QUOTE (Riley37 @ Nov 14 2008, 10:44 PM)

Are you saying here that the main book never omits any relevant details? If so, I disagree. From a charitable perspective, the developers had a lot of hard choices about what to fit into core rules, and they did not have bandwidth for detailed rules on this topic. Less charitable viewpoints are readily available.
I will say that the developers did a very good job and SR4 is definitly the best so far. The "never omits any relevant details" bit... no. I shall pretend you didn´t ask.
QUOTE
I can see a spirit having a signature that's slightly different than the sig of the summoner, but they should be similar enough that if you know a mage's sig, if you then assense any spirit summoned by that caster, you can reasonably make the connection.
Two hits, assensing both, lay open that there is a connection between master and spirit. The form of that connection is unstated, and there is no rules reference for both having the same signature. That said, one could introduce the DNA theory without much contradiction.
QUOTE
On a side note, I'm trying to come up with better imagery than "it looks just like the illustration in SR4 main book bestiary" when my mage summons spirits, and asking the GM for thumbnail visual descriptions when we encounter NPC spirits. Even if one botches Assensing, one might be able to make guesses just based on the appearance, eg the Beast spirit that looks like a tengu might have been summoned by a Shinto mage.
There are some suggestions for spirit appearance in Streetmagic (German pg. 95). I´ll soon be trying to do the same (I get to play, yes!), and was quite pleased to learn that druid plant spirits can look like Dryads... better than some living wood...