Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Communism in Sixth World
Dumpshock Forums > Discussion > Shadowrun
Pages: 1, 2
mattness pl
Any communist's countries in Shadowrun?
If so, how they look like?

Maybe like Russia in 1950's - Your Leader is your God.

Or maybe like in China right now - more cynical IMHO - economy is open to the world, but THE Party rules.

HOW IT (communism) LOOKED IN REAL?
I spend half of my life in communism (Poland until 1989).
It wasn't fun. Pretty boring.
Only one or two TV channels with propaganda stuff. (my favorite slogan: "We FIGHT for peace" biggrin.gif ).
You are cut out from "free world".
Newspapers are lying about world outside. ("Capitalists are jealous and they want to destroy our communist paradise". Well to be honest they didn't use paradise smile.gif .)
There are many restrictions. (particulary during marshall law: nobody can be outside when is dark. People cannot gather without permission.).
In kindergarten you're brainwashed. (Songs how good is communism. Apotheosis of soldiers.)
In school you SHOULD join to the young equivalent of communist party.
Poland was in "friendship" with Soviet Union - so everybody must learn russian since elementary school until you're end education.
You CAN'T complain about the system ("Communism is the best system in the world.". Period.).

What you think (or expect)?
Maybe in SoA there will be some about communist countries?
Leaks, anybody wink.gif ?
Critias
Loose Alliances. Grab it. Understand ahead of time the chapter on Commies is written by a spastic 12 year old -- be ready -- but grab it.
Synner
Take note that what you are referring to is not true communism, it is a twisted form of socialism approaching fascism. The closest we've come to communism in real life is Cuba and the first decade of Maoist China. Everything else has degenerated into nationalist or authoritarian socialist regimes posturing as ideological communists.

Neo-Communism and its two main factions "institutional communists" and "utopists" are outlined in Loose Alliances (which also specifies that Russia 206x is a nationalist/neo-fascist regime masquerading as a state communism - a parallel to Stalinist Russia). Shadows of Asia (as will eventually SoLA) will cover some communist regimes and nations (including true communists and those who pose as communists).

Critias' evaluation is spot on. The voice used is grating and often irritating but he does cover the basics.
Jrayjoker
Communism can't work in groups bigger than 1 person. Its human nature, we survived as a species by alternating between being greedy little bastards and helping each other out, but selfishness will always occur.

Other than that, Loose Alliances is you canon source and one stop shop for information.
hobgoblin
QUOTE

Only one or two TV channels with propaganda stuff. (my favorite slogan: "We FIGHT for peace" biggrin.gif ).


hmm, add a lot more channels but still one message and what do you have?

QUOTE

Newspapers are lying about world outside.  ("Capitalists are jealous and they want to destroy our communist paradise". Well to be honest they didn't use paradise smile.gif .)


well i dont think it have gone that far just yet, or have it?

QUOTE

In kindergarten you're brainwashed. (Songs how good is communism. Apotheosis of soldiers.)


hmm, sounds kinda familiar in a way, dont know why tho...

QUOTE

Poland was in "friendship" with Soviet Union - so everybody must learn russian since elementary school until you're end education.


and most capitalist contrys teach english from a early age...

QUOTE

You CAN'T complain about the system ("Communism is the best system in the world.". Period.).


one never knows when one get a visit from people in black suits...

and yes, im being flipant silly.gif

thing is that the so called communist contrys where nothing more then dictatorships lead by people selected by people that again was selected by people selected by stalin. ie, the system was hijacked from allmost the start.

i wonder tho if not something closer to the ideal would be factorys run by the workers, where every major change would be put up for vote among the workers.

thing is that any system can be hijacked, its just a matter of getting the right people in the right places at the right time. so it cant be done by one man but it can be done by a group. but then one man can gain leadership of said group...
hobgoblin
QUOTE (Jrayjoker)
Communism can't work in groups bigger than 1 person. Its human nature, we survived as a species by alternating between being greedy little bastards and helping each other out, but selfishness will always occur.

yes, one help as long as it can benefit one self some other time (calling in favors and similar).

in that respect i wonder if not gang-systems are the perfect example of human nature at its purest...
Jrayjoker
Just read "The Lord of the Flies." It is about a group of school boys descent into savagery after being shipwrecked.
nezumi
QUOTE (Jrayjoker)
Communism can't work in groups bigger than 1 person. Its human nature, we survived as a species by alternating between being greedy little bastards and helping each other out, but selfishness will always occur.

To be fair, some married couples make a good try of it.

On, and privyette (sp?) mattress. I lived in Moscow from 86-89. A real trip, but it certainly ruined any faith in socialism.

Hmm... I'm tempted to pick up Loose Alliances now. Never really cared about it before, but an SR game in a communist nation would be neat.
Modesitt
QUOTE
Communism can't work in groups bigger than 1 person. Its human nature, we survived as a species by alternating between being greedy little bastards and helping each other out, but selfishness will always occur.


It works just fine on scales larger than that. It stops working when you put a gun to someones head and force them to be that way.

For example, I used to play a MMORPG called A Tale in the Desert. Almost without exception, every single one of the guilds was a communist revival. Everyone put all their material possessions in communal storage facilities that were used to advance the guild as a whole. Everyone was expected to help out as much as they could, but you were never forced to work. It worked because if you didn't want to play that way, you could just go off and do your own thing.

There are also numerous real life examples of it working out with the common demoninator being that you can opt out any time you want. Look up some of the wealth redistribution schemes of the Mormon church or how the Amish deal with insurance(They don't) or some of the Jewish communes in Israel.
Synner
QUOTE
There are also numerous real life examples of it working out with the common demoninator being that you can opt out any time you want. Look up some of the wealth redistribution schemes of the Mormon church or how the Amish deal with insurance(They don't) or some of the Jewish communes in Israel

Good calls. I'd also mention several traditional Native American tribes which represented the closest to utopic communist societies we've seen. While African tribes have some communal traditions the power structures are too heirarchic to be considered communist.
hermit
QUOTE

HOW IT (communism) LOOKED IN REAL?
I spend half of my life in communism (Poland until 1989).
It wasn't fun. Pretty boring.
Only one or two TV channels with propaganda stuff. (my favorite slogan: "We FIGHT for peace" biggrin.gif ).

Oh really? With us, it was mainly "friendship" with the USSR. I tell you, one hour of East German TV and you'd LOATHE the very word. biggrin.gif

Oh, and the Incas' political system was very close to communism. And they were quite a large and successful empire, until they crumbled because two sun kings were fighting over the throne, and the Spaniards invaded, all at once.

And finally, propably the best working examples of true communism were the Kibbuzim in Israel.
Crimsondude 2.0
LA lists five neo-communist countries.

Russia isn't one, but it is referred to elsewhere.
CircuitBoyBlue
To be fair, one has to mention that capitalism isn't really working, either. I can't think of a single country that runs according to perfect capitalist ideals. If you look at the extent of corporate welfare in the world, you'll see that even the most gung ho of "capitalist" countries has on at least some level realized that the system just doesn't work. Here in the US, if we were running on a purely capitalist system, we wouldn't have bailed out the airlines after September 11th when they came whining for taxpayer money. Of course, then we'd have no airlines, and as super power with no airplanes, we'd be the laughing stock of the world, but you can't call it capitalism.

Even in SR, I don't see pure capitalism being implemented, because the megacorps will want some way to squeeze money out of people in addition to actually providing useful products or services, and if their subsidiaries are failing, they'll want some government around, even if its only function is to tax people and then bail out corporations with the proceeds. And it's hard for me to imagine any communist governments around in SR, because, well, we WERE trying to destroy communist countries during the cold war, and we were doing it for a reason. The megas would also try to destroy communist countries to open up new markets and teach existing governments that if you go around nationalizing things, the corps will mess you up. Communism in the 6th world might exist among certain cultures in places like Awakened Siberia, or one of those other parts of the world that have shunned what we think of as civilization, but as a government, I don't see it flying, because any place where people are using computers and cell phones, the corps are going to want to march in and give themselves monopolies on selling computers and cell phones.
Crimsondude 2.0
QUOTE (CircuitBoyBlue @ Jun 17 2005, 02:47 PM)
Here in the US, if we were running on a purely capitalist system, we wouldn't have bailed out the airlines after September 11th when they came whining for taxpayer money. Of course, then we'd have no airlines, and as super power with no airplanes, we'd be the laughing stock of the world, but you can't call it capitalism.

ATSA is a blight on humanity.

But no, the U.S. would still have a metric fuckton of airlines--even international ones. If United Airlines has taught people anything, it's that operating in bankruptcy for four years is pretty beneficial to stockholders (more customers because of lower rates, employees took pay cuts, the U.S. is now paying their employees' pensions, and so on.). Filing for bankruptcy was probably the smartest move UA made since deregulation.

So, no, it delayed the inevitable that would have happened had 9/11 not occurred, but it wouldn't have wiped out the airline industry by any stretch.

But... going back to neo-communism. Just because they call themselves communist doesn't mean jack. Look at Cuba in Cyberpirates!. They call themselves Neo-Communists, but in reality they're just Bautista-like corporate tools.
hermit
QUOTE
we WERE trying to destroy communist countries during the cold war, and we were doing it for a reason.

Guess 'you' failed. Newsflash: there still is a North Korea, China, Cuba, and communist parties play an important role in all post-soviet states. Besides, in SR, 'you' have ceased to exist, so ... there.

QUOTE
The megas would also try to destroy communist countries to open up new markets and teach existing governments that if you go around nationalizing things, the corps will mess you up.

The megas aren't all-powerful. Besides, if they get their free trade zones, they are happy to exploit hardly paid commie workers, too. They may *want* to change things, but wishing and getting are two entirely different things.
Crimsondude 2.0
Yes, but in SR North Korea and China have also disappeared, and Cuba ain't Castro's Cuba.
hermit
Sure, but that doesn't mean communism as an ideology has lost it's appeal. If anything, it will gain, due to the immense gap between haves and have-nots, the rampant corruption, the exploitation of people by the corps ... it's the 1890s all over again, in many ways.
Charon
QUOTE (CircuitBoyBlue @ Jun 17 2005, 03:47 PM)
To be fair, one has to mention that capitalism isn't really working, either. I can't think of a single country that runs according to perfect capitalist ideals. If you look at the extent of corporate welfare in the world, you'll see that even the most gung ho of "capitalist" countries has on at least some level realized that the system just doesn't work.

This is a fallacy. Existence of corporate welfare doesn't imply that capitalism doesn't work.

The abundance of subventions even in gung-ho capitalist countries is a byproduct of how democracy and lobbies intertwine, not capitalism's supposed flaws.

---

Outside of neo-communist countries, most runner involvement with NC should be with policlub. A reborn international communist movement in the fringe of capitalist countries could be neat. Anything about that in Loose Alliance?
hermit
Capitalism, as a pure ideology, doesn't fly. The combination of capitalism and some socialist ideas that is the Western model (yes, even the US' system has socialist elements) is what makes a market-based economy work best.
FlakJacket
QUOTE (hermit)
If anything, it will gain, due to the immense gap between haves and have-nots, the rampant corruption, the exploitation of people by the corps

For a small minority maybe. The rest of the people are going to be looking for the inside track on how to to get out of their situation and become one of the haves, fuck everyone else. Dystopian baby! smile.gif
hermit
Eh ... I doupt that. I mean, how much chances do SINles people have of making it? Without becoming criminals? And how many are SINless ... 15% of the total population? That's not a tiny segment ...
FlakJacket
I meant only a small part of the have nots are going to become pinko commie bastards. The rest, they'll deal drugs, steal and rob, run the shadows, sell their bodies, sell other people's bodies etc. to move up the ladder as best they can and sod the other guy. Becoming one of the haves doesn't have to take place within the law, it's probably easier outside it. Which sounds suspiciously like the Redmond Barrens wouldn't you say? smile.gif
hermit
I dunno ... there's a lot of apathy there, too. All it needs is some sort of leader figure.
hobgoblin
the funny thing is that in many ways a corporate enclave looks very similar to a soviet style communist state. you live in corp housing, you eat corp food, you work for mother corp nyahnyah.gif

as for the people in the barrens, they will most likely do whatever it takes to survive. some (mostly the young and single) will do all kinds of crime, alone or in groups (similar to how young people with no future today join gangs and deal drugs ++ ). the older and those with family however will most likely band together to asist each other. most likely these groups will form based on communist/socialist ideas (ie what is mine is yours).
hobgoblin
QUOTE (hermit)
I dunno ... there's a lot of apathy there, too. All it needs is some sort of leader figure.

like say torgo?
Crimsondude 2.0
There is no Torgo. Torgo is just some sick freak's wet dream.

QUOTE (FlakJacket)
I meant only a small part of the have nots are going to become pinko commie bastards. The rest, they'll deal drugs, steal and rob, run the shadows, sell their bodies, sell other people's bodies etc. to move up the ladder as best they can and sod the other guy. Becoming one of the haves doesn't have to take place within the law, it's probably easier outside it. Which sounds suspiciously like the Redmond Barrens wouldn't you say? smile.gif

You mean like the Soviet rather capitalistic black market?

For shame. No one would buy into such nonsense.

I mean, come on. When you're living on the brink of desperation, your natural reactions aren't to engage in ruthless exploitation and manipulation of people. It's to work together and trust one another. Stupid-head.
ShadowDragon8685
QUOTE (Crimsondude 2.0)
You mean like the Soviet rather capitalistic black market?

For shame. No one would buy into such nonsense.

I mean, come on. When you're living on the brink of desperation, your natural reactions aren't to engage in ruthless exploitation and manipulation of people. It's to work together and trust one another. Stupid-head.

Yes...



And those with the twisted deviousness to exploit those who follow their natural reactions for their own gain are usually the ones who wind up as Haves.
Shrapnel
QUOTE (Crimsondude 2.0)
QUOTE (CircuitBoyBlue @ Jun 17 2005, 02:47 PM)
Here in the US, if we were running on a purely capitalist system, we wouldn't have bailed out the airlines after September 11th when they came whining for taxpayer money. Of course, then we'd have no airlines, and as super power with no airplanes, we'd be the laughing stock of the world, but you can't call it capitalism.

ATSA is a blight on humanity.

But no, the U.S. would still have a metric fuckton of airlines--even international ones. If United Airlines has taught people anything, it's that operating in bankruptcy for four years is pretty beneficial to stockholders (more customers because of lower rates, employees took pay cuts, the U.S. is now paying their employees' pensions, and so on.). Filing for bankruptcy was probably the smartest move UA made since deregulation.

Government subsidies are bad, no matter who is receiving them.

If the major airlines truly wanted to survive in a capitalist economy after 9-11, they would have offered the customers what they wanted, which is safer travel.

Instead, we have the government bailing them out, and the TSA to "protect" us... What a joke...

I personally say that if they can't survive based on the product or services they offer, they have no business being in business.
Crimsondude 2.0
Oh, you're preaching to the choir on that one, except about the TSA.

But we're missing the point. There's no such thing as a real Communist country in SR, which is why they're called Neo-Communists.
Shrapnel
My point about the TSA and capitalism is that it should be the individual airline's responsibility to provide security for their flights, not the government's.

The airports should be responsible for their own security, as well.

Same goes for Shadowrun. Notice that even Seattle has a contract for Lone Star to provide their security.

Let's say that you run an airline in the Shadowrun universe, for example. Which would you feel more comfortable with? Allowing the government to assign all of their screw-ups and rejects to your security detail, or hiring a company like Knight Errant to provide security?
Crimsondude 2.0
But they didn't, and wouldn't, hire KE. They'd hire Bob's Discount Guards.

And you'd be lucky if Bob's Guards knew how to read, let alone recognize a MP-5 from a blow dryer.

But that's how SR would work, sure. I just don't think that's how RL should.
Shrapnel
"Bob's Discount Guards"...

Now there's a name that strikes fear in the hearts of shadowrunners worldwide... wink.gif
ShadowDragon8685
Remember that the paniced and unpredictable actions of an amatuer can be far more devestating than the calculable attack of a professional. You KNOW that sammie is going to be using a standard grip on his pistol and shooting at YOU. That paniced rent-a-guard might freak out and wind up shooting out the only light in the room. Or the high-pressure steam tank beside you. Or something.

In game mechanics, this means he rule of six'd his 6 Qck dice to fire the AR he has no skills for, and generated six successess, toasting your butt.


Or they could truely be so inept that you're only authorized to use nonlethal force against them, as a handicap. smile.gif
Synner
QUOTE (hobgoblin)
the funny thing is that in many ways a corporate enclave looks very similar to a soviet style communist state. you live in corp housing, you eat corp food, you work for mother corp :P


Or a fascist corporativist state (like the 1930's German Nacional Socialists and the Italian Fasci)... take your pick ;)

QUOTE
as for the people in the barrens, they will most likely do whatever it takes to survive. some (mostly the young and single) will do all kinds of crime, alone or in groups (similar to how young people with no future today join gangs and deal drugs ++ ). the older and those with family however will most likely band together to asist each other. most likely these groups will form based on communist/socialist ideas (ie what is mine is yours).

We actually introduced a couple of larger versions of these running around the GeMiTo barrens in SoE, and they're actually inspired by current day anarcho-socialist proto-policlubs called Centri Sociali.
Snow_Fox
QUOTE (Jrayjoker)
Communism can't work in groups bigger than 1 person. Its human nature, we survived as a species by alternating between being greedy little bastards and helping each other out, but selfishness will always occur.

Other than that, Loose Alliances is you canon source and one stop shop for information.

quite right. Marx wrote a nice piece of fiction that cannot work in real life because it would require a shift in basic human nature. Real communism, which has NEVER existed in the world, would quickly become fuedalism with one bad crop, with those who can make food being protected by those who can fight in return for a portion of the limited resource, food, rather than accepting communal starvation.
A good example of this can be seen in modern North Korea. Farmers do the bare minimum they HAVE to on the communal lots and put asm uch effort as they can into their personal gardens.

I'm going ot have to disagree with Synner if he says modern Cuba is as close to real communism as we can get because it has a repressive govenrment that allows NO decent. There is no expression of thought allowed if it does not go along with the official line.

Likewise in modern Vietnam. For all the corruption that was in South Vietnam there was a relatively free press and dozens of papers. There are today 2 and they only plug hte party line. For an example of how titghtly control the Vietnamese are, if you saw the movie "We Were soldiers" with Mel Gibson a couple of years ago? The commander of the Vietnamese troops was vietnamese. He was covicted of treason for his part in that movie for how it portrayed vietnamese soldiers and was sentenced to 5 years inside.
Cynic project
QUOTE (CircuitBoyBlue)
To be fair, one has to mention that capitalism isn't really working, either. I can't think of a single country that runs according to perfect capitalist ideals. If you look at the extent of corporate welfare in the world, you'll see that even the most gung ho of "capitalist" countries has on at least some level realized that the system just doesn't work. Here in the US, if we were running on a purely capitalist system, we wouldn't have bailed out the airlines after September 11th when they came whining for taxpayer money. Of course, then we'd have no airlines, and as super power with no airplanes, we'd be the laughing stock of the world, but you can't call it capitalism.

Even in SR, I don't see pure capitalism being implemented, because the megacorps will want some way to squeeze money out of people in addition to actually providing useful products or services, and if their subsidiaries are failing, they'll want some government around, even if its only function is to tax people and then bail out corporations with the proceeds. And it's hard for me to imagine any communist governments around in SR, because, well, we WERE trying to destroy communist countries during the cold war, and we were doing it for a reason. The megas would also try to destroy communist countries to open up new markets and teach existing governments that if you go around nationalizing things, the corps will mess you up. Communism in the 6th world might exist among certain cultures in places like Awakened Siberia, or one of those other parts of the world that have shunned what we think of as civilization, but as a government, I don't see it flying, because any place where people are using computers and cell phones, the corps are going to want to march in and give themselves monopolies on selling computers and cell phones.

True capitalism turns into a form of communism. Now this is of the worst and despotic economic outcomes, but it is true. In a true capitalism, you do not have monopoly laws,or even rules dealing with things such worker safety. This leads to the "Sprawl-mart" owning everything. Seeing as that there would only be one company and one source of jobs, that my friend is a form of communism.

By the way Marx was an economist,and was writing about economies, not governments . Neither capitalism or communism have to follow any given government structure.
Crimsondude 2.0
I thought he was a historian, not an economist.

Either way, he made some gross assumptions (which may have made him an economist after all) that were in part compromised by ... compromise.

Actually, true capitalism and communism have some things in common, but what sets apart true capitalism is it's assumption that people will all have capital to invest (which is true when you consider the idea of human and intellectual capital). Capitalism values the investment and market economy whereas communism was focused on the alienation of modern man. If everyone could just do whatever hobby they love for a living while the jobs no one wants are done by someone (or thing) to compensate for that, then great. Otherwise, even working at a power plant can be alienating, let alone a chip processing facility. Capitalism doesn't respect or endeavor for monopolies, though, because they distort the free market, but without government intervention assumes someone (or rather, a group of someones) will join together to break any monopoly. The critical failure becomes one where negative externalities which might be untenable to a majority of people otherwise continue to exist so long as they do not have a pronounced effect on the market. This concept has been expressed by some critics of the current administration as (for example), "Faith-Based Environmentalism" for the perception that businesses will conserve and protect resources because it's in their and the market's rational interest to do so.
JongWK
QUOTE (Snow_Fox)
I'm going ot have to disagree with Synner if he says modern Cuba is as close to real communism as we can get because it has a repressive govenrment that allows NO decent. There is no expression of thought allowed if it does not go along with the official line.

I'd say Cuba is more and more a military dictatorship that nationalized most businesses.

Most real-life "hardcore leftists" in Latin America are a sad joke, having turned to rabid nationalism as a political weapon (I know, nationalist communists?).
hobgoblin
the thing about intelectual capital is that everyone is a copying machine. only way for it to work is that everyone sits in their own little box and thinks about ideas. problem is that the best way for a human to come up with something new is by studying and improving the ideas of others. see a contradiction?

allso, when rational thought and greed fight, greed allways wins...
Snow_Fox
Right, we go from Communism to fuedalism in one quick step.

under pure Marxism, the state disappears and people act the "right way" because it should be obvious to them. but of course no "communist" who ever seized power could then dismantle his organization because he would then have to face people who didn't support his system, Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Po-pot, Castro, Ho Chi Minh etc. instead to "defend" his system each became a totalitarian ruler who would tolerate no thoughts not in lnie with his "obviously right" form.
hobgoblin
the titles change, the style stays the same...
mattness pl
S***. I didn't acquire info bout from DS Mailer frown.gif .

Critias -> LA. That's tough for me frown.gif . The only exception I'll make is SoA. I'm just too poor to buy new sourcebook. Welcome to postcommunist's reality.

hobgoblin -> My English too poor to answer... But your reply was nice biggrin.gif
(one TV channel is more effective - it's like in Batman forever - everybody are tuned to the same message. Like in commercials: if you want to "escape", you change the channel. If you have one channel you can't escape, can not switch the channel).

Jrayjoker -> "Just read "The Lord of the Flies.""
Yes. That's good book. It shows how cruel are human beings are (children are NOT SO innocent), and explain in some way, how bolshevics hijacked the ideal of communism (but I still prefer democracy).

Somebody mentioned about corporatation. Yeah. When I read Shiawase description in Corporate Shadowfiles I felt like home smile.gif . And coupon's - in Poland people got worthless money, but were looking for coupon's. For car, vodka, sweets, refrigirator.

Synner ->
Dictatorships? Boooring...
There is something about comparison between communism and nazis (That was National Socialist party.). But IMHO Hitler's bribe the German society to accept his plans (Jews and wars). He used occupied countries (Russia, Poland, Holland etc.) and made industry from Holocaust, and slave labor.
Communist's didn't fed on outside (not on this scale). Gros citizens of gulags were russians. Check N. Korea, and Cuba - despite of hunger and internal problems they're still on-it's-own formula.

But still I don't know, what kind of communist paradises gamers can meet in Shadowrun.
Maybe some luddism system?
Or back-to-the-roots Like in Pol Pot's Cambodia, or in China during cultural revolution?
Maybe some system based on anonymical party board (runners must find and kill all of them: "You must kill all 12 leaders").
Crimsondude 2.0
QUOTE (mattness pl)
But still I don't know, what kind of communist paradises gamers can meet in Shadowrun.
Maybe some luddism system?
Or back-to-the-roots Like in Pol Pot's Cambodia, or in China during cultural revolution?

Think the exact opposite.
nezumi
QUOTE (Cynic project)
This leads to the "Sprawl-mart" owning everything. Seeing as that there would only be one company and one source of jobs, that my friend is a form of communism.

Sounds more like an oligarchy. It's not Marx' Utopia if there's still someone in charge (the CEO), and people are working to make money and in competition with each other, as opposed to because they honestly think it's the best thing for the community.

I will say, I'm quite amused to note that there's such an anti-socialist feeling here, while on the other forum I go to on RPOL (Roleplay Online), there seems to be a lot more support for socialism. Makes me wonder if DS posters are pessimists or realists. Either way, I still agree, socialism is a nice fiction based on a silly premise of an advanced social conscience becoming ingrained in each and every individual.
Supercilious
QUOTE (nezumi)
QUOTE (Cynic project @ Jun 18 2005, 12:22 PM)
This leads to the "Sprawl-mart" owning everything. Seeing as that there would only be one company and one source of jobs, that my friend is a form  of communism.

Sounds more like an oligarchy. It's not Marx' Utopia if there's still someone in charge (the CEO), and people are working to make money and in competition with each other, as opposed to because they honestly think it's the best thing for the community.

I will say, I'm quite amused to note that there's such an anti-socialist feeling here, while on the other forum I go to on RPOL (Roleplay Online), there seems to be a lot more support for socialism. Makes me wonder if DS posters are pessimists or realists. Either way, I still agree, socialism is a nice fiction based on a silly premise of an advanced social conscience becoming ingrained in each and every individual.

Shadowrun is a cynical game, it has no doubt affected all of us to some degree.
Snow_Fox
Uh chummer, you do know that Chinas' great cultureal revolution and Pol Pot's acts resulting in no new golden age and only resulted in the deaths of millions of people. In Cambodia people were murdered because of their class, even if they went along with the plan, because they had been "contaminated" with education.
toturi
QUOTE (Snow_Fox)
Uh chummer, you do know that Chinas' great cultureal revolution and Pol Pot's acts resulting in no new golden age and only resulted in the deaths of millions of people. In Cambodia people were murdered because of their class, even if they went along with the plan, because they had been "contaminated" with education.

Communism does not have qualms about taking harsh measures in time of emergency. If a biological terrorist attack were to occur in the United States or any other Western democracy, the politicians and pundits would be debating things back and forth for weeks before deciding on the proper measures. If it happened in China, even if an entire city was contaminated, the Chinese government would have no qualms about nuking the place to contain the spread of the disease. China does not have to worry about terrorists because the iron fist does not relax like in the old Soviet Union. Unfortunately, when the iron fist relaxes, you get things like Beslan.

Just seeing things from the other side.
Crimsondude 2.0
QUOTE (toturi)
ve qualms about taking harsh measures in time of emergency. If a biological terrorist attack were to occur in the United States or any other Western democracy, the politicians and pundits would be debating things back and forth for weeks before deciding on the proper measures.

...
mfb
yes. that's an earmark of communism. not despotism.
mattness pl
QUOTE (Snow_Fox)
Uh chummer, you do know that Chinas' great cultureal revolution and Pol Pot's acts resulting in no new golden age and only resulted in the deaths of millions of people. In Cambodia people were murdered because of their class, even if they went along with the plan, because they had been "contaminated" with education.

2 000 000 people dead. That was 33% of Cambodia population, iirc. If you had book, glasses, or knew foreign language - Red Khmers get you to rice fields and killed with a hoe. And you're family.
I hope that story will cure any idealist among us...

QUOTE
If it happened in China, even if an entire city was contaminated, the Chinese government would have no qualms about nuking the place to contain the spread of the disease. China does not have to worry about terrorists because the iron fist does not relax like in the old Soviet Union. Unfortunately, when the iron fist relaxes, you get things like Beslan.

toturi - yeah. "Real communism" has great POLICE system. No problems with civil rights. You don't care about minorities... And you're internal police MUST be strong. If not - people will rebel.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Dumpshock Forums © 2001-2012