Machiavelli
Nov 7 2010, 08:33 PM
If i have a cast a quickened or sustained spell on myself and sombody wants to break it, can i defend actively agains it, which means to "protect" the spell besides what it can do for itself?
Glyph
Nov 7 2010, 08:56 PM
No. But even without "actively" defending against dispelling, you still get your Magic and the spell's Force (and the karma that you spent on it for quickened spells) vs. the enemy mage's counterspelling and Magic. And you are instantly aware of the attempt.
Zyerne
Nov 7 2010, 09:11 PM
Just remember to watch out for the troll with the sniper rifle.
Karoline
Nov 7 2010, 09:18 PM
QUOTE (Zyerne @ Nov 7 2010, 04:11 PM)

Just remember to watch out for the troll with the sniper rifle.
???
Zyerne
Nov 7 2010, 09:27 PM
It's from the opening fiction to SR2.
"Once the magician lost his force field, he was vulnerable to Smedley's sniper rifle. End of story."
Admitedly, the circumstances were slightly different but the truisim holds, I think.
pbangarth
Nov 8 2010, 03:04 PM
I'm waiting for magic to catch up with technology. There are:
Electronic measures :: Spells
Electronic counter measures :: Counterspelling
Electronic counter-counter measures :: ??
Sengir
Nov 8 2010, 06:56 PM
QUOTE (pbangarth @ Nov 8 2010, 04:04 PM)

Electronic counter-counter measures :: ??
In response, Force of Will
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.