rlemansky
Jun 22 2004, 09:39 AM
Greetings.
I was wondering if anyone had the names of the Meta-variant Homo Sapien species. IIRC, Elves were 'nobilis', trolls were 'ingentis', orks were 'robustus', and dwarfs were ' pumilionis'. What are dryads, gnowmes, night ones, etc. ?
Thanks,
R
shadd4d
Jun 22 2004, 09:54 AM
I don't ever remember it being listed, actually. Just the latin assumably for the normal metatypes.
Maybe in the Companion, but no idea really.
Don
Smiley
Jun 22 2004, 10:27 AM
I don't see any in the companion. Just the common layman names. I guess you can let your imagination run wild and apply any that you deem fitting.
Abstruse
Jun 22 2004, 11:27 AM
They're not really seperate races, just a subclassification of the same race. A Night One is still classified as Homo Sapiens Nobilis. For the few that are different classifications, check out Paranormal Animals of North America/Europe.
The Abstruse One
Nikoli
Jun 22 2004, 12:34 PM
I would imagine a Night One might be Homo Sapiens Nocturnus Nobilis, or some such.
toturi
Jun 22 2004, 12:40 PM
Homo Sapien Vegetatis Nobilis - Dryads
Homo Sapien Oculis Ingentis - Cyclops
Nikoli
Jun 22 2004, 12:44 PM
Homo Sapies Ruprestus - Reporter
kevyn668
Jun 22 2004, 01:38 PM
QUOTE (Nikoli) |
Homo Sapies Ruprestus - Reporter |
Wouldn't that be Homo Sapiens Sensationalus?
(If I knew enough latin to say "Yellow Journalism" or "Bullshit Peddler" I would)
Nikoli
Jun 22 2004, 01:45 PM
Represtus is Large Mouth Bass
kevyn668
Jun 22 2004, 01:50 PM
Oooooh. Well that works for me, too.
Nikoli
Jun 22 2004, 01:55 PM
Misfit Toy
Jun 22 2004, 03:36 PM
I imagine the variant's part of the taxonomy would come at the end, not the middle. So a Night One might be Homo Sapiens Noblis Nocturnus if anything, not Nocturnus Nobilis. Taxonomy goes from the broadest group to the narrowest group.
Nikoli
Jun 22 2004, 04:35 PM
Thanks Misfit, that does make more sense.
Alania
Jun 22 2004, 04:48 PM
SR 2.01 had those listet in the Corebook
the listing for humans was "Homo Sapiens Sapiens" afair
RangerJoe
Jun 22 2004, 04:49 PM
Wouldn't it make more sense to add the sub-species name after the species name?
I.e.-- Homo Sapien Nobilis Vegetatis - Dryads
kevyn668
Jun 22 2004, 05:23 PM
QUOTE (Misfit Toy) |
I imagine the variant's part of the taxonomy would come at the end, not the middle. So a Night One might be Homo Sapiens Noblis Nocturnus if anything, not Nocturnus Nobilis. Taxonomy goes from the broadest group to the narrowest group. |
...
RangerJoe
Jun 22 2004, 05:35 PM
Ka. Oops. World: 1, Joe: 0.
Providing a canon ruling on the metavarient sub-species names would be a really neat thing for the Powers that Be to post as content on the official SR website (hint hint--nudge-nudge) (Unless it's the cornerstone of some forthcoming text, of course)
Abstruse
Jun 23 2004, 11:39 AM
Homo Sapiens Sapiens is what is generally used today to describe modern humans. Just plain Homo Sapiens would be the last stages of cave men.
The Abstruse One
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.