My wife and I are writing a short story set in a cyberpunk setting which draws off Shadowrun/CP2020s concept of people in prison being wired up to Virtual Reality for the length of their term. I know there are some very brief mentions of this fact in Canon, but not a lot of in-depth explorations of it (that I'm aware of).
I'm going on the assumptions that:
People are tied into a VR system via their datajack or a trodenet, and spend their entire sentence (or very nearly so) interacting with an artificial world.
They lie physically in a secure facility, where they're watched over by a minimal group of guards, some nurses and a medical team, along with remote surveillance and drones in support
Basically everything is corporate-run and -owned, under contract to the UCAS (and therefore they must conform to UCAS laws and public opinion. They can't organ-harvest on living prisoners because the voters would object, and politicians would kill the contract.)
I don't know if, by canon, they'd be tied into a single-user simsense feed, or if they'd all be tied into a shared simsense environment. For story reasons I'm assuming the latter, however. This wouldn't be like following the matrix-rules (Matrix rules apply to deckers using a specialized tools to navigate a utility-oriented system, not to users plugged into a specialized simsense system). If this system is more intense than normal simsense, it is also an added a security measure because trying to bust out a person's body from prison without logging him out of the system could result in some very wicked dumpshock, perhaps even deadly levels of biofeedback.
Presumably, officially, the system is designed to teach valuable life-skills. It would be an idealized copy of the real world, with "real" jobs, and in exchange they get nicer rewards in the system, plus points towards parole. People who don't play by the rules just don't profit (you can't steal parole time, and you can't kill people virtually - in theory, anyway). The added benefits of this system is that it allows for the social component, which people have argued is a basic human need, and therefore is popular with the voters, it allows inmates to actually do productive work such as watch remote security cameras or perform basic electronic work for profit, and it may also allow the entire system to do something dark and nefarious like use all that otherwise untapped brainpower to make a giant organic computer. Does this sound reasonable?
In reality of course, the system means people spend a long time in prison (prisons get paid based on how many people are currently in the system, so paroling people or letting them die is lost profit), so the system is just a drab place that keeps people busy while the company rakes in the cash, perhaps cutting a profit from getting prisoners to do useful work they can then contract out. The system would boast all sorts of nice things to make the voters happy (psychological help available 24/7, automated legal assistance, full libraries, etc., but all of them are just cheap bots with canned responses).
Of course, if someone knows how to code well enough, he could probably find vulnerabilities in the system, making very simple hacking tools (a virtual shiv, for instance). So it's not like crime in prison would be completely eliminated.
Some questions I'm considering;
How do they prevent deckers with deltaware cranial decks from causing problems? Deltaware means it's unlikely to come up on bioscans, but having a deck in prison basically means they have free reign to wreak havoc.
What do they do with the bodies to keep them healthy? Does anything special have to be done to reduce infection and bed sores?
What would the resulting culture be like? What's the male/female ratio? Would they have something to cause pain to men when they feel sexually aroused (intentional or not, think catheter), therefore reducing sexual abuse and rape, or would it not be a concern?
In regards to the processing work, should I assume that all the hard processing is done by the server, and the individual is only getting simsense data? What could an enterprising inmate do before or after conviction to take advantage of that system?
I've had some thoughts of my own, but I'd like to see what other people think before I embarrass myself.