Grimtooth
Jun 29 2004, 06:06 PM
Physad power of Armor is impact only.
Is the magician spell of the same name for both Ballistic and Impact?
I'm at work and bookless at the moment.
Also
If you were to make a physad who fancies himself a berserker, could he use a wolf skin enchanted as an anchroing focus for the armor spell and use the same wolf skin as a talisman geas for ALL of his abilities?
JaronK
Jun 29 2004, 06:22 PM
The magician version gives both balistic and impact, but it makes you glow. I don't know about the other bit.
JaronK
CoalHeart
Jun 29 2004, 06:36 PM
Correct physad power is impact only. and it is called Mystic Armor
'Armor' is the name of the mage spell, and it applies to both ballistic and impact. It also makes you glow blue. (you can argue with your gm to change color, but it's not invisible)
Yes you could use a wolf skin anchoring foci with 'Armor' on it. But remember the Foci needs to be the same force as the spell. and if you ever remove the foci the spell drops and as a physad you can't use sorcery to recast the spell. The Creator of the Foci has to cast it back onto it, AND that foci will always have the creator's signature on it.
And yes you could use your wolf skin as a geas for everything, but remember you lose it or it gets broken and it's useless and you've lost all ability to use any of your physad powers.
Grimtooth
Jun 29 2004, 07:07 PM
Cool
Thanks to JaronK and CH
Lord Ver'an
Jun 30 2004, 05:47 AM
Could you design an armor spell that did not glow?
Misfit Toy
Jun 30 2004, 07:18 AM
There's no reason why you wouldn't as per the spell design rules, though individual GMs would vary on that opinion. It'd have the exact same Drain Level, too. There's no "obvious spell" modifier oddly enough.
Logically, there should be a significant reason since, if it were possible, it'd have been on the market a long time ago.
RedmondLarry
Jun 30 2004, 07:36 AM
All armor spells glow, because it helps with game balance. Any GM can allow non-glowing armor spells in his campaign if he wants to (perhaps they smell bad instead?)
Grimtooth
Jun 30 2004, 01:20 PM
you mean like an armor spell that smells like feet and ozone

player A - That guy over there just took a full auto burst to the chest and shrugged it off. Must be an armor spell
Player B - More like an armor smell!!!
toturi
Jun 30 2004, 01:24 PM
An armour spell that stinks(smells like a predater) can be used to great effect to put off sniffer dogs or other paranormal animals.
CoalHeart
Jun 30 2004, 01:30 PM
It's just a game balane thing.
To let sams have an idea of what guage of heavy firepower they should aim at the glowing guy.
Also it's a good way to get that 'GEEK THE MAGE' rule off the mage.
You cast it on your tank sammy, and dress him up in decorative robes.
kevyn668
Jun 30 2004, 01:42 PM
To the original post: You could make your physad berserker a physmage beserker. Then he could recast the spell as needed.
Now that that's taken care of: I know I should know better but...
How does glowing make the armor spell balanced? Just so you can see it? Why don't the "Increase Attribute/Reaction/Reflexes" spells glow? Its a magical enhancement...
That's like saying Trolls are big and ugly for game balance.
Neon Tiger
Jun 30 2004, 01:45 PM
The glow effect of armor spell is game balance, as others have said before me. I would let players design a non-glowing version for extra drain, say, +1 drain level.
Neon Tiger
Jun 30 2004, 01:50 PM
QUOTE (kevyn668) |
To the original post: You could make your physad berserker a physmage beserker. Then he could recast the spell as needed.
Now that that's taken care of: I know I should know better but...
How does glowing make the armor spell balanced? Just so you can see it? Why don't the "Increase Attribute/Reaction/Reflexes" spells glow? Its a magical enhancement...
That's like saying Trolls are big and ugly for game balance. |
Getting more initiative/strength/body/whatever is rather easy for most characters. Getting a very good armor rating is very hard for most characters, at least without sacrifising quickness.
And yes, trolls are ugly because of game balance.
CoalHeart
Jun 30 2004, 01:52 PM
Um.... Trolls are big and ugly for game balance.
If you had a person that looked like a human and was the size of a human, but had the strength and innate toughness of a troll it would take away from the downside of being Troll. No one would fear you, no social penalties, no racism, no need for new armor sizes or bigger cars or weapons. You'll have an easier time finding girlfriiends. And why then would anyone pick to be human, when you can be a humanlooking troll?
Anyways.... Back on topic and the questions asked.
Like I said the glowing effect is to give someone a target to shoot for. It is also an energy field that surrounds a person on the outside and protects them.
As for the improved attribute / reaction / reflexes. Those are all internal effects. I'm sure if you cut someone's arm open you would see some nice glowing around their muscles / tendons / nerves.
kevyn668
Jun 30 2004, 02:01 PM
Meh, whatever.
Herald of Verjigorm
Jun 30 2004, 05:50 PM
The "shoot for the glow" mentality has caused me to consider a cruel trick by a mage. Armor the adept, the troll, and (int-2) bystanders. If the opposition takes out the big guns at everything with that armor glow...
CoalHeart
Jun 30 2004, 06:10 PM
QUOTE (Herald of Verjigorm) |
The "shoot for the glow" mentality has caused me to consider a cruel trick by a mage. Armor the adept, the troll, and (int-2) bystanders. If the opposition takes out the big guns at everything with that armor glow... |
It's a great trick. Usually the gangers through low end security forces fall for it in my game. Trained personelle are a bit harder to trick
Neon Tiger
Jun 30 2004, 10:36 PM
Even better, use a illusion spell that duplicates the glow effect of Armor spell. On several people.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.