QUOTE (McAllister @ Aug 27 2009, 07:33 AM)

I'd say that Spell Defense requires LOS to the target, and, for Mana spells (and Physical Direct Combat spells...right?), the target is the victim's aura, which the overwatch mage can see. So, you can use Spell Defense against Mana spells, but not Physical spells. Reasonable?
Well going by the following:
QUOTE ("SR4A @ pg.203)
Type
Spell Type is either mana (M) or physical (P). Mana spells affect
their targets through the mana that permeates the astral and physical
planes—affecting the target in a magical and spiritual manner that is
only effectively resisted by the Willpower of a living or magical being.
Physical spells directly target the body; resistance relies on the target’s
Body attribute. Only mana spells can affect astral forms. Either type of
spell may be used in the physical world, but mana spells cannot affect
non-living targets.
It states that Mana spells affect targets through the mana (fine so far), that permeates the astral and physical planes. There's nothing in that which implies a Mana spell must work via the Astral. It actually suggests to my mind that such an act can be accomplished purely on the physical. That Physical spells can't work on the Astral seems merely sensible as they target a victim's body which simply isn't present no the Astral. The closing line stating that either type of spell may be used "in the Physical world" isn't conclusive, but is again suggestive that mana spells can be handled in one world rather than the other.
There's nothing I can see that forbids it beyond all doubt, but it seems to follow from several other things. The fluff justifications people have given for doing so all seem to be from previous editions that aren't backed up by 4th, anywhere I can see. Even mana barriers (wards or otherwise) are explicitly stated to be able to exist on the Physical or Astral planes exclusively, as well as sometimes be dual-natured.
QUOTE ("SR4A @ pg. 194")
Mana barriers on the astral plane are solid, hazily opaque walls.
Such barriers stop astral movement and impose a visual penalty to
astral perception equal to the barrier’s Force. Astral mana barriers
are resistant to astral spells as well as other astral forms, in the same
manner as physical mana barriers noted above.
That makes a pretty clear case for spells on the Physical being unaffected by activity on the Astral so I don't see why one type of Counterspelling should be distinct. If you can't dispel a spell from a different plane, I don't see why you can offer spell defence. If you can't negatively affect someone's aura from a different plane (e.g. a direct combat spell), then I don't see why you can positively affect it (spell defence). If spells can't affect something on a different plane, I don't see why they can be affected by something on a different plane.
And as
ZenShooter01 points out, if you can do this, then it makes a significant tactical difference. Not just to magicians, but to Guardian spirits (or whatever) that might be assigned to protect someone.