Friggas Ring
Sep 3 2004, 06:47 PM
The goal of my spell is to make it so that a target (or group of targets, for the AOE variation) can neither understand nor be understood by other audibly.
This is what I've come up with thus far.
Babble
Illusion Spell - because I only need it to modify the words of someone. I'd pick Manipulation if I wanted to alter all sounds.
Base Drain of Light - because the target can still hear, just not comprehend speech
Target number of 4 - I forget where I got that from, Sadly, I'm a work at the moment
-1 drain level for it being an Illusion spell
+1 drain level for it being physical (cast it on a surveilance camera so that it can't record your conversation)
Add +1 to the drain level for the area version of the spell
So basically, this is where I stand:
Babble - Physical - Direct Illusion - TN: 4 - Sustained - Drain: (L)
If the target of this spell fails to resist with his Intelligence rating, he is unable to understand any language for as long as the spell is sustained.
=-=-=-=
Any comments? Changes you think I should make? Too easy to cast? Wrong spell type?
Ancient History
Sep 3 2004, 06:53 PM
Mispeling Vyrus, anyone?

Seriously, you might have to deal with Celedyr for copyright issues.
Jason Farlander
Sep 3 2004, 07:44 PM
This would also make an interesting basis for an indirect illusion. Cast the spell around a subject or an area. Anyone (or anything) attempting to understand speech issuing from the target or area must resist the spell.
The indirect version would have a TN of 4, since there is no single, specific target. The direct version would almost certainly derive its TN from the Willpower of the affected target(s), though.
RangerJoe
Sep 3 2004, 08:39 PM
I think the idea for the spell is excellent, but I'd prefer there to be a mana version (just affecting metahumans) and a physical version (affecting all kinds), like the invis/imp invis pair. That way you could call the mana version "Babble" and the technological version "Typo."
Backgammon
Sep 3 2004, 08:41 PM
I'd use Translate as a base and work from there. Not that your rules are bad, just saying.
Kagetenshi
Sep 3 2004, 09:41 PM
Babble and gibberish? Babble and gobbledeygook?
~J
Dashifen
Sep 3 2004, 09:48 PM
QUOTE (Ancient History @ Sep 3 2004, 01:53 PM) |
Mispeling Vyrus, anyone? Seriously, you might have to deal with Celedyr for copyright issues. |
Nice

And props on a good spell design. I'll be saving this one in my back pocket for this semester's runs. Now I just have to hope my players haven't found the forums yet
Kanada Ten
Sep 3 2004, 10:22 PM
When I designed a very similar spell based on
Sahandrian 's Garble I made it an Indirect Illusion cast upon a subject making everyone he or she talks to unable to understand him or her and ended up with a drain of M (major single sense, sustained).
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.