Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Focus addiction
Dumpshock Forums > Discussion > Shadowrun
Mortax
So, do weapon foci count to focus addiction in 2nd and 3rd edition? Without books, and can't remember.

Thanks all!
Mr.Platinum
YES!
Straight Razor
yep
Mr.Platinum
anyone else have a different way of saying yes with us?
Tanka
Hai!

Si!

Ja!

Oui!

And on, and on, and on...
Kagetenshi
1

~J
Calvin Hobbes
Uh-huh

You bet.

That is correct.

Gold star!

Yesserino!
RunnerPaul
Yes-a-ress-a-bingbong!

The Yes-meister! Makin' copies!
Mr.Platinum
you are all great in my mind.
Critias
No, they don't.
Sandoval Smith
はい! そうだー
QUOTE
No, they don't.
何でえんねん?
Well, there's nothing in either 3rd Ed, or MitS that says they're exempt from that, but then again they aren't used in the same way that a sustaining, or power focus is. Has this been something that's come up in debate before?
Mr.Platinum
QUOTE (Sandoval Smith)
はい! そうだー
QUOTE
No, they don't.
何でえんねん?
Well, there's nothing in either 3rd Ed, or MitS that says they're exempt from that, but then again they aren't used in the same way that a sustaining, or power focus is. Has this been something that's come up in debate before?

You are spending Karma to bond the focus, so I still say Yes.

and Critias wheres your back up? page references? proove me wrong, i know you want to cause i make you angery.

and if you guys would like to check further i know there is a couple of other focus addiction threads out there .
Mr.Platinum
http://forums.dumpshock.com/index.php?show...focus+addiction


ah heres one, and there is another also posted by moon hawk.
Glyph
I think he just said no as an ironic commentary on all of the recurring "yes" variations.

But he forgot to use the sarcastic.gif smiley.

How are we supposed to know someone is being sarcastic, if they don't label it for us? biggrin.gif
Mr.Platinum
The rule is also optional, it's just for controling power mongering Mages.
Mortax
Yes, however I veiw it as a nessisary rule. If there is no focus addiction, and grounding is gone, what is the downside to useing an uber focus of doom?
nick012000
1. Karma cost
2. Monetary cost

If you can pay the costs, you'll be weaker in other areas, because you didn't spend it on them.
Lindt
Wards? The fact that you light up like times square in the astral? Gremlins?
Nidhogg
I concur. I can see little point in penalising a mage for having uber-foci that he has earned and paid the cost for. If you must place restrictions on the player's toys, then just have the smart enemies take called shots against his foci until he stops abusing them.
nick012000
And don't forget that even though grounding is gone, they can still be blown up by an astral Manabolt.
emo samurai
Can they be masked?
nick012000
You can mask a total Force in foci equal to your initiate grade.
Critias
QUOTE (Mr.Platinum)
QUOTE (Sandoval Smith @ Jan 15 2006, 03:32 PM)
はい! そうだー
QUOTE
No, they don't.
何でえんねん?
Well, there's nothing in either 3rd Ed, or MitS that says they're exempt from that, but then again they aren't used in the same way that a sustaining, or power focus is. Has this been something that's come up in debate before?

You are spending Karma to bond the focus, so I still say Yes.

and Critias wheres your back up? page references? proove me wrong, i know you want to cause i make you angery.

and if you guys would like to check further i know there is a couple of other focus addiction threads out there .

I was just being contrary. Calm down, little buddy. It'll be okay.
Nyxll
QUOTE (Mortax @ Jan 17 2006, 03:32 PM)
Yes, however I veiw it as a nessisary rule.  If there is no focus addiction, and grounding is gone, what is the downside to useing an uber focus of doom?

1. All of the attention you are going to attract.
2. The difficulty in masking them.
3. Cost / difficulty in getting/making them
4. and of course losing them.

if the group is caught, any opposing mage will lock the thing away. Now your mage will be weaker than the generic mage that spent the karma on magic instead.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Dumpshock Forums © 2001-2012