QUOTE (Arax Dvorak @ Aug 23 2016, 06:41 PM)

why did Gaddafi bring upon certain nuclear destruction by attacking Israel with chemical weapons? for no explained reason...
QUOTE (Sengir @ Aug 23 2016, 07:22 PM)

Because Shadowrun was written in the 80s, when
swarthy bearded men where the Hollywood villain/cannonfodder of choice, and Gaddafi was the very real embodiment of that cliche: When his agents didn't go around bombing airplanes and discos, Libya was exporting small arms and especially Semtex in bulk to everybody to shouted "revolution!".
Ironically, 2004 was the year IRL where Gadaffi accepted to dismantle its WMD program under foreign surveillance, probably after seeing what happened to Saddam Hussein. It is also the year Yasser Arafat died.
It's hard to say what Gadaffi would have tried if he had access to missile with a 1000 km range. I can picture him buying an Arafat assassination scenario and wanting to avenge it, or simply overeacting to a Mossad ops in Libya. But it could also be more of an open crisis scenario, like Arafat compound siege (2002 RL) or Cast Lead-type operation (2008-2009 RL) in which he was willing to interfere.
BTW, if you consider the Israeli counter-strike likely killed tens of thousands of people if not more (let's add,
muslim people), and neither the US, Russia nor UK may have done much after, there could be the motivation for assassinating all four leaders in a row (even though they wouldn't have been personally in charge).
QUOTE (Arax Dvorak @ Aug 23 2016, 06:41 PM)

aside from some generic guardian angel type intervening at the last minute to stop Moscow from becoming a mushroom cloud, the only way the Lone Eagle incident makes sense to me is if someone knew the Lone Eagle was going to be launched ahead of time, and that they could stop it... and that the ensuing response would lead to the internment, spare the Native Americans from the worst of VITAS, and that the Ghost Dance was coming...
I think you may be looking at it from the wrong perspective. After 2017, it may seem obvious that the SAIM was going to win the war with magic. But to a number of people of 2009, the most likely scenario was that ecologist and native opposition could be crushed by federal agencies, let alone a full-fledged military response.
The Terrafirst attack on a nuclear plant in 2002 first made ecologists the bad guys. Then US government and corporations then started to exploit resources inside natural parks and tribal reserves. Which the tribes resisted. All of a sudden, military personnel from tribal background break into a nuclear missile silo, deliver a crazy ultimatum (all people from European descend must leave Northern America) and somehow managed to launch a missile all the while they all get killed by invading special forces. But that missile never hit. Tribal members get rounded into camps, reserves now are empty of people, and still full of natural resources. How convenient.
QUOTE (Arax Dvorak @ Aug 24 2016, 11:55 PM)

nomenklatura were the ones in influential posts, apparatchik is anyone who was part of the party apparatus... but... semantics...
Originally, the nomenklatura were (plural) the lists of positions which required approval from a communist party committee. The most important position in the Soviet Union depended on the central committee, but every lower committee had its own nomenklatura. Apparatchiks were the people who made their career inside the communist party. All apparatchiks belonged to a nomenklatura, since every position inside the party would require approval from a committee, but there were parts of the nomenklatura that remained relatively from apparatchiks in most cases, namely Red Army and KGB top position (whose nomination required party approval, but often went to career officers).