QUOTE (MJBurrage @ Dec 10 2008, 04:47 PM)

Anyway, I would argue for breadth, over depth, with at least an overview for every country. If a country does warrant more then a few pages I would rather get a summary in the Almanac, and a full chapter in a separate location book later.
I vehemently disagree with the breadth over depth comment and I will attempt to explain why.
IMHO, location books peaked at New Seattle. I have yet to buy a new location book since New Seattle for this very reason. I know there's some good stuff in Runner Havens and I probably need it but right now, I can't bring myself to buy it.
All the later generation location books from Shadows of North America through to Runner Havens have had notoriously sparse detail on each region. Cities were missing key locations/venues to check out. This is the sort of detail that makes a city feel "alive"and is crucial to all GMs. To be even more frank, the GM is the one that gets the most value from these books so they should be heavily geared to them.
As a GM I don't like having to create a thousand locations for each city. If I have a good chunk of the more common places a runner will visit in a given city are defined that frees my mind to focus on other game elements or creating a new,
single location as required. I can fully flesh out MORE cities in more DETAIL and do it more QUICKLY. It makes my job as the GM EASIER. That is what a location book should be able to do.
If I have to spend my time writing up every location in a city for every adventure after already spending money on the location book then I am sorry but it fails in my eyes.
If, however, we were to see sparse descriptions on countries and a more detailed description on a key city (e.g. 2-3 summary of Russia, detailed description of Moscow - off the top of my head), that might work.
I just really want to stress the fact that this continued "breadth over depth" is hurting the game and this mentality has to stop.
- J.