fool
Oct 8 2006, 07:18 PM
cool now how do I get text after the spoiler?
Thanks for your help
Fortune
Oct 8 2006, 07:23 PM
You have to close the Spoiler tag with {/spoiler} {}=[]
Then you can type normally afterwards.
fool
Oct 8 2006, 07:26 PM
givin it a shot
[ Spoiler ]
goin for it
{spoiler} {}=[]
lets see ho it went{/spoiler} {}=[]
maybe now
Fortune
Oct 8 2006, 07:29 PM
The close tag is the same as the one to open the Spoiler, except that a '/' is added. So you type {spoiler} (substituting [] for {}), then type the spoilt text, then close the spoiler with {/spoiler} (substituting [] for {}), then type whatever text you want after the spoiler.
A good hint is to hit the quote button of post which contains a Spoiler and see how they do it.
[ Spoiler ]
Like this
Then type!
fool
Oct 8 2006, 07:32 PM
ok
[ Spoiler ]
now we'll see how good my logic is
yeah
fool
Oct 8 2006, 07:32 PM
you people rock.
Fortune
Oct 8 2006, 07:32 PM
And there you go.
James McMurray
Oct 8 2006, 08:26 PM
CODE |
[Spoiler]Spoiler text here.[/Spoiler] |
I know the issue was solved already, but lots of people were using replacement examples when the [CODE] tag lets you use the actual code. So while the spoiler lesson was no longer needed, there was room for another one.
Austere Emancipator
Oct 8 2006, 08:30 PM
Tekumel
Oct 8 2006, 09:16 PM
QUOTE (Austere Emancipator) |
[ Spoiler ] |
Damn you Austere. >.>
James McMurray
Oct 8 2006, 09:39 PM
If that was a test of patience I failed really quickly. Anything interesting at the end or did he just cut and paste the spoiler tags 300 times?
knasser
Oct 8 2006, 09:49 PM
QUOTE (James McMurray) |
If that was a test of patience I failed really quickly. Anything interesting at the end or did he just cut and paste the spoiler tags 300 times? |
Austere Emancipator
Oct 8 2006, 10:03 PM
It was my way of telling you that it's not fair, after several people have spent a lot of effort on ineffective methods of achieving something, to suddenly drop in and give a much easier solution to the problem at hand.
[It was only 15 times anyway...]
James McMurray
Oct 8 2006, 10:14 PM
Ah. 15 is way more than I wanted to dig, but message received.
Fortune
Oct 8 2006, 11:50 PM
QUOTE (Austere Emancipator @ Oct 9 2006, 08:03 AM) |
... after several people have spent a lot of effort on ineffective methods of achieving something ... |
I don't think my suggestion to use the Quote feature to check how other people accomplish the task to be 'ineffective'.
Bryce963
Oct 9 2006, 08:22 AM
Hmm, nested Spoilers make a really cool pattern.... and its like Christmas, if your parents are sadistic bastards.
James McMurray
Oct 9 2006, 01:20 PM
LOL! That brings back old times. My mom used to wrap boxes inside boxes. It would take awhile but eventually there would start to be a bill or two inside the box, along with another box.
nezumi
Oct 9 2006, 02:07 PM
QUOTE (James McMurray) |
LOL! That brings back old times. My mom used to wrap boxes inside boxes. It would take awhile but eventually there would start to be a bill or two inside the box, along with another box. |
What was the bill for? All the boxes she bought?
James McMurray
Oct 9 2006, 02:35 PM
Gong!
Eben McKay
Oct 9 2006, 06:29 PM
It's the worst Christmas ever.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.