QUOTE (AllTheNothing @ Nov 16 2008, 07:34 AM)

As technicaly-minded as anyone that knows what his speaking of, Tachi.
People could almost think you're a military weapon technician!

I'm a gunsmith (still in training), but, the only experience I have with military hardware comes from when a friend of mine (who has no family) took me to a "bring your family" day at Fort Carson. I got to play with: M16A4, M203

, Mk 19 AGL, and a M2 .50 HMG, but they only let us watch them fire an AT4, I really wanted to try that one. I must say, however, that being near an AT4 while firing is better than 5 pots of coffee when it comes to waking you up in the morning.
QUOTE (psychophipps @ Nov 16 2008, 06:31 PM)

Actually, it takes a lot less energy than you think. The problem lies in the fact that gunpowder is a more efficient energy source per gram than capacitors and/or batteries. Also remember that a laser doesn't have the same ammunition mass/diameter ratios to worry about as a firearm, that you can get pretty good penetration with very thin beams, you never have to worry about leading your target, and that the steam explosion at the impact area still ensures a pretty good terminal effect (and quite difficult wound treatment) to a living target despite it's small beam diameter.
You mean the spaul (SP?) from molten metal?