Recently, it's come up that a player wants to mount an underbarrel Antioch-3 GL on... an Antioch-3 GL.
The question is does it use the rules for heavy weapons(top-, barrel-, and under-barrel mounts) or missile/rocket launchers(no mounts)?
Ideas?
Full Version: Ares Antioch-3: Mounts or No?
Brother Maynard, bring up the Book Of Armament !
| QUOTE (Nath) |
| Brother Maynard, bring up the Book Of Armament ! |
Private Meier, raise the field artillery! The one from division!
IIRC Antioch is man portable[1] so I'd use heavy weapons. Heavy weapons rules that is.
Birdy
[1] Man Portable: MilSpeak for "Somebody welded a handgrip to it"
Regardless of what the rules say, you can't allow that. Because next thing you know, some troll will have a 12-pack Antioch combo, just because.
You can end up with a infinite pack Antioch combo... Start with 1, add another, add another under the second....
Only if you don't use the Canon Hauling The Load rules.
Ahhhh, but who said a PC was using it? It could even be vehicular...
| QUOTE (Austere Emancipator) |
| Regardless of what the rules say, you can't allow that. Because next thing you know, some troll will have a 12-pack Antioch combo, just because. |
lol
Why does this remind me of a certain episode of pvponline.com...
-foont- -foont- -foont- -SPLORTCH-
Nah this was to be man portable and I had already told him, even if you do mount the double, you cannot put an underbarrel mount on the underbarrel mount.
so basically what i understand from you guys is, yes give it should be a heavy weapon, and thereby have mounts, but make sure it doesn't get too out of control. If that's wrong please let me know.
so basically what i understand from you guys is, yes give it should be a heavy weapon, and thereby have mounts, but make sure it doesn't get too out of control. If that's wrong please let me know.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.