[Apologies before hand -- I'm about to go to bed after being up WAY too late playing Raven Shield. =D My typing is probably extremely crappy, though I have made an effort to clean it up as best I can.]
Actually, I /have/ been to the site, and I believe I was the one that posted it to these boards. Could be wrong, and I may not have been the first poster.
I most certainly DID miss that, though. =D I knew he was a martial artist, as he's well known in martial arts and stunt circles, but I did NOT catch that le Parkour was something he considered a
fighting art.
Where does he note it as a fighting art? (I'm genuinely curious.) Is this a case of a <foo>-do [comprehensive way of life] vs a <foo>-jutsu [cmoprehensive way of winnign fights
]? Do we consider either or both to be a "martial art"? (I know that the term is used ni english to mean either, often times, but feel that in general as far as game mechanics go, the way-of-fighting seems to be more applicable than way-of-eating-and-acting-and-moving.)
The english version of the Le Parkour site (
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/parkour/parkoureng...lish/page3.html) refers to it as a sport, as well as an "art of movement". Also, all of the various movements that are discussed (that I've seen) are jumps, drops, rolls, flips, twists, balance work. Nothing seems to be at all combative about that. I am certain that a skilled Parkour artist could apply it pretty well to any martial art they might know (wall jumps/kicks?), but I do not think that the aim of Parkour is at all to teach a student to fight. The closest I saw to that was that it's about "overcoming obstacles" that one meets in life; but I still don't get a "fight" vibe from this.
Which leads me to ask - what is martial about Parkour? Perhaps only the mindset, that no obstacle is too much, and that solutions are always available.
[edit]
Something interesting too that I gleaned from a Google for "parkour martial art":
http://www.urbanfreeflow.com/UrbanFreeFlow...irthofanart.htm-- in which one of the early members of the Parkour movement (who apparently worked with David Belle to develop it - or so he claims) notes that "the parkour was born from the meeting of various elements which are sports in general, and particularly urban sliding sports (for example, skateboarding), asian martial arts, as well as breakdancing, and of course David’s father’s teaching." (Martial arts definitely had a formative role in its development.)
He then goes on to add, "we could talk about art of jumping, art of overcoming obstacles, art of moving. but the definition is not important, I don’t prefer to give another name than parkour", which leads me to believe that there is no combative intent in le Parkour, that it is all about _playing_.
[/edit]