The more that I'm seeing arguments about the VCR, the more that I'm becoming convinced that a part of the "thing" about VCR's--like cyberdecking--is that it's very much style over substance. Put another way, it sounds cool, but when it comes down to it you can get information quicker and more easily with Google.

I don't see this in anyway to diminish the arguments and ideas that are being presented. Indeed, thank you for making them!
QUOTE (Lionesque @ Feb 1 2021, 05:24 AM)

You can use the VCR kind of like a control panel for controlling a number of semi-autonomous vehicles at once. Like those people who fly model airplanes with a huge box hanging around their neck. Only this is the 2050s, so itøs all digital, and you can control several at one, either as a group or by switching from one to the other. However, you can also 'jump in', and that's when the real fun begins.
Yep, of course. Anyone that has flown a drone by eye, screen, or FPV can get the gist of this. One imagines that the drones of the 2050s have far more onboard computational power than those on the current market, with the software capable of following specific instructions akin to, say, those that have GPS-programmable routes. Depending on that onboard hardware and software, "control[ling] several at on[c]e" can mean very different things.
For example, if they're "smart" drones (as it were) then that's not much of a stretch. Anyone can do that with a reasonable wi-fi/radio controller. On the other hand, if you can
directly control multiple drones without relying upon smart drone software, then that is going to require being able to multi-task/thread in the 'ole noggin'. Hence the VCR. Being able to control multiple vehicles as if you were piloting them directly is a
big deal. Not Essence 5 BD, but still it's going to require either the external deck or an internal VCR.
There are, of course, other ways for controlling larger number of drones, e.g. creating a mesh with a lead drone etc. And, yes, there's the hot sim.
QUOTE (Lionesque @ Feb 1 2021, 05:24 AM)

When you 'jump in', the VCR translates input from the vehicles' sensors, motors etc. into something your brain can interpret, and then transmits those signals to your brain and (at least partially) overwrites the sensory input from your meat body. You 'become' the vehicle.
This sounds really neat and cool, but... Practically?
First, if you're getting data from the drone/vehicle, then it has to have the capability of providing that data. If it doesn't, then you're really trying to convert data into a sensation (or whatever) so that your brain can interpret it. Altitude converts to, say, a sense of vertigo.
Second, it's all good to say that you "become the vehicle" (or whatever) but how do you translate, say, rotor information in a quadcopter drone to bodily sensation and for it to be actually
meaningful and
actionable? Indeed, about the only way that the VCR makes sense as described is for controlling anthropomorphic drones/robots where the human brain can make up for all those complex algorithms like balance and "falling forward" is actually walking.
Also, why would you want to override the signals from your body? "Ouch! Ouch! I'm burning!" would be something that you might reasonably want to know.
So, I ask again, what would a VCR actually
do?
From what I can tell, it allows the operator to
directly control multiple vehicles or multiple actions
within a vehicle without recourse to controlling software. That's a huge (BD!) deal. Being able to do that would make a huge mount of sense from the Rigger and the Spyder angle.
Your brain is also going to need to process a whole bunch of information faster than it would otherwise normally be able to do. Also a big deal. That lends credence to the previous argument about brain connectivity etc. so chalk that up for an argument for increased Essence cost over my previous argument about "It's just a computer, Jack."
Everything else, though? That really does seem like it's a vehicle/drone thing, right?
QUOTE (Lionesque @ Feb 1 2021, 05:24 AM)

It seems to me that you sort of insist on the VCR being a kind of inefficient wired reflexes, but that is not at all how we have used the VCR at our table.
I cannot speak for your table, but I
can say that this intimation comes directly from SR2 where the Essence costs and effects basically mirror Wired Reflexes--just for vehicles and a lot cheaper. That in and of itself would count for the "inefficient wired reflexes" thing.
What I
am saying is that, based upon what people have been saying, the impact of the VCR is in a completely different area. That and, perhaps, that hot sim's are going to be completely over-rated (as they likely are with cyberdecks).
QUOTE (Lionesque @ Feb 1 2021, 05:24 AM)

So no, the VCR doesn't give you a combat buff, if by combat buff you mean the ability to use your meat hand to shoot your pistol faster or better. Rather, the VCR allows you to 'become' (e.g.) a sherman tank and navigate, dodge and shoot at enemies as if you were the tank. How's that for a combat buff?
I misspoke/typed, likely because of the Essence Cost and rules that are focused on "reaction times."
What I'm really talking about is what the VCR does in real/game life. Already, the notion that you can multi-task to extreme to control multiple drones directly or, alternately, take up multiple crew requirements in a vehicle? That's a BD!
So how is being a tank a combat buff? For me the real question is not how it feels to be a tank, but how you can control a tank
on your own without all the additional crew.
QUOTE (bannockburn @ Feb 1 2021, 07:38 AM)

Don't forget that you can record video with it. Super useful!

Ha. Too true.