Fortune
Oct 19 2006, 03:12 PM
And I might even buy into that if it were just Dunk himself, but it isn't. It would be Nadjia, and Holly, and Jane-in-the-Box (who definitly wouldn't forget this type of thing), and various others, even dipshit Ryan. It just doesn't feel right in an otherwise very carefully constructed document.
lorechaser
Oct 19 2006, 04:42 PM
I would point out that Virii are one of the bits of nature we are constantly struggling to understand. There are still well-read, highly educated scientists who don't agree on whether a virii is a living being a non-living being, or some third category.
We are constantly gaining new insight to what a virus can do.
FrankTrollman
Oct 19 2006, 04:47 PM
Although we do all agree that the plural is Viruses. Virii isn't even corret in Latin.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plural_of_virus-Frank
hyzmarca
Oct 19 2006, 08:36 PM
It may be that HMHVV in general refers to a family of viruses rather than a single virus and the "strains" are genuses within that family. This would also justify the regional subtypes of ghouls and vampires by allowing each genus to encompass several specific viruses.
lorechaser
Oct 19 2006, 08:47 PM
No, but Virii, must like irregardless, is fun to say.
FrankTrollman
Oct 19 2006, 09:15 PM
QUOTE (hyzmarca) |
It may be that HMHVV in general refers to a family of viruses rather than a single virus and the "strains" are genuses within that family. This would also justify the regional subtypes of ghouls and vampires by allowing each genus to encompass several specific viruses. |
Time to go back to
Virus Taxonomy Online for some research.
QUOTE |
A biological classification is a conceptual construction made up of classes with a hierarchical structure, the ranks being the species, genus, family, order and phylum. It must be emphasized that the classes or taxonomic categories used for building up a classification are conceptual constructions that do not correspond to groups of real organisms with a location in space and time. This is why it is impossible for a biologist ever to encounter an abstract genus or species during his handling of organisms. It is odd that many biologists who readily accept that genera, families or orders are conceptual constructions of the mind, i.e., abstractions, insist that species have a real existence in space and time and are not abstract classes. It seems that species are more readily perceived as populations of real organisms rather than as abstractions. On the other hand, higher ranks such as genera and families are more easily accepted as universal classes defined by one or more properties present in every member of the class. |
Look, it's all fine and dandy for HMHVV to be a species, a genus, a family, or an arbitrary set having no taxonomical correspndance. However, since it
is a completely arbitrary group, that group has completely arbitrary definitions. And the definitions accepted by the scientific community are at the very least:
- It infects humans and/or metahumans.
- It causes vampirism.
- It is a virus.
If it infects subjects who are not part of that defined clade, it's not part of that clade. If it doesn't cause vampirism, it's not part of that clade. If it's not a virus, it's not part of that clade.
It's that simple. Testamonial that an infection that causes ghoul transformation is part of that clade is false a priori because it doesn't cause vampirism. If there's no essence consumption, then whatever other similarities it does or does not have, it's not properly part of any clade called HMHVV.
Now, it could be part of the same family as HMHVV. It could be very closely related to HMHVV (but considering that one requires the killing of a new host in order to properly transfer and the other is spreadable by contact with bodily fluids
I really doubt that), but it's not under the HMHVV umbrella. It can't be.
It's like when someone says "One of my shoe factories in Singapore is in Kalistan, it makes house paint." - he's lying. If it makes house paint in Kalistan, it's not a shoe factory in Singapore.
QUOTE |
No, but Virii, must like irregardless, is fun to say. |
Irregardless is North American Colloquialism according to the OED. That means that if you're from North America, saying "Irregardless" is correct usage. "Virii" just makes you sound like a jackass.
-Frank
fistandantilus4.0
Oct 19 2006, 09:31 PM
QUOTE |
It's that simple. Testamonial that an infection that causes ghoul transformation is part of that clade is false a priori because it doesn't cause vampirism. |
Just a little nit pick, Wendigo's are also part of the main HMHVV strain (I know, I know, just going off canon ATM), and they dont drink blood. They eat flesh, and get others too.
The difference (supposedly) is that they feed off of essence like a vamp when they do this, and the ghoul (so far at least) doesn't.
FrankTrollman
Oct 19 2006, 09:37 PM
QUOTE (fistandantilus3.0) |
QUOTE | It's that simple. Testamonial that an infection that causes ghoul transformation is part of that clade is false a priori because it doesn't cause vampirism. |
Just a little nit pick, Wendigo's are also part of the main HMHVV strain (I know, I know, just going off canon ATM), and they dont drink blood. They eat flesh, and get others too.
The difference (supposedly) is that they feed off of essence like a vamp when they do this, and the ghoul (so far at least) doesn't.
|
Where's the part where this is a nitpick? The Wendigo consumes essence, just like a vampire. It can pass that virus back to humans and turn them into vampires. Thus, the virus affects humans and metahumans and causes "vampirism" in both. I fail to see how that's even weird.
QUOTE (SR2 @ p. 225) |
Similar Species: Despite the ghoul's preference for human flesh, this creature is obviously different from the wendigo (p. 232). |
-Frank
fistandantilus4.0
Oct 19 2006, 09:40 PM
Wasn't SR2 when ghouls were still goblinized people?
My point was simply saying that they're different because they eat flesh not drink blood was irrelevant. I'm not saying that they should be included because of it, just the reasoning.
FrankTrollman
Oct 19 2006, 09:44 PM
Eating flesh is pretty much irrelevent in this discussion, as should be made clear by the banshee.
The point is that vampirism requires a living victim. Ghouls require carrion. There is no vampirism going on. Even if they were drinking coagulated blood through holes in their fangs, they still wouldn't be vampirizing anything because their food is already dead.
And if Ghouls get turned into their state and achieve their dietary requirements through a virus, that's not a virus that causes vampirism, and by definition therefore not a member of the HMHVV clade.
-Frank
fistandantilus4.0
Oct 19 2006, 09:47 PM
QUOTE (FrankTrollman) |
Eating flesh is pretty much irrelevent in this discussion, as should be made clear by the banshee. |
I was going to point that out as well. Which was why I said it was a nit pick. Not arguing against you, just interested in seeing where this is going acutally.
QUOTE |
The point is that vampirism requires a living victim. Ghouls require carrion. There is no vampirism going on. Even if they were drinking coagulated blood through holes in their fangs, they still wouldn't be vampirizing anything because their food is already dead. |
Good clarification, thanks.
Grinder
Oct 19 2006, 10:02 PM
QUOTE (FrankTrollman) |
[*]Phascolarctos Monstrosity Virus (PMV) (Drop Bear Virus) It affects koalas, so we know this isn't an example of HMHVV. And they aren't even vampiric. Arrgh. |
People of DS, don't read the words of the blasphemous Frank!
We (DBC) will deal with him accordingly very soon.
Tanks for your attention, now back to topic.
Fortune
Oct 19 2006, 10:07 PM
QUOTE (Grinder) |
Tanks for your attention ... |
Is that Drop Bear speak?
fistandantilus4.0
Oct 19 2006, 10:08 PM
Pushing it elf
Grinder
Oct 19 2006, 10:19 PM
QUOTE (Fortune) |
QUOTE (Grinder @ Oct 20 2006, 08:02 AM) | Tanks for your attention ... |
Is that Drop Bear speak?
|
Damn!
Well, would a tank get your attention?
Wakshaani
Oct 19 2006, 11:16 PM
QUOTE (TonkaTuff) |
Well, it brings up the uncomfortable question of how, exactly, to classify a clone. Especially if it turns out to not be chemical, but really does depend on the residual aura. In the literature, it's said that they can't clone parts - they have to grow entire (meta)human bodies and harvest the parts when it's done. These clones are considered to be animals at best - slabs of meat at worst. But if these are simply non-human blobs of flesh - why would ghouls, who must eat the flesh of living (or once-living) humans to live, be able to derive any sustenance from them? If clones are otherwise perfectly normal metahumans kept insensate on drugs, or simply left in a feral state, in order to benefit their identical genetic twins... well, that obviously raises a vast number of concerns. Even if they're genetically or surgically manipulated to be of sub-human intelligence (or vegetative), it still raises ethical questions that most people wouldn't want to think about too closely. |
Kinda wonder if there isn't some sort of "Clone Liberation Front" that goes afetr medical facilities, intending to set the clones free to have a life.
"Fre, FREE I tell you!"
Of course, they're pretty much braindead bodies, so, they'd have to be tricky.
Hrm.
Load a bunch in a truck, go see Dr Smith, and start popping in Skillwires and Skillsofts?
"There. You can walk, talk, eat, and learn. You're effectively an eight year old. Now, go into the woods. Freedom!"
Hrm.
Also thoughts of Skillwires and Personafixes.
And now just TERRIBLE things start in my head for runs.
"Go here, pull out the body in 14-Z-9, keep it in a truck, and bring it here."
"Why?"
"Because that's teh replacement body for my ex-boss. I'm going to bring him here, dress him as a maid, and make him be my manservant for the next decade or so."
"..."
"What?"
Ancient History
Oct 20 2006, 04:16 AM
QUOTE (fistandantilus3.0) |
QUOTE (FrankTrollman @ Oct 19 2006, 04:44 PM) | Eating flesh is pretty much irrelevent in this discussion, as should be made clear by the banshee. |
I was going to point that out as well. Which was why I said it was a nit pick. Not arguing against you, just interested in seeing where this is going acutally.
QUOTE | The point is that vampirism requires a living victim. Ghouls require carrion. There is no vampirism going on. Even if they were drinking coagulated blood through holes in their fangs, they still wouldn't be vampirizing anything because their food is already dead. |
Good clarification, thanks.
|
Heh. Y'all are operating on a fairly narrow definition of vampirism.
FrankTrollman
Oct 20 2006, 04:21 AM
QUOTE (Ancient History) |
Heh. Y'all are operating on a fairly narrow definition of vampirism. |
Because I'm excluding tools that have been left in the rain and become dangerous?
The defintion I'm operating on is "harmfully draws magical sustenance from living creatures". That's pretty fucking generous.
-Frank
Ancient History
Oct 20 2006, 04:27 AM
Not particularly. I'm not saying you're wrong, but I think you'd have an easier time not having a stroke over this kind of thing if you kept an open mind. Vampirism, for example, could have several definitions. Yours might be:
1) A condition which grants the Energy Drain power
Another might be:
2) A condition which grants any of the associated traits, behaviors, appearence, and/or appetites of a given culture's analogue to the vampire archetype
Just because it doesn't suck blood (or Essence, as the case may be) doesn't mean it isn't vampiric, at least to some people.
FrankTrollman
Oct 20 2006, 04:35 AM
Sure, whatever. But a vampire must be a parasite. It's in the dictionary definition even. It preys upon others. That's the whole point.
A ghoul is a scavenger. It doesn't prey upon anything or anyone. That's not vampiric, that's just gross.
-Frank
TonkaTuff
Oct 20 2006, 05:43 AM
Well, like other scavengers, ghouls can eat rotten, dead bodies - or they can (and do) hunt down live prey, if it's more convenient. Dead things are usually just easier to get ahold of, so that's what they eat more often. The dietary requirement is simply metahuman flesh. The freshness, or lack thereof, isn't an issue. They don't even have to kill you. A ghoul would be served just as well biting a hunk off of your arm off and running away with it as killing you outright and feasting on your corpse.
While certainly not 'vampirism' in the traditional, literary sense, the feral (or just plain evil) ones are as likely to be man-eating predators as grave-robbing scavengers. That's why they (and their disease) are considered a threat. People don't make a habit of hanging around corpses, so when they do come in contact with ghouls, it's usually because they're being hunted as prey (or, occasionally, wandering where they don't belong).
Draconis
Oct 20 2006, 06:44 AM
QUOTE (Ancient History) |
Not particularly. I'm not saying you're wrong, but I think you'd have an easier time not having a stroke over this kind of thing if you kept an open mind. Vampirism, for example, could have several definitions. Yours might be:
1) A condition which grants the Energy Drain power
Another might be:
2) A condition which grants any of the associated traits, behaviors, appearence, and/or appetites of a given culture's analogue to the vampire archetype
Just because it doesn't suck blood (or Essence, as the case may be) doesn't mean it isn't vampiric, at least to some people. |
"1) A condition which grants the Energy Drain power"
I love this definition. I summon a free spirit with Energy Drain and make it inhabit my toaster. I have a Vampiric Toaster!! Muhahaha.
2) A condition which grants any of the associated traits, behaviors, appearence, and/or appetites of a given culture's analogue to the vampire archetype
Beware the dreaded Chupacabra!
lorechaser
Oct 20 2006, 02:29 PM
Japanese vampires are creepy flying heads....
eidolon
Oct 20 2006, 02:36 PM
QUOTE (FrankTrollman) |
A ghoul is a scavenger. It doesn't prey upon anything or anyone. That's not vampiric, that's just gross. |
Not to fling poo or anything, but part of why ghouls are scary in my games (and in my readings of the fiction) is because not all of them just sit around happily waiting for something to die next to them.
Yeah, the intelligent ones want to be "accepted" and all that jazz, and Dunkie left money to them, and blah blah blah. However, it's also a given fact that not nearly all ghouls are intelligent.
They will and do actively hunt living people, kill them, and eat them. (In some areas, etc etc)
That's pretty parasitic, in my book, and to the populace at large it places them right up there with vampires. And when you add in the rules for passing on being a ghoul, it's ever worse. (I know not everyone likes those rules, but I do so I use them.)
Grinder
Oct 20 2006, 02:53 PM
I do the same in my games. Ghouls hunt in packs and roam in the streets of the sprawls every night.
eidolon
Oct 20 2006, 03:13 PM
Yup. In some areas, and often led by one of those intelligent ghouls that "just wants to be loved" during the day.
Draconis
Oct 20 2006, 04:15 PM
QUOTE (eidolon) |
Yup. In some areas, and often led by one of those intelligent ghouls that "just wants to be loved" during the day. |
My vampiric toaster just wants to be loved. Love the toaster.
Ok that's it i'm going to bed.
FrankTrollman
Oct 20 2006, 04:16 PM
Sure. Ghouls kill your family members and eat their turgid corpses. But that's not vampiric. It's like calling a hyena "vampiric". You can do it, but then the word doesn't mean anything. You don't hear Billy Corgan singing
"The world is a vampire,
bludgeoning you to death with a tire iron and then coming back a few days later to eat rotting flesh off your bones."
Hellz no! A vampire has to draw sustenance from your living body, that's how that particular horror works.
Now the ghoul horror, where it eats dead human bodies and isn't above making dead human bodies for that purpose - that's a whole different thing. That's "Parents" not "Dracula".
And on that note, I still maintain that the original Ghoul writeup was far more horriifying than the current one. In the original, people transformed into Ghouls for no reason, and became super strong, super fast, and super good at killing things. Then they became unable to eat anything but raw, rotting meat. And finally, and this is the kicker: they ate human flesh because they preferred it.
Now that's a villain I can shoot between the eyes without guilt. The transformation causes them to just really like eating people. So much so that whatever moral code they had before they turned, they just find (or make) human corpses and eat them. That's quality villainy.
The current version, I don't even know why there's an anti-ghoul movement anywhere. There's more than enough human corpses being generated from natural death to feed all the ghouls, with the shedim crisis there's a genuine need to dispose of all the bodies in a permanent fashion, and ghouls must eat human corpses. Plus ghouls are still super killing machines, but now you can transform people into ghouls. I honestly don't know why corporations or governments aren't handing out ghoul blood injections to people in controlled circumstances to create armies of super soldiers (and if necessary, subsequently installing persona fixes on the ones that end up too crazy). Body 7 on a human pedastrian? Holy shit!
-Frank
kzt
Oct 20 2006, 04:51 PM
QUOTE (FrankTrollman) |
And on that note, I still maintain that the original Ghoul writeup was far more horriifying than the current one. In the original, people transformed into Ghouls for no reason, and became super strong, super fast, and super good at killing things. |
Do you have more detail in this version? That sounds intresting.
eidolon
Oct 20 2006, 05:03 PM
QUOTE (Frank) |
I still maintain that the original Ghoul writeup was far more horriifying than the current one. |
Agreed. That take on ghouls is far superior, IMO. Scary, not "just another metatype that's misunderstood".
The "just another metatype" is what happens when the game designers decide to not only codify some lamer's desire to be able to play a half-kobold-half-ankheg-dragon-blooded-hyena-baboon cleric, but to also make that "normal" in the story material.
Steak and Spirits
Oct 20 2006, 05:12 PM
QUOTE |
...half-kobold-half-ankheg-dragon-blooded-hyena-baboon cleric... |
Don't forget to add 'Chaotic Good' into that mix.
Spunky, energetic, excitable, rebellious, but really good natured when it comes down to it: The ever original 'Chaotic Good'.
FrankTrollman
Oct 20 2006, 05:39 PM
QUOTE (kzt) |
QUOTE (FrankTrollman @ Oct 20 2006, 11:16 AM) | And on that note, I still maintain that the original Ghoul writeup was far more horriifying than the current one. In the original, people transformed into Ghouls for no reason, and became super strong, super fast, and super good at killing things. |
Do you have more detail in this version? That sounds intresting.
|
Here's the original writeup, with annotations:
QUOTE |
GHOULS Manesphagus horridus |
Note: scientific name does not begin with "homo". Now granted that the zoological greek here is really bad, but the removal of "homo" from the species identifier means that it can't interbreed with other human types such as orks or elves.
QUOTE |
Identification: Ghouls commonly stand 1.7 meters tall and weigh 78 kilograms. |
I know, you're thinking "nothing weighs kilograms! It's a unit of mass!" Whatever, you know what they meant. To put that in perspective, the average human in relatively good nutrition and health stands 1.7 meters tall and masses 70 kilograms. So the transformation into a ghoul makes you about 10% denser.
QUOTE |
They are a goblinized form of human or metahuman. The change results in a rough, scabrous hide and the loss of all body hair. Skin coloration varies from dead-white to ashen gray, depending upon the ghoul's original ethnic group. |
This is a similar coloration change as happens to people who are dangerously hypoxic, and was probably the source material here (ghouls look like they are dying).
QUOTE |
The fingers of a ghoul's hand enlongate and its nails harden into claws. Its skull has slightly enlongated jaws that contain 28 teeth. These are modified to a consistent jagged shape. The females have two mammae. |
Human females also have two mammae, but humans have 32 teeth. The transformation into a Ghoul causes your Wisdom Teeth to drop out and not get replaced when the new jagged teeth come in.
QUOTE |
Similar Species: Despite the ghoul's preference for human flesh, this creature is obviously different from the wendigo. |
Did it say "preference? Hell yes it did! It's not a dietary requirement, it's just something they like to do.
QUOTE |
Habitat: Crypts, abandoned properties near graveyards, and densely populated slums Magic Capability: Normally inate, but some individuals are magically active. |
That means that it's dual natured, by the way. That's how the old writeups talked about that issue (which meant that many people didn't notice that one or more critters was dual.
QUOTE |
Habits: Nocturnal. A ghoul feeds on dead animals, usually humans. |
Remember how it had a preference for human meat? They can live off any dead animals they want, but nonetheless attempt to get most of their sustenance from people. That's pretty gross.
QUOTE |
Its diet and sanitary habits often result in a nauseating odor that emanates from the creature's pores.If no suitable building is available, the ghoul will often dig its own burrow. Though usually found in packs of 6 to 20, some ghouls wander alone. Such specimens tend to be extremely aggressive and have greater-than-average physical characteristics. A ghoul's life expectency is similar to its subspecies of origin. Its breeding season is unrestricted. Young: One (rare) |
So while it's not capable of interbreeding with humans, they can mate with each other and produce offspring just like normal humans when they do so.
QUOTE |
Economic Value: Most governments offer a bounty on ghouls. Many juristictions also make any commerce with or aid to a ghoul punishable by fine, imprisonment, re-education, or even death. Range: Worldwide Commentary: Many ghouls, though suffering from goblinization trauma and possibly loss of mental capacity, remain thinking creatures capable of using whatever technology they can acquire. City-dwelling ghouls often mask their odor with perfumes. |
That pretty much settles the original question "can ghouls talk?" by the way. Yes they can.
QUOTE |
Powers: Enhanced Senses (Smell, Hearing) Weaknesses: Allergy (Sunlight, Moderate); Reduced Senses (Blind or nearly so) |
Note: not all ghouls are actually blind. There are some that can see poorly in addition to the ones that can't see at all. Of course, they can all astrally perceive.
-Frank
kzt
Oct 20 2006, 05:42 PM
Thanks!
Jack Kain
Oct 20 2006, 06:00 PM
I've noticed a little debate starting on the HMHVV virus so I'll join in.
I decided I'd go to
http://wiki.dumpshock.com/index.php/HMHVVDump shocks own wiki for the shadowrun universe.
Your basic HMHVV causes the following changes
* Elves and elven variants become Banshees.
* Dwarves and dwarven variants become Goblins.
* Humans, and in extremely rare cases, other metatypes, become Vampires.
* Orks and ork variants become Wendigos.
* Trolls and troll variants become Dzoo-noo-qua.
There is also HMHVV-BL
which is fatal in most metatypes but turns humans into Nosferatu vampires.
Then there is
HMHVV-II
* Loup-garou—an infected baseline human (aka werewolf)
* Fomorians—an infected troll or troll variants
* Bandersnatch—an infected sasquatch
Finally we come to Krieger HMHVV which creates Ghouls.
HMHVV is a family of virus. If you disagree then you disagree with the game its self.
PBTHHHHT
Oct 20 2006, 06:07 PM
QUOTE (FrankTrollman) |
I know, you're thinking "nothing weighs kilograms! It's a unit of mass!" Whatever, you know what they meant. To put that in perspective, the average human in relatively good nutrition and health stands 1.7 meters tall and masses 70 kilograms. So the transformation into a ghoul makes you about 10% denser. |
To put it into perspective from those who can't conver to the metric system.
1.7 meters... that's about 5' 6.8", basically almost 5'7.
70 kg is about 187 lb while 78 kg is 208 lb. (using the troy standard for the lb)
FrankTrollman
Oct 20 2006, 06:13 PM
QUOTE (PBTHHHHT) |
QUOTE (FrankTrollman @ Oct 20 2006, 12:39 PM) | I know, you're thinking "nothing weighs kilograms! It's a unit of mass!" Whatever, you know what they meant. To put that in perspective, the average human in relatively good nutrition and health stands 1.7 meters tall and masses 70 kilograms. So the transformation into a ghoul makes you about 10% denser. |
To put it into perspective from those who can't conver to the metric system.
1.7 meters... that's about 5' 6.8", basically almost 5'7. 70 kg is about 187 lb while 78 kg is 208 lb. (using the troy standard for the lb)
|
Whoa there.
While 1.7 meters is 5'7", your poundage is way off. A pound is .4536 kilograms, so 78 kilograms is 172 pounds. I have honestly no idea what pound standard you are using.
-Frank
PBTHHHHT
Oct 20 2006, 06:34 PM
Hmmm... my conversion program might be off then. I'll have to do it by hand then. Yes, I use this conversion program called Prokon that folks use at work. I did select the Troy/apothecary standard for pound instead of the Avoirdupois one.
edit: interesting, the website
http://www.worldwidemetric.com/metcal.htm seems to be correct then. 70 kg is about 158 lb and 78 is 172 lb. Ok, that sounds better. I was thinking the average was a bit obscene, maybe the average for UFC folks or something.

Yup, ok, I hit the wrong standards button. We use the avoirdupois standard instead of the troy/apothecary standard for pounds. Remember folks to use the correct standards.
Butterblume
Oct 20 2006, 06:41 PM
Around here, one pound is exactly 0,5 kg.
The guy with the unpronouncable Name and the many Hs in it stated he used troy pounds. The numbers are fine, but troy pounds are even more out of date than the rest of the units of measurement all those backwater countries use.
(A troy pound is about 373g. If the wikipedia is right

).
PBTHHHHT
Oct 20 2006, 06:46 PM
You should see my conversion program, you have more different standards than you can shake a stick at. I even have options for the Netherland pond, the Roman pondus, the Russian Pood, the Russian poud, the Danish pund, the Swedish pund...
what exactly is a UK standard for pocket?
Yes, I did specifically state that I used the troy standard.
Jaid
Oct 20 2006, 07:05 PM
around here, one pound < 0.5 kg, because approximately 2.2 lbs makes one kg. as far as i can tell, that's pretty standard.
Butterblume
Oct 20 2006, 07:22 PM
Those last few posts just illustrate the usefulness of the metric system

.
Jaid for example uses the FrankTrollman pound

.
We probably should get back to ghouls. I hear ghoul scientists prefer measurement units which are long dead.
Jaid
Oct 20 2006, 07:28 PM
ah... so we're talking cubits then, i suppose?
or perhaps you prefer furlongs? leagues? or something else perhaps?
incidentally, i think the topic's needs were satisfied long ago. the topic is "can ghouls talk". the answer given was "yes". everything beyond that point has been rather pointless in terms of staying on topic, really.
Butterblume
Oct 20 2006, 07:54 PM
Actually, I prefer meters and the variations of it, like km and mm

. Metric units are just that more practical. In our university lab we had a lot of old devices which still used out of date units, like Torr for air pressure (since 1978 those old units are officially disallowed), and I really didn't like them.
On the other hand, I can see why someone would use the unit he has grown up with. After all, it's nearly 5 years since the Euro was introduced, and I still often convert prices to the Deutsche Mark (the old unit of currency) in my head (which isn't that hard, since the exchange rate is practically 1:2).
Fortune
Oct 20 2006, 08:21 PM
QUOTE (Grinder) |
Ghouls hunt in packs and roam in the streets of the sprawls every night. |
So do gangers and dogs and devil rats, but that doesn't mean they can all be classed as vampires.
Dale
Oct 20 2006, 10:02 PM
Ghouls have to be exterminated because each and every single one is equal to an animal with rabies. The infestation and infection must be stopped.
Ophis
Oct 21 2006, 08:27 AM
I have to say that i find the idea that I could catch a disease that turns me into a flesh eater far more terrifying than a random awakening. I also think from a metagaming PoV the disease thing is great,players know their characters won't goblinise in to ghouls, but they are aware that the disease can be caught.
On corps infecting people to creat super soldiers, the execs have probably seen and of the Living Dead movies, which prove why you shouldn't make a shambling horde as an army.
Grinder
Oct 21 2006, 02:35 PM
QUOTE (Fortune) |
QUOTE (Grinder @ Oct 21 2006, 12:53 AM) | Ghouls hunt in packs and roam in the streets of the sprawls every night. |
So do gangers and dogs and devil rats, but that doesn't mean they can all be classed as vampires.
|
Agreed. My statement wasn't directed at that topic, I just seconded eidolon who portrayed the way he uses ghouls in his campaigns.
Jaid
Oct 21 2006, 09:30 PM
QUOTE (Ophis) |
On corps infecting people to creat super soldiers, the execs have probably seen and of the Living Dead movies, which prove why you shouldn't make a shambling horde as an army. |
ghouls don't shamble. in fact, for untrained humans, they are quite fast (strength 6).
give them some combat drugs and they'll be really moving

of course, this is all quite irrelevant IMO....
when a combat trooper with body 4, vehicle armor at 9, movement speeds of up to 120m per combat turn (with no tests required) can cost 10,000 retail fully equipped, and doesn't ever require a salary. and parts of the cost are completely recoverable. with 8 dice to attack and 6 to defend...
(for your reference:)
(steel lynx - 5000, Ingram White Knight 2000, smartgun system 400, Smart Firing Platform 2000, camera with smartlink 600 = 10,000

which is a fairly respectable drone)
oh yeah, and it has 3 IPs as well. i mean, honestly, the regular soldier better be able to throw more than 6 dice from skill + attribute if he wants to stay competitive with one guy who can control multiple drones (per the rules, unlimited, but i assume further software is required to keep the drones working in groups beyond a certain size).
further costs would exist, but if your hacker can hack an encrypt program and copy it a million times, so can the military... and over the cost of, say, even 200 drones, you're basically looking at insignificant costs.
if you consider the cost of training a regular soldier + paying them when you're not at war, not to mention feeding them, pensions, etc, plus the fact that drones don't disobey orders... i would suspect drones are probably used in situations where modern regular soldiers would be. certainly, there would be living metahumans as well... but they would not be regular soldiers. they would need to throw at least a couple dice more than the drones on offense, and would need at least 2 IPs imo to even be useful... so, i can certainly see why no one has bothered to make ghoul armies. (not to mention the fact that people will object to kidnapping and infecting people, then slapping a P-fix chip into them... i mean, corps are willing to use deniable assets to pretend like they're angels, i don't think they're gonna be willing to risk getting caught kidnapping and infecting even SINless people, when it's so cheap to just get yourself some basic combat drones... )
hyzmarca
Oct 21 2006, 09:52 PM
Drones are vulnerable to electromagnetic interference. Lets face it, ony sane person is going to have a rather powerful jammer in addition to RF shielding in their facilities.
In an actual battle (not just a shadowrun or other limited engagement) you have to put feet on the ground because it is far too easy to cut you off from your drones.
Jaid
Oct 21 2006, 11:17 PM
QUOTE (hyzmarca) |
Drones are vulnerable to electromagnetic interference. Lets face it, ony sane person is going to have a rather powerful jammer in addition to RF shielding in their facilities. In an actual battle (not just a shadowrun or other limited engagement) you have to put feet on the ground because it is far too easy to cut you off from your drones. |
i dunno about that. with a sattelite link (only another 500

onto both ends) and ECCM 3, you're looking at effective signal 11 from an unmodified drone. so, looking over at the jammer table, you get a maximum jammer rating of 10 - which *cannot* effect the drone any more. on the drone i presented, this adds an additional 500 + 1500/x

where x is the number of drones you have (the cost of buying the ECCM 3 once, then sharing it amongst all the drones).
so, you're looking at 10,500

per drone now... not a significant difference. to be honest, we could probably bump it up a lot higher in cost before we have to worry about cost compared to an actual person.
i mean, to be fair, it is more than likely imo that military drones have pilot ratings of at least 4 (and naturally therefore a response of 4, and rating 4 autosofts).
this would bump the cost of my proposed drone up quite a bit... specifically, you'd have to buy 2 rating 4 response chips per drone. and of course, 1 rating 4 pilot, a few rating 4 autosofts, and while we're at it, a rating 4 ECCM. so, here's the new, more likely military proposal (though the original 10,000

drone with a 500

satellite link still remains viable in a pinch)
steel lynx 5000, ares alpha (more versatile) 1700, airburst link 500, gas vent II 200, smart firing platform 2000, imaging scope 300, with image link 25, smartlink 500, thermographic 100, low-light 100, flare comp 50, vision magnification 50, ultrasound 1000, sensor package including camera 100, with vision enhancement 3 300, flare comp 50, ultrasound 1000, low light 100, thermographic 100, microphone 50 with audio enhancement 3 600, radio signal scanner 6 150, motion sensor 50, MAD scanner (mine detector) 3 225, response chip 4 x 2 4000, sattellite link 500 = 18,750

admittedly, at this point we're looking at getting a little more expensive, but then again a good chunk of this stuff you were gonna have to buy for the soldier anyways... oh, and let's not forget the cost of programs:
Pilot 4 6000, targetting automatics 4 2000, targetting heavy 4 2000, clearsight 4 2000, defense 2000, maneuver groundcraft 4 2000, ECCM 4 4000 = 20000/x, where x equals the number of drones you have.
though, again, if you're on a budget, it's definitely much better to just use the first build. these ones just so happen to be slightly above what the average human with professional skill level is capable of is all.
(i suppose you would also have to add some more security gear to the drones... you might even want to bump the response chips, pilots, and ECCM to 5, and add in an analyse program for tougher defense, in addition to a physical passkey + biometric data required).
and like i said, you aren't going to totally replace humans... you're going to replace regular soldiers. you're still gonna have humans coming along with them (i would expect for each group of drones, you're probably gonna have one drone commander/communications officer with a maxed out commlink, and quite possibly multiple types of drones; at least one would be an observation drone, quite possibly some air support. would probably also be the driver, if applicable, for a large vehicle (probably military hovercraft imo) to act as mobile command center/repair area/transport for the groundcraft. possibly also in charge of some specialised drones as well, depending on mission. one mechanic (though they all might have some minimal skills). one actual officer of some kind. one medic. and one or two special forces (it's hard to sneak a drone anywhere when it's broadcasting in a ridiculously huge radius, after all). of course, not having any military experience, i could certainly be missing some rather important things, but that's a rough guess.
of course, this doesn't necessarily mean that the setting currently reflects this setup... but it really should probably replace regular soldiers with drones, just because drones are relatively cheap in the long run. i mean, to get even one soldier to the point where he's as effective as these drones, you're looking at wired 2 plus a bunch of training... plus the gun and most of the sensors. the cost of housing, feeding, training, and so forth of the soldier all adds up real quick...