Knight Saber
Jan 1 2009, 08:31 PM
Can a mage casting a "touch" spell use a melee weapon for the touching, or is it strictly unarmed? Previous editions have said that it's the will behind the act that matters in certain things (hitting spirits with an arrow or sword will work, while a gun won't, for example). It'd certainly give mages a reason to carry staves around, or retractable batons... shades of Elly in Xenogears.
Stahlseele
Jan 1 2009, 08:35 PM
usually strictly unarmed stuff.
but there's things like elemental aura that can be applied to basically anything.
Maelstrome
Jan 1 2009, 08:37 PM
ive always ran it as having to bodily touch the target.
vollmond
Jan 1 2009, 09:49 PM
SR4, pg 195
QUOTE
To touch an unwilling target, the caster must make a normal un-armed attack as part of the Complex Action of spellcasting.
ludomastro
Jan 1 2009, 10:33 PM
I'd allow it for a bonded weapon focus. But that would, of course, be a houserule.
Cadmus
Jan 2 2009, 09:08 AM
Could always use those Hardliner gloves

All the more reason for ork and troll mages hehe,
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.