IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 >  
Closed TopicStart new topic
> Where are the SR4 hate threads?
Sabosect
post Sep 1 2005, 10:45 PM
Post #76


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 807
Joined: 9-October 04
Member No.: 6,741



QUOTE (WorkOver @ Sep 1 2005, 05:31 PM)
eh??  At first I wrote off most posts about SR4 being bad as complaints about the power level of the game being turned down.

this post takes the cake.

So, you have played campaign where the stats are higher than 6?  thats funny, as you can only have on exceptional skill....

Aye, yes I have. And, trust me, exceptional stat doesn't do anything when you can have a starting character with an 11 in a stat. You see, some of us make it a point to at least attempt to memorize the racial maximums.

QUOTE
Also, exactly *how* does the system fall apart when the numbers go above 6?


You mean you have missed the four threads in which this was covered? Four entire threads?

Tell you what. You build a character with a stat above six, just for the hell of it, and play SR4. Then tell me how well it holds together. As it is, I'm not going to post 20+ pages of mathematics just to satisfy your whim.

QUOTE
What house rules do you need?  Care to list any?


Go here: http://forums.dumpshock.com/index.php?showtopic=9694

My post is on the second page. Read it.

QUOTE
I guess I just don't see these glaring problems that the bitter board warriors are posting about.


Yeah, I guess you are. Might want to check that. Start with the dozen or so topics already dealing with it.

QUOTE
Stat 3 + Skill 3 = 6 dice.  Targets are 5 not 4, so what?


Stat 7 + Skill 6 = 13 dice. Perfectly possible at chargen.

QUOTE
Old system it was 6 skills, max attributes.  Max everything.  Shadowrun 3 was more like playing with a cheat code enabled.  It was fun, but jesus, when a player says that a 5 will power on a human mage was gimping himslef (and this is a new player), something is wrong.


Actually, a cheat code would have you starting with 12+ dice. The best SR characters often had a dozen or more dice to throw. Hell, 20 dice is perfectly believable. And don't get me started on the godlike AIs.

QUOTE
now 4 willpower, + 4 logic is 8 dice to resist that spell.


You're kinda doing something wrong if that's all the dice you can get.

QUOTE
BTW, I have NEVER suffered drain from a spell in SR3.  I mean never.


Congrats. You weren't casting powerful-enough spells. That's called "using some sense" for spellcasting.

QUOTE
I think all the bitching is just typical full of shit complaing for complaining sakes.


It's interesting you say that now and don't bother checking the other threads. Or, for that matter, are apparently not bothering to read the title of this one.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marc Hameleers
post Sep 1 2005, 10:46 PM
Post #77


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 16
Joined: 28-August 05
Member No.: 7,636



I saw a thread where 77 % said they would use 4th....and only a small% would kling to 3rd. Why would that be? Have they all been brainwashed?

Really, if you prefer 3rd, that;s fine. But don't think everyone else is a raving lunatic because they feel different. It is clear there are very different opinions of shadowrun 4th. That's fine. But now go and do something usefull with all that energy you put trying to put down 4th edition. Go write a great campaign for 3rd, wich uses all the different rules wich our group was too dumb to comprehend :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ellery
post Sep 1 2005, 10:46 PM
Post #78


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 778
Joined: 6-April 05
Member No.: 7,298



QUOTE
list examples please. I may be just too stupid to know what the hell you are talking about.


How about attributes being cheaper to buy and more useful than skill groups, post character-creation? How about attributes being as cheap to buy and more useful than skill groups during character creation? How about a character creation system that rewards people who start off with very low attributes and build up attributes over time rather than treating attributes more as fixed qualities and having skills built up? How about the fact that out of the 5 or 6 types of ammo given, half are statistically useless, despite descriptions to the contrary? How about being able to create a balanced character at creation time that, as a bonus, can roll 4x more dice for a test than average? How about that range makes almost no difference to firearms performance? Etc. etc. etc..
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hahnsoo
post Sep 1 2005, 10:49 PM
Post #79


Mr. Johnson
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,587
Joined: 25-January 05
From: Berkeley, CA
Member No.: 7,014



Just talking about streamlining:

Combat is about the same (as far as dice rolled, damage taken, boxes filled), although it is much easier to count hits against a fixed TN than a floating TN that you have to calculate every single action (SR3 feels just like Battletech at times... when we play Battletech, my group looks to me for TNs because I have all of the charts and such memorized). The Matrix rules, though, are much much simpler. Simple things like shutting down cameras and retrieving paydata that used to take 4 or so odd rolls per task under the old VR 2.0 rules now only take 1 roll, 2 at the most. Even Cybercombat is better. It's much easier to add the "tech" into a typical Shadowrun without doing a separate 2nd run for the decker.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sabosect
post Sep 1 2005, 10:56 PM
Post #80


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 807
Joined: 9-October 04
Member No.: 6,741



QUOTE (Marc Hameleers)
I saw a thread where 77 % said they would use 4th....and only a small% would kling to 3rd. Why would that be? Have they all been brainwashed?

Really, if you prefer 3rd, that;s fine. But don't think everyone else is a raving lunatic because they feel different. It is clear there are very different opinions of shadowrun 4th. That's fine. But now go and do something usefull with all that energy you put trying to put down 4th edition. Go write a great campaign for 3rd, wich uses all the different rules wich our group was too dumb to comprehend :)

Dear gods, did someone pour a large dose of "illiterate" into the water or something?

Marc, quick question: Did you bother to read the title of the thread, or are you just clicking around at random? Or did you think a topic titled "Where are the SR4 hate threads?" would magically be full of people praising SR4 and completely lacking any complaints at all?

And, yes, I am one of those people who voted that they would use SR4. I've even stated it on here. But that doesn't mean I am completely happy with the system, that it doesn't need more fixes than the insides of a guy who decided to do the chacha with a claymore, or that I don't see room for hundreds of areas of improvements. What is means is that I am willing to play a specialized, nonadaptive system and use it for the purposes intended.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cochise
post Sep 1 2005, 11:01 PM
Post #81


Mr. Quote-function
***

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 1,317
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Somewhere in Germany
Member No.: 1,376



Not that I can't understand some of your arguments, but ...

QUOTE (Sabosect)
Aye, yes I have. And, trust me, exceptional stat doesn't do anything when you can have a starting character with an 11 in a stat. You see, some of us make it a point to at least attempt to memorize the racial maximums.


*hmm*
6*1.5 (rounded down) = 9
7*1.5 (rounded down) = 10 ... I guess something went wrong while memorizing ;)

QUOTE
Congrats. You weren't casting powerful-enough spells. That's called "using some sense" for spellcasting.


That seems to depend on perspective. There are more than enough possibilities in SR3 to cast very high powered spells, kill anyone in sight and walk away with zero drain ... Starts with using odd force numbers, continues with proper use of fetish-based or exclusive spells, turns "right" with "overkill via success" and finally ends with a trauma damper ...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adarael
post Sep 1 2005, 11:05 PM
Post #82


Deus Absconditus
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,742
Joined: 1-September 03
From: Downtown Seattle, UCAS
Member No.: 5,566



QUOTE
How about attributes being cheaper to buy and more useful than skill groups, post character-creation?


Ahh! Thank you for reminding me of what really grates on me about 4th edition. Yes. This. This is my King #1 Beef. I want to grab Fanpro, shake them, and shout, "Did you never play Legend of the 5 Rings 1st and 2nd Edition!?!?"

Because 1st had this problem, leading to Supermen with average skills. They overcompensated for it in 2nd by changing to roll skill keep stat, which meant that grizzled veteran samurai might be able to hit an average target number if they were lucky. And in 3rd edition, they finally managed to balance it.

It's like, "Yo! Fanpro... AEG did all the work for you, 6 months ago. You're lagging."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sabosect
post Sep 1 2005, 11:13 PM
Post #83


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 807
Joined: 9-October 04
Member No.: 6,741



QUOTE (Cochise @ Sep 1 2005, 06:01 PM)
Not that I can't understand some of your arguments, but ...

QUOTE (Sabosect)
Aye, yes I have. And, trust me, exceptional stat doesn't do anything when you can have a starting character with an 11 in a stat. You see, some of us make it a point to at least attempt to memorize the racial maximums.


*hmm*
6*1.5 (rounded down) = 9
7*1.5 (rounded down) = 10 ... I guess something went wrong while memorizing ;)

SR3 core rules, page 245, table titled Racial Attribute Limit Table:

QUOTE
Troll
11 (17)
5 (8 )
10 (15)
4 (6)
4 (6)
6 (9)


The stats are in this order: Body, Quickness, Strength, Charisma, Intelligence, Willpower.

To quote a really bad movie: This is the point where you fall down.

QUOTE
QUOTE
Congrats. You weren't casting powerful-enough spells. That's called "using some sense" for spellcasting.


That seems to depend on perspective. There are more than enough possibilities in SR3 to cast very high powered spells, kill anyone in sight and walk away with zero drain ... Starts with using odd force numbers, continues with proper use of fetish-based or exclusive spells, turns "right" with "overkill via success" and finally ends with a trauma damper ...


A trauma damper is not what I consider as technically getting around drain. The damage is done whether you notice it or not. Not suffering drain is never having to worry about the damage.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Sep 2 2005, 03:33 AM
Post #84


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



QUOTE
I think all the bitching is just typical full of shit complaing for complaining sakes.


Yeah. Especially since your perspective and opinions are the only ones that matter to all of us. You know, them being 100% correct and immutable and all.

And seeing as how none of us have acquired the legal rights to use them, maybe you're the only person that should post on the boards?

Just trying to be helpful. :please:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Oracle
post Sep 2 2005, 05:43 AM
Post #85


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 934
Joined: 26-August 05
From: Earth - Europe - AGS - Norddeutscher Bund - Hannover
Member No.: 7,624



QUOTE (Eldritch)
And sex in any incarnation has no place in a core rule book. Period. It's in bad taste.

Ok. You're right. Sex is such an unnatural and disgusting thing. It shouldn't be mentioned anywhere. At least it shouldn't be done by anyone.
No, seriously: The world of Shadowrun is full of violence, drugs, weapons, apocalyptic nazi cultist wielding magical weapons of mass destruction, racism, spells made to turn people into a gooey substance, human sacrifice and so on. You will find all this in the core rulebook. The world of 2070 is no kindergarten. Sex is the single one most natural things in the world. So you think, that sex is 'worse' than violence? Sounds a little bit schizophrenic to me. ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ellery
post Sep 2 2005, 05:56 AM
Post #86


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 778
Joined: 6-April 05
Member No.: 7,298



Although from a pure marketing perspective in the U.S., it's possibly not the smartest move--or it may be an advantage. These things can be hard to judge. It's not the safest thing to do from a purely marketing perspective.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Clyde
post Sep 2 2005, 06:05 AM
Post #87


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 458
Joined: 12-April 04
From: Lacey, Washington
Member No.: 6,237



Ellery, if they wanted a safe investment they wouldn't be making PnP RPGs at all. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Sep 2 2005, 06:10 AM
Post #88


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



QUOTE (Marc Hameleers)
Really, if you prefer 3rd, that;s fine. But don't think everyone else is a raving lunatic because they feel different. It is clear there are very different opinions of shadowrun 4th. That's fine. But now go and do something usefull with all that energy you put trying to put down 4th edition. Go write a great campaign for 3rd, wich uses all the different rules wich our group was too dumb to comprehend

you know what? bite me. look at the goddamn thread title, moron: nobody was bitching about how SR4 sucked until some idiot decided "hey, let's pick on the guys who don't like SR4". why don't you dickheads leave us alone, instead of telling SR4-haters to keep quiet on a thread about why SR4-haters are so quiet.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Sep 2 2005, 06:48 AM
Post #89


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



^
:rollin: :rollin: :rollin: :rollin:

Indeed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Sep 2 2005, 06:50 AM
Post #90


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Eidolon, your post reminds me of the buzzsaw room in the final level of Shinobi 1 for Game Gear.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Grinder
post Sep 2 2005, 06:52 AM
Post #91


Great, I'm a Dragon...
*********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 6,699
Joined: 8-October 03
From: North Germany
Member No.: 5,698



QUOTE (mfb)
you know what? bite me. look at the goddamn thread title, moron: nobody was bitching about how SR4 sucked until some idiot decided "hey, let's pick on the guys who don't like SR4".

Hey, don't call me an idiot! :S
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sabosect
post Sep 2 2005, 06:53 AM
Post #92


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 807
Joined: 9-October 04
Member No.: 6,741



Damn! Mfb rolled 30 6's for his Use Clue Bat skill. And that's before the rerolls and against a TN of 2.

Edit: Grinder, if the shoe fits...

Edit2: If it doesn't fit, then consider it to be a side effect of annoyance. Mfb only said what a lot of us were thinking.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Grinder
post Sep 2 2005, 07:00 AM
Post #93


Great, I'm a Dragon...
*********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 6,699
Joined: 8-October 03
From: North Germany
Member No.: 5,698



We have a saying in german: "gleich und gleich gesellt sich gern".

Maybe i have to convert to the SR4 haters army.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sabosect
post Sep 2 2005, 07:02 AM
Post #94


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 807
Joined: 9-October 04
Member No.: 6,741



Can you translate for those of us who can't be bothered to learn German or look it up in a translater? Otherwise, your next sentence could refer to a lot of things.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Grinder
post Sep 2 2005, 07:11 AM
Post #95


Great, I'm a Dragon...
*********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 6,699
Joined: 8-October 03
From: North Germany
Member No.: 5,698



Oh, sorry. Roughly translated it's "people with equal attitude like to hang out together".
(it was referred to the "idiot")
Very roughly. Hope it does make sense somehow. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sabosect
post Sep 2 2005, 07:25 AM
Post #96


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 807
Joined: 9-October 04
Member No.: 6,741



To keep from being associated with Marc, the idiot who is basically going around and trying to stir up shit? Yeah, you would have to convert to the haters side.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Grinder
post Sep 2 2005, 07:29 AM
Post #97


Great, I'm a Dragon...
*********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 6,699
Joined: 8-October 03
From: North Germany
Member No.: 5,698



Exactly. :)

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marc Hameleers
post Sep 2 2005, 08:36 AM
Post #98


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 16
Joined: 28-August 05
Member No.: 7,636



QUOTE
To keep from being associated with Marc, the idiot who is basically going around and trying to stir up shit? Yeah, you would have to convert to the haters side


Uhm, thanks...

MY God the guy who has a sig that says somethign like " Dumshock forum, the anal retentives that fun forgot " or something really is right.

I've been to many fora in my life, but none so negative and rude as this. I am a regular at several fora, and man is the attitude differnt. A shame, goes Shadowrun is a great game, and deserves a good community.

I never did stir up shit. I was trying, in a language not my native one, to ask why you not only bitch about the game, but also were, and still are, very negative about the PLAYERS who like it. It was that that i was agitating about, not your bitching in general.

Liking SR 4 does not make me: an idiot, a moron or a dickhead ( just a few quotes ), nor does not agreeing with you guys make me any of those. Really, your name calling, insulting and fit throwing reminds me of my 5 year old niece, she also communicate like that when someone doesn't agree. Try to keep it clear of personal stuff.

Oh well, Now that i have tasted your great, welcomming attitude myself, I probably will stay clear of posting here again. You guys really should try to take a look at some of the other fora out there, and see how fan communities can work.

Too bad, again, SR4 looks like a great game, and deserves great fans.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ellery
post Sep 2 2005, 08:59 AM
Post #99


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 778
Joined: 6-April 05
Member No.: 7,298



If you look closely, you'll notice that the tension goes both ways--there are plenty of attacks by people who like SR4 on those who don't as well. It's a natural reaction to a divisive product. Large changes are almost always divisive unless the resulting product is clearly better than the original in all ways that are different.

It just goes with the territory. In six months it'll be more in line with other fora, I expect.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sabosect
post Sep 2 2005, 09:01 AM
Post #100


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 807
Joined: 9-October 04
Member No.: 6,741



QUOTE (Marc Hameleers)
QUOTE
To keep from being associated with Marc, the idiot who is basically going around and trying to stir up shit? Yeah, you would have to convert to the haters side


Uhm, thanks...

MY God the guy who has a sig that says somethign like " Dumshock forum, the anal retentives that fun forgot " or something really is right.

I only accused you of illiteracy, idiocy, and stirring up shit. You might want to read what MFB said. Here, let me quote it for you:

QUOTE
you know what? bite me. look at the goddamn thread title, moron: nobody was bitching about how SR4 sucked until some idiot decided "hey, let's pick on the guys who don't like SR4". why don't you dickheads leave us alone, instead of telling SR4-haters to keep quiet on a thread about why SR4-haters are so quiet.


You might want to go back a few posts and read everything that is said.

QUOTE
I've been to many fora in my life, but none so negative and rude as this. I am a regular at several  fora, and man is the attitude differnt. A shame, goes Shadowrun is a great game, and deserves a good community.


Actually, if you don't come across as a fragging moron and can dodge the flame wars, this place is pretty nice.

Look, kid, we're not going to coddle you, we're not going to protect you from your own actions. However, in most cases, we can be nice to you. I've actually admitted I'm wrong on several occasions, which I think helps in my case.

QUOTE
I never did stir up shit. I was trying, in a language not my native one, to ask why you not only bitch about the game, but also were, and still are, very negative about the PLAYERS who like it. It was that that i was agitating about, not your bitching in general.


Your post:

QUOTE
I saw a thread where 77 % said they would use 4th....and only a small% would kling to 3rd. Why would that be? Have they all been brainwashed?

Really, if you prefer 3rd, that;s fine. But don't think everyone else is a raving lunatic because they feel different. It is clear there are very different opinions of shadowrun 4th. That's fine. But now go and do something usefull with all that energy you put trying to put down 4th edition. Go write a great campaign for 3rd, wich uses all the different rules wich our group was too dumb to comprehend  :)


Examining the context of your post, nothing about it suggests that your statement it true without your statement requiring ignorance or misconception on your part, something that with your skill of using the English language I do not consider excuseable, especially when all it requires is you read a few posts. Missing those posts and the important context is an example of actions taken by those who are newbies to using this style of communication, which does bring into question your claim you are a regular of several forums.

If you follow my post, you see I was replying to what someone said. Going back to the post I replied you, you see the person in question was replying to something I said. Going back one more step, you find my post, which follows:

QUOTE
To be honest, my biggest complaint about SR4 is the fact it's more invariable than Call of Cthulhu is when it comes to campaign styles. And CoC itself has, at most, 10 campaign styles it can support, as opposed to the 121 million of GURPS or the 200 of SR3. The rest of the complaints are all merely what adds up to the biggest one.

Due to dice mechanics, SR4 cannot support the type of ultra-corp, we-are-hired-by-governments campaign style, or even anything even close to it. It is a street style game, and the entirety of the mechanics are geared towards that. That is why it has easily-reached limits and why the entire dice system starts to fall apart when you start getting into anything above a 6 in anything. That's also why the advancement system is the way it is. Using that for a group of UCAS marines really doesn't support the "we're badass and you know it" style associated with that type of campaign. And, when you get cases where the PCs are running a corporation and dealing with other corporations (say, my campaign or a similar style The Grat Krass is involved in), then pretty much the entire system falls apart or actually actively discourages it.

It's much like how much you have to tweak DnD to create a low-powered campaign without heavy magic involvement.

In the end, it would take me two weeks just to create enough houserules to make SR4 compatible with anything above street and manage to have actual game balance. Unlike SR3, SR4 simply doesn't scale.


And, to be honest, there you have it: I was being negative about the system, not the people who play it. Oh, and if you bothered to check more of my posts, you would find out that in spite of my complaints I plan on playing it anyway as I see a use for it. You see, not everyone who complains about SR4 actually hates it.

QUOTE
Liking SR 4 does not make me: an idiot,  a moron or a dickhead ( just a few quotes ), nor does not agreeing with you guys make me any of those. Really, your name calling, insulting and fit throwing reminds me of my 5 year old niece, she also communicate like that when someone doesn't agree.  Try to keep it clear of personal stuff.


No, but your, as mfb put it, "telling SR4-haters to keep quiet on a thread about why SR4-haters are so quiet" does. Remember: Topic titles do have some relevance to the discussion at hand. Really, after awhile of putting up with that bullshit, it gets tiring.

QUOTE
Oh well, Now that i have tasted your great, welcomming attitude myself, I probably will stay clear of posting here again. You guys really should try to take a look at some of the other fora out there, and see how fan communities can work.


If you think we're hostile, you really are a newbie to forums. Trust me, kid, we've been downright civil. Try the GameFAQs forums, or maybe the DnD forums. Then, after you've been spanked by them a few times, come back and tell us how hostile we are. Hell, for a gaming forum, we're fucking saints.

QUOTE
Too bad, again, SR4 looks like a great game, and deserves great fans.


SR4 has them. Some of them are man enough to admit the game they play has flaws and to point them out. I'm one of them. I'm just annoyed enough with you that I decided to bare hands.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

5 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 >
Closed TopicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd January 2026 - 02:27 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.