Shrike30
Apr 13 2006, 11:02 PM
Yeah, but it's okay if they're retroactive

I've got an oddball political stance... fairly liberal but pro-gun-ownership. I figure I should put a decent amount of trust in the government to handle things like policing the streets, managing health care, and the like... and make damn sure that if we're going to give our government that much power over our daily lives, the tools for revolution are firmly in the hands of the populace.
ronin3338
Apr 13 2006, 11:10 PM
Amen brother!
Kanada Ten
Apr 13 2006, 11:27 PM
QUOTE (James McMurray) |
Nope, not once. I'm not a big fan of turning myself into a monster out of cowardice. |
Instead you turn the police into monsters out of cowardice
Shrike30
Apr 13 2006, 11:35 PM
hyzmarca
Apr 13 2006, 11:43 PM
QUOTE (Shrike30) |
I don't know where you live, exactly, but in the USA it's a federal crime to sell a firearm to a 12 year old. |
Not if the child is accompanied by a parent or legal guardian who is not disqualified from purchasing a firearm due to felony conviction or ruling of mental incomptence.
That would technically be the parent purchasing the gun with the child's money and then giving the weapon to the child but the end result is the same.
And really, statistics do show that creating stable economic prosperity is the best method of defeating gang violence. When is the last time you saw a one of Bill Gates' buddies killed in a driveby? The wealthy limit themselves to financial crimes and domestic violence.
James McMurray
Apr 14 2006, 12:00 AM
So instead I should have asked my rich daddy to buy me a gun? LOL
Deamon_Knight
Apr 14 2006, 03:36 AM
Don't forget that we haven't even examined the accuracy of the report. I gave up on accepting news reporting after my local paper called a WW2 Vintage M1-Garand a semi-automatic assault rifle.
I agree with Hyzmarca (Aside from the Communist thing. Dude, WTF?) we must be ever wary of state power, but I am also a firm believer in the old maxim "Never blame on malice what can be explained by stupidity".
The BATF shouldn't be detaining anyone, this kid was wearing gang like colors, he ran from the cops, and did something that prompted the agents to wrestle him to the ground. And some other relavent facts were probably omitted.
The kid acted suspicious and the BATF overreacted (something they do too often), but somehow I don't think the freedom of American Republic is mortally endangered.
ShadowDragon8685
Apr 14 2006, 04:54 AM
Hey, he's wearing strange colors... So are the "cops".
Look at that picture. Those two are not uniformed officers. The only colours they're displaying are their badges. Easy-to-miss badges. Two big white guys start running after me with guns, you bet your ass I'm gonna haul mine. And in the middle of a "run-for-your-life adrenaline rush, you really think I'm gonna listen to two people who may or may not be telling the truth yelling "Police! Freeze!" especially when all the evidence I have at my disposal says they're a couple of crazy middle-aged wiggers coming to bust a cap in my ass?
James McMurray
Apr 14 2006, 04:56 AM
Then you'll likely end up on the pavement with a boot in your neck.
ShadowDragon8685
Apr 14 2006, 04:58 AM
That, or I'll do something really stupid and draw my super-secret ninja sword..... Or, you know, my concealed carry piece, flip behind some cover, and yell for someone to call the police.
THAT would really confuse them. Then you get a three-way mexican standoff between me, BATF Street Judges, and the real po-lice.
James McMurray
Apr 14 2006, 05:03 AM
It probably wouldn't take long for BATF and the PD to team up and grease your ass.
ShadowDragon8685
Apr 14 2006, 05:04 AM
In Georgia?
Remember what comes out of the South.
Moonshine and Tobacco.
Remember what the South imports?
Firearms.
BATF agents in Georgia are about as welcome as Halloweeners at a Lone Star Picnic.
James McMurray
Apr 14 2006, 05:07 AM
Yeah, especially to the police, those drunken tobacco chewing gun bunnies!
ShadowDragon8685
Apr 14 2006, 05:11 AM
I'm just saying, the police are as likely to order everyone to drop their guns as they are to team up with BATF doughnut-munchin' thrill-seekers who're getting their jollies trying to sit on the necks of local students.
James McMurray
Apr 14 2006, 05:12 AM
And of course, it's blatantly obvious that those BATF agents were nothing but doughnut-munchin' thrill-seekers who're getting their jollies trying to sit on the necks of local students.
A picture is worth 1,000 words, but apparently some of us read differently.
ShadowDragon8685
Apr 14 2006, 05:14 AM
Dude, neither of them are wearing uniforms. A couple of middle-aged guys open the festivities by pulling their pieces and shouting at me, yes, I'm gonna run.
The smart response would've been to walk up to me and say "Uhhh, wanna take that mask off, buddy?" If they were really paranoid, they could call the campus police, who would say "yes, he's been to the ninja versus pirate event. Let him go."
No, they opted for neck-sitting.
James McMurray
Apr 14 2006, 05:18 AM
1) We don't know that's how they "opened the festivities."
2) We have no idea why they are on his neck. I doubt it's because that's how they get their jollies, although it's definitely possible.
Sure, there's other ways to handle things. But there always is. Without knowing the details it's impossible to say to what extent their reaction was justified without using some sort of prejudicial "knowledge" of how "doughnut-munchers" usually operate.
ShadowDragon8685
Apr 14 2006, 05:20 AM
They're BATF agents. They're like the apophrycal tale of the FBI's computer-programmer for fifteen years getting so excited that some muggers tried to mug him and trying to pull out his badge and scream "FBI! FREEZE"! that he didn't realize what he was brandishing was his photo of his girlfriend.
James McMurray
Apr 14 2006, 05:21 AM
Excellent! Now we have all the facts.
Shanshu Freeman
Apr 14 2006, 07:20 AM
QUOTE (Deamon_Knight @ Apr 14 2006, 03:36 AM) |
Don't forget that we haven't even examined the accuracy of the report. I gave up on accepting news reporting after my local paper called a WW2 Vintage M1-Garand a semi-automatic assault rifle.
I agree with Hyzmarca (Aside from the Communist thing. Dude, WTF?) we must be ever wary of state power, but I am also a firm believer in the old maxim "Never blame on malice what can be explained by stupidity".
The BATF shouldn't be detaining anyone, this kid was wearing gang like colors, he ran from the cops, and did something that prompted the agents to wrestle him to the ground. And some other relavent facts were probably omitted.
The kid acted suspicious and the BATF overreacted (something they do too often), but somehow I don't think the freedom of American Republic is mortally endangered. |
well said
QUOTE (ShadowDragon8685) |
Dude, neither of them are wearing uniforms. A couple of middle-aged guys open the festivities by pulling their pieces and shouting at me, yes, I'm gonna run.
The smart response would've been to walk up to me and say "Uhhh, wanna take that mask off, buddy?" If they were really paranoid, they could call the campus police, who would say "yes, he's been to the ninja versus pirate event. Let him go."
No, they opted for neck-sitting. |
set aside the fact that they are officers of the law a moment. let's pretend it's *anybody* pointing a gun at you IRL... depending on what they want me to do I'm pretty likely to comply. I don't plan on out running a bullet.
nezumi
Apr 14 2006, 01:55 PM
QUOTE (Shanshu Freeman) |
let's pretend it's *anybody* pointing a gun at you IRL... depending on what they want me to do I'm pretty likely to comply. I don't plan on out running a bullet. |
What's wrong? Small combat pool?
Shrike30
Apr 14 2006, 07:03 PM
If I'm surprised by a random person pointing a gun at me from a few yards away, I'm probably going to do what they want.
If they're any sort of real distance away, and I've got any sort of escape nearby that looks bulletproof (like, say, a campus building in the scenario we're looking at), there's no way in hell I'm sticking around to find out WHAT they want, if their opener involves pointing a gun at me.
Regardless of everyone's personal expected reaction to this situation, the ninja in question decided to totally flip out and run away when confronted with people we can all largely agree are not immediately visually recognizeable as police officers.
Tanka
Apr 15 2006, 04:58 AM
An on-topic story turned into yet another flamefest.
Ah, Dumpshock, you never cease to amaze me.
Shanshu Freeman
Apr 16 2006, 05:24 AM
QUOTE (nezumi) |
QUOTE (Shanshu Freeman @ Apr 14 2006, 02:20 AM) | let's pretend it's *anybody* pointing a gun at you IRL... depending on what they want me to do I'm pretty likely to comply. I don't plan on out running a bullet. |
What's wrong? Small combat pool?
|
lol very
QUOTE (Shrike30) |
we can all largely agree are not immediately visually recognizeable as police officers. |
They aren't necessarily obligated to be visually identifiable... which is problematic in our era of widespread personal music device usage... verbal IDs and warnings might not be all that effective.
QUOTE (tanka) |
An on-topic story turned into yet another flamefest.
Ah, Dumpshock, you never cease to amaze me. |
You're right, it's important to keep disagreements friendly, academic, and limit most discussion to those relevant to SR... but discussions are bound to rabbit trail a bit... let's sit back and enjoy the ride. <3
Tanka
Apr 16 2006, 10:47 AM
QUOTE (Shanshu Freeman @ Apr 16 2006, 01:24 AM) |
QUOTE (tanka) | An on-topic story turned into yet another flamefest.
Ah, Dumpshock, you never cease to amaze me. |
You're right, it's important to keep disagreements friendly, academic, and limit most discussion to those relevant to SR... but discussions are bound to rabbit trail a bit... let's sit back and enjoy the ride. <3
|
Oops, forgot to put on my sarcasm cap.
*caps*
That better?
Edited because I thought of a much better response. Ha!
Ankle Biter
Apr 16 2006, 03:14 PM
To be honest I have seen too many cases of policemen doing routine work being shot by some dick who dosen't want to get a parking ticket or jaywalking citation or whatever to be remotley surprised when they draw on every bugger and their dog. If you want cops to be all touchy feely you first need to figure out a way of stoping assholes shooting at them at the drop of a hat.
I am against members of the ATF kneeling on some kid's neck, though, It should have been clear by the time he stopped that he was not going to try anything.
James McMurray
Apr 16 2006, 04:58 PM
I haven't seen any flaming yet. A few sarcastic comments, but it's nowhere near the flamewar stage.
James McMurray
Apr 16 2006, 05:00 PM
The odds are pretty good something happened to make the cop kneel on his neck. Just because we're trained by a sensationalist media to think that all cops are evil bastards doesn't make it true.
xizor
Apr 16 2006, 08:28 PM
it also doesnt make it false.
I suspect that cops have a fairly normal distribution between good and not so good people.
Wounded Ronin
Apr 16 2006, 10:28 PM
QUOTE (James McMurray) |
The odds are pretty good something happened to make the cop kneel on his neck. Just because we're trained by a sensationalist media to think that all cops are evil bastards doesn't make it true. |
Back when I was in high school there was a bus driver I knew for years. I knew he wasn't a bad guy. But he complained about constant harassment from the police. This was in NYC.
I think that blaming everything on "a sensationalist media" is intellectually lazy. Don't you think it's at least a little bit possible that some cops are good people while others simply enjoy having power?
Tanka
Apr 17 2006, 01:10 AM
QUOTE (Wounded Ronin) |
QUOTE (James McMurray @ Apr 16 2006, 12:00 PM) | The odds are pretty good something happened to make the cop kneel on his neck. Just because we're trained by a sensationalist media to think that all cops are evil bastards doesn't make it true. |
Back when I was in high school there was a bus driver I knew for years. I knew he wasn't a bad guy. But he complained about constant harassment from the police. This was in NYC.
I think that blaming everything on "a sensationalist media" is intellectually lazy. Don't you think it's at least a little bit possible that some cops are good people while others simply enjoy having power?
|
BUT WE MUST PROTECT OUR FREEDOM WITH FORCE!
What's the Ben Franklin quote? Oh yeah:
"Those who would give up essential liberty for temporary peace deserve neither peace nor liberty."
Austere Emancipator
Apr 17 2006, 01:15 AM
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Tanka
Apr 17 2006, 01:20 AM
I was close. Had to look it up on another forum, wherein they usually get things wrong anyway.
Thanks for the correction.
Shanshu Freeman
Apr 17 2006, 04:07 AM
QUOTE (tanka) |
QUOTE (Shanshu Freeman @ Apr 16 2006, 01:24 AM) | QUOTE (tanka) | An on-topic story turned into yet another flamefest.
Ah, Dumpshock, you never cease to amaze me. |
You're right, it's important to keep disagreements friendly, academic, and limit most discussion to those relevant to SR... but discussions are bound to rabbit trail a bit... let's sit back and enjoy the ride. <3
|
Oops, forgot to put on my sarcasm cap.
*caps*
That better?
Edited because I thought of a much better response. Ha!
|
much, thank you
QUOTE (Wounded Ronin) |
I think that blaming everything on "a sensationalist media" is intellectually lazy. Don't you think it's at least a little bit possible that some cops are good people while others simply enjoy having power? |
very good point... another consideration is that the profession attracts people with high levels of circulating testosterone, fwiw
James McMurray
Apr 17 2006, 06:01 AM
QUOTE |
it also doesnt make it false. |
Nope. Never said it did.

QUOTE |
I think that blaming everything on "a sensationalist media" is intellectually lazy. Don't you think it's at least a little bit possible that some cops are good people while others simply enjoy having power? |
I didn't blame everything on sensationalist media, I said they've trained us to believe that cops are evil. Most stories which focus on cops focus on the bad things they do. When the cops do right, the stories instead focus on the bad things their arrestees did. Evil sells better than good.
I've even said already that police are human, so will fall all over the spectrum. I don't take offense at people saying cops do bad things, it just annoys me when they automatically assume that if something is being done by a cop (kneeling on a neck in this case) then it must be something bad.
John Campbell
Apr 17 2006, 06:42 AM
Damn that sensationalist media, making people think that it's a bad thing when a cop kneels on the neck of someone whose only crime was against fashion!
SL James
Apr 17 2006, 07:16 AM
It's not senationalist, per se; but rather it's just another example of the Jew-run liberal media.
ShadowDragon8685
Apr 17 2006, 07:31 AM
*dives on SL James'
Grenade in the hopes that it will be ignored and not turn into an incindiary flamewar or a thread-lockage.*
SL James
Apr 17 2006, 07:34 AM
How disappointing that you think so little of your fellow dumpshockers.
ShadowDragon8685
Apr 17 2006, 07:37 AM
Or worse: The Drop Jew Thread. >_<
Tanka
Apr 17 2006, 10:38 AM
QUOTE (ShadowDragon8685) |
Or worse: The Drop Jew Thread. >_< |
danzig138
Apr 17 2006, 05:58 PM
QUOTE (James McMurray) |
I didn't blame everything on sensationalist media, I said they've trained us to believe that cops are evil. |
Funny. It was seeing cops in action that taught me that, not the media.
Shanshu Freeman
Apr 17 2006, 06:18 PM
Why is it okay to generalize behavior when it is the police? Nobody can get away with it when it's another group... that's like saying all muslim clerics promote suicide bombings.
James McMurray
Apr 17 2006, 06:33 PM
Because police don't have large amounts of political pull, not anti-defamatory groups to fall back on.
emo samurai
Apr 17 2006, 06:38 PM
Which flame warrior are you? I'd estimate about about 25% of posters are Xenophobes, 20% are centurions, and a very vocal 5% are trollers.
Austere Emancipator
Apr 17 2006, 07:19 PM
QUOTE (emo samurai) |
20% are centurions |
Like who? I can only remember one Dumpshocker arguing that having been in the (US) military makes him right about something. I've met quite a few on other boards, though.
Shrike30
Apr 19 2006, 12:01 AM
Y'all think it's possible that he's kneeling on the kid's neck because, when the picture was taken, he hadn't ascertained if the kid was armed or not yet? I mean, potential for police brutality aside, most cops I've met are pretty thorough when it comes to "making sure the guy can't really move around until I know he's not a threat anymore." They like the whole "not getting stabbed" thing, you see.
emo samurai
Apr 19 2006, 12:02 AM
Which flame warrior am I?
James McMurray
Apr 19 2006, 12:06 AM
<Sarcasm>
No! It can't be psosible! Nothing a federal agent ever does can be good!!!
YOU SUCK!!!!!
</sarcasm>
Kanada Ten
Apr 19 2006, 12:08 AM
ATF agents are not cops.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.