QUOTE (BishopMcQ @ Sep 1 2008, 01:07 AM)
[snarky]Because genocide's a bitch and we killed them all? [/snarky]
Truthfully, I think it has more to do with cultural elitism. The majority of conquering nations believed that their military advantages showed them as a better people and therefore did not learn anything from the ones they conquered. Other cultural imperatives forced a lack of acceptance or belief that technological improvements were "witchcraft." Europeans learned more from the remnants of Moor libraries in Spain than the libraries in the Holy Land.
and thats made the romans quite interesting for europe (and im willing to bet that china got formed in a similar way) as they just as much conqured by cultural assimilation and economy as by force.
beat the current ruler, tell the people that they can keep their gods and so on but also integrate the roman ones into it, then grant them access to the roman market.
only people they really had issues with was the monotheists in a area between greece and egypt, and that was because their "one god" concept didnt mix with the roman pantheon of gods...
if one strip away the religious bit, one could claim that germany, eu, and maybe even usa got formed in a similar way.
as for the china bit up top? iirc, different areas talked different languages until fairly recently. but everyone bowed to the chinese emperor and understood his commands thanks to the written language being concept based rather then sound based.
i makes one wonder if not a one world government could be formed, not by weapons, but by trade...
oh, and about missing parts of egyptian history, no shit!
its been known that history is written by the winner. and there is known actions by the egyption priesthood to wipe out "misbehaving" kings from history...