Raygun
Aug 18 2006, 03:42 AM
I do all of my shooting outdoors anymore, so here's one of my very few hot-brass-against-the-skin stories:
The first time I shot a Walther P99 I was at an indoor range. About the third mag in, a case managed to bounce off of the target return, off of the lane divider to my right, and directly into the little space between my brow and my glasses (nothing but net) and stick right in the corner of my eye until I could clear the gun and rip the glasses off. That space was just barely big enough for the case to fit through it rim-first. If it were a .45 ACP case, it would have just bounced off of my head.
PlainWhiteSocks
Aug 18 2006, 03:47 AM
| QUOTE (Snow_Fox) |
I've found that if I'm firing more than one gun in a session it affects who the kick is perceived. If I've fired off a box of the heavy revolver- .357 or .38 special and then draw the .380, I don't feel any kick and the accuracy is up.
|
I used to warm up with a .308 Witchita. It's a bolt action pistol with a pleasant heavy recoil. 20 rounds through that, and I could almost treat my .45acp as a .22. I keep wondering if it's all in my head or maybe there's actually something physical that happens after the big recoil I thought maybe something like WW2 pilots that had a natural kind of G-suit built into their legs after flying for a long time. The human body tends to be pretty adaptable after all.
Critias
Aug 18 2006, 03:51 AM
I don't know if, as you mentioned, it's all a big head-game we play with ourselves, or what, but I've noticed something similar. I had a blast with my wife's little .22 single action yesterday. I'd shoot my Glock 19 for a little bit (4-5 mags) then trade her (she got 15 shots, I got 6, she thought it was a bargain) -- that thing felt like a BB gun or something, and had the lightest trigger in the world by comparison. It was great.
HalloranElder
Aug 18 2006, 06:01 AM
| QUOTE (Shrike30) |
| If I could carry a taser with the range, capacity, and accuracy of a handgun, I would. Sadly, it's not an option. |
For some reason, I feel it necessary to quote this:
| QUOTE (Dunkelzahn's Will) |
| In order to reduce the number of innocent bystanders who die each day as a result of security officers firing on criminals, I leave a five-pound brick of orichalcum to either Lone Star or Knight Errant, whichever first develops an inexpensive, effective, non-lethal stun technology accurate at 100 meters. |
LilithTaveril
Aug 18 2006, 06:06 AM
Hmm... Mix taser darts with machine guns?
TheNarrator
Aug 18 2006, 09:15 AM
| QUOTE (HalloranElder) |
| QUOTE (Shrike30) | | If I could carry a taser with the range, capacity, and accuracy of a handgun, I would. Sadly, it's not an option. |
For some reason, I feel it necessary to quote this:
| QUOTE (Dunkelzahn's Will) | | In order to reduce the number of innocent bystanders who die each day as a result of security officers firing on criminals, I leave a five-pound brick of orichalcum to either Lone Star or Knight Errant, whichever first develops an inexpensive, effective, non-lethal stun technology accurate at 100 meters. |
|
In the past I've had a character get the Ares ELD-AR "paintball" assault rifle and load the capsules with a combo of Narcoject and DMSO. Under the rules system (6D Stun vs. half Impact Armor) it actually drops guys
faster than the bursts of live ammo from the Ares Alpha.
Of course, the price per dose of Narcoject and DMSO probably ruins the "inexpensive" part of the requirements. 160

per shot.
Snow_Fox
Aug 18 2006, 11:53 AM
| QUOTE (Critias) |
| I don't know if, as you mentioned, it's all a big head-game we play with ourselves, or what, but I've noticed something similar. I had a blast with my wife's little .22 single action yesterday. I'd shoot my Glock 19 for a little bit (4-5 mags) then trade her (she got 15 shots, I got 6, she thought it was a bargain) -- that thing felt like a BB gun or something, and had the lightest trigger in the world by comparison. It was great. |
It's not the pull on my .25 that I notice so much as the noise. All the bangs and booms of other guns and that has a tiny little 'crack' that sounds almost harmless.
Shrike30
Aug 18 2006, 04:34 PM
| QUOTE (Raygun @ Aug 17 2006, 07:25 PM) |
| Hey Shrike, what kind of gun were you using in 10mm? In my own experience, 10mm Auto has some of the "sharpest" recoil of all of the guns you mentioned, but I guess that would depend pretty heavily on the load and gun you're using. The Glock 20 is pretty bad with hotter loads, especially a 200 grainer @ 1200 fps. The Tanfoglio (EAA Witness) not so much so, but still not anything I would say "shoves" the way the .45 ACP does. |
Glock 20 and 29, actually. Haven't had the chance to do much 10mm shooting, but I was pretty happy with the way it works out on the Glock platforms. It's certainly possible it was a light load. The guns certainly had a lot of blast... at a booth in an indoor range, you're approaching "eyeballs pressed back into your skull" levels of blast with a G29.
I've gotten brass hooked up between the earpiece of my shooting glasses and the side of my temple (leaving me to slap at the side of my head, which my brother thought was hilarious), reflexively caught a freshly-ejected .45 casing as it spun towards my head (leaving a nice little red ring in my palm), had casings drop into my shirt and end up resting on my belt, singing my belly (which is why I stopped tucking in my shirt at the range, if I didn't have to) and once had the guy next to me manage to land a casing between two of my left fingers while I was in the middle of a tac mag change in a drill (the only scar I know of from brass, a nice little darker patch of skin just below a knuckle). Fun stuff
Fix-it
Aug 18 2006, 07:29 PM
Yeah, .22 match pistols with hair triggers are a blast.
what's really fun is finding the smallest targets you can find, and cranking 'em allllll the way to the end of the range. whoever can actually hit the thing wins.
ShadowDragon8685
Aug 18 2006, 08:40 PM
| QUOTE (Fix-it) |
Yeah, .22 match pistols with hair triggers are a blast.
what's really fun is finding the smallest targets you can find, and cranking 'em allllll the way to the end of the range. whoever can actually hit the thing wins. |
Are we allowed to bring any weapon we want to that contest?
Fix-it
Aug 19 2006, 05:00 AM
nope. beat up old .22-rimfire match pistols only.
iron sights,
off handed,
one eye closed.
Snow_Fox
Aug 19 2006, 03:05 PM
If you don't mind I'll use my .25 berratta with a 2 1/2 inch barrell. AND I'll shoot left handed! At 75 feet the holes in the target are so small you can't see them to fix your aim from shot to shot.
Though this does raise an interesting idea for SR- target pistols. We all go for power or concealability but it seems like an interesting convcept- a hold out pistol that give plus for accuracy OR maybe just has the range of a heavy pistol but only the impact of a hold out.
Wounded Ronin
Aug 20 2006, 09:42 PM
| QUOTE (Snow_Fox) |
If you don't mind I'll use my .25 berratta with a 2 1/2 inch barrell. AND I'll shoot left handed! At 75 feet the holes in the target are so small you can't see them to fix your aim from shot to shot.
Though this does raise an interesting idea for SR- target pistols. We all go for power or concealability but it seems like an interesting convcept- a hold out pistol that give plus for accuracy OR maybe just has the range of a heavy pistol but only the impact of a hold out. |
IIRC Hitman 2 had a suppressed Ruger mk. 2 you could take. It was fun to use although the way it was implemented in game it wasn't accurate enough to be useful.
So, yes, if my Shadowrunner could be bald and use a suppressed Ruger mk. 2 I'd consider that to be bonus.
otomik
Sep 9 2006, 12:09 PM
| QUOTE (Fix-it) |
| I don't like berrettas because they always seem to jam half way through the clip on me. |
BERETTA (one "R"). How dare you defile fine italian craftsmanship with your cheapass mags, if you're milspec then this has to do with the inferior Checkmate magazine contract which was recently ended in favor of a new contract from Airtronics. The sure options for quality magazines are Beretta Factory, Meccanica Del Sarca and Mec-Gar (best and from same small northern italian town). Any popular gun has magazines available from poor 3rd party manufacturers and thirdworld hellhole potmetal milsurplus, so many have negative impressions on 1911s as well for this reason.
| QUOTE (Fix-it) |
| and the exposed barrel is just dying for dirt and junk in between that and the slide. |
like what?

a carefully inserted sheet of paper? it's like less than a millimeter and I can't seem to remember it ever being a problem on it's venerable predeccesors like the Walther P-38/P1 series and Egyptian Helwan 9mm and Israeli Brigadiers. do you freak out about the Glock frame/slide gap as well?
| QUOTE (Fix-it) |
and the problem is it's designed by an italian. 
silly people and thier "form over function" nonsense. |
It's your problem now, you'll be seeing me, tony two times and jimmy wonder bread this coming Columbus Day. You know us Italians, we get so silly sometimes, silly as a bullet in the head, ya know?
| QUOTE (Raygun) |
Man, you'd better hope otomik doesn't wander in here.  |
Concrete Shoe Maker and Beretta Defender of the Faith, Otomik
Shrike30
Sep 9 2006, 06:46 PM
The Hammerli 610s/620s were both target pistols. Light pistol damage, heavy pistol ranges, and a point of recoil comp built in.
Wounded Ronin
Sep 13 2006, 02:27 AM
| QUOTE (otomik) |
| QUOTE (Fix-it) | | I don't like berrettas because they always seem to jam half way through the clip on me. |
BERETTA (one "R"). How dare you defile fine italian craftsmanship with your cheapass mags, if you're milspec then this has to do with the inferior Checkmate magazine contract which was recently ended in favor of a new contract from Airtronics. The sure options for quality magazines are Beretta Factory, Meccanica Del Sarca and Mec-Gar (best and from same small northern italian town). Any popular gun has magazines available from poor 3rd party manufacturers and thirdworld hellhole potmetal milsurplus, so many have negative impressions on 1911s as well for this reason.
| QUOTE (Fix-it) | | and the exposed barrel is just dying for dirt and junk in between that and the slide. |
like what?  a carefully inserted sheet of paper? it's like less than a millimeter and I can't seem to remember it ever being a problem on it's venerable predeccesors like the Walther P-38/P1 series and Egyptian Helwan 9mm and Israeli Brigadiers. do you freak out about the Glock frame/slide gap as well? | QUOTE (Fix-it) | and the problem is it's designed by an italian. 
silly people and thier "form over function" nonsense. |
It's your problem now, you'll be seeing me, tony two times and jimmy wonder bread this coming Columbus Day. You know us Italians, we get so silly sometimes, silly as a bullet in the head, ya know? | QUOTE (Raygun) | Man, you'd better hope otomik doesn't wander in here.  |
Concrete Shoe Maker and Beretta Defender of the Faith, Otomik
|
"Berettas suck, Beavis."
"Yeah. Huh huh. Huh huh."
Fix-it
Sep 13 2006, 02:59 AM
| QUOTE |
| a carefully inserted sheet of paper? it's like less than a millimeter and I can't seem to remember it ever being a problem on it's venerable predeccesors like the Walther P-38/P1 series and Egyptian Helwan 9mm and Israeli Brigadiers. do you freak out about the Glock frame/slide gap as well? |
arctic enviroments, actually. the barrel heats up from extended firing, water melts and seeps in as you roll around in the snow, then freezes. the gun jams.
the germans found this out on the eastern front.
and so did the guys testing the beretta 92FS up in alaska before it was accepted by the army.
actually, I heard that the thing exploded in a test box when they pulled the trigger while trying to clear a jam, but that's just what I heard.
I've had constant problems with commercial berettas, and what I hear seems to echo my problems.
So it's my opinion that berettas have a design flaw or two. I'll stick with my Hi-power, but you may use whatever you like.
Critias
Sep 14 2006, 05:53 AM
| QUOTE (Fix-it) |
| I'll stick with my Hi-power, but you may use whatever you like. |
Oh, man. Wow. Whew. The first time I read that, I thought you were saying a Hi Point was, like, the top-of-the-line firearm manufacturer, and the weapon you were most likely to trust your life to, and...heh...whew. Okay. Hi Power. That makes more sense.
Raygun
Sep 14 2006, 07:35 AM
| QUOTE (Fix-it) |
arctic enviroments, actually. the barrel heats up from extended firing, water melts and seeps in as you roll around in the snow, then freezes. the gun jams.
the germans found this out on the eastern front. |
But apparently it wasn't that important to them. West Germany used the P38 until 1957 (mostly because they made about an assload of them during the war). Then they went and adopted an alloy-framed version of it (designated P1) and used that one until it was replaced by the P8 in 1995. That's 55 years of service; a long time for any design.
The Austrians used the P38 until it was replaced by the P80 (Glock 17) in the early 80's, for 40ish years of service.
I'm thinking the whole "artic environments" thing was really not that big of a deal to them. Not that I'm a Beretta fanboy or anything. They're not my favorite either. I just think that's a shitty reason to trash a decent handgun design. Even a friggin' AK will get frozen shut if you treat it like shit.
Now back to your regularly scheduled otomik freak-out.
Fix-it
Sep 14 2006, 05:37 PM
| QUOTE (Raygun) |
| QUOTE (Fix-it @ Sep 13 2006, 02:59 AM) | arctic enviroments, actually. the barrel heats up from extended firing, water melts and seeps in as you roll around in the snow, then freezes. the gun jams.
the germans found this out on the eastern front. |
But apparently it wasn't that important to them. West Germany used the P38 until 1957 (mostly because they made about an assload of them during the war).
|
Because it wasn't a standard issue handgun. P-38s and Lugers were only assigned to officers. Not the guys running and rolling in the snow. The beretta IS a standard issue handgun, and our guys are in the field, I would want a handgun that has moving parts like that covered.
The point is, If it DOES get treated like shit, I want it to still function.
Good gun? sure.
Good combat handgun? maaayyybee....
Raygun
Sep 14 2006, 06:16 PM
| QUOTE (Fix-it @ Sep 14 2006, 05:37 PM) |
| Because it wasn't a standard issue handgun. P-38s and Lugers were only assigned to officers. Not the guys running and rolling in the snow. |
Um, not every dude running around in the US Army gets an M9 either.
Seeing as they made around 1.2 million P38s during the war (I don't think Beretta has made half that number of M9s in 20 years), I find it rather difficult to believe that they just stockpiled them for use by officers only. NCOs probably got them, at the very least. Lugers likely were officer-only pieces, but then they made far fewer of those and to a much higher standard.
| QUOTE |
The beretta IS a standard issue handgun, and our guys are in the field, I would want a handgun that has moving parts like that covered.
The point is, If it DOES get treated like shit, I want it to still function. |
And the M9, by and large, does exactly that. But when you're the kind of retard who can't understand that getting a pistol soaking wet in an extremely cold environment is likely to cause major problems, you deserve to have a gun that doesn't work. I gaurantee that if you treated a Hi-Power like that, you'd run into problems with it as well, as you would with pretty much any gun.
| QUOTE |
Good gun? sure.
Good combat handgun? |
At least it doesn't have a friggin' magazine safety on it, right?
lorechaser
Sep 14 2006, 07:31 PM
Jumping back to the original question:
An out of the box idea:
Breast implants.
I'd assume tech in 2070 is good enough to create some sort of form, with space inside, and a fairly invisible seam. Get something like a 38C, and put a pistol inside them. It's almost like drawing from a shoulder holster.
Granted, it'll play hell with you physically, but I don't imagine most Shadowrunners really care.
Shrike30
Sep 14 2006, 08:01 PM
With some weapons, you wouldn't even need to get that large. I think a well-sculpted "skin pouch" would let you do a reasonable amount.
Snow_Fox
Sep 15 2006, 03:00 PM
At the risk of sounding boast full, I don't need implants andthe last thing I want is something making mine larger!
Critias
Sep 15 2006, 03:02 PM
| QUOTE (Snow_Fox) |
| At the risk of sounding boast full, I don't need implants andthe last thing I want is something making mine larger! |
I don't believe you.
Hey, do you guys believe her? I don't believe her.
Citizens demand pictures!
otomik
Sep 15 2006, 05:08 PM
| QUOTE (Raygun @ Sep 14 2006, 06:16 PM) |
At least it doesn't have a friggin' magazine safety on it, right? |
[freakout]BHP, made to french military specifications, lets not forget how the resulting poor trigger contributes to already subpar accuracy compared to other common designs.[/freakout]
lorechaser
Sep 15 2006, 06:34 PM
| QUOTE (Snow_Fox) |
| At the risk of sounding boast full, I don't need implants andthe last thing I want is something making mine larger! |
Ah, but if we're working on your character, she's not so ... naturally blessed.

If you, get a reduction, then use the extra skin to make a pouch!
Snow_Fox
Sep 15 2006, 07:29 PM
ouch!
what are doing? Looking for the female version of 'is that a gun in your pocket or asre you just glad to see me?" eek
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.