealing spell sustainable...
it was just my idea of a name for that kind of spell :P |
|
|
Aug 25 2005, 03:12 PM
Post
#23
|
|
Chicago Survivor Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 5,079 Joined: 28-January 04 From: Canton, GA Member No.: 6,033 |
Calcium Carbonate, you need vinegar to be rid of it fast, or CLR.
|
|
|
Aug 25 2005, 03:14 PM
Post
#24
|
|||||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 297 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 248 |
I found no rule in SR3 that forbids it though. ;)
Nah. Just let him stand in the open. In Seattles athmospheric conditions, he will melt. :D |
||||
|
|||||
Aug 25 2005, 03:18 PM
Post
#25
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 239 Joined: 21-August 05 Member No.: 7,586 |
well in sr3 combat spell couldn' have the sustain option, but manipulation spells could.
Anyway the only difference i see so far between petrify and TtG is the barrier rating. Liquify and messify..... and the more enemies come, the richer you get ..... :ork |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th April 2024 - 01:02 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.