QUOTE (AngelisStorm @ Sep 18 2008, 02:02 AM)

I really like the Fake Sin explanation.
But that aside, I think the question is "What are you going to do about it?"
Yup, there might be public outcry. But so what? What is the "public" going to do about it? What is a Senator going to do? "I use my legislative powers to make this thing that can't happen, not happen."
The long and the short is that is did happen. Everyone freaks out because it does potentially destroy the whole point having a SIN (crashes aside). So experts are called in, the FBI and anyone else who matters ICE his SIN to the gills... and it happens anyway.
There is always a way to do something like that. This is Shadowrun, encryption (for example) means jack. So the guy wakes up on the date (probably somewhere remote, since who knows what might happen, right?) goes to buy coffee... and his accounts are useless. Despite everything he, the goverment, and countless experts could do. And there is no proof he is himself. He procedes to a police station, and the cops go "Really? Your THAT guy? Sure. What are you doing in Montana?" And then a rent a cop follows him and kills him for the money while on his lunch break. Bad idea, and he probably knows it. Even if the cops put him under their protectection, people are going to find out where he is, and now he can't run because the cops won't let him.
Also can you imagine now many SINless are probably going to the police and the institute trying to prove they are this guy? A chance to take over his life, when you don't have a SIN? Probably going to cause a bit of chaos, what with bounty hunters killing the imposters, so the police have to protect ever crazy person who makes the claim.
Once the "impossible" has happened, what do you do about it? How do you prove who you are, when all the procautions you took were for naught?
And as for legal responce... "Ahh, you killed the target. I was told that if someone could prove this, I should give them this serial number. Have a nice day." Said runner finds out it's a black offshore account, and no one can prove anything.
Who cares about Lars?
It's the fact that someone -- doesn't matter who -- can just
say that they're going to eliminate all traces of a person, SIN included, and then pay someone to murder that person (why they're even bothering to remove the SIN and identity, I don't know -- it doesn't make a death contract any more legal). It's the complete and total lack of fall-out from it that I have a problem with.