Hi Guys,
I'd like to talk about my job for a moment, so that when you send questions to info (at) ShadowrunRPG.com you can better understand what I send back.
First off, my job is to take a load off of Rob. (Rob Boyle is the Line Developer for all of the English-language Shadowrun.) Rob can do a higher quality job answering your questions, but he doesn't have time to keep up with the demand. Getting answers from me quickly, even if they are only 96.8% accurate, is a service to the Shadowrun community. I have answered 265 E-mails, most with multiple questions, in 4 months on the job. I have a backlog of 8 questions since I took the job which I haven't had time to research, mostly Rigger and Decker questions (especially Otaku). mfb has the most in my backlog, at two. He's a smart guy and doesn't ask easy questions.
My job is not to change the rules. I have no official capacity to change rules. I do not edit the FAQ, I do not edit the Errata. I can make suggestions, particularly when a GM or player points out an error to me. For example, super-sonic transports in Rigger 3 don't have the fuel capacity and fuel efficiency to go from Seattle to Tokyo. But Rigger3, page 10, indicates they do it in 4 hours. (Thanks Janne.) After researching that the fuel capacity and seating capacity of the HSCT match the Concorde, I suggested increasing the fuel efficiency listed in the book to allow not only Seattle-Tokyo but also New York-Rome. I don't know if or when this will make it into the book, errata, or FAQ.
My job is not to comment on House Rules. I don’t have time for it.
My job is not to debate rules. I don’t have time for it. Instead I simply present my understanding and leave it at that. Often I take the time to explain where my understanding comes from, but not always.
My job is not to make up rules. Often there is no published answer to a question. I often respond by saying “I don’t know any official answer for this, so it’s up to the GM in your game. Here are two possibilities for how to play it, and here’s what we do in my campaign...”
Rob has asked me to give answers my best shot even if it might contradict something he may have said in the past. I should only go to him for help when the rule in question is a significant one for the game and I feel my understanding is lacking. For example, I went to him in December with several Invisibility questions because I felt it was a significant area. I used his response to form answers to Fortune’s questions yesterday.
Rob doesn't forward all 'info' questions to me. He takes some himself.
With permission from Adam, a Dumpshock administrator, I violate the rule against using multiple identities on Dumpshock. I use ‘ShadowFaq’ only in my official capacity. I use my other identity for playing in “Welcome to the Shadows”, for when I want to debate a rule, and sometimes just to hang out.
I rarely log on to Dumpshock as 'ShadowFaq', so personal messages here won't be seen for days or weeks.
You'll get the quickest answers if you send only one or two questions per message. If you send several and one is difficult, the whole reply has to wait till I can get to the difficult one.
Sincerely,
-- ShadowFaq
Post #6
[Edit]Please only comment on my job here. Leave rule questions out of this thread. Thank you.[/Edit]